Issue 7, 2022

A comparative life cycle analysis of electromicrobial production systems

Abstract

Electromicrobial production (EMP) processes, in which electricity or electrochemically-derived mediator molecules serve as energy sources to drive biochemical processes, represent an attractive strategy for the conversion of CO2 into carbon-based products. However, these systems have yet to be employed on an industrial scale, limiting our understanding of their potential performance and environmental benefits/impacts. We describe the development and application of a comprehensive framework to analyze EMP systems relying on reactor, process, and life cycle impact models. This framework is used to analyze three proposed EMP systems relying on formate, H2, and acetate as intermediate molecules, each producing three hypothetical products: biomass, lactic acid, and industrial enzymes. Physics-based bioreactor models predict that EMP systems can achieve productivities up to 0.65 g L−1 h−1 for biomass production and 0.42 g L−1 h−1 for the production of lactic acid. Despite improved solubility of formate as a substrate, formate-fed EMP systems do not lead to improved productivities compared to H2-fed systems due to O2 gas–liquid mass transfer limitations (for biomass and enzymes) or salinity-induced toxicity issues (for lactic acid). Process models revealed that substrate generation was by far the largest energy demand of the EMP systems, followed by carbon capture and ammonia production, while energy required for gas–liquid mass transfer and fluid mixing accounted for only a small fraction of the systems’ energy footprints. Life cycle impact model results demonstrated that EMP systems can achieve a smaller carbon footprint than traditional bioprocessing strategies provided the electric grid supplying electricity to the EMP system is composed of at least 90% renewable energy sources. For each of the three products we consider, the H2-mediated Knallgas bacteria system achieves the lowest overall global warming potential, indicating that this EMP strategy may be best-suited for industrial efforts based on current technology. EMP systems also would use ∼95% less land compared to traditional bioprocesses. We also identify environmental hotspots and process limitations that are key targets for future engineering and research efforts for each EMP system. Our analysis demonstrates the utility of an integrated assessment framework and should help guide the design of working, scalable, and sustainable electromicrobial production systems.

Graphical abstract: A comparative life cycle analysis of electromicrobial production systems

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
18 Feb 2022
Accepted
25 May 2022
First published
31 May 2022

Energy Environ. Sci., 2022,15, 3062-3085

Author version available

A comparative life cycle analysis of electromicrobial production systems

A. J. Abel, J. D. Adams and D. S. Clark, Energy Environ. Sci., 2022, 15, 3062 DOI: 10.1039/D2EE00569G

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements