Bimetallic nanoparticles: advances in fundamental investigations and catalytic applications

Abstract

Bimetallic nanoparticles provide promising active sites for many reactions, and such materials can be synthesized with different spatial distributions, such as disordered alloys, core–shell structures, and Janus-type heterogeneous structures. Catalytic activity, selectivity, and stability of bimetallic nanoparticles can be modified by the geometric, electronic, multifunctional and mixing effects, as compared with single metals. Accurate control of bimetallic compositions and their distributions is crucial to obtain high-performance catalysts. The present review summarizes the recent advances in preparation methods and catalytic applications of supported bimetallic nanomaterials. In addition, representative case studies are also provided to investigate how bimetallic nanoparticles can be used as desired catalysts and how specific functional catalysts are designed for targeted reactions. The structure–performance relationships of supported bimetallic catalysts for a number of reactions are discussed to achieve a fundamental understanding. Synthetic strategies and perspectives for precise control of bimetallic active components and element distributions with distinctive nanostructures are proposed for potential industrial applications.

---

Environmental significance

This review covers recent advances in the preparation methods and catalytic applications of bimetallic nanomaterials. The relationships between structural features and catalytic properties of different bimetals are discussed. Deactivation and regeneration of the catalysts are highlighted, which are essential for catalyst design and optimization. Typical reactions, such as catalytic oxidation, hydrogen evolution reaction, and carbon dioxide reduction, are provided to demonstrate the wide range of catalytic applications of bimetallic catalysts. The structural features and advantages of bimetallic nanoparticles are discussed in detail to provide an in-depth understanding of the role of the catalysts during the reaction processes. Furthermore, fundamental understanding and strategies to design specific bimetallic components and dual active sites are prospected for potential industrial applications.

1. Introduction

Bimetallic nanoparticle catalysts exhibit better catalytic performance compared to their corresponding monometallic counterparts and have an expansive industrial application prospect. Just as the name implies, the two metallic elements are usually present as alloys or a mixture of particles. The unique synergistic effect between the two metal components provides the outstanding catalytic properties of bimetallic nanoparticles, which provides better activity, stability or selectivity.^1,2 This review covers recent advances in the preparation methods and catalytic applications of bimetallic nanomaterials. The relationships between structural features and catalytic properties of different bimetals are discussed. Deactivation and regeneration of the catalysts are highlighted, which are essential for catalyst design and optimization. Typical reactions, such as catalytic oxidation, hydrogen evolution reaction, and carbon dioxide reduction, are provided to demonstrate the wide range of catalytic applications of bimetallic catalysts. The structural features and advantages of bimetallic nanoparticles are discussed in detail to provide an in-depth understanding of the role of the catalysts during the reaction processes. Furthermore, fundamental understanding and strategies to design specific bimetallic components and dual active sites are prospected for potential industrial applications. The synergistic effect in bimetallic catalysts may be ascribable to the complex structure from various atomic arrangements of two metallic elements. The existence form of bimetallic nanoparticles can be classified into random alloys, intermetallic compounds, biased structures or mixtures, which present special geometric structures and electronic properties. Bimetallic nanoparticles exhibit superior catalytic performance in different types of chemical reactions.^3–10 Bimetallic nanoparticles possess the properties of both metals as well as other additional superior properties. The unique electronic and geometrical structures (bond lengths, tensions, etc.) of bimetallic nanoparticle surfaces after alloying provide multifunctional active sites.¹¹ Meanwhile, the adsorption energies of reactants and intermediates on the bimetallic catalyst surface are changed, thus leading to better catalytic activities and selectivities of bimetallic catalysts. On the other hand, enhanced bimetallic contact sites designed by introducing a second metal to a noble substrate effectively improve the utilization efficiency of the noble metal.

Metal additives in bimetallic catalysts enhance the activity, selectivity, and stability of a catalyst by the following four different effects:¹² (i) the geometric structure effect: the addition of a second metal modifies the active site geometry of the substrate metal. The enhanced product selectivity as well as the initial activity of the bimetallic nanoparticle is ascribed to altered size of the metal active site by introducing the second element; (ii) the electronic structure effect: the addition of a second metal facilitates intermetallic electron transfer to optimize the electronic structure of active sites. The electron transfer between the two metals changes the surface electronic properties of the catalyst, which adjusts the adsorption energy and strength of the reaction substrate on the catalyst surface; (iii) the synergistic effect: the two metal species in bimetallic nanoparticles participate in chemical bonding to reaction intermediates or transition states. Bimetallic catalysts co-ordinate the properties of two metals to realize a bifunctional effect or the interaction between the two metals offers improved catalytic performance; and (iv) the stabilization effect: the addition of a second metal inhibits particle agglomeration or carbon deposition to obtain excellent stability. Also, excessive reduction or over-oxidation of the active sites is suppressed to realize high selectivity.

In this review article, we provide a comprehensive overview of the structural features and catalytic behaviors of bimetallic nanoparticle catalysts. The catalytic applications of bimetallic nanoparticles are summarized in the following three aspects: (i) the surface catalytic active sites of noble metals are exposed to promote metal availability and reduce consumption by introducing a second metal; (ii) the morphology and chemical components of bimetallic nanoparticles can be adjusted during the synthesis process. Target bimetallic nanoparticles can be constructed to regulate catalytic activity and selectivity according to the specific purposive reactions; and (iii) the synergistic interaction between bimetallic nanoparticles provides high intrinsic activity and selectivity.

This review covers recent advances in the preparation methods and catalytic applications of bimetallic nanomaterials. The synthesis approaches of bimetallic catalysts are described, and the relationship between structural features and catalytic properties of different bimetals (e.g., bimetallic nanoparticles and dual active sites) is discussed, which is a key issue in catalysis. In addition, deactivation and regeneration of the catalysts are highlighted, which are essential for catalyst design and optimization. Typical reactions, such as catalytic oxidation, the hydrogen evolution reaction, and carbon dioxide reduction, are provided to demonstrate the wide range of catalytic applications of bimetallic catalysts. The structural features and advantages of bimetallic nanoparticles are discussed in detail to provide an in-depth understanding of the role of the catalysts during the reaction processes. Furthermore, fundamental understanding and strategies to design specific bimetallic components and dual active sites are discussed for potential industrial applications.

2. Structural features of bimetallic nanoparticles

The structure of a bimetallic material determines its catalytic properties. Bimetallic nanocatalysts can be divided into two types based on the dispersion extent of the two metal atoms.¹³ Bimetallic nanoparticles exist as alloys and intermetallic compounds when metal atoms are highly dispersed. The segregation effect is a dominant factor in low dispersion, in which heterogeneous and core–shell structures are the main forms of bimetallic nanoparticles. On the one hand, the formation of bimetallic structures relies on regulating the synthetic method, i.e., using the addition sequence of metal precursors, the difference in electrode potentials, and regulating the reaction kinetics. On the other hand, the intrinsic properties of the two metals determine whether segregation happens to reduce the system energy and achieve the most stable state of dispersion.

2.1. Geometric structures of bimetallic nanoparticles

Metal additives in bimetallic nanoparticles can effectively alter the size of the active site, which gives rise to the desirable design of catalytic activity and stability as well as product selectivity. Geometric effects are decorations on the metal surface where the second metal is partially deposited or completely incorporated on the substrate. The presence of different atoms in bimetallic nanoparticles also leads to the complexity of the spatial distribution of the two metal elements.¹⁵ The two metallic elements may form various types of geometric arrangements (Fig. 1), such as disordered alloys, core–shell structures, and Janus-type structures.¹⁴ The decrease in geometry size of bimetallic nanoparticles gives rise to an increase in surface atoms (i.e., the ratio of the number of surface atoms to the total number of atoms). Increased coordination unsaturation of surface atoms appears, accompanied by the significant improvement in catalytic properties. The coordination number of surface atoms plays a determining role in catalytic performance, and the adsorption of reactants and intermediates on surface atoms is influenced by neighbor atoms. It has been reported that the specific catalytic reaction may follow different reaction pathways when the reactants are adsorbed on different surface sites. The geometrical environment of a Pt-based catalyst surface can be dramatically changed by embedding a second metal in the surface lattice of Pt to form an alloy or intermetallic compound (Fig. 2).¹⁶ The second metal can isolate Pt atoms. The isolated Pt atoms can only adsorb on the top atom or molecule (Fig. 2d-I_a), leading to bridging adsorption between the two Pt atoms (Fig. 2d-I_b). And the collection of three atoms allows the reactant molecules to react in the hollow sites (Fig. 2d-I_c), which can effectively enhance the selectivity of the reaction.

Fig. 1 (a) Schematic illustration of several types of bimetallic nanoparticles with different spatial distributions of the two metal elements within the individual bimetallic nanoparticles,¹⁴ (Reproduced with permission from ref. 14 Copyright 2021, ACS) and (b) results of the combined simulations of molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for 0.5(A): 0.5(B) composition for 28 combinations of bimetallic nanoparticles.¹⁵ Reproduced with permission from ref. 15 Copyright 2021, Wiley.

Fig. 2 (a) Overview of bimetallic systems and electrochemical reactions contained in this review. Bold elements appear in rows and columns to enable a concise scheme. RE stands for rare earth elements. “Other” reactions are electrochemical oxidation reactions of higher alcohols, BH₄⁻, hydrazine, and methane and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Summarized optimization strategies: (b) ligand effects, (c) strain effects, (d) geometric effects, and (e) the bifunctional mechanism. (d) Geometric effects are divided into two parts. The first is the site isolation effect, accompanied by different adsorption possibilities of a molecule, that is, (I_a) in the hollow site, (I_b) on the bridge site or (I_c) on top of an atom. (II) The second is the equality of sites.¹⁶ Reproduced with permission from ref. 16 Copyright 2019, ACS.

2.2. Electronic structures of bimetallic nanoparticles

The electronic structure of bimetallic nanoparticles is less sensitive to the particle size variation. The electronic effect of bimetallic nanoparticles controls the metal surface properties by modulating electronic states. Modulation of the electronic structure of the metal sites can give rise to synergistic effects and electron re-distribution between the bimetallic sites.¹⁷ This reconstruction facilitates the optimization of adsorption energy of the oxygen-containing species, which moderates adsorption intensity of the main intermediates at the diatomic site.¹⁸ Bimetallic sites can provide higher metal loadings and flexible active sites, which promote simultaneous adsorption of different reactants on the catalysts as well as different adsorption mechanisms. The electronic structure resulting from the pairing of two atoms also influences the adsorption mechanism. In summary, bimetallic site catalysts not only provide more adsorption sites, but also present different reaction paths and electronic structures, which greatly enhance the selectivity and stability. For example, bimetallic BiCu alloy nanosheets were synthesized to reconstruct the electronic structure for the carbon dioxide reduction reaction.¹⁹ The results indicated that the improved bimetallic catalytically active sites constructed by Cu alloying successfully enhanced the interfacial electron transfer in BiCu alloy nanosheets to achieve the ideal reaction kinetics. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations suggested that the Cu alloying contributed to the increased density of states near the Bi Fermi surface and the optimized adsorption of *OCHO intermediates at the Bi sites, leading to good electrocatalytic activity and superior operating stability.

3. Synthesis of different types of bimetallic entities

3.1. Synthesis of bimetallic nanoparticles

Generally speaking, the standard reduction potential (E⁰, V vs. the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE)) of a metal determines the difficulty to reduce a metal ion. The more positive reduction potential indicates that the metal precursor is easier to reduce to the metallic element, which provides a reference for estimating the reduction speed of metal ions. However, when the ions (e.g., halide ions) and molecules (e.g., organic amines) with coordination ability are added to adjust the coordination environment, the coordination interaction decreases the reduction potential of the metal to an extent which relates to the coordination stability constant. During the reaction, the decrease in the metal reduction potential leads to a negative reduction rate, and the ligand which acts as a capping agent is adsorbed on the surface of the metal atom after the precursor is reduced. Hence, bimetallic nanoparticles with the desired structures can be predicted and designed by examining or modulating the reduction potentials of the two metal precursors. In general, similar reduction potentials can yield alloy-type structures, widely differing from the reduction potential generated deviatoric-like structures. For instance, the standard reduction electrode potentials for [PtCl₄]²⁻/Pt, [PdCl₄]²⁻/Pd, [RhCl₆]³⁻/Rh, and Ru³⁺/Ru in acidic media are very close to each other, being +0.76, +0.59, +0.43, and +0.39 V vs. SHE (Table 1),²⁰ respectively. Thus, the synthesis of bimetallic alloys (e.g., AuPd,²¹ AuPt,²² and PdPt²³) has been widely reported. However, the reduction rate of the metal precursor, as one of the structural causative factors, is influenced by many factors, such as reduction potential, precursor concentration, and the selection of the reducing agent. The reducing agent is considered one of the crucial factors. For example, a strong reducing agent (i.e., sodium borohydride) should be able to rapidly reduce the metal precursors to generate a bimetallic alloy even in the presence of large reduction potential differences. When weak reducing agents (e.g., formaldehyde) are used, the reduction potential of the metal precursor becomes the dominant factor in the formation of the final structure. The interfacial energy between the two metals (phases) determines which kind of segregation type structure is formed. A low interfacial energy implies that the two metals have good affinity for each other and can be able to infiltrate the surface, hence tending to form core–shell structures. In contrast, a high interfacial energy brings about the island growth and generates bimetallic nanocrystals with heterogeneous structures. Dai's group did a lot of work in the preparation of double metal alloys (e.g., PdAu,²¹ PdPt,²³ AuRu,²⁴ PdRu,²⁵ PtRu,²⁶ and PdCo²⁷) using the polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-protected reduction strategy with NaBH₄ as the reducing agent.

Table 1 The standard reduction potentials and element electronegativity of different half reactions for various metal precursors.²⁰

Half reaction	E^0 (V vs. SHE)	Element electronegativity
[PtCl4]^2− + 2e^− → Pt + 4Cl^−	+0.76	2.28
[PdCl4]^2− + 2e^− → Pd + 4Cl^−	+0.59	2.20
[RhCl6]^3− + 3e^− → Rh + 6Cl^−	+0.43	2.28
Ru^3+ + 3e^− → Ru	+0.39	2.20
Cu^2+ + 2e^− → Cu	+0.34	1.90
Ni^2+ + 2e^− → Ni	0.23	1.91
Co^2+ + 2e^− → Co	−0.28	1.88

---

The multistep synthesis of bimetallic nanocrystals is typified by the crystal seeding and displacement methods, which feature the successful reduction of the two metal precursors to the metal in sequence.^28,29 The crystal seeding method is the most common strategy for the synthesis of bimetallic nanocrystals with core–shell and heterostructures. The important factors to be taken into account in the crystal seed method include the stability of the crystal seed and the smooth deposition of the second metal to obtain ideal bimetallic nanocrystals. A suitable surfactant or stabilizer is added during the preparation process to ensure that the crystals are well dispersed in the solution, which can facilitate the uniform deposition of the second metal. The reduction speed of the second metal atoms should be slow and the concentrations of the precursors are not high to ensure that the initial deposition takes place on the surface of the seed. When the atomic deposition rate is dominant, the heterogeneous structures can be readily obtained (by the kinetic control); if the atomic diffusion speed is faster, the bimetallic nanoparticles with stable core–shell structures tend to be formed (by the thermodynamic control). To generate a stable core–shell and heterogeneous structure, the crystal structures of the two metals should be identical (the same atomic arrangements). Most of the noble metals (e.g., Rh, Pd, Ag, Ir, Pt, and Au) and common transition metals (e.g., Ni and Cu) meet such a requirement with a face-centered cubic structure as the most stable phase.^30,31 Based on this rule, face-centered cubic structures can be constructed for metals with other crystal phases. For example, Xia et al. synthesized Pd–Ru core-skeleton octahedra using truncated octahedral Pd as the crystal seeds.³² The resultant Ru octahedral nanoframes replicated the face-centered cubic crystal structure of Pd seeds by the kinetic control (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3 Structural and compositional analyses of the Pd–Ru core–frame octahedra that were obtained by growing Ru on the corners and edges of Pd truncated octahedra as the seeds. (a) Typical TEM image showing the octahedral shape and good uniformity of the sample (inset shows the corresponding atomic model), and (b) line-scan EDX spectra of elemental Pd and Ru that were acquired from an individual octahedron (inset) along a corner-to-corner and an edge-to-edge direction as indicated by the white arrows. (c) High-resolution HAADF–STEM image of an individual octahedron orientated along 〈110〉 direction, and (d) schematic illustration showing the two steps involved in the synthesis of Ru NFs: (1) selective nucleation and growth of Ru on the corners and edges of Pd truncated octahedra, yielding Pd–Ru core–frame octahedra, and (2) formation of Ru octahedral NFs by etching away the Pd cores.³² Reproduced with permission from ref. 32 Copyright 2016, ACS.

Liu's group fabricated mesoporous intermetallic (PtSn, PtPb, PtCd, PtZn, and PdSn) samples using a general stepwise concurrent template strategy (Fig. 4).^33,34 In this approach, the intermediate concurrent template was first constructed to obtain a hybrid of mesoporous platinum or palladium and a KIT-6 template (meso-Pt/KIT-6 or meso-Pd/KIT-6), which could be transformed using the second precursor under reducing conditions. The second precursor could either be a second metal or a metalloid. meso-Pt/KIT-6 or meso-Pd/KIT-6 could be re-crystallized with the second metal precursor (e.g., SnCl₂ ³³) at elevated temperatures to form atomically ordered intermetallic compounds, whereas the mesoporous SiO₂ template (KIT-6 or SBA-15) provided a nano-restricted mesopore environment to grow the ordered mesoporous nanocrystals.^35–38 The concurrent template method can be easily extended to design other mesoporous intermetallic nanoparticles with macroscopic morphologies, mesoscopic structures, and atomic intermetallic phases (ordering). The obtained mesoporous intermetallic compounds exhibited the best surface electronic states and chemisorption properties with controlled catalytic selectivity and excellent stability.

Fig. 4 (a) HAADF–STEM image and (b) EDX mappings of h-meso-i-Pt₁Sn₁ nanoparticles, (c) HAADF–STEM image and (d) EDX mappings of meso-i-Pt₁Sn₁ nanobundles, (e) HAADF–STEM image of meso-i-Pt₁Pb₁ nanoparticles, (f–h) HAADF–STEM images and corresponding EDX mappings of (f) meso-i-Pt₁Pb₁, (g) meso-i-Pt₁Cd₁, and (h) meso-i-Pt₁Zn₁ nanoparticles, (i) HAADF–STEM image and (j) EDX mappings of meso-i-Pd₃Sn₂ nanoparticles, and (k) PXRD patterns of h-meso-i-Pt₁Sn₁ nanoparticles, meso-i-Pt₁Sn₁ nanobundles, meso-i-Pt₁Pb₁, meso-i-Pt₁Cd₁, meso-i-Pt₁Zn₁, and meso-i-Pd₃Sn₂ nanoparticles.³³ Reproduced with permission from ref. 33 Copyright 2022, Wiley.

The metal displacement method is another common strategy for the synthesis of bimetallic nanocrystals, which involves the replacement of a weakly active metallic element with a highly reactive metal as a sacrificial metal. The essential requirements are the difference in the metallic activity between the two metal ions. Active metals, such as Ag, Ni, Co, and Cu, are commonly used for synthesizing alloys or bimetallic nanocrystals with core–shell structures. The initial reduced metal atoms are attached on the surface of the sacrificial metal, and the bimetallic nanoparticles are formed through a complex process among atomic diffusion, migration, and mixing. For example, the PdAg, PtAg or AuAg alloys with different morphologies were constructed using Ag as a sacrificial metal.^39,40 The addition of Na₂PdCl₄ or Na₂PtCl₄ allowed the well-dispersed silver nanocubes in water to be converted into Pd–Ag or Pt–Ag nanoboxes.³⁹ The nanocages formed by the replacement of silver with palladium were composed of a Pd–Ag single-crystalline alloy, while the nanocages formed by the replacement of Ag with Pt were assembled with different platinum nanoparticles. The shells of bimetallic nanoparticles of the core–shell structure obtained by the metal displacement method were all alloys. Lee et al. prepared Ag@AgAu core–shell-structured nanoparticles with an alloy shell by the galvanic substitution reaction between HAuCl₄ and Ag nanoparticles.⁴¹ Time-course studies by HRTEM and UV/Vis spectroscopy revealed the following sequence of events in the evolution of core–shell structures from Ag nanoparticle seeds: (i) oxidative dissolution of Ag atoms from the {111} facets of Ag nanoparticles and initial preferential deposition of Au atoms from AuCl₄⁻ reduction on the Ag{100} facets, followed by alloying with the Ag atoms below; (ii) subsequent Au atom deposition on the Ag{111} facets followed by Ag–Au alloying there; and (iii) re-arrangement of the surface atoms to form the final core–shell nanoparticles. In practice, researchers commonly etch and dissolve unreacted intermediates or by-products to remove impurities and form bimetallic nanocrystals with hollow or porous structures, hence improving the utilization efficiency and catalytic activity of the active metal.

3.2. Deactivation and regeneration of bimetallic catalysts

Catalyst deactivation is the loss of catalytic activity or selectivity during reaction processes, which is a major drawback in industrial applications. Resources are invested in catalyst replacement or regeneration to overcome deactivation. Deactivation is common for solid catalysts as well as bimetallic catalysts. Possible deactivation mechanisms of bimetallic catalysts include sintering of bimetallic particles, coking, leaching of metallic substances, segregation of the two metallic elements, phase transitions, and poisoning (Table 2 and Fig. 5).⁴² Deactivation processes are reported to stem from three general effects. Among these effects, modification of the active phase shows the largest diversity of origins that may lead to simultaneous blockage. Processes such as sintering or leaching lead to irreversible deactivation of a catalyst, but coke deposition can be reversed by calcination to remove the carbonaceous species covered on the catalyst surface. The study of structural transformation of bimetallic catalysts can guide the regeneration of bimetallic catalysts. The catalytic activity rejuvenation of bimetallic PtSn nanoparticles after coke deposition could be realized by satisfactory oxychlorination treatment to achieve effective Pt re-dispersion.⁴³

Table 2 Definitions of generalized deactivation modes identified in Fig. 5.⁴² Reproduced with permission from ref. 42 Copyright 2022, Springer Nature

Generalized mode	Definition
Depletion	Loss of the active phase into the reaction mixture via dissolution or sublimation
Promoter depletion	Loss of catalyst components other than the active phase (e.g., co-catalysts or other promoting additives)
Fragmentation	Loss of the active phase due to structural modifications leading to their detachment as whole entities
Segregation	Loss of the active phase due to physical separation of the catalyst from the reaction mixture with or without prior agglomeration
Species deposition	Deposition of the species from the reaction mixture leading to the coverage of the active sites
Aggregation	Agglomeration of catalyst components reducing the active site accessibility
Sintering	Size increase of the active phase reducing the number of accessible sites with possible modification of their nature
Poisoning	Strong adsorption of the species from the reaction mixture blocking active sites or unfavorably altering their properties
Relocation	Spatial reorganization of catalyst components reducing the active site accessibility or unfavorably altering their properties
Dispersion	Size reduction of the active phase unfavorably altering the properties of active sites
Structural collapse	Total loss of the active phase structure radically changing the nature of the active sites
Restructuring	Partial alteration of the active phase structure unfavorably altering the properties of the active sites
Skeletal modification	Localized change of the catalyst framework unfavorably altering the properties of the active sites
Phase change	Bulk compositional alteration of the active phase unfavorably altering the properties of the active sites

---

Fig. 5 Generality of deactivation modes.⁴² Reproduced with permission from ref. 42 Copyright 2022, Springer Nature.

Deactivation of bimetallic catalysts is a complex phenomenon caused by various reasons including carbon deposition, sintering, poisoning (e.g., adsorption of sulfur or other compounds), and coverage or loss of active components. Restoring catalytic performance of the bimetallic catalysts requires the selection of a suitable regeneration strategy based on the specific cause of deactivation. The following steps are usually involved:^29,42,43 (i) thermal treatment: carbon or other organic deposits on the surface of the catalyst can be removed and catalytic activity of the catalyst can be restored by the appropriate high-temperature treatment; (ii) reduction treatment: for oxidized metal catalysts, the active sites of the metal can be restored by calcining in a reducing atmosphere (such as hydrogen or carbon monoxide) at an appropriate temperature; (iii) regeneration treatment: catalysts deactivated by sintering can be treated at high temperatures in a hydrogen atmosphere to restore their original surface area and pore structure. The high temperature can induce re-dispersion of the metal particles, and hydrogen helps to reduce the metal oxides to the metallic states; (iv) ion exchange treatment: bimetallic catalysts that contain exchangeable metal ions and deactivated or lost active components can be replaced by ion exchange processing; and (v) chemical cleaning: if the deactivation is caused by the adsorption of toxic or chemical compounds (e.g., sulphides, halogens, etc.) on bimetallic catalysts, they can be cleaned with a suitable chemical solvent to remove the above toxic or chemical substances.

4. Catalytic applications of bimetallic nanoparticles

Bimetallic nanoparticles possess several significant performance advantages over single metal nanoparticles: (i) enhanced activity: bimetallic nanoparticles can increase catalytic performance under milder conditions due to bimetallic synergistic effects. Electronic interactions between two different metals can adjust the surface electronic properties, thus reducing the activation energy of the reaction; (ii) improved selectivity: bimetallic nanoparticles can provide higher selectivities toward the desired products in certain reactions. The combination of bimetals may change the reaction paths or stabilize specific intermediates; (iii) developed stability: bimetallic nanoparticles exhibit better stability than monometallic nanoparticles, especially at high temperatures or under severe practical reaction conditions. The second metal may form a protective layer on the surface that inhibits corrosion or sintering of another active metal component; (iv) enhanced resistance to toxicity: adsorption of toxic substances (e.g., SO₂, H₂O or by-products) leads to deactivation of the active component. The second metal can increase desorption capacity and release the active sites by regulating the surface properties; (v) enhanced mass transfer: bimetallic nanoparticles show stronger mass transfer capability owing to the rougher surface or more active sites, which improves adsorption and diffusion of the reactants; and (vi) regulated optical and electronic properties: the optical and electronic properties of bimetallic nanoparticles can be modulated by changing the ratio and structure of the bimetallic components to meet specific application requirements.

There are various explanations for the mechanism of the promotion of catalytic performance using bimetallic nanoparticles, which are summarized as follows:^45,46 (i) the synergistic interaction between bimetals effectively increases resistance to poisoning; (ii) altering the spacing between the two metal elements to regulate the d-band center and improve the catalytic activity; (iii) inhibiting particle aggregation to enhance stability by adding a second metal; and (iv) surface roughness which is accountable for introducing the second metal to increase the active sites.

4.1. Methane combustion

Methane has a stable molecular structure with a low polarity and requires a high light-off temperature for catalytic oxidation. Methane combustion at low temperatures has always been one of the biggest challenges in the field of catalytic oxidation. Due to the high reaction temperature, even Pd-based catalysts often suffer from catalyst deactivation owing to carbon accumulation or nanoparticle sintering. Pd-based bimetallic nanoparticles have been widely used in methane oxidation due to unique structural and electronic effects. Pd-based bimetallic catalysts can reduce Pd consumption while improving the catalytic activity and stability. Numerous studies (Table 3) have shown that the introduction of a second metal into Pd can increase the surface active sites and adjust the adsorption strength and binding energy between the catalyst and the reactants or intermediates.^{47,50,53,55,56} For example, Zhao et al.⁴⁷ adopted the KIT-6-templating strategy to generate mesoporous cubic Pd, Pt, and Pd_xPt (x = 0.43–8.52) for methane oxidation. It was found that Pd and Pt were well dispersed in the ordered mesoporous architecture of the Pd_xPt alloys. The redox properties of Pd showed a significant adjustment by Pt doping, and the Pt–Pd oxide (i.e., PdO–PtO₂) exhibited better catalytic performance than the Pt⁰–Pd⁰ metallic material with a good thermal stability. The meso-Pd, meso-Pt, and meso-Pd_2.41Pt showed a T_50% and T_90% (the temperatures required for achieving methane conversions of 50 and 90%) of 350, 372, and 303 and 368, 506, and 322 °C at a space velocity (SV) of 100 000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively. The meso-Pd_2.41Pt sample performed the best with the highest TOF_Pd+Pt at 280 °C and specific reaction rate at 280 °C of 0.59 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ and 4.46 μmol g_cat⁻¹ s⁻¹ at 280 °C, respectively. The deactivation of the Pd_2.41Pt catalyst caused by the introduction of carbon dioxide or water vapor was reversible, whereas the deactivation caused by the introduction of sulfur dioxide was irreversible. The authors thought that the well-ordered and developed mesoporous structure and good oxygen activation ability were accountable for the high catalytic activity.

Table 3 Catalytic performance for CH₄ combustion over bimetallic nanoparticles

Catalyst	Preparation method	Noble metal particle size (nm)	Noble metal loading (wt%)	CH4 concentration (vol%)	SV (mL g^−1 h^−1)	T50% (°C)	T90% (°C)	Ref.
Meso Pd2.41Pt	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	7.1	—	2.5	100 000	303	322	47
AuPd/meso-Co3O4	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	3.5	1.94	2.5	20 000	280	324	21
PdPt/meso-Mn2O3	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	2.5	1.42	2.5	20 000	345	425	23
AuRu/meso-Mn2O3	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	2–5	0.97	2.5	20 000	470	540	24
AuPd/3DOM CoCr2O4	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	3.3	1.93	2.5	20 000	353	394	48
AuPd/3DOM La0.6Sr0.4MnO3	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	2.2	2.92	5.0	50 000	314	336	49
PdPt/3DOM LaMnAl11O19	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	4.3	1.14	2.5	20 000	487	549	50
PdPt/MnOx/3DOM CoFe2O4	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	3.0	2.10	2.5	20 000	301	372	51
AuPd/3DOM Mn2O3	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	3.7	1.97	2.5	40 000	393	440	52
AuPd–Co/3DOM Mn2O3	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	3.6	1.94	2.5	40 000	365	442	52
Au–Pd/3DOM Co3O4	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	2.6	1.99	2.5	20 000	337	379	53
Au–Pd–CoO/3DOM Co3O4	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	2.7	1.99	2.5	20 000	312	341	53
Au–Pd–CoO/3DOM Mn2O3	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	3.1	1.97	2.5	20 000	430	500	53
Au–Pd–CoO/3DOM Al2O3	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	3.0	1.95	2.5	20 000	543	625	53
CoPd/3DOM CeO2	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	4.1	0.77	2.5	40 000	430	480	27
AuPd/Co3O4/3DOM MnCo2O4	PVA-protected NaBH4 reduction strategy	4.6	1.98	2.5	40 000	340	408	54

---

Cargnello et al. developed a supramolecular approach to homogeneously deposit single units composed of a palladium (Pd) core and a ceria (CeO₂) shell onto a modified hydrophobic alumina (Fig. 6).⁵⁷ The commercial alumina substrate was highly hydrophilic, while the Pd@CeO₂ active component was hydrophobic. The hydrophobic Pd@CeO₂ structure presented agglomeration instead of adhering to alumina, resulting in irreversible catalyst deactivation. The authors aimed to develop an efficiency strategy to modulate special properties of the alumina surface to be hydrophobic and deposit the active component as a single unit on the surface of the substrate. The alumina surface was decorated with organosilane triethoxy(octyl)silane (TEOOS) to ensure that the surface was covered by the formed alkyl chain, leading to a larger adsorption capacity of the Pd@CeO₂ structure without deactivation. The water droplets deposited on the hydrophobic alumina were repulsed instead of the favorable interaction with the OH groups of alumina, which further confirmed the adopted tactic. The as-prepared sample showed a remarkably higher methane oxidation activity and the supported catalyst remained intact without segregation or agglomeration during the calcination at 850 °C. The authors pointed out that the excellent methane complete oxidation activity was associated with the strong metal–support synergy interaction, well-defined ordered geometry mesopore structure, and outstanding thermal stability under the demanding conditions. Dai and co-workers systematically studied the correlation between noble metals and several supports for methane oxidation activity.²¹ It was observed that AuPd nanoparticles were highly distributed on the surface of meso-Co₃O₄ with an average size of 2.7–4.5 nm.²¹ The 2.94Au_0.50Pd/meso-Co₃O₄ catalyst exhibited an excellent performance and possessed the highest specific reaction rate. Over 2.94Au_0.50Pd/meso-Co₃O₄ at a SV of 20 000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹, the T_10% (the temperature required for achieving a methane conversion of 10%), T_50%, and T_90% were 230, 280, and 324 °C, respectively, with the lowest apparent activation energy and the highest TOF_AuPd being achieved over this catalyst. Similarly, meso-Mn₂O₃-supported PdPt alloy (2.1–2.8 nm in size) materials with uniformly dispersed noble metals also showed good methane combustion performance.²³ The 1.41Pd_5.1Pt/meso-Mn₂O₃ sample gave the best methane oxidation performance with the highest TOF_PdPt and best specific reaction rate at 400 °C. In addition, the as-prepared sample displayed an increased endurance performance in the presence of SO₂, CO₂ or water vapor by introducing an appropriate amount of Pt. Moreover, AuRu/meso-Mn₂O₃ was generated to possess good low-temperature reducibility, in which the 0.97AuRu/meso-Mn₂O₃ sample showed the highest catalytic activity.²⁴ The same research group investigated three-dimensionally ordered macroporous (3DOM) Cr-based spinel-type oxide-supported gold–palladium alloy catalysts with an abundant adsorbed oxygen (O_ads) species concentration and good low-temperature reducibility for methane combustion. 1.93AuPd_1.95/3DOM CoCr₂O₄ achieved the highest methane conversion, with superior TOF_AuPd at 320 °C of 0.271 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ and the highest specific reaction rate at 320 °C of 1.15 μmol g_cat⁻¹ s⁻¹.⁴⁸ The presence of SO₂ in the reaction system over the 0.97AuRu/meso-Mn₂O₃ sample caused a permanent loss in activity, while the deactivation induced by moisture addition was reversible. The thermal stability and adsorbed oxygen species of the AuPd/3DOM La_0.6Sr_0.4MnO₃ bimetallic catalysts were investigated.⁴⁹ It was found that the 2.92AuPd/3DOM La_0.6Sr_0.4MnO₃ sample possessed the best suitable Au/Pd molar ratio (1 : 2) for CH₄ oxidation, which exhibited the highest TOF_AuPd (10.2 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹) and the lowest apparent activation energy (E_a = 72.4 kJ mol⁻¹). The sizes of the bimetallic Au–Pd catalyst increased from 2.15 to 3.76 nm after its exposure to water, indicating that the presence of water vapor caused an irreversible deactivation. Hexaaluminates (AAl₁₂O₁₉, in which A is an alkali, alkaline earth or rare earth element) are regarded as excellent catalyst candidates due to good thermal stability (their sintering temperatures are above 1200 °C). The same research group also tested methane combustion activities of PdPt/3DOM LaMnAl₁₁O₁₉ with noble metal particle sizes of 3–5 nm,⁵⁰ in which the 1.14Pd_2.8Pt/3DOM LaMnAl₁₁O₁₉ sample performed the best. Ex situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used to investigate the formation of the active PdO species during the oxidation processes of Pd in 1.14Pd_2.8Pt/3DOM LaMnAl₁₁O₁₉ at different temperatures. Doping with an appropriate amount of Pt to the Pd-based catalyst could improve the tolerance performance in the presence of H₂O, CO₂, and SO₂ (which did not exert significant influence on catalytic stability). Recently, the same group has investigated ternary metal catalysts for methane combustion, which are combined with noble metal nanoparticles, transition metal oxides, and porous spinel-type mixed oxide. The as-prepared PdPt/MnO_x/3DOM CoFe₂O₄ sample possessed the highest O_ads species content and the best low-temperature reducibility with a PdPt particle size of 2.2–3.0 nm.⁵¹ The 1.81PdPt/6.7MnO_x/3DOM CoFe₂O₄ sample displayed the highest activity with the lowest apparent activation energy, as well as the highest TOF_{Noble metal} and TOF_CoFe2O4 of 37.44 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ and 0.28 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹, respectively.

Fig. 6 TEM investigations of Pd@CeO₂ core shell structures dispersed on hydrophobic alumina. (a) HAADF-STEM image after calcining to 500 °C for 5 hours and (b) to 850 °C for 5 hours. (c) EDS spot analysis of the indicated particles. (d) High magnification HAADF-STEM image of the Pd@ CeO₂/H–Al₂O₃ catalysts calcined to 500 °C and (e) the corresponding EDS line profile together with a model. (f) HRTEM image of a single Pd@CeO₂ structure on the Pd@CeO₂/H–Al₂O₃ catalysts calcined to 500 °C. Heating and cooling light-off curves of CH₄ conversion against the temperature for the three catalyst formulations used. (g) Pd@CeO₂/H–Al₂O₃ core–shell catalyst, (h) Pd/CeO₂-IWI, and (i) Pd/CeO₂/Al₂O₃-IMP.⁵⁷ Reproduced with permission from ref. 57 Copyright 2012, Science.

The modified polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-protected reduction method was applied to synthesize transition metal (M = Mn, Cr, Fe, and Co)-doped Au–Pd–M nanoparticles. The Au–Pd–M nanoparticles with a diameter of 3.6–4.4 nm were uniformly loaded on the surface of 3DOM Mn₂O₃ ⁵² or 3DOM Co₃O₄ ⁵³ via the gas bubble-assisted adsorption route. Among the Au–Pd–M nanoparticles/3DOM Mn₂O₃ samples, supported Au–Pd–0.21Co performed the best for methane oxidation due to its highest Pd²⁺ concentration; the supported Au–Pd–0.22Fe catalyst possessed the best ability for oxygen activation, resulting in the highest catalytic activity for o-xylene oxidation (T_90% = 213 °C). The supported Au–Pd–yCoO nanocatalyst with a Co/Pd molar ratio of 0.40 performed the best for methane oxidation, whereas the Au–Pd–3.61CoO/3DOM Co₃O₄ catalyst showed the highest TOF_Pd at 280 °C and methane reaction rate at 280 °C. Furthermore, the supported Au–Pd–CoO catalysts still possessed good thermal stability for methane oxidation, which was associated with the strong interaction between the noble metal nanoparticles and the 3DOM support and the Pd–CoO interface stabilized by the Au species. The doping of CoO into Au–Pd nanoparticles enhanced the adsorption and activation ability of methane, in which CoO was the methane adsorption site and the Pd–CoO interface was the active center for methane oxidation. It was concluded that doping the transition metal into Au–Pd nanoparticles could modify the microstructure of Au–Pd to generate an interface between the noble metal and the transition oxide, hence enhancing the adsorption and activation ability of the reactants (O₂, CH₄, and/or o-xylene) and catalytic performance. Moreover, the doping of the transition metal led to a decrease in the amount of noble metals, significantly improving the utilization efficiency of noble metals. The PVA-protected two-step reduction strategy was adopted to fabricate the CoPd nanoparticles. The CoPd nanoparticles displayed a core–shell (core: Pd; shell: Co) structure, with an average size of 3.5–4.5 nm, and were well dispersed on the wall surface of 3DOM CeO₂.²⁷ The Co_xPd/3DOM CeO₂ samples were highly active and exhibited super thermal stability for methane oxidation, with the Co_3.5Pd/3DOM CeO₂ sample showing the highest catalytic activity and excellent thermal stability in the range of 400–800 °C. Based on the activity data and characterization results, it was concluded that the excellent catalytic activity of Co_3.5Pd/3DOM CeO₂ was related to its good O₂ and CH₄ adsorption abilities and unique Pd@Co core–shell structure. It is envisioned that fabricating an active catalyst with a unique structure can further reduce the use of noble metals, thus improving their utilization efficiency. By studying AuPd/Co₃O₄/3DOM MnCo₂O₄ catalysts for CH₄ oxidation, Han et al.⁵⁴ found that the high O_ads species concentration and unique pore structure were responsible for the good activity.

4.2. VOC oxidation

The dual active site structure–effect relationship refers to the influence of the spatial distribution, interactions, and electronic properties of two different metal components, which play a crucial role in catalytic activity, selectivity, and stability. The structure–effect relationship of the dual active site is mainly reflected in the following aspects:⁴⁴ (i) ligand effect: the introduction of a second metal can change the electronic state of the host metal (M), thus altering the coordination environment of the M atom. The number of the second metal atoms and the coordination mode can affect the electron density and energy level of the host M atoms, thus influencing the catalytic activity and selectivity; (ii) geometric effect: the relative position and spacing of the two metal atoms in a bimetallic site affects adsorption and activation of the reactant molecules. Specific interatomic distances can promote the formation and breaking of specific chemical bonds, thus changing the reaction paths; (iii) synergistic effect: synergistic interaction of bimetals in the active sites enhances the catalytic performance. The introduction of a second metal may promote dispersion of another metal or inhibit sintering under the reaction conditions; (iv) electronic effects: electronic interactions between two metals can change the electronic states, including electron donating and accepting abilities, which are critical for redox capacity and electron transfer processes; (v) lattice strain effect: the introduction of a second metal with mismatched lattice constants produces localized strains, which can change the electronic structure and surface energy of the host metal; and (vi) surface reconstruction: different surface structures of bimetallic catalysts, such as alloys, core–shell structure, and Janus or core frame, change catalytic activity and selectivity of the catalysts. Different surface structures can provide different active sites, thus influencing adsorption of the reactants and catalytic reaction paths.

Noble metals (e.g., Pd and Pt) are the most efficient elements in the oxidation reaction due to their excellent C–H cleavage and C–C bond breakage abilities. Monometallic catalysts have only isolated active centers and the addition of a second metal provides intermetallic electron transformation. Therefore, synergistic combinations between bimetals re-configure the active sites through the modulation of the electron arrangement of monometallic or the increase of new active sites. As mentioned above, geometrical or electronic modifications with the addition of a second metal are the most effective strategies to develop catalysts with better performance and stability (Table 4). Exploring the optimal bimetallic structure and design for specific reactants is an important perspective in catalysis research. For instance, Xie et al.⁵⁸ prepared 3DOM Co₃O₄ and its supported gold–palladium alloy (AuPd/3DOM Co₃O₄) nanocatalysts using a PVA-protected reduction method. The 3DOM Co₃O₄-supported Au–Pd samples performed much better than the supported single Au or Pd sample for toluene oxidation, with the 1.99AuPd/3DOM Co₃O₄ sample showing the best performance: the T_10%, T_50%, and T_90% were 145, 164, and 168 °C at a SV of 40 000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively. The AuPd/3DOM Co₃O₄ sample displayed a hydrothermal stability than the supported single Au or Pd sample. O₂ could be conveniently activated on a gold nanoparticle cluster by formation of the hydroperoxyl species via the H-transfer reaction in the presence of water vapor. The Pd nanoparticle cluster possessed a good ability to adsorb water molecules, whereas the Au nanoparticle cluster showed a good capability to activate O₂ molecules in the presence of water molecules. The formation rate of the active oxygen species was important for the development of a catalyst with high stability. Compared with the Pt/M catalyst, the Pt–Cu/M catalyst owned a stronger ability of VOC adsorption and gaseous oxygen activation by introducing additional sites.⁵⁹ The Langmuir–Hinshelwood (adsorbed oxygen) and Mars–van Krevelen (lattice oxygen) mechanisms existed in toluene oxidation over the present Pt/M and Pt–Cu/M catalysts, respectively. The change in the involved active oxygen species during toluene oxidation resulted from the Pt–Cu alloy structure. In addition to the adsorption of O₂, some of the active lattice oxygen species could also be replenished by migration of the bulk lattice oxygen in Pt–Cu/Mn₂O₃. The XPS results demonstrated that the Pt–Cu/Mn₂O₃ catalyst exhibited a stronger ability of activating O₂ to O_ads than the Pt/M catalyst. A part of the bulk lattice oxygen could be converted into the surface active O_latt to participate in the reaction. Introduction of Cu, as an additional activation site of O₂, not only enhanced the adsorption capacity of precious metals for toluene/iso-hexane, but also increased the O₂ activation ability. Wang et al. synthesized uniformly dispersed Au–Pd nanoparticles with sizes of 2.7–3.2 nm for toluene and o-xylene oxidation by the PVA-protected reduction approach.⁶⁰ The T_50% (T_90%) for the oxidation of toluene and o-xylene over Au–Pd/Co₃O₄ were 171 (180) and 181 (187) °C at a SV of 40 000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively. The redox ability and oxygen vacancy concentration of the catalyst certainly played an important role in the oxidative removal of VOCs. It was concluded that the enhanced low-temperature reducibility and surface oxygen species concentration accounted for the high catalytic activity of the Au–Pd/Co₃O₄ sample. Xia et al. prepared well-dispersed Au–Pd/α-MnO₂ nanocatalysts via hydrothermal and PVA-protected reduction routes.⁶¹ It was found that the interaction between Au–Pd alloy nanoparticles and α-MnO₂ nanotubes significantly improved the reactivity of lattice oxygen species. The interaction between the Au–Pd alloy nanoparticles and the α-MnO₂ support made the Au and Pd species exist in a mixture of metallic (Au⁰ and Pd⁰) and ionic (Au^δ+ and Pd²⁺) states. The T_50% (T_90%) for the oxidation of toluene and m-xylene over Au–Pd/α-MnO₂ were 175 (185) and 210 (220) ^°C at a SV of 40 000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively. The 0.91Au_0.48Pd/α-MnO₂ nanotube catalyst exhibited high catalytic stability as well as good tolerance to water vapor and CO₂ in the oxidation of VOC mixtures. Au–Pd/Ce_0.6Zr_0.3Y_0.1O₂ with a noble metal particle size of 4.6–5.6 nm was prepared using cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB)-assisted hydrothermal and PVA-protected reduction methods.⁶² The 0.90Au–Pd/Ce_0.6Zr_0.3Y_0.1O₂ sample possessed lower apparent activation energies (37–43 kJ mol⁻¹) than the Ce_0.6Zr_0.3Y_0.1O₂ sample (88 kJ mol⁻¹) and hence performed the best for toluene oxidation: the T_50% and T_90% were 190 and 218 °C at a SV of 20 000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively. The excellent catalytic performance of 0.90Au–Pd/Ce_0.6Zr_0.3Y_0.1O₂ was attributed to the highest adsorbed oxygen concentration, the best low-temperature reducibility, and the strong interaction between Au–Pd nanoparticles and Ce_0.6Zr_0.3Y_0.1O₂ nanorods. Au_xMn_y/meso-Fe₂O₃ catalysts for benzene and toluene oxidation were prepared by KIT-6-templating and reduction strategies.⁶³ The Au₅Mn₂/meso-Fe₂O₃ catalyst exhibited the best benzene conversion activity: T_50% and T_90% were 237 and 254 °C at a SV of 20 000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹, with the TOF_Au and specific reaction rates at 210 and 230 °C being 1.08 s⁻¹ and 6.92 mmol g_Au⁻¹ s⁻¹ and 2.29 s⁻¹ and 11.58 mmol g_Au⁻¹ s⁻¹, respectively. The benzene chemisorption mechanism and adsorbed oxygen species could greatly influence the oxidation of benzene. The Au in Au₅Mn₂/meso-Fe₂O₃ could obtain electrons from the benzene ring in the presence of benzene adsorption, resulting in stronger adsorption of benzene and thus increasing the catalytic activity for benzene oxidation. Such excellent performance was related to its well-dispersed AuMn nanoparticles, high adsorbed oxygen species concentration, good low-temperature reducibility, high benzene adsorption capacity, and strong benzene adsorption. Au–Pd/meso-Cr₂O₃ catalysts with uniformly dispersed noble metal nanoparticles at a size of 2.9–3.7 nm were fabricated by KIT-6-templating and PVA-protected reduction methods.⁶⁴ The 1.95Au₁Pd₂/meso-Cr₂O₃ catalyst exhibited the best toluene oxidation activity: T_50% and T_90% were 145 and 165 °C at a SV of 20 000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively, with the lowest apparent activation energy (31 kJ mol⁻¹). The Pd nanoparticles possessed a good ability to adsorb water molecules, whereas the Au nanoparticles showed a good capability of activating O₂ molecules in the presence of water. Therefore, the introduction of an appropriate amount of moisture to the feedstock could facilitate the easy activated adsorption of O₂ molecules on the supported Au–Pd alloy sample, resulting in a positive effect on toluene oxidation over 1.95Au₁Pd₂/meso-Cr₂O₃. Using the hydrothermal and PVA-protected NaBH₄ reduction strategies, highly active PdPt_y/V₂O₅–TiO₂ catalysts with good moisture- and sulfur dioxide-resistant performance in toluene oxidation were prepared.⁶⁵ The 0.46PdPt_y/V₂O₅–TiO₂ catalyst exhibited the best toluene oxidation activity: T_50% and T_90% were 220 and 245 °C at a SV of 40 000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively, with an apparent activation energy (E_a) = 45 kJ mol⁻¹), specific reaction rate at 230 °C = 98.6 μmol g_Pt⁻¹ s⁻¹, and turnover frequency (TOF_{Noble metal}) at 230 °C = 142.2 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹. No significant changes in toluene conversion were detected when 5.0 vol% H₂O or 50 ppm SO₂ was introduced to the reaction system. It was concluded that vanadium was the main site for SO₂ adsorption, while PdO was the secondary site for SO₂ adsorption, which protected the active Pt site from being poisoned by SO₂, thus making the 0.46PdPt_y/V₂O₅–TiO₂ catalyst show good sulfur dioxide resistance. The superior activity, excellent thermal stability, water resistance, and CO₂ resistance of 0.46PdPt_y/V₂O₅–TiO₂ were associated with its well-dispersed PdPt nanoparticles, high adsorbed oxygen species concentration, good redox ability, large toluene adsorption capacity, and strong interaction between PdPt_y and V₂O₅–TiO₂. PtRu/3DOM Ce_0.7Zr_0.3O₂ catalysts with uniformly dispersed noble metal nanoparticles at a size of 4.2–5.1 nm were prepared by polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-templating and ethylene glycol reduction methods.²⁶ The 2.03PtRu/3DOM Ce_0.7Zr_0.3O₂ catalyst exhibited the best performance in toluene oxidation: T_50% and T_90% were 163 and 194 °C at a SV of 40 000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively, with the lowest apparent activation energy (45 kJ mol⁻¹). However, 1.98PtRu@3DOM Ce_0.7Zr_0.3O₂ possessed excellent thermal stability, while the thermal stability of 2.03PtRu/3DOM Ce_0.7Zr_0.3O₂ decreased greatly after calcination at 800 °C for 5 h. After the high-temperature treatment, the average particle size of PtRu nanoparticles in 1.98PtRu@3DOM Ce_0.7Zr_0.3O₂ increased slightly from 4.2 to 6.7 nm, whereas that of PtRu nanoparticles in 2.03PtRu/3DOM Ce_0.7Zr_0.3O₂ increased significantly from 5.1 to 17.3 nm. The good performance of 1.98PtRu@3DOM Ce_0.7Zr_0.3O₂ was associated with its highly dispersed partially embedded PtRu nanoparticles and good toluene and oxygen adsorption ability, and the formation of Pt–O–Ce-like bonds that possessed a strong interaction between PtRu nanoparticles and 3DOM Ce_0.7Zr_0.3O₂ contributed to its better thermal stability.

Table 4 Catalytic performance of supported bimetallic nanoparticles for VOC oxidation

Catalyst	Preparation method	Mean noble metal particle size (nm)	Reaction conditions	T50% (°C)	T90% (°C)	Ref.
Au–Pd/3DOM Co3O4	PVA-protected reduction method	2.7	1000 ppm toluene, SV = 40 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	164	168	58
Pt–Cu/Mn2O3	Oleylamine method	2.8	1000 ppm toluene, SV = 40 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	199	220	59
Pt–Cu/Mn2O3	Oleylamine method	2.8	1000 ppm iso-hexane, SV = 40 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	205	280	59
Au–Pd/Co3O4	PVA-protected reduction method	2.7–3.2	1000 ppm toluene, SV = 40 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	171	180	60
Au–Pd/Co3O4	PVA-protected reduction method	2.7–3.2	1000 ppm o-xylene, SV = 40 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	181	187	60
Au–Pd/α-MnO2	PVA-protected reduction method	2.5 ± 1.5	1000 ppm toluene, SV = 40 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	175	185	61
Au–Pd/α-MnO2	PVA-protected reduction method	2.5 ± 1.5	1000 ppm m-xylene, SV = 40 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	210	220	61
Au–Pd/Ce0.6Zr0.3Y0.1O2	PVA-protected reduction method	4.6–5.6	1000 ppm toluene, SV = 20 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	190	218	62
AuMn/meso-Fe2O3	Oleylamine co-reduction method	3.5	1000 ppm toluene, SV = 20 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	210	230	63
AuMn/meso-Fe2O3	Oleylamine co-reduction method	3.5	1000 ppm benzene, SV = 20 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	237	254	63
Au–Pd/meso-Cr2O3	PVA-protected reduction method	2.9–3.7	1000 ppm toluene, SV = 20 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	145	165	64
PdPty/V2O5–TiO2	PVA-protected reduction method	3.1	1000 ppm toluene, SV = 40 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	220	245	65
PtRu/3DOM Ce0.7Zr0.3O2	Ethylene glycol reduction method	3.0	1000 ppm toluene, SV = 40 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	163	194	26
Pd1Co1/Al2O3	Oleic acid method	4.1	1000 ppm benzene, SV = 40 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	220	250	66
PtW/Al2O3	Solvothermal method	4.5–8.8	1000 ppm benzene, SV = 40 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	133	140	67
AuPd/3DOM CeO2	PVA-protected reduction method	3–4	750 ppm trichloroethylene, SV = 20 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	330	415	68
RuPd/3DOM CeO2	PVA-protected reduction method	2.9–3.5	1000 ppm trichloroethylene, SV = 20 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	237	298	25
RuPt/3DOM CeO2	PVA-protected reduction method	2.9–3.5	1000 ppm trichloroethylene, SV = 20 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	321	373	25
RuAu/3DOM CeO2	PVA-protected reduction method	2.9–3.5	1000 ppm trichloroethylene, SV = 20 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	290	349	25
RuCo/meso-MgO	Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-assisted method	1.8	1000 ppm1,2-dichloroethane, SV = 20 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	403	445	69
RuCo/meso-Al2O3	Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-assisted method	1.8	1000 ppm1,2-dichloroethane, SV = 20 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	363	391	69
RuCo/HZSM-5	Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide -assisted method	1.8	1000 ppm 1,2-dichloroethane, SV = 20 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	238	281	69

---

Supported bimetallic single-atom palladium–cobalt catalysts with high catalytic efficiency and enhanced sulfur resistance in benzene oxidation (Fig. 7) were fabricated by a novel strategy.⁶⁶ The PdCo/Al₂O₃ catalyst exhibited the best catalytic activity, and the gradual recovery of activity after introduction of 25 ppm SO₂ for a long time was observed. By investigating the sulfur resistance in catalytic benzene oxidation, we found that the PdCo/Al₂O₃ catalyst showed a good sulfur resistance, and its activity for benzene oxidation experienced a process of first decline and then recovery after the introduction of SO₂. The results of surface compositions and adsorption–desorption behaviors of PdCo/Al₂O₃ showed that there was no competitive adsorption between benzene and oxygen on the surface of the catalyst. It could be inferred that its excellent catalytic activity was due to the dual active sites composed of Pd and Co double single atoms. The adsorption–desorption behaviors of the catalysts before and after sulfur resistance were investigated, and the enhanced sulfur resistance was mainly attributed to its good active site regeneration ability, which was due to the rapid decomposition of the sulfite or sulfate species formed on the surface of single-atom dispersed Pd and Co. In addition, the results of in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) and other characterization studies revealed that benzene oxidation over PdCo/Al₂O₃ might take place according to the sequence of benzene → cyclohexadiene → phenol → quinone → maleate → acetic acid → CO₂ and H₂O. PtM (M = W, Mo) bimetallic nanoparticles and commercial γ-Al₂O₃-supported PtM catalysts were prepared by the solvothermal method.⁶⁷ The shape of the PtW(Mo) nanoparticles was regular, while Pt nanoparticles displayed an inhomogeneous rod-like morphology. Compared to the as-obtained metal nanoparticles, the sizes of the metal nanoparticles in the supported samples had no obvious changes, and they were well distributed on the support surface. The PtW/Al₂O₃ catalyst exhibited the best catalytic activity for benzene oxidation: T_50% and T_90% were 133 and 140 °C at a SV of 40 000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively. The presence of WO_x or MoO_x clusters in the bimetallic samples accelerated the reaction. Electrons were transferred from the WO_x or MoO_x to Pt, as evidenced by the increase in the W⁶⁺/W⁵⁺ or Mo⁶⁺/Mo⁵⁺ molar ratio after the increase in W or Mo doping in the bimetallic system (Pt^σ+ + W⁵⁺ → Pt^σ+ + W⁶⁺), which made the Pt more electronegative. Concurrently, O₂ could be activated by picking up the electrons from the surface Pt to give electrophilic oxygen site (O⁻, O₂⁻ or O₂²⁻) species, which was verified by the oxygen adspecies concentrations on the catalyst surface. In situ DRIFTS studies revealed that the transformation from phenol to benzoquinone was the key step in the oxidation process of benzene. The supported bimetallic catalysts exhibited stronger benzene adsorption ability than the supported Pt catalyst. Therefore, it was reasonably concluded that the key role of the MO_x was adsorption and activation of VOC molecules. 3DOM CeO₂-supported Au–Pd alloys were synthesized using PMMA-templating and PVA-protected reduction methods.⁶⁸ It was found that the AuPd/3DOM CeO₂ samples displayed a good-quality 3DOM architecture, and the noble metal nanoparticles with a size of 3–4 nm were uniformly dispersed on the skeleton surface of 3DOM CeO₂. Among all of the samples, 2.85AuPd_1.87/3DOM CeO₂ performed the best for the oxidation of trichloroethylene (TCE): T_50% and T_90% were 330 and 415 °C at a SV of 20 000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively. Furthermore, the 2.85AuPd_1.87/3DOM CeO₂ sample possessed the lowest apparent activation energy (33 kJ mol⁻¹). In addition, the synergistic effect of Au and Pd in 2.85AuPd_1.87/3DOM CeO₂ also contributed to the superior thermal stability and water and Cl resistance. The alloying of Au and Pd improved the adsorption and activation of oxygen molecules and enhanced the interaction between the AuPd alloy nanoparticles and the support, resulting in a significant increase in catalytic activity and resistance to chlorine poisoning. It was concluded that the excellent catalytic performance for TCE oxidation of 2.85AuPd_1.87/3DOM CeO₂ was associated with the highly dispersed AuPd_1.87 alloy nanoparticles, high adsorbed oxygen species concentration, good low-temperature reducibility, and strong interaction between AuPd nanoparticles and 3DOM CeO₂ as well as the high-quality 3DOM structure and high surface acidity.

Fig. 7 TEM images and particle-size distributions (inside) of (A) PdCo nanoparticles and (B) Pd nanoparticles, (C) STEM image and EDX line scan (inside) of PdCo nanoparticles, (D) EDX elemental mapping of PdCo nanoparticles, STEM images of (E) Pd₁Co₁/Al₂O₃ and (F) Pd/Al₂O₃, aberration-corrected STEM images of (G) Pd₁Co₁/Al₂O₃, and EDX elemental mapping of (H) Pd₁Co₁/Al₂O₃.⁶⁶ Reproduced with permission from ref. 66 Copyright 2021, Elsevier.

Ruthenium-based materials are promising catalysts for the removal of chlorinated VOCs (CVOCs) due to their good ability in cleaving the C–Cl bonds and decreasing the Cl deposition. However, the roles of noble bimetals alloyed with Ru have not been clarified clearly. Bimetallic RuM (M = Au, Pd or Pt) alloys supported on 3DOM CeO₂ were fabricated by PMMA-templating and PVA-protected reduction methods (Fig. 8).²⁵ The Ru, Pd, and Ru_yM nanoparticles with an average size of 2.9–3.5 nm were uniformly dispersed on the skeleton surface of 3DOM CeO₂. The 0.93Ru_2.87Pd/3DOM CeO₂ sample showed the highest catalytic activity and the lowest apparent activation energy (34 kJ mol⁻¹) in TCE oxidation, with the T_50% and T_90% being 237 and 298 °C at SV = 20 000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively. Simultaneously, 0.93Ru_2.87Pd/3DOM CeO₂ exhibited the highest TCE oxidation rate at 250 °C (30.3 μmol g_{Noble metal}⁻¹ s⁻¹) and the highest TOF_{Noble metal} at 250 °C (3.1 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹). 0.93Ru_2.87Pd/3DOM CeO₂ also possessed a better hydrothermal stability than 0.85Ru/3DOM CeO₂ after the hydrothermal ageing treatment at 750 °C. Effects of H₂O, CO₂, and HCl on catalytic activity of 0.93Ru_2.87Pd/3DOM CeO₂ were also examined. The presence of Ru in the samples was favorable for generation of HCl and Cl₂ and reduction of the by-products in TCE oxidation, and tetrachloroethylene was the main by-product. The possible catalytic mechanism over 0.93Ru_2.87Pd/3DOM CeO₂ was also proposed. The outstanding catalytic efficiency of 0.93Ru_2.87Pd/3DOM CeO₂ could be assigned to the high adsorbed oxygen species, good low-temperature reducibility, strong TCE adsorption and activation ability, and formation of an intimate nanointerface between RuPd nanoparticles and 3DOM CeO₂. The effect of the nature of porous supports (mesoporous Al₂O₃ (meso-Al₂O₃), mesoporous MgO (meso-MgO), and microporous HZSM-5) on catalytic performance of the bimetallic RuCo nanoparticles was investigated for the oxidation of 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCE).⁶⁹ The order in activity was RuCo/HZSM-5 (T_50% = 238 °C and T_90% = 281 °C) > Ru/HZSM-5 (T_50% = 260 °C and T_90% = 308 °C) > Co/HZSM-5 (T_50% = 285 °C and T_90% = 329 °C) > RuCo/meso-Al₂O₃ (T_50% = 363 °C and T_90% = 391 °C) > RuCo/meso-MgO (T_50% = 403 °C and T_90% = 445 °C), with the more acidic RuCo/HZSM-5 showing the highest catalytic activity. The excellent oxidation performance was related to the abundant acidic sites, porous structure, and redox centers on the surface of HZSM-5. The large surface area and pore structure of the catalyst facilitated the adsorption of 1,2-DCE molecules, and then 1,2-DCE could remove HCl at the acidic sites to obtain C₂H₃Cl. The loading of RuCo nanoparticles as a strong oxidation center facilitated the deep oxidation of the intermediate products, thus effectively inhibiting the formation of the toxic by-product C₂H₃Cl and reducing secondary contamination. The X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) results confirmed that the RuO₂ species were dominantly present in the bimetallic sample, and doping of the Co species could increase the length of the Ru–O bond. Over the RuCo/HZSM-5 sample, the partial deactivation induced by water vapor or HCl addition was reversible, while that induced by SO₂ introduction was irreversible. According to the characterization results, the oxidation of 1,2-DCE over RuCo/meso-Al₂O₃, RuCo/meso-MgO or RuCo/HZSM-5 might take place concurrently via the Langmuir–Hinshelwood and Mars–van Krevelen mechanisms. The synergistic promotion of the redox, the surface acid, and the strong interaction of the highly dispersed RuCo nanoparticles with HZSM-5 improved the oxidation performance of the catalyst.

Fig. 8 (a, b, e, f, i, j, and m–p) TEM and (c, g, and k) HAADF–STEM images, EDX elemental mappings, and (d, h, and l) EDX line scan profiles of (a and b) 3DOM CeO₂, (c and d) 0.93Ru_2.87Pd/3DOM CeO₂, (e–h) 0.91Ru_2.85Au/3DOM CeO₂, (i–l) 0.90Ru_2.77Pt/3DOM CeO₂, (m and n) 0.85Ru/3DOM CeO₂, and (o and p) 0.88Pd/3DOM CeO₂.²⁵ Reproduced with permission from ref. 25 Copyright 2020, RSC.

4.3. Others

The addition of another metal to a platinum catalyst to exert a bimetallic synergistic effect is an effective way to significantly improve the catalytic performance. When the metal composition changes from single to double elements, however, the complexity of the active sites increases. For example, Bao et al. reported Pt–Fe/SiO₂ catalysts with coordinatively unsaturated metal sites and lower valent states for the preferential oxidation of CO.⁷⁰ The excellent performance catalyst exhibited a structure consisting of a Pt-rich core with the ferrous species encapsulated on the surface. The oxygen molecules were adsorbed at the interface between the coordinatively unsaturated Fe²⁺ and the Pt atoms, which were dissociated into active oxygen atoms to participate in the reaction. By the way, the Pt–FeO₂ interface confinement stabilized the ligand-unsaturated ferrous species against further oxidation to Fe₂O₃ to achieve a relative stability. The ultra-low-temperature and high-performance Fe–Pt/SiO₂ catalysts reported by Lu et al. demonstrated that the Fe₁(OH)–Pt interface was the catalyst active site in CO-selective catalytic oxidation,⁷¹ which was in good agreement with the above result. Unlike the active and stable Fe²⁺ site in the Fe–Pt/SiO₂ catalyst reported by Bao et al.,⁷⁰ the Fe²⁺ species was oxidized to the Fe³⁺ species in the gas feed, and the Fe₁(OH)_x clusters were anchored on the Pt nanoparticles to form the active Fe₁(OH)–Pt interface reported by Lu et al.⁷¹ Density functional theory calculations indicated that the Fe₁(OH)_x–Pt single interfacial sites could readily react with CO and facilitate oxygen activation to realize 100% selective CO elimination. Platinum-based bimetallic nanoparticles were regarded as the most efficient catalysts for CO oxidation. Construction of Pt–metal (hydr)oxide interface active sites was highly efficient for CO oxidation at low temperatures. Another type of the active site was the Pt–M alloy structure, in which platinum was directly bonded to the second metal atom. The Pt–Co/SiO₂ and Au–Co/SiO₂ catalysts were subjected to different redox behaviors and applications in CO oxidation.⁷² The Co oxide species were completely reduced to metallic Co⁰ atoms and formed an alloy structure with Pt atoms below 300 °C, which showed a superior catalytic activity for CO oxidation.⁷² However, the Co species in the reduced Au–Co/SiO₂ samples were rapidly oxidized at room temperature in an O₂ atmosphere, since the Co atoms were mostly located at the sample surface. The result indicated that a suitable reduction treatment could form a high density of the interface sites between the surface CoO structure and the noble metal to enhance the reactivity. Wei et al. reported that the Pt–Co(OH)/SiO₂ bimetallic catalysts were treated with a reduction pre-treatment to form the Pt–Co bonds directly, which acted as the active site in CO oxidation at low temperatures.⁷³ Meanwhile, Co atoms were oxidized to CoO_x in the catalytic reaction process, and the synergistic interaction between the Pt–CoO_x interfaces became a new active site. Two-dimensional planar Pt sub-nanoclusters with a single atomic layer were loaded on the SiO₂ surface using the atomic layer deposition (ALD) method, and CoO_x was deposited to decorate the Pt atoms. The resulting Pt–CoO_x/SiO₂ catalysts exhibited extremely high catalytic performance in the selective oxidation of CO, achieving a 100% CO conversion and 100% selectivity in the range of 25–140 °C.⁷⁴ The Pt clusters and CoO_x species formed a Pt–CoO_x interface through O atoms after the high-temperature reduction, and the structure of the Pt–CoO_x sub-nanoclusters remained stable during the preferential oxidation of CO in H₂. The results of the DRIFTS and XPS characterization showed that the charge transfer from Pt to CoO_x in the sub-nanoclusters of Pt–CoO_x reduced the charge feedback from Pt to CO molecules, which weakened the adsorption strength of CO at the Pt site and effectively enhanced its catalytic performance.

Alloying 3d transition metals with Pt was an effective strategy to improve the catalytic activity for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Table 5 gives an activity overview of the various bimetallic catalysts for certain reactions reported in the literature. The challenge was insufficient catalyst durability due to the rapid leaching of transition metal elements. To overcome the defect and achieve enhanced durability, Huang et al. reported a novel catalytic structure based on PtGa ultrathin alloy nanowires (NWs) with the unconventional strong p–d hybridization interactions.⁷⁶ The ORR mass activity and specific activity of PtGa NWs increased by 10.5 and 12.1 times, respectively, compared with those of the commercial Pt catalyst. The mass activity of the PtGa NWs decreased by only 15.8% after 30 000 endurance tests, while a 79.6% reduction happened over the commercial Pt catalyst. It was found that the strong p–d hybridization interaction between Ga and Pt was responsible for the superior ORR performance via synergistically upgrading the surface electronic structure and improving the oxidation resistance of Pt as well as suppressing the leaching of lattice Ga. Conventional alloy catalysts lack an accurate control over the local atomic structure of the active site. Mueller et al. investigated the active site synergistic effect of bimetallic Pd–Au electrocatalysts by coating the surface of Au nanoparticles with different doses of palladium (Fig. 9).⁷⁷ It was found that different contents of the Pd-modified gold nanoparticles induced changes in the Pd ensemble size and corresponding adsorption properties. Density functional theory calculations revealed that the modification of Pd sites in the Pd@Au electrocatalysts effectively reduced the CO₂ activation energy barrier. Moreover, the *CO intermediates combined with the bimetallic surface were less toxic than the pure Pd, and the synergistic effect between the Pd@Au electrocatalysts was accountable for the high activity for the electroreduction of CO₂ to CO.

Table 5 Catalytic activities of the bimetallic nanoparticles for certain reactions

Catalyst	Preparation method	Particle size (nm)	Reaction	Reaction conditions	Catalytic performance	Ref.
Pt–Fe/SiO2	Chemical deposition	2–4	The preferential oxidation of CO in excess H2	1 vol% CO, 0.5% O2, H2 balance. SV = 36 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	Pt–Fe/SiO2 catalysts showed almost 100% CO conversion and 100% CO selectivity at room temperature	70
Pt–Co/SiO2	Two-step NaBH4 reduction method	3.8	CO oxidation in excess O2	1 vol% CO, 0.5 vol% O2, He balance; SV = 75 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	Complete CO conversion at room temperature was observed when the catalyst was reduced at 100 °C	72
Au–Co/SiO2	Two-step NaBH4 reduction method	2.5	CO oxidation in excess O2	1 vol% CO, 0.5 vol% O2, He balance; SV = 75 000 mL g^−1 h^−1	Complete CO conversion at room temperature was observed when the catalyst was reduced at 500 and 600 °C	72
Au–Rh	Oleylamine co-reduction method	8.5	Hydrogen evolution reaction	10 μL Au–Rh/C was added in a mixture of water, isopropanol and Nafion (5%) at a volumetric ratio of 4 : 1 : 0.0025 to make the working electrode	Au75Rh25 core–shell decahedra exhibited an overpotential of 64.1 mV at a current density of 10 mA cm^−2 and mass activity of 10.76 mA μgRh^−1	75
PtGa	Oleylamine co-reduction method	1.2 ± 0.4	Oxygen reduction reaction	O2-saturated 0.1 M HClO4 solutions at a sweep rate of 10 mV s^−1 and a rotation rate of 1600 rpm at room temperature	Pt4.31Ga NWs/C showed the highest specific and mass activities of 3.28 mA cm^−2 and 1.89 A mgPt^−1 at 0.9 VRHE	76
Pd–Au	Chemical deposition	5.3	CO2 reduction	A solution of 0.1 mol L^−1 KHCO3 was used as electrolyte. CO2 was bubbled at a constant rate of 20 sccm and purged for 10 minutes prior to each measurement	Pd5@Au95 delivered a CO2 reduction current density of up to 5.8 mA cmgeo^−2 at −0.8 V	77
AuAg	Nitric acid leaching to obtain nanoporous AgAu alloys		Oxidative coupling of methanol	Oxygen (0.2 Torr) and methanol (0.1 Torr) were introduced into the vacuum chamber via leak valves	AgAu alloys producing methyl formate selectively without deactivation at 150 °C	4
Au–Pt	Oleylamine co-reduction method	16	Oxygen reduction reaction	Ar-purged 0.1 mol L^−1 HClO4 solutions at a sweep rate of 50 mV s^−1 between 0.05 and 0.1 V at room temperature	AuPt1.03 star-shaped decahedra achieved the highest mass activity (0.94 mA μgPt^−1) and area activity (1.09 mA cmPt^−1)	78
PtRu	Oleylamine co-reduction method	12.7	Methanol electro oxidation	CV curves were recorded in an Ar-purged 0.5 mol L^−1 H2SO4/0.5 mol L^−1 CH3OH solution at a sweep rate 50 mV s^−1 in the range of 0.2 V to 1.2 V vs. RHE	Pt7Ru bimetallic icosahedra achieved a specific activity of 0.76 mA cm^−2 and mass activity of 74.43 mA mgPt^−1	79

---

Fig. 9 Synthesis and HAADF−STEM images of the Pd@Au nanoparticles. (a) Illustration of the synthetic scheme for the Pd@Au nanoparticles with control over the dose of Pd, and (b–d) STEM images and EELS-based element maps for (b) Pd₂@Au₉₈, (c) Pd₅@Au₉₅, (d) Pd₁₀@Au₉₀, and (e) Pd₂₀@Au₈₀, where Au and Pd atoms are represented by red and green pixels, respectively.⁷⁷ Reproduced with permission from ref. 77 Copyright 2019, ACS.

Activation pretreatments were commonly used to adjust the surface compositions and structures of bimetallic alloy materials. Friend et al. investigated the transformations of nanoporous Ag_0.03Au_0.97 alloys by the O₃ activation induced treatment and subsequent adjustments under steady-state CH₃OH oxidation conditions.⁴ The activation treatment produced enriched AgO and Au₂O₃ in the near-surface region of Ag. The reduction of generated oxides happened in the O₂/CH₃OH mixture to produce CO₂ and highly Ag-enriched surface alloys. However, bulk agglomerate diffusion led to sintering and Ag re-distribution at high temperatures, and the selectivity for the catalytic generation of methyl formate was reduced. The results revealed that the material properties which determined the catalytic activity were dynamic, and the substable form of the catalysts might account for the catalytic performance.

The ultimate goal of catalyst design was to optimize catalytic performance by revealing the relationship between the structure and activity. However, it remains a great challenge to distinguish the role of electronic and geometrical effects (ensemble effects) for bimetallic core–shell electrocatalysts. Yang et al. reported an efficient strategy to study the local epitaxial growth of Rh atoms on Au decahedra to investigate the electronic and geometrical effects.⁷⁸ A series of Au–Rh core–shell star-shaped structured decahedra with different compositions were prepared using the seed growth method. Hollow Ru nanoframe-structured nanocrystals were generated by the selective etching of Au nanocrystal cores with I₃⁻/I⁻ ions as the etchant. The Au₇₅Rh₂₅ core–shell star-shaped decahedra exhibited the best catalytic activity for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) with an overpotential of 64.1 mV at a current density of 10 mA cm⁻¹. In comparison with the commercial Rh/C catalyst, the Au–Rh decahedra showed better decomposition efficiency and selectivity. The results of density functional theory calculations indicated that geometric effect (ensemble effect) was the dominant factor in accelerating the kinetics of the HER, as the exposure of Au atoms on the surface weakened the strong adsorption of the intermediates on the Rh surface. The Au–Pt core–shell structured star decahedra (Fig. 10) were fabricated using a one-step thermal synthesis method with oleylamine as solvent and a reducing agent for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in fuel cells.⁷⁵ The introduction of amine groups reduced the surface energy of Pt, thus achieving the epitaxial growth of Pt nanocrystals on the Au core and regulating the thickness of the Pt epitaxial layer at the atomic scale. Significantly, Br⁻ ions could stabilize the ORR favored Pt {111} crystalline surface to a large extent, thus preventing the formation of the spherical nanoparticles. The AuPt_1.03 star decahedron exhibited the highest mass activity (0.94 mA μg_Pt⁻¹) and area activity (1.09 mA cm_Pt⁻²), which was 6.7 and 5 times higher than that of the commercial Pt/C catalyst, respectively. The decahedron of Au–Pt core–shell with a thicker Pt shell layer effectively enhanced the catalytic activity and durability of the composite structure due to the synergetic effect and twin structure, with essentially no loss of activity for the ORR after 30 000 cycles of testing. The Pt–Cu alloy octahedra with different compositions were prepared using the solvothermal method for methanol oxidation.⁸⁰ Cl⁻ ions in the copper chloride reactant were found to selectively modulate the underpotential deposition (UPD) of copper atoms on the Pt crystalline surface, which was crucial to the formation of Pt–Cu octahedral nanocrystals. Element-specific growth trajectories of Pt–Cu nanostructures coupled with compositional variations and geometrical morphologies were observed: the Pt_xCu_1−x polydendrimer started from Pt-rich crystalline species (x > 0.6) and evolved into a Pt–Cu alloying phase (x ≈ 0.5), which in turn formed Pt-rich dendrites (when x > 0.8). Due to the synergistic interaction between Pt and Cu bimetallic multipod nanostructures, the alloy octahedron exhibited resistance to CO toxicity and a superior catalytic activity to the commercial Pt/C catalyst. The PtRu bimetallic particles have been known to be promising commercial catalysts for methanol oxidation. Shape-controlled synthesis of PtRu bimetallic nanocrystals, especially for {100} (e.g., cubic) or {111} cuts (e.g., icosahedral) exposed to the catalytic Platonic structure limits the development of catalytic properties. Lin et al. reported a facile method for the synthesis of Ru-decorated Pt bimetallic cubes and icosahedra in mixed solvents for methanol oxidation.⁷⁹ It was found that the formation of cubes might be due to the selective adsorption of CO from the catalytic decomposition of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) by the Ru salt precursor on Pt {100} in solvents which contained N,N-dimethylformamide and oleylamine. The synthesis became a two-phase interfacial reaction due to the large difference in solvent polarity and slowed down the reaction kinetics by introducing hexadecane to the above solvent, which facilitated the formation of the icosahedra instead of a cube structure. Ru-modified Pt icosahedra displayed better catalytic performance in terms of specific activity and mass activity than the cubes for methanol oxidation, due to a combination of twin-induced strain and facet effects. The Ru-decorated Pt bimetallic icosahedra showed a specific activity of 0.76 mA cm⁻² and a mass activity of 74.43 mA mg_Pt⁻¹, which were 6.7 and 2.2 times higher than those of the PtRu nanoparticles, respectively.

Fig. 10 Morphological, structural, and compositional characterization studies of Au–Pt star-shaped decahedra prepared using the standard procedure: (a) TEM image, (b) HAADF-STEM image, (c) EDX mapping, (d) line-scan analysis, (e) HRTEM image, and (f) HAADF-STEM image at a higher magnification. The insets of a and b show the magnified TEM and HAADF-STEM images of a single star-shaped decahedron, respectively. The red and green colors in (c) correspond to Au and Pt elements, respectively.⁷⁵ TEM and HAADF-STEM-EDX mapping images of the Au–Pt nanocrystals prepared using the standard procedure, except for the different molar ratios of Au to Pt salt precursors: (a) 1.0 : 1.0, (b) 1.0 : 0.9, (c) 1.0 : 0.8, (d) 1.0 : 0.7, (e) 1.0 : 0.6, and (f) 1,0 : 0.5.⁷⁵ Reproduced with permission from ref. 75 Copyright 2015, ACS.

There are water, sulfur dioxide or other organic compounds in practical industrial exhaust gases. The presence of water and reactant molecules exhibits competitive adsorption, which causes the partial deactivation of catalysts. Simultaneously, the adsorbed water molecules generate a large number of hydroxyl groups and occupy the exposed surface active sites, which inhibit generation of the surface active oxygen species. It was reported that the bimetallic PdW/TiO₂ catalysts showed better water resistance than monometallic Pd/TiO₂.⁸¹ After the introduction of 1.0 vol% H₂O, benzene conversions over PdW/TiO₂ remained almost unchanged while those over Pd/TiO₂ were decreased by 20%. The in situ FTIR results showed that the absorption intensity of OH species on the Pd/TiO₂ catalyst was significantly stronger than that over the bimetallic PdW/TiO₂ catalyst. The absorption bands of OH species on PdW/TiO₂ almost disappeared after water was cut off. In contrast, the adsorbed OH species on the Pd/TiO₂ catalyst were desorbed slowly. The results indicated that the bimetallic PdW/TiO₂ catalyst inhibited the formation of surface hydroxyl groups and accelerated the desorption of water. The adsorbed SO₂ molecules on the catalyst surface always occupy the active sites, which result in poisoning of the catalyst. The catalyst deactivation caused by inducing SO₂ is ascribed to the formation of difficultly decomposed sulfate species. Pd/ZrO₂ and PtPd/ZrO₂ catalysts were prepared to investigate their SO₂-resistant performance.³ Methane conversions over PtPd/ZrO₂ were decreased slightly after the introduction of 100 ppm SO₂, and catalytic activities were returned to the initial levels when SO₂ was cut off. However, the introduction of 100 ppm SO₂ to the Pd/ZrO₂ catalyst resulted in a methane conversion drop by 45% (indicating an irreversible deactivation). The XPS results demonstrated that a new component appeared on the S 2p spectrum of the PdPt/ZrO₂ catalyst compared with the Pd/ZrO₂ catalyst, which could be attributed to the adsorption of SO₂ at the Pt site. The introduction of Pt facilitated the preferential adsorption of SO₂ at the Pt site, thereby protecting the PdO active phase from being poisoned by SO₂.

The adsorption and desorption behaviors of VOC molecules and intermediates on the surface of the catalysts determine catalytic performance of the bimetallic nanoparticles. For example, PtFe/MnO₂ nanoparticles were fabricated for toluene and isohexane oxidation.⁸² The VOCs-TPD results revealed that the Pt/MnO₂ catalyst showed a large toluene adsorption capacity, while the PtFe/MnO₂ catalyst was more favorable for isohexane adsorption. The conversion of toluene over Pt/MnO₂ was decreased by 50% after 6 h of the reaction, whereas that over PtFe/MnO₂ remained stable after 20 h of the reaction. The PtFe/MnO₂ catalyst exhibited stronger reducing properties and a higher lattice oxygen activity, which changed the toluene oxidation intermediate pathways.

Based on the above discussion, the introduction of a second metal modifies the surface properties of a bimetallic catalyst so as to obtain multifunctional active sites, which optimize adsorption behaviors of the reactant molecules and reaction pathways. Future work should focus on designing and synthesizing bimetallic catalysts with high activities and stability in the presence of H₂O, SO₂ or other organic compounds.

As mentioned above, bimetallic catalysts show excellent activity and stability in many reactions. Catalytic performance of bimetallic catalysts can be adjusted for the reactions of different reactants by changing the metal nature, metal composition or support nature. Bimetallic catalysts exhibit better thermal stability and resistance to sintering. The bimetallic sites optimize the reaction paths and adsorption properties of the intermediates, exhibiting better resistance to toxicity. However, reaction mechanisms over bimetallic catalysts may be more complex than those over their monometallic counterparts. The exact function of the dual active sites may be unclear, which makes it more difficult to optimize the catalytic performance. Preparation of bimetallic catalysts with uniform distributions and desired particle sizes requires complex steps, which may limit large-scale production of such kinds of bimetallic catalysts for industrial applications. Bimetallic catalysts require a more complex regeneration process after deactivation since the interaction of the two metals may influence their regeneration efficiencies. Overall, bimetallic nanoparticles offer many advantages in catalytic oxidation reactions. The catalytic performance and application values of bimetallic catalysts can be maximized by controlling their chemical compositions, structures, and preparation methods.

5. Conclusion and perspectives

Surface composition and elemental arrangement play a crucial role in determining activity and selectivity of a bimetallic catalyst. Understanding the factors that regulate the structure optimization is important for both engineering the surface electronic properties of bimetallic nanoparticles and achieving the desired catalytic reactivity. This review article provides an overview of the preparation methods, characterization, and catalytic applications of bimetallic nanoparticles. Bimetallic nanoparticles offer enriched catalytic properties, which is ascribed to the specific interactions between the two metals, the tunable compositions, and the reconfigurable electronic arrangements. Generally speaking, an improved chemical engineering method is designed to control the sizes, morphologies, chemical components, and coordination environments of bimetallic nanoparticles. The significant surface reactivity factors of bimetallic nanoparticles are investigated and summarized, including solid-state diffusion, intrinsic surface energy, surface reactant adsorption, and surface chemical reactivity between reactants and metal atoms. Diverse bimetallic nanostructures with individualized active sites present different structure–reactivity relationships for the specific reactions. It is essential to elucidate the different predominant roles and reaction pathways of the active sites in two-metal catalysts.

The improved catalytic performance of bimetallic catalysts is associated with the following four effects: the geometric structure effect, electronic structure effect, synergistic effect, and stabilization effect. Modification in the coordination number, atomic arrangement, atomic size, and local atomic charge of reactive metals provides the corresponding multifunction and synergistic effect in heterogeneous catalysis, such as dual adsorption/activation of reactants, decoking, and enhanced redox ability. The unique geometrical structures and electronic properties of bimetallic nanoparticles overcome various bottlenecks in terms of conversion efficiency and product selectivity. It is hopeful that the insights summarized in this review article will contribute to further studies on bimetallic nanoparticles.

Industrial exhaust gases have complex chemical compositions and are usually mixed with H₂O, SO₂ or other organic compounds under practical conditions. In general, the presence of other components introduces competitive adsorption, which induces the decrease in catalytic activity. Bimetallic catalysts exhibit high activities toward targeted VOC oxidation and reduce the generation of harmful by-products. High-performance bimetallic catalysts without noble metals are economically viable and promising for large-scale preparation. Future work should pay much attention to designing efficient and economical bimetallic catalysts for industrial applications.

Data availability

This thesis is a review and the data in the text are derived from the references. Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFB3504101 and 2022YFB3506200), National Natural Science Foundation of China (22322601 and 22306008), National Natural Science Committee of China-Liaoning Provincial People's Government Joint Fund (U1908204), R&D Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KZ202210005011), Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2022M720315), and Postdoctoral Research Foundation of Beijing (2023ZZ-139).

