Issue 16, 2021

Steering the methanol steam reforming reactivity of intermetallic Cu–In compounds by redox activation: stability vs. formation of an intermetallic compound–oxide interface

Abstract

To compare the inherent methanol steam reforming properties of intermetallic compounds and a corresponding intermetallic compound–oxide interface, we selected the Cu–In system as a model to correlate the stability limits, self-activation and redox activation properties with the catalytic performance. Three distinct intermetallic Cu–In compounds – Cu7In3, Cu2In and Cu11In9 – were studied both in an untreated and redox-activated state resulting from alternating oxidation–reduction cycles. The stability of all studied intermetallic compounds during methanol steam reforming (MSR) operation is essentially independent of the initial stoichiometry and all accordingly resist substantial structural changes. The inherent activity under batch MSR conditions is highest for Cu2In, corroborating the results of a Cu2In/In2O3 sample accessed through reactive metal–support interaction. Under flow MSR operation, Cu7In3 displays considerable deactivation, while Cu2In and Cu11In9 feature stable performance at simultaneously high CO2 selectivity. The missing significant self-activation is most evident in the operando thermogravimetric experiments, where no oxidation is detected for any of the intermetallic compounds. In situ X-ray diffraction allowed us to monitor the partial decomposition and redox activation of the Cu–In intermetallic compounds into Cu0.9In0.1/In2O3 (from Cu7In3), Cu7In3/In2O3 (from Cu2In) and Cu7In3/Cu0.9In0.1/In2O3 (from Cu11In9) interfaces with superior MSR performance compared to the untreated samples. Although the catalytic profiles appear surprisingly similar, the latter interface with the highest indium content exhibits the least deactivation, which we explain by formation of stabilizing In2O3 patches under MSR conditions.

Graphical abstract: Steering the methanol steam reforming reactivity of intermetallic Cu–In compounds by redox activation: stability vs. formation of an intermetallic compound–oxide interface

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
22 May 2021
Accepted
19 Jul 2021
First published
23 Jul 2021
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Catal. Sci. Technol., 2021,11, 5518-5533

Steering the methanol steam reforming reactivity of intermetallic Cu–In compounds by redox activation: stability vs. formation of an intermetallic compound–oxide interface

K. Ploner, A. Doran, M. Kunz, A. Gili, A. Gurlo, N. Köwitsch, M. Armbrüster, J. Bernardi, M. Watschinger and S. Penner, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2021, 11, 5518 DOI: 10.1039/D1CY00913C

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements