Multifunctional polydiacetylene-liposome with controlled release and fluorescence tracing

Xiaojuan Yan and Xueqin An*
School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China. E-mail: anxueqin@ecust.edu.cn; Fax: +86 021-64250804; Tel: +86 021-64250804

Received 19th March 2014 , Accepted 7th April 2014

First published on 7th April 2014


Abstract

A multifunctional polydiacetylene-liposome (PDA-liposome) was prepared by self-assembly, which can be characterized with controlled drug release and fluorescence tracing. The controlled drug release was realized in both in vitro simulation and cancer cells by temperature control. The internalization and distribution of the PDA-liposome in cancer cells were presented by fluorescence cell imaging.


A theranostic was defined as a material that combines the modalities of therapy and diagnostic imaging by Funkhouser in 2002.1 So far, it has been greatly developed and facilitated advances in medical research.2 In contrast to the development and use of separate materials for disease therapy and diagnosis, theranostics combine features of delivering therapeutic drugs and diagnostic imaging into one entity, which has the potential to overcome the undesirable drug release and biological toxicity in current distinct imaging and therapeutic agents.3 The ultimate goal for the theranostic field is to gain the ability to image and monitor the diseased tissue, delivery kinetics, and improve the drug efficacy by controlled release.4 The development of nanomaterials,5 including liposomes, polymers, micelles, inorganic nanoparticles, and peptide/protein conjugates, offers new opportunities to meet the need of theranostics.6 The most promising aspects of utilizing nanoparticles as therapeutics, diagnostics, and theranostics are their potential to localize (or be targeted) in a specific manner to the site of disease and reduce or eliminate the possible numerous untoward side effects.7,8 The functional nanoparticles have been investigated in controlled release,9 site-specific targeting,10,11 or imaging12–14 for potential applications in cancer therapy and diagnosis. However, there are several inherent disadvantages with current formulations in drug delivery and imaging, including toxicity to living organisms,15,16 fluorescence bleaching, severe side effects, uncontrolled drug release, instability in storage, and so on. A biocompatible drug carrier with integrated features of controlled release and imaging is urgently needed for biological and medical research.

Liposomes are spherical vesicles consisting of phospholipid bilayers surrounding an aqueous cavity.17 The biocompatible liposomes in nanoscale have been used widely for drug delivery,18 and there are several liposome-mediated drug delivery products approved for clinical trials.19 Many current methods by incorporating components are applied to achieve controlled drug release of liposomes with thermal,20 photo-thermal,21 pH,22 magnetic,23 or enzymatic triggers.24 Thermosensitive liposomes with a lower critical solution temperature (Tc) are common drug carriers that function by thermo-stimulated drug release, and it has been used in various cancer treatments.25 The Tc is the phase transition temperature for gel to liquid crystalline transition in the liposomes.26 It has been found that nanocarrier mediated delivery of anticancer drugs can be positively influenced by localized thermal treatment.27

Polydiacetylene (PDA), a class of eneyne conjugated polymers derived from amphiphilic monomers of diacetylenic acid, has been extensively investigated on its peculiar optical properties.28,29 Recently, more attention was paid to the fluorescence property of PDA in sensing and detections.30 However, the intrinsic poor hydrophilicity of PDA restricted the applications in aqueous solutions. PDA liposome composed of PDA and phospholipids possesses a good solubility and stability and has been used in drug delivery as a drug sustained-release system.31,32 To the best of our knowledge, a combination of thermo-triggered drug release and fluorescence tracing in PDA liposome has not been reported yet.

The goal of this work is to present a drug delivery system of polydiacetylene liposome (PDA liposome) with multifunctional properties of thermo-triggered release and fluorescence tracking. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have been reported on the drug controlled release at the cellular level yet. Docetaxel (DTX), a semisynthetic derivative of the taxoid family of antineoplastic agents,33 was used as a model drug. The morphology, size, entrapment efficiency, and fluorescence property of DTX-loaded PDA liposomes (DLPLs) were discussed. The thermo-triggered release of DLPLs was studied in vitro simulating experiments and model cancer cells. The internalization and distribution of the DLPLs in cancer cells were monitored by fluorescence cell imaging.

DLPLs were prepared by self-assembly using a combination method of thin-film hydration and supercritical CO2 fluid (SFC-CO2),34 as shown in ESI. A series of PDA liposomes with different PDA/lipid ratios were prepared as shown in ESI, and the optimal mole ratio of PDA/phospholipids was determined as 0.8. So sample with ratio of 0.8 was used for various studies in the manuscript. The morphology of DLPLs was characterized by transmission electron microscope (TEM), as shown in Fig. 1a. The TEM image revealed that the DLPLs were monodisperse micro-spheres, and the microstructure was shown more clearly in the inset. The size distribution of DLPLs was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) at 25 °C. As shown in Fig. 1b, the average size of DLPLs was about 250 ± 15 nm. DLPLs with this size were suitable for drug delivery in cancer therapy by the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect.35,36


image file: c4ra02414a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) TEM images and (b) size distribution of DLPLs.

The entrapment efficiency of DLPLs was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using dialysis method as shown in ESI. DTX entrapment efficiency in DLPLs was determined,21 and which was about 96.5 ± 1.0%.

In order to explore the effect of temperature on drug release of DLPLs, in vitro release studies were carried out at various temperatures. The cumulative release profiles of DLPLs at different temperatures were shown in Fig. 2a. The drug release was found to be greatly dependent on temperature. As shown in Fig. 2b, the drug release increased with increasing temperatures at temperature below 40 °C, and which decreased with increasing temperatures at temperature above 40 °C at release time of 300 min. The drug was released abundantly from DLPLs at an optimal temperature of 40 °C. To explain the temperature-dependent release mechanism, lower critical solution temperature (Tc) of DLPLs was measured by micro-differential scanning calorimetry (micro-DSC). As shown in Fig. 2c, the Tc of DLPLs was 40 ± 1 °C, which was consistent with the optimum drug release temperature of DLPLs within the experimental error. The encapsulated drug was released abruptly from the PDA liposome at Tc because of the enhanced permeability of lipid bilayer membrane, which was resulted from the gel–liquid crystalline phase transition of DLPLs. Whereas when temperature was below or above Tc, the drug release would be hindered by tight arrangement or blocked by partially parallel arrangement of phospholipids in the membranes of DLPLs, respectively.22 The thermo-triggered release drug can be realized through combination process of light irradiation and photothermal conversion.21 The results will provide new therapy of hyperthermia and photo-thermal therapy for cancer care.


image file: c4ra02414a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) Cumulative release profiles of DLPLs at different temperatures; (b) the plot of cumulative drug release vs. temperature at release time of 300 min; (c) heating curve of DLPLs measured by micro-DSC at scanning rate of 1 °C min−1.

The fluorescence property of PDA liposome is an essential parameter in cell imaging and tracking. The fluorescence emission spectra of PDA liposome and PDA vesicle solutions were measured by fluorescence spectroscopy at 25 °C. As shown in Fig. 3a, the fluorescence intensity of PDA liposome in aqueous solution was much higher than that of PDA vesicle because the solubility of PDA was improved a lot by introducing phospholipids in the PDA liposome.


image file: c4ra02414a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a) Fluorescence emission spectra of PDA liposome (red line) and PDA vesicle (black line) in aqueous solution at 298 K; (b–d) LCSM images of Bcap-37 cells treated with DLPLs for 2 h: (b) bright-field image; (c) composite bight-field and fluorescence image; (d) fluorescence image. All images were obtained with a 63× objective.

In order to investigate the biocompatibility and drug efficacy of DLPLs, human breast carcinoma cells (Bcap-37) were selected as model cells for live cell imaging and cytotoxicity tests. The fluorescence cell imaging was performed using laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM). Trans-membrane behaviour and distribution of DLPLs were monitored by fluorescence cell imaging. After incubation for 2 h at 37 °C in humidified atmosphere containing 5.0% CO2, the DLPLs had been internalized inside the Bcap-37 cells, as shown in Fig. 3b–d. It revealed that DLPLs were provided with good membrane permeability. By the transmembrane and endocytic behaviours, the drug was concentrated effectively in cancer cells, and the anticancer efficacy of DTX could be improved markedly.

Before evaluating the anticancer efficacy of DLPLs, cytotoxicity of blank PDA liposome was tested on Bcap-37 cells by MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assays and flow cytometry (FCM), as shown in ESI. It was indicated that blank PDA liposome had very little cytotoxicity to Bcap-37 cells.

The DTX in DLPLs was released in Bcap-37 cells by temperature control to evaluate the effect of temperature on the controlled release of DLPLs. Bcap-37 cells were incubated with DLPLs for 2 h before the controlled release treatment to ensure the DLPLs transmembrane transportation. The Bcap-37 cells were separated into two groups. One experimental group (G1) was treated at 40 °C for 30 min, the other control group (G2) was treated at the common culture temperature (37 °C), followed by incubation at 37 °C for 24 h or 48 h, respectively. After the incubation, the cell apoptosis rates were measured by FCM. As shown in Fig. 4, the apoptosis rates of Bcap-37 cells in the G1 were 21.6 ± 3.9% and 26.4 ± 4.5% at 24 h and 48 h, respectively. However, the apoptosis rates were increased to 37.7 ± 6.1% and 53.9 ± 6.4% in the G2 at 24 h and 48 h, respectively. Comparing to the control group (G1), the apoptosis rates of Bcap-37 cells in the G2 were increased by 4.8% and 16.2% for 24 h and 48 h, respectively. It means that the drug efficacy of DLPLs using thermal stimulus controlled release was about 1.2 and 1.4 times of that using common release for 24 h and 48 h, respectively. The results of thermal stimulus controlled drug release in the DLPLs prove that the drug efficacy at Tc temperature of DLPLs is higher than that at 37 °C, and which is in accordance with that in vitro model experiments (Fig. 2). This phenomenon could be caused by synergistic effects of thermo-triggered release of DLPLs and good permeability of membrane. The fluorescence thermal stimulus PDA liposome will be a potential controlled release system for drug delivery and tracking.


image file: c4ra02414a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Apoptosis rates of Bcap-37 cells incubated with DLPLs by common release at 37 °C or thermo-triggered release at 40 °C after 24 h and 48 h, respectively (blue columns: 37 °C and red columns: 40 °C).

Conclusions

In summary, this work presented a novel DLPLs drug delivery system, which provides both function of controlled drug release and a fluorescence tracking. The DLPLs were characterized with good biocompatibility, membrane permeability, high drug entrapment efficiency, enhanced fluorescence, and thermo-triggered drug release. The temperature-controlled drug release has been realized both in vitro simulation and cancer cells. Significantly, the anticancer drug efficacy was much improved using temperature-controlled drug release in Bcap-37 breast cancer cells. The DLPLs can be accumulated in Bcap-37 breast cancer cells within 2 h. The intracellular distribution of DLPLs could be traced and monitored by fluorescence imaging in real time. This technology could be realized in oncotherapy of surface tumors. The results showed that there is still great space for developing, and it will be further studied to obtain a novel targeted delivery system in vivo, which is integration system of both treatment and diagnosis. The novel DLPLs could be a promising candidate for drug delivery, disease diagnosis and therapy.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21273073 and 21073063), the National High-Tech R&D (863) Program of China (no. 2011AA06A107).

Notes and references

  1. J. Funkhouser, Curr. Drug Discovery, 2002, 2, 17–19 Search PubMed.
  2. T. Lammers, S. Aime, W. E. Hennink, G. Storm and F. Kiessling, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 40, 1029–1038 CrossRef PubMed.
  3. M. E. Caldorera-Moore, W. B. Liechty and N. A. Peppas, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 44, 1061–1070 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. S. S. Kelkar and T. M. Reineke, Bioconjugate Chem., 2011, 22, 1879–1903 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. V. P. Torchilin, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 2006, 58, 1532–1555 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. T. L. Doane and C. Burda, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 2885–2911 RSC.
  7. H. S. Choi, W. Liu, P. Misra, E. Tanaka, J. P. Zimmer, B. I. Ipe, M. G. Bawendi and J. V. Frangioni, Nat. Biotechnol., 2007, 25, 1165–1170 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. S. Santra, C. Kaittanis and J. Grimm, Small, 2009, 5, 1862–1868 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. L. Paasonen, T. Laaksonen, C. Johans, M. Yliperttula, K. Kontturi and A. Urtti, J. Controlled Release, 2007, 122, 86–93 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. L. D. Leserman, J. Barbet, F. Kourilsky and J. N. Weinstein, Nature, 1980, 288, 602–604 CrossRef CAS.
  11. N. Mackiewicz, E. Gravel, A. Garofalakis, J. Ogier, J. John, D. M. Dupont, K. Gombert, B. Tavitian, E. Doris and F. Ducongé, Small, 2011, 7, 2786–2792 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. O. Veiseh, C. Sun, J. Gunn, N. Kohler, P. Gabikian, D. Lee, N. Bhattarai, R. Ellenbogen, R. Sze, A. Hallahan, J. Olson and M. Zhang, Nano Lett., 2005, 5, 1003–1008 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. L. Cheng, K. Yang, Y. Li, J. Chen, C. Wang, M. Shao, S.-T. Lee and Z. Liu, Angew. Chem., 2011, 123, 7523–7528 CrossRef.
  14. D. Kim, Y. Y. Jeong and S. Jon, ACS Nano, 2010, 4, 3689–3696 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. A. M. Derfus, W. C. W. Chan and S. N. Bhatia, Nano Lett., 2004, 4, 11–18 CrossRef CAS.
  16. R. Hardman, Environ. Health Perspect., 2006, 114, 165–172 CrossRef.
  17. K. Cho, X. Wang, S. Nie, Z. G. Chen and D. M. Shin, Clin. Cancer Res., 2008, 14, 1310–1316 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. W. T. Al-Jamal and K. Kostarelos, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 44, 1094–1104 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. V. P. Torchilin, Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery, 2005, 4, 145–160 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. A. Agarwal, M. A. Mackey, M. A. El-Sayed and R. V. Bellamkonda, ACS Nano, 2011, 5, 4919–4926 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. X. An, F. Zhang and Y. Zhu, Langmuir, 2013, 29, 1061–1068 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. W. Zhou, X. An, J. Wang, W. Shen, Z. Chen and X. Wang, Colloids Surf., A, 2012, 395, 225–232 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. D. Qiu and X. An, Colloids Surf., B, 2013, 104, 326–329 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. J. Davidsen, K. Jorgensen, T. L. Andresen and O. G. Mouritsen, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Lipids Lipid Metab., 2003, 1609, 95–101 CrossRef CAS.
  25. D. Needham and M. W. Dewhirst, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 2001, 53, 285–305 CrossRef CAS.
  26. D. Chapmana, Q. Rev. Biophys., 1975, 8, 185–235 CrossRef.
  27. S. Ganta, H. Devalapally, A. Shahiwala and M. Amiji, J. Controlled Release, 2008, 126, 187–204 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. D. H. Charych, J. O. Nagy, W. Spevak and M. D. Bednarski, Science, 1993, 261, 585–588 CAS.
  29. S. Wacharasindhu, S. Montha, J. Boonyiseng, A. Potisatityuenyong, C. Phollookin, G. Tumcharern and M. Sukwattanasinitt, Macromolecules, 2010, 43, 716–724 CrossRef CAS.
  30. J. Wu, A. Zawistowski, M. Ehrmann, T. Yi and C. Schmuck, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 9720–9723 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. C. Guo, S. Liu, Z. Dai, C. Jiang and W. Li, Colloids Surf., B, 2010, 76, 362–365 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. C. Guo, S. Liu, C. Jiang, W. Li, Z. Dai, H. Fritz and X. Wu, Langmuir, 2009, 25, 13114–13119 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. M.-C. Bissery, D. Guenard, F. Gueritte-Voegelein and F. Lavelle, Cancer Res., 1991, 51, 4845–4852 CAS.
  34. X. An, F. Zhang, Y. Zhu and W. Shen, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 7202–7204 RSC.
  35. A. K. Iyer, G. Khaled, J. Fang and H. Maeda, Drug Discovery Today, 2006, 11, 812–818 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  36. H. Maeda, K. Greish and J. Fang, Adv. Polym. Sci., 2006, 193, 103–121 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Preparation methods of PDA liposome, dialysis method, fluorescence cell imaging, phase transition temperatures, cell culture, and cytotoxicity of PDA liposome. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra02414a

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.