References

1. Y. Nakaya and S. Furukawa, Catalysis of alloys: classification, principles, and design for a variety of materials and reactions, Chem. Rev., 2022, 123(9), 5859–5947.
2. A. Pedersen, J. Barrio, A. Li, R. Jervis, D. J. L. Brett, M. M. Titirici and I. E. L. Stephens, Dual-metal atom electrocatalysts: theory, synthesis, characterization, and applications, Adv. Energy Mater., 2022, 12(3), 2102715.
3. X. F. Zhang, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, L. Jing, L. K. Wu and H. X. Dai, Catalytic performance and SO₂ resistance of zirconia-supported platinum-palladium bimetallic nanoparticles for methane combustion, Catal. Today, 2022, 402(15), 138–148.
4. B. Zugic, M. A. van Spronsen, C. Heine, M. M. Montemore, Y. Y. Li, D. N. Zakharov, S. Karakalos, B. A. J. Lechner, E. Crumlin, M. M. Biener, A. I. Frenkel, J. Biener, E. A. Stach, M. B. Salmeron, E. Kaxiras, R. J. Madix and C. M. Friend, Evolution of steady-state material properties during catalysis: oxidative coupling of methanol over nanoporous Ag_0.03Au_0.97, J. Catal., 2019, 380, 366–374.
5. K. Kusada, D. S. Wu, Y. Nanba, M. Koyama, T. Yamamoto, X. Q. Tran, T. Toriyama, S. Matsumura, A. Ito, K. Sato, K. Nagaoka, O. Seo, C. Song, Y. N. Chen, N. Palina, L. S. R. Kumara, S. Hiroi, O. Sakata, S. Kawaguchi, Y. Kubota and H. Kitagawa, Highly stable and active solid-solution-alloy three-way catalyst by utilizing configurational-entropy effect, Adv. Mater., 2021, 33(16), 2005206.
6. H. Arandiyan, Y. Wang, J. Scott, S. Mesgari, H. X. Dai and R. Amal, In situ exsolution of bimetallic Rh-Ni nanoalloys: a highly efficient catalyst for CO₂ methanation, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10(19), 16352–16357.
7. D. I. Enache, J. K. Edwards, P. Landon, B. Solsona-Espriu, A. F. Carley, A. A. Herzing, M. Watanabe, C. J. Kiely, D. W. Knight and G. J. Hutchings, Solvent-free oxidation of primary alcohols to aldehydes using Au-Pd/TiO₂ catalysts, Science, 2006, 311(5759), 362–365.
8. P. Landon, P. J. Collier, A. F. Carley, D. Chadwick, A. J. Papworth, A. Burrows, C. J. Kiely and G. J. Hutchings, Direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide from H₂ and O₂ using Pd and Au catalysts, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2003, 5(9), 1917–1923.
9. W. R. Schwartz and L. D. Pfefferle, Combustion of methane over palladium-based catalysts: support interactions, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116(15), 8571–8578.
10. J. S. Tian, R. Kong, Z. Wang, L. Fang, T. Y. He, D. Jiang, H. G. Peng, T. L. Sun, Y. H. Zhu and Y. Wang, Enhancing methane combustion activity by modulating the local environment of Pd single atoms in Pd₁/CeO₂ catalysts, ACS Catal., 2024, 14(1), 183–191.
11. X. H. Huo, G. L. Li, X. Wang and W. B. Zhang, Bimetallic catalysis in stereo divergent synthesis, Angew. Chem., 2022, 134(45), e202210086.
12. T. T. Li, N. Ji, Z. C. Jia, X. Y. Diao, Z. J. Wang, Q. L. Liu, C. F. Song and X. B. Lu, Effects of metal promoters in bimetallic catalysts in hydrogenolysis of lignin derivatives into value-added chemicals, ChemCatChem, 2020, 12(21), 5288–5302.
13. S. Ashraf, Y. Y. Liu, H. J. Wei, R. F. Shen, H. H. Zhang, X. L. Wu, S. Mehdi, T. Liu and B. J. Li, Bimetallic nanoalloy catalysts for green energy production: advances in synthesis routes and characterization techniques, Small, 2023, 19(43), 2303031.
14. N. Eom, M. E. Messing, J. Johansson and K. Deppert, General trends in core–shell preferences for bimetallic nanoparticles, ACS Nano, 2021, 15(5), 8883–8895.
15. J. C. Qiu, Q. N. Nguyen, Z. H. Lyu, Q. X. Wang and Y. N. Xia, Bimetallic Janus nanocrystals: syntheses and applications, Adv. Mater., 2022, 34(1), 2102591.
16. L. Rößner and M. Armbrüster, Electrochemical energy conversion on intermetallic compounds: a review, ACS Catal., 2019, 9(3), 2018–2062.
17. H. N. Shi, J. H. Li, H. Z. Wang, J. G. Hou, K. Y. Li and X. W. Guo, Chlorine tailored p-d blocks dual-metal atomic catalyst for efficient photocatalytic CO₂ reduction, Appl. Catal., B, 2023, 322, 122139.
18. Z. H. Xu, W. Zuo, Y. Y. Yu, J. Y. Liu, G. Z. Cheng and P. P. Zhao, Surface reconstruction facilitated by fluorine migration and bimetallic center in NiCo bimetallic fluoride toward oxygen evolution reaction, Adv. Sci., 2024, 11(6), 2306758.
19. W. B. Wu, J. Y. Zhu, Y. Tong, S. F. Xiang and P. Z. Chen, Electronic structural engineering of bimetallic Bi-Cu alloying nanosheet for highly-efficient CO₂ electroreduction and Zn-CO₂ batteries, Nano Res., 2024, 17, 3684–3692.
20. Y. Q. Kang, O. Cretu, J. Kikkawa, K. Kimoto, H. Nara, A. S. Nugraha, H. Kawamoto, M. Eguchi, T. Liao, Z. Q. Sun, T. Asahi and Y. Yamauchi, Mesoporous multimetallic nanospheres with exposed highly entropic alloy sites, Nat. Commun., 2023, 14, 4182.
21. Z. X. Wu, J. G. Deng, Y. X. Liu, S. H. Xie, Y. Jiang, X. T. Zhao, J. Yang, H. Arandiyan, G. S. Guo and H. X. Dai, Three-dimensionally ordered mesoporous Co₃O₄-supported Au-Pd alloy nanoparticles: high-performance catalysts for methane combustion, J. Catal., 2015, 332, 13–24.
22. H. F. Wang, G. H. Lin, X. Q. Li, W. S. Lu and Z. C. Peng, Self-standing hollow porous AuPt nanospheres and their enhanced electrocatalytic performance, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2019, 554, 396–403.
23. P. Xu, Z. X. Wu, J. G. Deng, Y. X. Liu, S. H. Xie, G. S. Guo and H. X. Dai, Catalytic performance enhancement by alloying Pd with Pt on ordered mesoporous manganese oxide for methane combustion, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38(1), 92–105.
24. Z. Han, J. Y. Fang, S. H. Xie, J. G. Deng, Y. X. Liu and H. X. Dai, AuRu/meso-Mn₂O₃: a highly active and stable catalyst for methane combustion, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, 359, 012022.
25. X. Zhang, L. Y. Dai, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, L. Jing, X. H. Yu, Z. Han, K. F. Zhang and H. X. Dai, 3DOM CeO₂-supported Ru_yM (M = Au, Pd, Pt) alloy nanoparticles with improved catalytic activity and chlorine-tolerance in trichloroethylene oxidation, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2020, 10(11), 3755–3770.
26. W. B. Pei, L. Y. Dai, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, L. Jing, K. F. Zhang, Z. Q. Hou, Z. Han, A. Rastegarpanah and H. X. Dai, PtRu nanoparticles partially embedded in the 3DOM Ce_0.7Zr_0.3O₂ skeleton: Active and stable catalysts for toluene combustion, J. Catal., 2020, 385, 274–288.
27. S. H. Xie, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, X. T. Zhao, J. Yang, K. F. Zhang, Z. Han and H. X. Dai, Three-dimensionally ordered macroporous CeO₂-supported Pd@Co nanoparticles: highly active catalysts for methane oxidation, J. Catal., 2016, 342, 17–26.
28. K. D. Gilroy, A. Ruditskiy, H. C. Peng, D. Qin and Y. N. Xia, Bimetallic nanocrystals: syntheses, properties, and applications, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116(18), 10414–10472.
29. C. L. Chen, M. R. Sun, K. X. Wang and Y. J. Li, Dual-metal single-atomic catalyst: the challenge in synthesis, characterization, and mechanistic investigation for electrocatalysis, SmartMat, 2022, 3(4), 533–564.
30. R. Ferrando, J. Jellinek and R. L. Johnston, Nanoalloys: from theory to applications of alloy clusters and nanoparticles, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108(3), 845–910.
31. D. Skachkov, C. Venkateswara Rao and Y. Ishikawa, Combined first-principles molecular dynamics/density functional theory study of ammonia electrooxidation on Pt (100) electrode, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117(48), 25451–25466.
32. H. H. Ye, Q. X. Wang, M. Catalano, N. Lu, J. Vermeylen, M. J. Kim, Y. Z. Liu, Y. G. Sun and X. H. Xia, Ru nanoframes with an fcc structure and enhanced catalytic properties, Nano Lett., 2016, 16(4), 2812–2817.
33. H. Lv, H. Y. Qin, K. Ariga, Y. Yamauchi and B. Liu, A general concurrent template strategy for ordered mesoporous intermetallic nanoparticles with controllable catalytic performance, Angew. Chem., 2022, 134(17), e202116179.
34. H. Lv, Y. Z. Wang, L. Z. Sun, Y. Yamauchi and B. Liu, A general protocol for precise syntheses of ordered mesoporous intermetallic nanoparticles, Nat. Protoc., 2023, 18, 3126–3154.
35. Y. Z. Wang, H. Lv, L. Z. Sun, F. R. Jia and B. Liu, Ordered mesoporous intermetallic trimetals for efficient and pH-universal hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis, Adv. Energy Mater., 2022, 12(30), 2201478.
36. Y. Z. Wang, X. Y. Zhang, H. J. He, J. J. Chen and B. Liu, Ordered mesoporous high-entropy intermetallics for efficient oxygen reduction electrocatalysis, Adv. Energy Mater., 2024, 14(8), 2303923.
37. L. Z. Sun, H. Lv, J. Feng, O. Guselnikova, Y. Z. Wang, Y. Yamauchi and B. Liu, Noble-metal-based hollow mesoporous nanoparticles: synthesis strategies and applications, Adv. Mater., 2022, 34(31), 2201954.
38. H. J. Wang, H. Y. Jeong, M. Imura, L. Wang, L. Radhakrishnan, N. Fujita, T. Castle, O. Terasaki and Y. Yamauchi, Shape- and size-controlled synthesis in hard templates: sophisticated chemical reduction for mesoporous monocrystalline platinum nanoparticles, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133(37), 14526–14529.
39. J. Y. Chen, B. Wiley, J. McLellan, Y. J. Xiong, Z.-Y. Li and Y. N. Xia, Optical properties of Pd-Ag and Pt-Ag nanoboxes synthesized via galvanic replacement reactions, Nano Lett., 2005, 5(10), 2058–2062.
40. X. M. Lu, H.-Y. Tuan, J. Y. Chen, Z.-Y. Li, B. A. Korgel and Y. N. Xia, Mechanistic studies on the galvanic replacement reaction between multiply twinned particles of Ag and HAuCl₄ in an organic medium, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129(6), 1733–1742.
41. Q. B. Zhang, J. P. Xie, J. Y. Lee, J. X. Zhang and C. Boothroyd, Synthesis of Ag@AgAu metal core/alloy shell bimetallic nanoparticles with tunable shell compositions by a galvanic replacement reaction, Small, 2008, 4(8), 1067–1071.
42. A. J. Martín, S. Mitchell, C. Mondelli, S. Jaydev and J. Pérez-Ramírez, Unifying views on catalyst deactivation, Nat. Catal., 2022, 5, 854–866.
43. G. H. Kim, K.-D. Jung, W.-I. Kim, B.-H. Um, C.-H. Shin, K. Oh and H. L. Koh, Effect of oxychlorination treatment on the regeneration of Pt-Sn/Al₂O₃ catalyst for propane dehydrogenation, Res. Chem. Intermed., 2016, 42, 351–365.
44. F. Tao and Y. T. Li, A new type of catalysts: catalysts of singly dispersed bimetallic sites, Trends Chem., 2023, 5(6), 486–499.
45. P. Buchwalter, J. Rose and P. Braunstein, Multimetallic catalysis based on heterometallic complexes and clusters, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115(1), 28–126.
46. Y. H. Bing, H. S. Liu, L. Zhang, D. Ghosh and J. J. Zhang, Nanostructured Pt-alloy electrocatalysts for PEM fuel cell oxygen reduction reaction, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39(6), 2184–2202.
47. X. T. Zhao, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, P. Xu, J. Yang, K. F. Zhang, Z. Han and H. X. Dai, Mesoporous Pd_xPt alloys: high-performance catalysts for methane combustion, Mol. Catal., 2017, 442, 191–201.
48. Z. W. Wang, J. G. Deng, Y. X. Liu, H. G. Yang, S. H. Xie, Z. X. Wu and H. X. Dai, Three-dimensionally ordered macroporous CoCr₂O₄-supported Au-Pd alloy nanoparticles: highly active catalysts for methane combustion, Catal. Today, 2017, 281, 467–476.
49. Y. Wang, H. Arandiyan, J. Scott, M. Akia, H. X. Dai, J. G. Deng, K.-F. Aguey-Zinsou and R. Amal, High performance Au-Pd supported on 3D hybrid strontium-substituted lanthanum manganite perovskite catalyst for methane combustion, ACS Catal., 2016, 6(10), 6935–6947.
50. P. Xu, X. Zhang, X. T. Zhao, J. Yang, Z. Q. Hou, L. Bai, H. Q. Chang, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, G. S. Guo, H. X. Dai and C.-T. Au, Preparation, characterization, and catalytic performance of PdPt/3DOM LaMnAl₁₁O₁₉ for the combustion of methane, Appl. Catal., A, 2018, 562, 284–293.
51. X. Y. Li, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, S. H. Xie, X. T. Zhao, Y. Zhang, K. F. Zhang, H. Arandiyan, G. S. Guo and H. X. Dai, Enhanced catalytic performance for methane combustion of 3DOM CoFe₂O₄ by co-loading MnO_x and Pd-Pt alloy nanoparticles, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 403, 590–600.
52. S. H. Xie, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, X. T. Zhao, J. Yang, K. F. Zhang, Z. Han, H. Arandiyan and H. X. Dai, Effect of transition metal doping on the catalytic performance of Au-Pd/3DOM Mn₂O₃ for the oxidation of methane and o-xylene, Appl. Catal., B, 2017, 206, 221–232.
53. S. H. Xie, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, S. M. Zang, Z. H. Zhang, H. Arandiyan and H. X. Dai, Efficient removal of methane over cobalt-monoxide-doped AuPd nanocatalysts, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2017, 51(4), 2271–2279.
54. Z. Han, L. Y. Dai, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, L. Jing, Y. X. Zhang, K. F. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. Q. Hou, W. B. Pei and H. X. Dai, AuPd/Co₃O₄/3DOM MnCo₂O₄: highly active catalysts for methane combustion, Catal. Today, 2021, 376, 134–143.
55. Z. Q. Hou, L. Y. Dai, J. G. Deng, G. F. Zhao, L. Jing, Y. S. Wang, X. H. Yu, R. Y. Gao, X. R. Tian, H. X. Dai, D. S. Wang and Y. X. Liu, Electronically engineering water resistance in methane combustion with an atomically dispersed tungsten on PdO catalyst, Angew. Chem., 2022, 134(27), e202201655.
56. H. G. Peng, C. Rao, N. Zhang, X. Wang, W. M. Liu, W. T. Mao, L. Han, P. F. Zhang and S. Dai, Confined ultrathin Pd-Ce nanowires with outstanding moisture and SO₂ tolerance in methane combustion, Angew. Chem., 2018, 130(29), 8953–8957.
57. M. Cargnello, J. J. D. Jaén, J. C. H. Garrido, K. Bakhmutsky, T. Montini, J. J. C. Gámez, R. J. Gorte and P. Fornasiero, exceptional activity for methane combustion over modular Pd@CeO₂ subunits on functionalized Al₂O₃, Science, 2012, 337(6095), 713–717.
58. S. H. Xie, J. G. Deng, S. M. Zang, H. G. Yang, G. S. Guo, H. Arandiyan and H. X. Dai, Au-Pd/3DOM Co₃O₄: highly active and stable nanocatalysts for toluene oxidation, J. Catal., 2015, 322, 38–48.
59. Y. Feng, L. Wei, Z. W. Wang, Y. X. Liu, H. X. Dai, C. Wang, H.-C. Hsi, E. H. Duan, Y. Peng and J. G. Deng, Boosting catalytic stability for VOCs removal by constructing PtCu alloy structure with superior oxygen activation behavior, J. Hazard. Mater., 2022, 439, 129612.
60. Z. W. Wang, Y. X. Liu, T. Yang, J. G. Deng, S. H. Xie and H. X. Dai, Catalytic performance of cobalt oxide-supported gold-palladium nanocatalysts for the removal of toluene and o-xylene, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38(2), 207–216.
61. Y. S. Xia, L. Xia, Y. X. Liu, T. Yang, J. G. Deng and H. X. Dai, Concurrent catalytic removal of typical volatile organic compound mixtures over Au-Pd/α-MnO₂ nanotubes, J. Environ. Sci., 2018, 64, 276–288.
62. W. Tan, J. G. Deng, S. H. Xie, H. G. Yang, Y. Jiang, G. S. Guo and H. X. Dai, Ce_0.6Zr_0.3Y_0.1O₂ nanorod supported gold and palladium alloy nanoparticles: high-performance catalysts for toluene oxidation, Nanoscale, 2015, 7(18), 8510–8523.
63. J. Wang, L. Y. Dai, J. G. Deng, Y. X. Liu, L. Jing, W. B. Pei, Z. Q. Hou, X. Zhang, X. H. Yu and H. X. Dai, Experimental and density functional theory investigations on the oxidation of typical aromatics over the intermetallic compounds-derived AuMn/meso-Fe₂O₃ catalysts, J. Catal., 2022, 405, 273–287.
64. Z. X. Wu, J. G. Deng, S. H. Xie, H. G. Yang, X. T. Zhao, K. F. Zhang, H. X. Lin, H. X. Dai and G. S. Guo, Mesoporous Cr₂O₃-supported Au-Pd nanoparticles: high-performance catalysts for the oxidation of toluene, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2016, 224, 311–322.
65. J. J. Sun, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, L. Jing, M. M. Bao, Q. P. Sun, L. L. Li, L. K. Wu, X. Q. Hao and H. X. Dai, PdPt_y/V₂O₅-TiO₂: highly active catalysts with good moisture- and sulfur dioxide-resistant performance in toluene oxidation, Catalysts, 2022, 12, 1302.
66. Z. Q. Hou, L. Y. Dai, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, L. Jing, W. B. Pei, R. Y. Gao, Y. Feng and H. X. Dai, Highly efficient and enhanced sulfur resistance supported bimetallic single-atom palladium-cobalt catalysts for benzene oxidation, Appl. Catal., B, 2021, 285, 119844.
67. K. Y. Zhang, L. Y. Dai, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, L. Jing, K. F. Zhang, Z. Q. Hou, X. Zhang, J. Wang, Y. Feng, Y. X. Zhang and H. X. Dai, Insights into the active sites of chlorine-resistant Pt-based bimetallic catalysts for benzene oxidation, Appl. Catal., B, 2020, 279, 119372.
68. X. Zhang, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, X. H. Yu, Z. Han, K. F. Zhang and H. X. Dai, Alloying of gold with palladium: an effective strategy to improve catalytic stability and chlorine-tolerance of the 3DOM CeO₂-supported catalysts in trichloroethylene combustion, Appl. Catal., B, 2019, 257, 117879.
69. X. Zhang, L. Y. Dai, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, L. Jing, Z. W. Wang, W. B. Pei, X. H. Yu, J. Wang and H. X. Dai, Effect of support nature on catalytic activity of the bimetallic RuCo nanoparticles for the oxidative removal of 1,2-dichloroethane, Appl. Catal., B, 2021, 285, 119804.
70. Q. Fu, W. X. Li, Y. X. Yao, H. Y. Liu, H. Y. Su, D. Ma, X. K. Gu, L. M. Chen, Z. Wang, H. Zhang, B. Wang and X. H. Bao, Interface-confined ferrous centers for catalytic oxidation, Science, 2010, 328, 1141–1144.
71. L. N. Cao, W. Liu, Q. Q. Luo, R. T. Yin, B. Wang, J. Weissenrieder, M. Soldemo, H. Yan, Y. Lin, Z. H. Sun, C. Ma, W. H. Zhang, S. Chen, H. W. Wang, Q. Q. Guan, T. Yao, S. Q. Wei, J. L. Yang and J. L. Lu, Atomically dispersed iron hydroxide anchored on Pt for preferential oxidation of CO in H₂, Nature, 2019, 565, 631–635.
72. X. J. Xu, Q. Fu, M. M. Wei, X. Wu and X. H. Bao, Comparative studies of redox behaviors of Pt-Co/SiO₂ and Au-Co/SiO₂ catalysts and their activities in CO oxidation, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 3151–3158.
73. C. H. Wu, C. Liu, D. Su, H. L. Xin, H. T. Fang, B. Eren, S. Zhang, C. B. Murray and M. B. Salmeron, Bimetallic synergy in cobalt-palladium nanocatalysts for CO oxidation, Nat. Catal., 2018, 2, 78–85.
74. L. Huang, X. Y. Song, Y. Lin, C. Y. Liu, W. X. He, S. Y. Wang, Z. X. Long and Z. H. Sun, In situ observations of the structural dynamics of platinum-cobalt-hydroxide nanocatalysts under CO oxidation, Nanoscale, 2020, 12, 3273–3283.
75. T. Bian, H. Zhang, Y. Y. Jiang, C. H. Jin, J. B. Wu, H. Yang and D. R. Yang, Epitaxial growth of twinned Au-Pt core-shell star-shaped decahedra as highly durable electrocatalysts, Nano Lett., 2015, 15, 7808–7815.
76. L. Gao, X. X. Li, Z. Y. Yao, H. J. Bai, Y. F. Lu, C. Ma, S. F. Lu, Z. M. Peng, J. L. Yang, A. L. Pan and H. W. Huang, Unconventional p-d hybridization interaction in PtGa ultrathin nanowires boosts oxygen reduction electrocatalysis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 18083–18090.
77. Y. X. Wang, L. Cao, N. J. Libretto, X. Li, C. Y. Li, Y. L. Wan, C. N. He, J. S. Lee, J. Gregg, H. Zong, D. Su, J. T. Miller, T. Mueller and C. Wang, Ensemble effect in bimetallic electrocatalysts for CO₂ reduction, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 16635–16642.
78. T. Bian, B. B. Xiao, B. Sun, L. Huang, S. Su, Y. Jiang, J. K. Xiao, A. H. Yuan, H. Zhang and D. R. Yang, Local epitaxial growth of Au-Rh core-shell star-shaped decahedra: a case for studying electronic and ensemble effects in hydrogen evolution reaction, Appl. Catal., B, 2020, 263, 118255.
79. Z. Q. Lin, W. L. Chen, Y. Jiang, T. Bian, H. Zhang, J. B. Wu, Y. Wang and D. R. Yang, Facile synthesis of Ru-decorated Pt cubes and icosahedra as highly active electrocatalysts for methanol oxidation, Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 12812–12818.
80. Y. Y. Jiang, T. Bian, F. Lin, H. Zhang, C. H. Jin, Z. Y. Li, D. R. Yang and Z. Zhang, Revealing the elemental-specific growth dynamics of Pt-Cu multipods by scanning transmission electron microscopy and chemical mapping, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 21284–21289.
81. Y. J. Liang, Y. X. Liu, J. G. Deng, K. F. Zhang, Z. Q. Hou, X. T. Zhao, X. Zhang, K. Y. Zhang, R. J. Wei and H. X. Dai, Coupled palladium–tungsten bimetallic nanosheets/TiO₂ hybrids with enhanced catalytic activity and stability for the oxidative removal of benzene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2019, 53, 5926–5935.
82. Y. Feng, L. Wei, Y. X. Liu, H. X. Dai, Z. X. Zhao and J. G. Deng, Rapid supplement of active oxygen by constructing Pt-Fe alloy structure to improve catalytic stability for furniture paints industry VOCs removal, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2023, 324, 124621.

---