Issue 2, 2022
From the journal:

Dalton Transactions

Reply to the ‘Comment on “In Defence of Oxidation States”’ by J. C. Green, Dalton Transactions, 2022, 51, DOI: 10.1039/D1DT02930D

Nicholas C. Norman*a  and  Paul G. Pringle ORCID logo *a  

* Corresponding authors

a University of Bristol, School of Chemistry, Bristol, UK
E-mail: n.c.norman@bristol.ac.uk, paul.pringle@bristol.ac.uk

Abstract

We reiterate and reinforce some of the points concerning oxidation states and the Covalent Bond Classification method we made in the Perspective article entitled ‘In Defence of Oxidation States’ including a brief discussion of the relative merits of the terms ‘metathesis’ and ‘redox’ when considering addition across a metal–metal bond.

Graphical abstract: Reply to the ‘Comment on “In Defence of Oxidation States”’ by J. C. Green, Dalton Transactions, 2022, 51, DOI: 10.1039/D1DT02930D

About
Cited by
Related
Download options Please wait...

Associated articles

Article information

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/D1DT03725K
Article type
Comment
Submitted
03 Nov 2021
Accepted
06 Dec 2021
First published
21 Dec 2021
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Dalton Trans., 2022,51, 748-749

Permissions

Request permissions

Reply to the ‘Comment on “In Defence of Oxidation States”’ by J. C. Green, Dalton Transactions, 2022, 51, DOI: 10.1039/D1DT02930D

N. C. Norman and P. G. Pringle, Dalton Trans., 2022, 51, 748 DOI: 10.1039/D1DT03725K

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements