Issue 12, 1979

Carbene complexes. Part 16. Synthesis and properties of NNNN‴-tetra-aryl-substituted electron-rich olefin-derived carbeneruthenium(II) complexes containing a spontaneously formed ortho-metallated-N-arylcarbene ligand; the crystal and molecular structures of [RuCl{CN(C6H4Me-4)CH2CH2NC6H3Me-4}(PEt3)2](6) and [Ru(CO)Cl{CN(C6H4Me-4)CH2CH2NC6H3Me-4}(PEt3)2](16)

Abstract

The complex [RuCl2(PPh3)3] reacts thermally with the electron-rich olefin [[double bond, length as m-dash][graphic omitted]R′]2(R′= Ph, C6H4Me-4, C6H4OMe-4, or C6H4OMe-2), LR2′ with elimination of PPh3 and HCl, forming the five-co-ordinate carbeneruthenium(II) complex containing an ortho-metallated N-arylcarbene ligand [[graphic omitted]″}(PPh3)2], abbreviated as [[graphic omitted]R′)(PPh3)2]. One of these complexes (R′= C6H4Me-4) is also formed from [RuCl(NO)(PPh3)2] and LR2. The five-co-ordinate ruthenium(II) complexes readily undergo PR3 exchange [R3= Et3, Bun3, Bun2Ph, Et2Ph, Me2Ph, but not (C6H11)3]; with [[double bond, length as m-dash][graphic omitted]Et]2(LEt2), the unusual bis-(carbene) complex [[graphic omitted]R′)(LEt)(PPh3)](R′= C6H4Me-4) is formed. Small ligands [e.g. CO, PF3, P(OMe)3, or NCMe] generally add to form six-co-ordinate complexes of variable thermal stability. The complex [RuCl3(NO)(PPh3)2] with LR2, also affords an ortho-metallated complex [[graphic omitted]R′)(NO)(PPh3)]; this, like the other six-co-ordinate ruthenium(II) derivatives, does not undergo PR3 exchange, but with LEt2 NOCl is lost and [[graphic omitted]R′)(LEt)(PPh3)](R′= C8H4Me-4) is formed. Spectroscopic data provide information on the nature and stereochemistry of the complexes, the magnitude of 2J(13C–31P) being especially useful, with 2Jtrans[double greater-than, compressed]2Jcis. The five- and six-co-ordinate complexes are stereochemically rigid in solution. X-Ray analyses of the two title compounds have been refined to R and R′ of 0.054 and 0.093 for [[graphic omitted]R′)(PEt3)2](R′= C6H4Me-4)(6), and 0.045 and 0.053 for [[graphic omitted]R′)(PEt3)2](R′= C6H4Me-4)(16), respectively. In overall pseudo-octahedral geometry about ruthenium, complexes (6) and (16) differ only in the replacement of a weak Ru ⋯ HC contact (2.23 Å) in the former for a CO ligand in the latter. The bond lengths within the co-ordination sphere of (6) are slightly greater in (16), the smallest increase (0.011 Å) being for the Ru–P bonds and the largest (0.119 Å) for the Ru–C(6) bond [C(6) is the C of the metallated phenyl ring]. In complex (6) the two Ru–C(sp2) distances are 2.006(8)[Ru–C(6)] and 1.911(6)Å(Ru–Ccarb.).

Article information

Article type
Paper

J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1979, 1929-1942

Carbene complexes. Part 16. Synthesis and properties of NNNN‴-tetra-aryl-substituted electron-rich olefin-derived carbeneruthenium(II) complexes containing a spontaneously formed ortho-metallated-N-arylcarbene ligand; the crystal and molecular structures of [RuCl{CN(C6H4Me-4)CH2CH2NC6H3Me-4}(PEt3)2](6) and [Ru(CO)Cl{CN(C6H4Me-4)CH2CH2NC6H3Me-4}(PEt3)2](16)

P. B. Hitchcock, M. F. Lappert, P. L. Pye and S. Thomas, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1979, 1929 DOI: 10.1039/DT9790001929

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements