Issue 1, 2023

The reactivity of antimony and bismuth N,C,N-pincer compounds toward K[BEt3H] – the formation of heterocyclic compounds vs. element–element bonds vs. stable terminal Sb–H bonds

Abstract

The oxidative addition of CF3SO3CH2Si(CH3)3 (NpSiOTf) toward organopnictogen(I) N,C,N-pincer compounds, i.e. [2,6-(DippN[double bond, length as m-dash]CH)2C6H3]E (1-E, where E = Sb, Bi; Dipp = 2,6-iPr2C6H3) produced compounds [2,6-(DippN[double bond, length as m-dash]CH)2C6H3]E(NpSi)(OTf) (2-E, where E = Sb, Bi). By analogy, the in situ reduction of [2,6-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3]ECl2 (3-E, where E = Sb, Bi) followed by treatment with NpSiOTf or MeI gave compounds [2,6-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3]E(R)(X) (R/X = NpSi/OTf 4-E, where E = Sb, Bi; R/X = Me/I 5-Sb). The reactivity of these compounds toward 1 eq. of K[BEt3H] was examined showing remarkable differences depending both on the ligand backbone and the pnictogen used. Thus in the case of 2-E, the addition of the hydride across the imino-function was achieved thereby yielding azapnicta-heterocyclic compounds [2-(DippNCH2)-6-(DippN[double bond, length as m-dash]CH)C6H3]E(NpSi) (6-E, where E = Sb, Bi). The same reaction of 4-Bi produced dibismuthine {[2,6-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3]Bi(NpSi)}2 (7-Bi), but in the case of 4/5-Sb the analogous distibines {[2,6-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3]Sb(R)}2 (R = NpSi7-Sb, Me 8-Sb) were not formed directly and hydrides [2,6-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3]Sb(R)H (R = NpSi9-Sb, Me 10-Sb) could be isolated instead. Nevertheless, heating of both 9-Sb and 10-Sb led to an activation of a labile Sb–H bond and the formation of distibines 7/8-Sb.

Graphical abstract: The reactivity of antimony and bismuth N,C,N-pincer compounds toward K[BEt3H] – the formation of heterocyclic compounds vs. element–element bonds vs. stable terminal Sb–H bonds

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
04 Nov 2022
Accepted
29 Nov 2022
First published
30 Nov 2022

Dalton Trans., 2023,52, 218-227

The reactivity of antimony and bismuth N,C,N-pincer compounds toward K[BEt3H] – the formation of heterocyclic compounds vs. element–element bonds vs. stable terminal Sb–H bonds

P. Novák, M. Erben, R. Jambor, M. Hejda, A. Růžička, E. Rychagova, S. Ketkov and L. Dostál, Dalton Trans., 2023, 52, 218 DOI: 10.1039/D2DT03564B

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements