Issue 18, 2017

Improved assessment of accuracy and performance indicators in paper-based ELISA

Abstract

Paper-based devices are an excellent match for low-cost point-of-care testing (POCT) tools. Their user-friendliness, portability, and short time of analysis, coupled with ease of local manufacture make these devices the best option for inexpensive diagnostic testing tools. However, despite all their positive features, these low-cost diagnostic devices must present good performance indicators, such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. We developed and validated a paper-based ELISA for toxoplasmosis diagnosis through the detection of Toxoplasma gondii immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in 100 human serum samples. From among the different ways to define the cut-off value, we chose Youden's J index (cut-off = 21.73 A.U.), which presented a higher sensitivity value. Our paper-based assay presented a sensitivity of 0.96, a specificity of 0.87, and a gray zone comprising 16 samples (±15% of the cut-off value, with 3 false positive outputs). The accuracy of the test was estimated by using ROC curves (AUC = 0.97). We also created a macro in Microsoft Excel® to estimate the accuracy of the test (m-Accuracy) based on a non-parametric method, which evidenced a value = 0.88, which classifies our test as moderately to highly accurate. We also provide the m-Accuracy macro for download and the paper-based microplate designs for printing, in order to collaborate with the scientific community and facilitate further studies using this platform. The improvement of these diagnostic tools can bring this technology for those who need it, contributing to population health and well-being.

Graphical abstract: Improved assessment of accuracy and performance indicators in paper-based ELISA

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
24 Feb 2017
Accepted
10 Mar 2017
First published
22 Mar 2017
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY-NC license

Anal. Methods, 2017,9, 2644-2653

Improved assessment of accuracy and performance indicators in paper-based ELISA

T. Mazzu-Nascimento, G. G. Morbioli, L. A. Milan, D. F. Silva, F. C. Donofrio, C. A. Mestriner and E. Carrilho, Anal. Methods, 2017, 9, 2644 DOI: 10.1039/C7AY00505A

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications, without requesting further permission from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given and it is not used for commercial purposes.

To request permission to reproduce material from this article in a commercial publication, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party commercial publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements