DOI:
10.1039/C4RA01439A
(Paper)
RSC Adv., 2014,
4, 19980-19986
Novel visible-light driven g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composite photocatalyst for efficient degradation of dyes and reduction of Cr(VI) in water
Received
19th February 2014
, Accepted 22nd April 2014
First published on 22nd April 2014
Abstract
A facile and template free in situ precipitation method was developed for the synthesis of a g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S photocatalyst. The obtained products were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and ultraviolet-visible diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS). The DRS results showed that with the increase of the g-C3N4 content, the light absorption edge for g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S was blue shifted in the visible light region. The TEM images showed that the Zn0.25Cd0.75S particles had been finely distributed on the surfaces of the g-C3N4 sheets. The HRTEM images showing clear lattice fringes proved the formation of a heterojunction structure at the interfaces of g-C3N4 and Zn0.25Cd0.75S. In the photocatalytic degradation of dyes, the g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composite exhibited significantly enhanced activities, and the optimal g-C3N4 content was 20 wt%. A controlled experiment showed that the high charge separation efficiency of the photo-generated electron–hole pairs and the suitable energy band structures result in the high performance of g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S under visible light irradiation. The g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S sample also possessed a superior activity in the photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) in neutral solution. The photoelectrochemical measurements confirmed that the interface charge separation efficiency was greatly improved by coupling g-C3N4 with Zn0.25Cd0.75S. A terephthalic acid photoluminescence probing technique has been performed to detect the generation of ˙OH in the reaction system.
Introduction
Nowadays, toxic organic pollutants composed of synthetic textile dyes and other industrial dyestuffs have become one of the main sources of water pollution. All those pollutants discharged from factories are harmful to the environment and human health. More severely, they are difficult to remove by traditional treatment methods because of the high stability.1–3 Most of the azo dyes and fluorine dyes, such as aromatic amines, are suspected to have carcinogenic effects, so the international environmental standards are becoming more and more stringent, correspondingly the treatment of organic pollutants discharged into the environment has also been developed recently.4,5 As we all know, the photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) technology was an effective method for the environment remediation.6–10 Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been widely studied as a photocatalyst for pollutant degradation and solar energy conversion.11–14 However, its large band gap (3.2 eV for anatase) and low quantum yield determine that it is only active under ultraviolet light irradiation.15 Therefore, great efforts have been devoted to suppressing the recombination rate of photo-generated carriers and exploring visible-light driven photocatalyst.16,17
Recently, great efforts have been done in our group to explore visible-light responsive photocatalysts. For example, Li et al., has reported the synthesis and visible light photocatalytic activity of ZnxCd1−xS solid solutions.18 Through changing the molar ratio of Zn/Cd in the preparation process, ZnxCd1−xS nanocrystals with different band-gaps have been obtained. The molar ratio of Zn/Cd in ZnxCd1−xS has great influences on its activity under visible light illumination. And it was found that the sample with molar ratio of Zn/Cd = 1:3 (Zn0.25Cd0.75S) displayed the best activity. In order to further improve the activity of Zn0.25Cd0.75S, it has been used to combine with TiO2 to synthesize Zn0.25Cd0.75S/TiO2 composite photocatalyst for improving the carrier separation efficiency, but the results were not satisfactory.19
In this paper, we have used graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) to combine with Zn0.25Cd0.75S to prepare efficient visible-light responsive g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composite photocatalyst. Similar with graphene,20–22 g-C3N4 has received considerable attention due to its wide applications. The photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4 was first reported by Wang et al., but its activity was really low under visible light irradiation.23 In this work, we have demonstrated a facile in situ precipitation method to synthesize g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composite with high photocatalytic activity toward methyl orange (MO) and rhodamine B (RhB) under visible light irradiation. It was found that the g-C3N4 content had great influences on the photocatalytic activity, and the optimum g-C3N4 mass ratio was 20%. Moreover, g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S photocatalyst also possessed a superior activity in the photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) in neutral solution without addition of any sacrifice reagents.
Experimental section
Synthesis of g-C3N4
All the reagents are analytical-grade and purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. The g-C3N4 powders were synthesized by heating melamine in a muffle furnace according to the literatures with small modification.24,25 Briefly, 5 g of melamine was put into a semi-closed alumina crucible with a cover. The crucible was then placed in a muffle furnace and heated to 500 °C at a heating rate of 5 °C min−1, which has been held for 3 h at this temperature. When the temperature of alumina crucible was cooled down after reaction, the obtained g-C3N4 products would be ground into powders for use.
Synthesis of g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S
The facile in situ synthesis routes are as follows: first, an appropriate amount of analytical grade Zn(Ac)2·2H2O and Cd(Ac)2·2H2O (Zn/Cd = 1:3) were dissolved in deionized water to form a solution. Then a certain amount of g-C3N4 powders were added into this solution, which was then poured into Teflon-lined container (100 mL) and ultrasonicated for 30 min to completely disperse the g-C3N4. After that, a certain amount of 0.5 M Na2S solution was slowly added into the suspension with continuous stirring. After being stirred for 12 h at room temperature, the Teflon-lined container was then sealed in a stainless steel autoclave and maintained at 160 °C for 16 h. After reaction, the autoclave was naturally cooled to ambient temperature, and the obtained solid products were centrifuged, washed and dried in air at 80 °C overnight. According to this method, g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composite photocatalysts with different mass ratios of 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 wt% have been synthesized and named as CNZS-5, CNZS-10, CNZS-20, CNZS-30, CNZS-40, CNZS-50, and CNZS-60, respectively. PM-g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S is the abbreviation for the g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composite prepared by the physical mixing method with a same composition as CNZS-20 (20 wt% g-C3N4 and 80 wt% Zn0.25Cd0.75S physical mixed without any treatment). Pure CdS, g-C3N4/ZnS (20 wt%), and g-C3N4/CdS (20 wt%) composites have also be fabricated as references.
Characterization of photocatalysts
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the obtained products were recorded on a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer under the conditions of generator voltage = 40 kV; generator current = 40 mA; divergence slit = 1.0 mm; Cu Kα (λ = 1.5406 Å); and polyethylene holder. The TEM and HRTEM images were obtained on a JEOL model JEM 2010 EX transmission electron microscope. Diffuse reflectance ultraviolet-visible light (UV-vis) spectra (DRS) were measured at room temperature in the range of 200–700 nm on a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Cary 500 Scan Spectrophotometers, Varian, and U.S.A) equipped with an integrating sphere attachment. CHI-660D electrochemical workstation (CH Instruments, USA) has been used to perform the photoelectrochemical experiment. A three-electrode cell equipped with a quartz window has been used for the photoelectrochemical current response measurements. The sample deposited FTO glass has been used as the working electrode. The counter and reference electrodes were platinum wire and Ag/AgCl electrode, respectively. The electrolyte used in the experiment was 0.02 M Na3PO4 solution.
Photocatalytic tests
The visible light activity of g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composites were evaluated by the photocatalytic degradation of dyes (MO and RhB) in aqueous solution. A 500 W halogen lamp (Philips Electronics) has been used as the visible light source, which was placed in a cylindrical glass vessel equipped with water cooling system. The temperature of the reaction system has been maintained at 25 °C. Two cut-off filters have been used to completely remove any radiation below 420 nm, ensuring only visible light (420 nm < λ < 800 nm) could penetrate and irradiate the reaction system. 80 mL of MO aqueous solution (10 ppm) was first added into a 100 mL Pyrex glass vessel, and then 0.08 g of the obtained sample was introduced to form a suspension. Before visible-light irradiation, the suspension was stirred for 60 min for the dye and catalyst to reach adsorption–desorption equilibrium. During the reaction process under visible light irradiation, 3 mL aliquots were sampled at given time intervals. The acquired suspension was centrifuged to remove the catalyst, and the resulting clear liquor was analyzed using a Perkin-Elmer UV-vis spectrophotometer to monitor the dye concentrations. The percentage for dye degradation has been reported as C/C0. C is the absorption intensity for the main spectrum peak of dye at each irradiated time interval. And C0 is the absorption intensity of the starting concentration when adsorption–desorption equilibrium was achieved. For comparison, N-doped TiO2, In2S3, and CdS were utilized as references of visible-light driven photocatalysts. N-doped TiO2 was synthesized by heating commercial P25 under NH3 atmosphere at 600 °C for 3 h.26 CdS and In2S3 also have been respectively prepared according to previous literatures.27,28 The experiment conditions for the photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) over g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S was nearly the same as that used in decomposing dyes except for the amount of catalyst added (40 mg L−1) and the concentration of K2Cr2O7 (50 mg L−1).
Results and discussion
Structural characterization
Fig. 1 showed the XRD patterns of the as-prepared g-C3N4, Zn0.25Cd0.75S, and g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composites with different mass ratios. As we can see, The pure g-C3N4 sample has two distinct peaks located at 27.4° and 13.1° respectively, which are indexed to the (0 0 2) and (1 0 0) diffraction planes of g-C3N4 (JCPDS 87-1526). As for pure Zn0.25Cd0.75S, the sharp and narrow diffraction peaks demonstrate the good crystallization. However, for the g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composites with different mass ratios, only broadened diffraction peaks for Zn0.25Cd0.75S have been observed. The overlapping of the tow closely peaks for Zn0.25Cd0.75S (26.7°) and g-C3N4 (27.4°) had made it difficult to distinguish the peak for g-C3N4. Ge et al. has reported a very similar phenomenon in fabricating g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite.29
|
| Fig. 1 XRD patterns of pure g-C3N4, Zn0.25Cd0.75S, and g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composite, (a) pure Zn0.25Cd0.75S, (b) CNZS-40, (c) CNZS-30, (d) CNZS-20, (e) CNZS-10, (f) CNZS-5, and (g) pure g-C3N4. | |
The morphologies of g-C3N4, Zn0.25Cd0.75S, and g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composites are demonstrated in Fig. 2. Fig. 2a revealed that the as-prepared g-C3N4 appears to be aggregated large sheets. Fig. 2b showed that the as-prepared Zn0.25Cd0.75S exhibited irregular particle morphology with a uniform diameter of 15 nm. Fig. 2c illustrated that the Zn0.25Cd0.75S particles had been finely distributed on the surfaces of g-C3N4 sheets. Fig. 2d showed the HRTEM image of CNZS-20 sample. Two different kinds of lattice fringes were clearly exhibited, one of d = 0.323 nm matched (0 0 2) crystallographic plane of g-C3N4 (JCPDS 87-1526), the other of d = 0.351 nm matched the crystallographic plane of Zn0.25Cd0.75S, which was just between d = 0.362 nm for (1 0 0) planes (CdS in PDF no. 41-1049) and d = 0.311 nm for (1 1 1) planes (ZnS in PDF no. 65-0309). This finding suggested that the heterojunction structure was indeed formed in the g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composites. The heterojunction interfaces would presumably provide good potential for carrier transport.
|
| Fig. 2 TEM micrographs of the samples, (a) pure g-C3N4, (b) pure Zn0.25Cd0.75S, (c) CNZS-20, and (d) HRTEM image of CNZS-20. | |
Optical characterization
The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of g-C3N4, Zn0.25Cd0.75S, and g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composites were shown in Fig. 3. As we can see, the light absorption of the samples is different. The absorption edge of g-C3N4 was estimated at 450 nm, while that for Zn0.25Cd0.75S was located at 510 nm. As for the g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composites, their visible light absorption red-shifted which might result in generation of more electron–hole pairs and therefore enhancement of photocatalytic activity.
|
| Fig. 3 UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of the as-prepared samples: (a) pure Zn0.25Cd0.75S, (b) CNZS-5, (c) CNZS-10, (d) CNZS-20, (e) CNZS-30, (f) CNZS-40, (g) CNZS-50, (h) CNZS-60, and (i) pure g-C3N4. | |
Photocatalytic activity tests
The activities of g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composites were mainly evaluated by the visible light photocatalytic degradation for dyes and reduction of Cr(VI). The temporal concentration changes of dye, such as MO, were monitored by examining the variations in maximal absorption in UV-vis spectra at 464 nm. To investigate the influences of g-C3N4 content on the photocatalytic activity, g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composites with different g-C3N4 contents were used to decompose MO under the same conditions, and the results were shown in Fig. 4.As we can see, pure Zn0.25Cd0.75S showed a poor activity, that the degradation ratio of MO was only 33% after 75 min of visible light irradiation, while pure g-C3N4 could hardly decompose MO. However, when a small amount of g-C3N4 was combined with Zn0.25Cd0.75S, the activity would be remarkably enhanced. We estimate the optimum g-C3N4 mass ratio was 20%. When the g-C3N4 mass ratio gradually increased from 5 to 20%, the photocatalytic degradation ratio of MO was correspondingly improved from 66 to 99% within 45 min of reaction. However, when the g-C3N4 content was further increased, the photocatalytic activities of g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composites decreased gradually. For example, when the g-C3N4 content increased to 60%, the MO degradation ratio decreased to 82%. It was noteworthy that the activity of CNZS-20 was indeed higher than that for g-C3N4/CdS (20 wt%).
|
| Fig. 4 Degradation rates of MO under visible light irradiation using (a) pure Zn0.25Cd0.75S, (b) CNZS-5, (c) CNZS-10, (d) CNZS-20, (e) CNZS-30, (f) CNZS-40, (g) CNZS-50, (h) CNZS-60, (i) pure g-C3N4, (j) g-C3N4/CdS(20 wt%), and (k) g-C3N4/ZnS(20 wt%). | |
To evaluate the photocatalytic activities of g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S composites, other photocatalyst such as TiO2−xNx, CdS, and In2S3 was respectively used as comparison to decompose MO under visible light irradiation. Fig. 5 showed that when the suspension containing CNZS-20 catalyst was stirred in the dark for 45 min, no obvious concentration change of MO has been observed. However, under visible light irradiation, the photocatalytic activity of CNZS-20 was greatly higher than that of CdS, In2S3, and TiO2−xNx. After 45 min of reaction, the decomposition ratio of MO over CNZS-20 was up to 99%, while CdS, In2S3, and TiO2−xNx only decomposed 29, 40, and 12% of MO dye respectively.
|
| Fig. 5 Comparisons of photodegradation of MO on CNZS-20, TiO2−xNx, CdS, and In2S3 under identical conditions. | |
Furthermore, CNZS-20 has also exhibited excellent photocatalytic activity in decomposing RhB (2 × 10−5 M) under visible light irradiation. The temporal concentration changes of RhB were monitored by examining the variations in maximal absorption at 554 nm, and the degradation results were shown in Fig. 6. As we can see, RhB could be quickly decomposed under visible light illumination over CNZS-20, and about 99% could be degraded within 45 min. As a comparison, the degradation of RhB over PM-g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S was also investigated under the same conditions, and the degradation results were also shown in Fig. 6. It can be clearly seen that the activity of PM-g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S is getting worse compared with pure Zn0.25Cd0.75S. That is to say, even if g-C3N4 and Zn0.25Cd0.75S was physically mixed together in the ratio of 2:8, the activity was not enhanced because there no heterojunction interface was formed with simply physical mixing.
|
| Fig. 6 Degradation rates of RhB under visible light irradiation using (a) pure g-C3N4, (b) PM-g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S, (c) pure Zn0.25Cd0.75S, and (d) CNZS-20. | |
Fig. 7 showed the temporal evolution of the spectral changes of RhB mediated by CNZS-20 and Zn0.25Cd0.75S, respectively. It exhibited that the degradation processes of RhB over CNZS-20 and Zn0.25Cd0.75S were different. In the presence of Zn0.25Cd0.75S, the absorption peak of RhB located at 554 nm gradually blue shifted and decreased in the whole degradation process. However, when CNZS-20 was mediated, the absorption peak of RhB quickly shifted from 554 to 499 nm within 30 min of reaction. This hypsochromic shift of absorption maximum was caused by the N-deethylation of RhB during irradiation, which has been confirmed by Watanabe and co-workers.30,31
|
| Fig. 7 The absorption spectra of RhB in the presence of (a) pure Zn0.25Cd0.75S and (b) CNZS-20 under exposure to visible light (420 nm < λ < 800 nm). | |
The photocatalyst's lifetime is very important for its practical application. The repeated degradation experiments toward MO over CNZS-20 photocatalyst have been performed. In the cycle experiments, the photocatalyst was centrifuged and dried after each run, which was then weighed again to add the lost portion and used for the next run. The results were shown in Fig. 8. It showed that there was no obvious loss of photocatalytic properties after the 4th run. The XRD patterns of the fresh and used CNZS-20 samples were also shown in Fig. 9. It illustrated that the crystal structure of the CNZS-20 did not change after the photocatalytic reaction. Therefore, the CNZS-20 photocatalyst was stable enough and photo-corrosion hardly occurred in the reaction.
|
| Fig. 8 Cycling run in the photocatalytic degradation of MO over CNZS-20 sample. | |
|
| Fig. 9 Comparison of XRD patterns between the fresh and used CNZS-20 sample. | |
In addition, CNZS-20 photocatalyst also exhibited efficient activity for photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) in neutral solution without any addition of sacrifice reagents. As shown in Fig. 10, the maximum absorption band of the Cr(VI) solution located at 371 nm decreased gradually with the increase of irradiation time. After 25 min of reaction the absorption peak completely disappeared, and the reduction ratio of Cr(VI) was up to 99%. That is to say, because of the formation of heterojunction structure and high separation efficiency of carriers, large amount of electrons would be provided to deoxidize Cr(VI), while the holes might oxidize water to produce H+ and O2 when no extra hole scavengers were added in the system.
|
| Fig. 10 Photocatalytic reduction of aqueous Cr(VI) over CNZS-20 under visible light irradiation. (Inset) UV-visible spectral changes of Cr(VI) in aqueous CNZS-20 dispersions as a function of irradiation time. | |
Because g-C3N4 was an effective electron transporter, it would facilitate the charge migration and reduce the recombination of electron–hole pairs for the g-C3N4 based photocatalysts. When heterojunction interface was formed between g-C3N4 and Zn0.25Cd0.75S, the photo-generated electrons should be quickly transfer from g-C3N4 to Zn0.25Cd0.75S, and consequently enhance the overall activity. To better understand this standpoint, photoelectrochemical technique was used to characterize g-C3N4, Zn0.25Cd0.75S, and CNZS-20 sample.
Enhancement of interface charge separation efficiency
Fig. 11 showed the photocurrent transient response for the electrodes of bare g-C3N4, Zn0.25Cd0.75S, and CNZS-20 under visible light irradiation. As it can be seen, with the light switched -on and -off cycles, the CNZS-20 sample exhibited the highest photocurrent transient response under visible light irradiation, which was greatly larger than that for bare g-C3N4 and Zn0.25Cd0.75S. It suggested the remarkably enhanced carrier separation ratio over CNZS-20, which was in agreement with the enhancement of photo-activity for CNZS-20.
|
| Fig. 11 Photocurrent response of (a) pure g-C3N4, (b) Zn0.25Cd0.75S, and (c) CNZS-20 under visible light irradiation. | |
The high separation efficiency of photo-generated carriers should be ascribed to the suitable band potentials of g-C3N4 and Zn0.25Cd0.75S. According to a previous report, Zn0.25Cd0.75S was n-type semiconductor with Vfb of −0.8 V.19 The conduction band potential (VCB) of Zn0.25Cd0.75S was about −0.9 V, while the valence band potential (VVB) was 1.51 V. As for g-C3N4, Wang et al., reported that the VCB and VVB of polymeric g-C3N4 were determined at −1.3 and +1.4 V,23 respectively. A scheme for the separation and transport of photo-generated electron–hole pairs on the g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S interface was shown in Fig. 12. The photo-induced electrons in g-C3N4 could move freely towards the surface of Zn0.25Cd0.75S while the holes could transfer to the VB of g-C3N4 conveniently. As a result, the photo-generated electrons and holes were efficiently separated between g-C3N4 and Zn0.25Cd0.75S thereby enhanced the photocatalytic activity. Hydroxyl radicals (˙OH) were commonly considered as the possible key active species in the degradation process.29,32,33 Fig. 13 showed the ˙OH-trapping PL spectra of suspensions containing CNZS-20 and terephthalic acid. It exhibited that the fluorescence intensity increased steadily along with the irradiation time. It elucidated that ˙OH in CNZS-20 system was really produced under visible light irradiation.
|
| Fig. 12 Proposed mechanism for the photocatalytic degradation of dyes on CNZS-20 under visible light irradiation. | |
|
| Fig. 13 ˙OH-trapping PL spectra of suspensions containing CNZS-20 and TA. | |
Conclusions
Novel visible-light induced g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S photocatalysts have been successfully synthesized via a facile in situ precipitation method. After introduction of g-C3N4, the g-C3N4/Zn0.25Cd0.75S photocatalyst possessed a significantly enhanced visible light activity in decomposing dyes. The highest degradation efficiency was observed for the CNZS-20 sample. The activity enhancement was mainly attributed to the high separation efficiency of electron–hole pairs on their heterojunction interfaces. This method was expected to be extended for other g-C3N4 loaded materials, which might have potential applications in removing pollutants.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Scientific Research Reward Fund for Excellent Young and Middle-Aged Scientists of Shandong Province (BS2012HZ001), National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21103069, 21075052, 21175057, and 40672158), and Scientific Research Foundation for Doctors of University of Jinan (XBS1037 and XKY1043).
References
- S. Rengaraj, S. Venkataraj, J. W. Yeon, Y. Kim, X. Z. Li and G. K. H. Pang, Appl. Catal., B, 2007, 77, 157 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- J. S. Hu, L. L. Ren, Y. G. Guo, H. P. Liang, A. M. Cao, L. J. Wan and C. L. Bai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 1269 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- D. Z. Li, Z. X. Chen, Y. L. Chen, W. J. Li, H. J. Huang, Y. H. He and X. Z. Fu, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2008, 42, 2130 CrossRef CAS.
- H. Lachheb, E. Puzenat, A. Houas, M. Ksibi, E. Elaloui, C. Guillard and J. M. Herrmann, Appl. Catal., B, 2002, 39, 75 CrossRef CAS.
- Z. X. Chen, D. Z. Li, W. J. Zhang, Y. Shao, T. W. Chen, M. Sun and X. Z. Fu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 4433 CAS.
- U. G. Akpan and B. H. Hameed, J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, 170, 520 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- N. S. Foster, R. D. Noble and C. A. Koval, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1993, 27, 350 CrossRef CAS.
- R. Vinu and G. Madras, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2008, 42, 913 CrossRef CAS.
- J. J. Testa, M. A. Grela and M. I. Litter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2004, 38, 1589 CrossRef CAS.
- S. Luo, Y. Xiao, L. Yang, C. Liu, F. Su and Y. Li, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2011, 79, 85 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- L. M. Wang, N. Wang, L. H. Zhu, H. W. Yu and H. Q. Tang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2008, 152, 93 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- C. R. Chenthamarakshan and K. Rajeshwar, Langmuir, 2000, 16, 2715 CrossRef CAS.
- H. B. Yu, S. Chen, X. Quan, H. M. Zhao and Y. B. Zhang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2008, 42, 3791 CrossRef CAS.
- N. Shaham-Waldmann and Y. Paz, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 18946 CAS.
- Y. C. Zhang, J. Li, M. Zhang and D. D. Dionysiou, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011, 45, 9324 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- M. Sun, D. Z. Li, Y. Zheng, W. J. Zhang, Y. Shao, Y. B. Chen, W. J. Li and X. Z. Fu, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43, 7877 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- M. Sun, D. Z. Li, Y. B. Chen, W. Chen, W. J. Li, Y. H. He and X. Z. Fu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 13825 CAS.
- W. J. Li, D. Z. Li, Z. X. Chen, H. J. Huang, M. Sun, Y. H. He and X. Z. Fu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 14943 CAS.
- W. J. Li, D. Z. Li, S. G. Meng, W. Chen, X. Z. Fu and S. Yu, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011, 45, 2987 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- X. R. Wang, X. L. Li, L. Zhang, Y. K. Yoon, P. K. Weber, H. L. Wang, J. Guo and H. J. Dai, Science, 2009, 324, 768 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- X. S. Li, W. W. Cai, J. H. An, S. Kim, J. Nah, D. X. Yang, R. Piner, A. Velamakanni, I. Jung, E. Tutuc, S. K. Banerjee, L. Colombo and R. S. Ruoff, Science, 2009, 324, 1312 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- Y. B. Zhang, T. T. Tang, C. Girit, Z. Hao, M. C. Martin, A. Zettl, M. F. Crommie, Y. R. Shen and F. Wang, Nature, 2009, 459, 820 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- X. C. Wang, K. Maeda, A. Thomas, K. Takanabe, G. Xin, J. M. Carlsson, K. Domen and M. Antonietti, Nat. Mater., 2009, 8, 76 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- G. Zhang, J. Zhang, M. Zhang and X. Wang, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 8083 RSC.
- J. Liu, T. Zhang, Z. Wang, G. Dawson and W. Chen, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 14398 RSC.
- H. Irie, Y. Watanabe and K. Hashimoto, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003, 107, 5483 CrossRef CAS.
- S. L. Xiong, B. J. Xi and Y. T. Qian, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 14029 CAS.
- X. Q. An, J. C. Yu, F. Wang, C. H. Li and Y. C. Li, Appl. Catal., B, 2013, 129, 80 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- L. Ge, C. C. Han and J. Liu, Appl. Catal., B, 2011, 108–109, 100 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- T. Watanabe, T. Takizawa and K. Honda, J. Phys. Chem., 1977, 81, 1845 CrossRef CAS.
- T. Takizawa, T. Watanabe and K. Honda, J. Phys. Chem., 1978, 82, 1391 CrossRef CAS.
- W. Liu, M. L. Wang, C. X. Xu and S. F. Chen, Chem. Eng. J., 2012, 209, 386 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- S. C. Yan, Z. S. Li and Z. G. Zou, Langmuir, 2010, 26(6), 3894 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
|
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 |
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.