Issue 10, 2018

Triplet energy vs. electron transfers in porphyrin- and tetrabenzoporphyrin-carboxylates/Pd3(dppm)3(CO)2+ cluster assemblies; a question of negative charge

Abstract

Two tetracarboxylatetetrabenzoporphyrinzinc(II), TCPBP (9,18,27,36-tetrakis-meso-(4-carboxyphenyl)tetrabenzoporphyrinatozinc(II)) and TCPEBP (9,18,27,36-tetra-(4-carboxyphenylethynyl)tetrabenzoporphyrinatozinc(II)), and their two corresponding porphyrins, TCPP (tetrakis-meso-(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrinatozinc(II)) and TCPEP (5,10,15,20-tetra-(4-carboxyphenylethynyl)porphyrinatozinc(II)) as sodium salts in a 1 : 1 mixture of 2MeTHF/MeOH at 77 K exhibit phosphorescence in the near-IR region with maxima ranging from 785 to 1005 nm. The position of these triplet state emissions has been corroborated from DFT (B3LYP) by calculating the total energy difference between the ground, S0, and lowest energy triplet excited state T1 (the calculated position ranges from 797 to 1041 nm). At both temperatures, 77 and 298 K, these dyes make ionic driven host–guest assemblies with the unsaturated redox-active cluster Pd3(dppm)3(CO)2+ ([Pd32+], dppm = Ph2PCH2PPh2 as a PF6 salt). The formation of these assemblies is accompanied by a quenching of the phosphorescence band, without changing the emission lifetime. This phenomenon is consistent with the formation of the non-emissive assemblies dye⋯[Pd32+]x according to dye + [Pd32+] → dye⋯[Pd32+]x (x = 1–4), where only the porphyrin and tetrabenzoporphyrin dyes are phosphorescent. Quenching analysis confirmed that a static quenching mechanism operates. In one case, the quenching rate (kQ) has been evaluated from transient absorption spectroscopy (TAS) where the signal associated with the dye's triplet state exhibits a very short lifetime τ(T1), thus corroborating the efficient quenching. The quenching rate (1/τ(T1)) is much faster (3.0 × 108 s−1) than that expected for the other dye⋯[Pd32+]x assemblies in the literature (∼104 s−1) known for their triplet–triplet energy transfer. Based on the excited state driving force argumentation for oxidative quenching, this fast process is assigned to a predominant photo-induced electron transfer (3dye* + [Pd32+] → dye+˙ + [Pd3+˙]).

Graphical abstract: Triplet energy vs. electron transfers in porphyrin- and tetrabenzoporphyrin-carboxylates/Pd3(dppm)3(CO)2+ cluster assemblies; a question of negative charge

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
12 Oct 2017
Accepted
07 Dec 2017
First published
08 Dec 2017

New J. Chem., 2018,42, 8160-8168

Triplet energy vs. electron transfers in porphyrin- and tetrabenzoporphyrin-carboxylates/Pd3(dppm)3(CO)2+ cluster assemblies; a question of negative charge

P. Luo, P. Karsenti, B. Marsan and P. D. Harvey, New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 8160 DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ03943C

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements