Issue 9, 2017

Classification of epitaxy in reciprocal and real space: rigid versus flexible lattices

Abstract

Early investigations of epitaxy focused on inorganic adsorbates consisting of atoms or few-atom molecules, where commensurate registries are predominantly encountered. Expanding such studies to larger (organic) molecules has revealed hitherto unknown types of epitaxy with coherence between adlayer and substrate lattices in just one direction. Here we review recent contributions to the fundamental understanding and modeling of epitaxy. By sorting the ideas brought forward in the literature and amending some basic algebraic considerations a universal scheme for the classification of lattice epitaxy is presented. Ultimately, the occurrence of the different types of epitaxy is made plausible by easy-to-grasp energetic arguments.

Graphical abstract: Classification of epitaxy in reciprocal and real space: rigid versus flexible lattices

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Review Article
Submitted
30 Nov 2016
Accepted
23 Jan 2017
First published
17 Feb 2017

Soft Matter, 2017,13, 1748-1758

Classification of epitaxy in reciprocal and real space: rigid versus flexible lattices

R. Forker, M. Meissner and T. Fritz, Soft Matter, 2017, 13, 1748 DOI: 10.1039/C6SM02688E

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements