Intercluster charge ordering in monoclinic and triclinic Ba–Mo-based hollandite phases†
Abstract
Reproducible solid-state synthesis methods are presented for the preparation of tetragonal Ba1.1Mo8O16, monoclinic Na0.325(5)Ba1.006(18)Mo8O16, and triclinic Ba1.12(3)Mo8O16 hollandite phases, with complete, high-resolution crystal structures of the monoclinic and triclinic phases reported for the first time. The similar synthetic conditions allow direct comparisons between phases; differences between structures are shown to be correlated to subtle changes in the metal–metal bonding of the Mo4 cluster motif that is unique to the Mo-based hollandites. The trends in the local Mo valence, stoichiometry, and key Mo–Mo bond lengths of these and other reported Mo-based hollandite phases together support an interchain charge ordering model for this family of compounds, which has been previously suggested for the case of K2Mo8O16. An alternate model, where Mott physics dominate the electronic structure near the Fermi level, is not supported by temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility measurements, which are reported down to 2 K. The incorporation and homogeneity of Na in the monoclinic phase is verified using atom probe tomography.