Issue 12, 2019

Comparison of DET, DGT and conventional porewater extractions for determining nutrient profiles and cycling in stream sediments

Abstract

Determining inorganic nutrient profiles to support understanding of nitrogen transformations in stream sediments is challenging, due to nitrification and denitrification being confined to particular conditions in potentially heterogeneous sediment influenced by benthic microalgae, rooted aquatic plants and/or diel light cycles. The diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) and diffusive equilibration in thin films (DET) techniques allow in situ determination of porewater concentration profiles, and distributions for some solutes. In this study, DGT, DET and conventional porewater extraction (sectioning and centrifugation) methods were compared for ammonium and nitrate in stream sediments under light and dark conditions. Two-dimensional distributions of Fe(II) and PO4–P were also provided to indicate the degree of spatial and temporal heterogeneity in sediment porewater, which can explain the sources and sinks of ammonium at various depths in the sediments. Although the conventional porewater extraction method consistently measured higher NH4–N concentrations than the DGT and DET techniques, the study showed that the DET measurements were the most reliable indicator of porewater NH4–N concentrations, with the DGT data being usefully supplementary. However, a large proportion of the NO3–N concentrations measured by DGT and DET were close to or below the method detection limits. Therefore, further development of these techniques is required to reduce the blanks and detection limits to allow natural low sediment porewater NO3–N concentrations to be accurately monitored using DGT and DET. The study indicated that benthic microalgae had direct and indirect influences on porewater nutrient distributions over light–dark cycles. Overall, DGT and DET techniques can be useful for monitoring porewater nutrient concentrations and profiles and for determining how biological processes drive changes in sediment nutrient concentrations and distributions.

Graphical abstract: Comparison of DET, DGT and conventional porewater extractions for determining nutrient profiles and cycling in stream sediments

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
01 Jul 2019
Accepted
28 Oct 2019
First published
29 Oct 2019

Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2019,21, 2128-2140

Comparison of DET, DGT and conventional porewater extractions for determining nutrient profiles and cycling in stream sediments

J. Huang, H. Franklin, P. R. Teasdale, M. A. Burford, N. R. Kankanamge, W. W. Bennett and D. T. Welsh, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2019, 21, 2128 DOI: 10.1039/C9EM00312F

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements