Issue 13, 2013

Setting up the chromatographic analysis of anthelmintics using the “Crossed D-Optimal” experimental design methodology

Abstract

An “experimental design” methodology was applied to optimize the chromatographic separation and quantitative determination of six anthelmintics levamisole (LEV), thiabendazole (THI), mebendazole (MEB), albendazole (ALB), praziquantel (PRA) and niclosamide (NICL) by HPLC. Based on the “Crossed D-Optimal” criterion, the participation of three mixed solvents in the mobile phase (methanol, water and acetonitrile) was investigated, since binary systems presented low chromatographic resolution. Furthermore, this approach provides an opportunity to use a crossover design to study the effects of other chromatographic parameters, such as pH, which is considered important for achieving optimal results. Sample analysis was carried out on an HS C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm) 5 μm at 40 °C and the detection was performed with both a UV-diode array detector and an ELSD (Evaporative Light Scattering Detector). The mobile phase consists of an aqueous ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5; 0.05 M), acetonitrile and methanol (40 : 37 : 23, v/v/v) with 1 mL min−1 flow rate. The system was found to produce sharp and well resolved peaks for all analytes with their retention times ranging from 3.5 to 13.0 min. Linear regression analysis for the calibration curves showed a good relationship with regression coefficients higher than 0.999 for the UV detector and 0.997 for the ELSD respectively. The proposed method was validated and proven to be accurate, precise, reproducible and suitable for routine analyses.

Graphical abstract: Setting up the chromatographic analysis of anthelmintics using the “Crossed D-Optimal” experimental design methodology

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
03 Apr 2013
Accepted
09 May 2013
First published
10 May 2013

Anal. Methods, 2013,5, 3334-3346

Setting up the chromatographic analysis of anthelmintics using the “Crossed D-Optimal” experimental design methodology

N. G. Margaritelis, C. K. Markopoulou and J. E. Koundourellis, Anal. Methods, 2013, 5, 3334 DOI: 10.1039/C3AY40555A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements