Issue 13, 2024

Better nanoscience through open, collaborative, and critical discussions

Abstract

We aim to foster a discussion of science correction and of how individual researchers can improve the quality and control of scientific production. This is crucial because although the maintenance of rigorous standards and the scrupulous control of research findings and methods are sometimes taken for granted, in practice, we are routinely confronted with articles that contain errors.

Graphical abstract: Better nanoscience through open, collaborative, and critical discussions

Article information

Article type
Opinion
Submitted
25 Oct 2023
Accepted
19 Feb 2024
First published
05 Apr 2024
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Mater. Horiz., 2024,11, 3005-3010

Better nanoscience through open, collaborative, and critical discussions

N. C. V. Rost, M. Said, M. Gharib, R. Lévy and F. Boem, Mater. Horiz., 2024, 11, 3005 DOI: 10.1039/D3MH01781H

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements