Krishnendu
Saha‡
,
Daniel F.
Moyano‡
and
Vincent M.
Rotello
*
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 710 North Pleasant St, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA 01003. E-mail: rotello@chem.umass.edu; Fax: +413-545-4490; Tel: +413-545-2058
First published on 27th September 2013
The role of nanoparticle surface hydrophobicity on hemolytic properties is established in the absence and presence of plasma proteins. Significantly, the formation of a plasma protein corona on the NP surface protects red blood cells from both hydrophilic and hydrophobic NP-mediated hemolysis.
Surface functionality of NPs is central to their effective use in therapeutic applications, imparting functional properties6 and dictating their circulation profile in the blood stream.7 However, in contrast to small molecule therapeutics the formation of a protein corona on the NP surface during blood circulation8 alters the surface chemical behavior of NPs and defines the physiological responses.9 This interplay between the NP surface functionality and the protein corona formed in situ would be expected to dictate the overall interaction of NPs with RBCs, regulating the hemolytic behavior of NPs. To date, however, there is no clear understanding of how changes on the NP surfaces coupled with the formation of a protein corona control the hemolytic properties of NPs.10
Herein, we report on the role of NP surface functionality on hemolytic activity in the presence and absence of plasma proteins. To this end, we have synthesized a class of cationic gold NPs of the same core size (∼2 nm), differing in their surface hydrophobicity (Fig. 1). These NPs showed a direct increase in hemolytic activity with an increase of the surface hydrophobicity in the absence of plasma proteins. Significantly, the presence of a protein corona dramatically altered the hemolytic activity of these NPs; hemolysis was only observed for the most hydrophobic surface coverage. These studies demonstrate the importance of plasma proteins in moderating hemolytic activity, expanding the range of particle surfaces that can be employed without hemolytic consequences.
Fig. 1 The structure of the NPs used in the current study; logP denotes the n-octanol/water partition coefficients of the R groups. |
The NP surface hydrophobicity has a critical role in the cellular uptake,11 toxicity,12 and immune responses13 of nanomaterials. To understand the role of NP surface hydrophobicity in blood compatibility, a family of nine cationic NPs was synthesized systematically changing the degree of surface hydrophobicity by the use of specific chemical groups (Fig. 1).14 This chemical approach allows us to control the nature of the monolayer (nanoparticle surface), while keeping the other physico-chemical properties (e.g. size and surface charge) constant. Using this system, the NP properties can be translated into numerical descriptors, as demonstrated previously by interfacial tension experiments.15 As such, the logP values of the headgroups (R groups, Fig. 1) were employed to describe the relative hydrophobic nature of the NP surfaces.
In previous studies, we have demonstrated that cationic NPs showed significantly higher hemolysis compared to anionic counterparts.16 To this end, NPs with different surface charges, e.g. cationic, anionic, neutral, and zwitterionic (500 nM each) were incubated with RBCs for 30 min and the absorbance of released hemoglobin from the hemolyzed RBCs was measured at 570 nm.17 We observed a significantly higher hemolytic activity for cationic NPs compared to NPs with other surface charges (anionic, neutral, and zwitterionic) (see ESI†), corroborating previous reports.18
The role of NP surface hydrophobicity on hemolytic behavior was established by incubating NP1–NP9 (500 nM each) with RBCs as mentioned above. A direct increase in hemolytic activity was observed for NP1–NP9 with an increase of the hydrophobicity (Fig. 2), demonstrating the role of the NP surface hydrophobicity on the hemolysis. Significantly, NPs with similar headgroup logP values but different chemical functionalities, e.g.NP2 and NP3, demonstrated different degrees of hemolysis (∼4.5% and 13.5%, respectively), providing evidence for the role of specific functional groups in the observed hemolytic behavior.
The dose-dependent hemolytic behavior of these NPs was investigated by exposing RBCs to a range of concentrations of NPs from 8 nM to 500 nM. As shown in Fig. 3, a dose-dependent increase of hemolysis was observed for all NPs. NP1–NP3 did not show significant hemolysis at the highest concentration tested (500 nM), demonstrating biocompatibility of these particles with RBCs. Significantly, a sigmoidal dose–response curve was observed for more hydrophobic NPs (see ESI†), demonstrating the co-operative nature of the hemolytic process for these NPs.19 This result demonstrated that the subtle changes on NP surfaces can modulate the interaction profile with RBCs, leading to different hemolytic profiles.
The binding of plasma proteins on a NP can mask the chemical nature of the NP surface, altering its activity in vivo.20 The hemolytic activities of NP1–NP9 were further studied in the presence of 55% plasma protein, a condition NPs will meet when administered in the blood stream. NPs were pre-incubated with 55% plasma in PBS for 30 min and then added to the RBCs. The pre-incubation time was chosen to ensure protein absorption, although protein coronas form within minutes after NP exposure.21 Following incubation with RBCs, the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 570 nm to monitor the extent of hemolysis (vide supra). In presence of plasma, little to no hemolysis was observed for NP1–NP6 (Fig. 4). Significantly, NP6, which showed ∼70% hemolysis in the absence of plasma protein, demonstrated no hemolytic activity in the presence of plasma even after 24 h, a striking example of the effect of protein corona formation on the NP surface. Likewise, NP7–NP9 demonstrated a significant decrease in hemolytic activity (more than 20-fold) in the presence of plasma within 30 minutes. However, NP7–NP9 still showed ∼5% hemolysis within 30 min, demonstrating the hemolytic potential of these NPs even in the presence of plasma proteins. This behavior was more pronounced after 24 h where NP7 and NP9 showed severe hemolysis (Fig. 4). Significantly, NP7 and NP8 showed different hemolytic activities after 24 h in the presence of plasma proteins, despite their similar headgroup hydrophobicity, suggesting that surface topology plays a role in hemolysis propensity. Nonetheless, this study signifies the interplay of the chemical functionalities on the NP surface and the protein corona formed in situ, making NPs ‘silent’ towards hemolytic consequences. However, NPs with a high degree of surface hydrophobicity (headgroup logP > 4) demonstrated severe hemolysis, providing a limit to the NP surface hydrophobicities tested in this study.
Footnotes |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: NP synthesis, hydrodynamic sizes, zeta potentials, and pictures of NP hemolysis. See DOI: 10.1039/c3mh00075c |
‡ These authors contributed equally to the work. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 |