High-valent nonheme Fe(iv)O/Ru(iv)O complexes catalyze C–H activation reactivity and hydrogen tunneling: a comparative DFT investigation

Abstract

A comprehensive density functional theory investigation has been presented towards the comparison of the C–H activation reactivity between high-valent iron-oxo and ruthenium-oxo complexes. A total of four compounds, e.g., [Ru(IV)O(tpy-dcbpy)] (1), [Fe(IV)O(tpy-dcbpy)] (1′), [Ru(IV)O(TMCS)] (2), and [Fe(IV)O(TMCS)] (2′), have been considered for this investigation. The macrocyclic ligand framework tpy(dcbpy) implies tpy = 2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine, dcbpy = 5,5′-dicarboxy-2,2′-bipyridine, and TMCS is TMC with an axially tethered –SCH₂CH₂ group. Compounds 1 and 2′ are experimentally synthesized standard complexes with Ru and Fe, whereas compounds 1′ and 2 were considered to keep the macrocycle intact when switching the central metal atom. Three reactants including benzyl alcohol, ethyl benzene, and dihydroanthracene were selected as substrates for C–H activation. It is noteworthy to mention that Fe(IV)O complexes exhibit higher reactivity than those of their Ru(IV)O counterparts. Furthermore, regardless of the central metal, the complex featuring a tpy-dcbpy macrocycle demonstrates higher reactivity than that of TMCS. Here, a thorough analysis of the reactivity-controlling characteristics—such as spin state, steric factor, distortion energy, energy of the electron acceptor orbital, and quantum mechanical tunneling—was conducted. Fe(IV)O exhibits the exchanged enhanced two-state-reactivity with the quintet reactive state, whereas Ru(IV)O has only a triplet reactive state. Both the distortion energy and acceptor orbital energy are low in the case of Fe(IV)O supporting its higher reactivity. All the investigated C–H activation processes involve a significant contribution from hydrogen tunneling, which is more pronounced in the case of Ru, although it cannot alter the reactivity pattern. Furthermore, it has also been found that, independent of the central metal, aliphatic hydroxylation is always preferable to aromatic hydroxylation. Overall, this work is successful in establishing and investigating the cause of enzymes’ natural preference for Fe over Ru as a cofactor for C–H activation enzymes.