How common is it to get an OER overpotential that is <250 mV?

Abstract

The anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in room-temperature water electrolysis is a key bottleneck for achieving green, economical, and efficient hydrogen production. Thermodynamic constraints dictate that liquid water cannot be electrolyzed to gaseous O2 and H2 at 1.23 V, with a minimum overpotential of 0.25 V required, increasing the threshold to 1.48 V (the thermoneutral potential at room temperature). While this is true for water electrolysis, the maximum contribution to this 0.25 V overpotential comes from the anodic OER. Alarmingly, many recent studies claim far lower OER overpotentials than 250 mV, an impossibility even under isothermal conditions with a three-electrode setup. Our analysis reveals that, most of the time, these inaccuracies stem from a lack of understanding of thermodynamic constraints, misinterpretation of catalyst redox currents as OER activity, use of uncalibrated reference electrodes, and experiments conducted at non-standard conditions. A review of recent literature shows a consistent OER overpotential plateau of 250 ± 50 mV at 10 mA cm−2, with onset overpotentials 30–50 mV lower. While minor reductions may result from local heating effects, reports of extremely low OER overpotentials cannot be justified by such factors alone. Instead, they predominantly stem from poor experimental practices and misinterpretations. To ensure reliable OER characterization, we propose corrective measures, including proper reference electrode calibration, isothermal control, and rigorous data validation. Recognizing that OER catalysts can hardly achieve such extremely low overpotentials (<100 mV) at 10 mA cm−2 is crucial for eliminating errors and fostering progress in electrocatalyst development for efficient green hydrogen production.

Graphical abstract: How common is it to get an OER overpotential that is <250 mV?

Supplementary files

Transparent peer review

To support increased transparency, we offer authors the option to publish the peer review history alongside their article.

View this article’s peer review history

Article information

Article type
Perspective
Submitted
01 Phe 2025
Accepted
03 Ube 2025
First published
04 Ube 2025

J. Mater. Chem. A, 2025, Advance Article

How common is it to get an OER overpotential that is <250 mV?

P. Trivedi, N. C. Minj, S. Mittal, B. Kamaraj, S. Yadav and A. Sengeni, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2025, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/D5TA00009B

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements