Issue 29, 2020

Can COFs replace MOFs in flue gas separation? high-throughput computational screening of COFs for CO2/N2 separation

Abstract

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are under study as adsorbent and membrane candidates for gas separation applications. However, experimental testing of all synthesized COF materials as adsorbents and membranes under different operating conditions is not practical. Herein, we used a high-throughput computational screening approach to investigate adsorption- and membrane-based flue gas separation performances of 295 COFs. Adsorption selectivity, working capacity, percent regenerability and adsorbent performance score of COFs were calculated for separation of CO2/N2 mixture for three different cyclic adsorption processes, pressure swing adsorption (PSA), vacuum swing adsorption (VSA) and temperature swing adsorption (TSA). The top performing COFs were identified for each process based on the combination of several metrics. Selectivities of the top COFs were predicted to be greater than those of zeolites and activated carbons. Molecular simulations were performed considering the wet flue gas for the top COF adsorbents and results revealed that most COFs retained their high CO2 selectivities in the presence of water. Using COFs with detailed geometry optimization and high-accuracy partial charges in molecular simulations led to lower selectivities and adsorbent performance scores compared to using experimentally reported COFs with approximate charges. Membrane-based flue gas separation performances of COFs were also studied and most COFs were found to have comparable CO2 permeabilities with metal organic frameworks (MOFs), up to 3.96 × 106 barrer, however their membrane selectivities were lower than MOFs, 0.38–21, due to their large pores and the lack of metal sites in their frameworks. Structure–performance relations revealed that among the COFs we studied, the ones with pore sizes <10 Å, accessible surface areas <4500 m2 g−1 and 0.6 < porosity <0.8 are not only highly selective adsorbents but also CO2 selective membranes.

Graphical abstract: Can COFs replace MOFs in flue gas separation? high-throughput computational screening of COFs for CO2/N2 separation

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
01 May 2020
Accepted
16 Jun 2020
First published
14 Jul 2020
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020,8, 14609-14623

Can COFs replace MOFs in flue gas separation? high-throughput computational screening of COFs for CO2/N2 separation

O. F. Altundal, C. Altintas and S. Keskin, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 8, 14609 DOI: 10.1039/D0TA04574H

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements