Passive sampling for volatile organic compounds in indoor air-controlled laboratory comparison of four sampler types

Todd McAlary; Hester Groenevelt; Stephen Disher; Jason Arnold; Suresh Seethapathy; Paolo Sacco; Derrick Crump; Brian Schumacher; Heidi Hayes; Paul Johnson; Tadeusz Górecki

doi:10.1039/C5EM90021B

Passive sampling for volatile organic compounds in indoor air-controlled laboratory comparison of four sampler types

Todd McAlary,*^ac Hester Groenevelt,^a Stephen Disher,^b Jason Arnold,^b Suresh Seethapathy,^c Paolo Sacco,^d Derrick Crump,^e Brian Schumacher,^f Heidi Hayes,^b Paul Johnson^g and Tadeusz Górecki^c

Author affiliations

* Corresponding authors

^a Geosyntec Consultants, Inc., 130 Research Lane, #2, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
E-mail: tmcalary@geosyntec.com

^b Eurofins Air Toxics, Inc. (formerly Air Toxics Ltd.), Folsom, CA, USA

^c University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

^d Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Padova, Italy

^e Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK

^f United States Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV, USA

^g Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

Abstract

Correction for ‘Passive sampling for volatile organic compounds in indoor air-controlled laboratory comparison of four sampler types’ by Todd McAlary et al., Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2015, 17, 896–905.

Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts

Passive sampling for volatile organic compounds in indoor air-controlled laboratory comparison of four sampler types

Abstract

Associated articles

Article information

Download Citation

Permissions

Passive sampling for volatile organic compounds in indoor air-controlled laboratory comparison of four sampler types

Social activity

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements