Reducing coke formation in the catalytic fast pyrolysis of bio-derived furan with surface modified HZSM-5 catalysts

Bo Zhangab, Zhaoping Zhong*a, Qinglong Xieb, Paul Chenb and Roger Ruanb
aKey Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, PR China. E-mail: zzhong@seu.edu.cn; Fax: +86-25-8379-4700; Tel: +86-25-8379-4700
bCenter for Biorefining and Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, 1390 Eckles Ave., St. Paul, MN 55108, USA

Received 12th May 2015 , Accepted 17th June 2015

First published on 17th June 2015


Abstract

In order to reduce coke yield during catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass, MgO and 2,4-dimethylquinoline (2,4-DMQ) were selected to reduce the number of external acid sites of HZSM-5. Both MgO and 2,4-DMQ deposition could cause a reduction in total acid sites (both weak acid sites and strong acid sites) and external acid sites of HZSM-5. The modified catalysts were used for the catalytic conversion of bio-derived furan. For the MgO/HZSM-5 catalyst, the effects of amount of MgO deposited and deposition time were studied. The carbon yields of aromatics, C2–C5 olefins, total chemicals, CO2 and CO increased at first and then decreased slightly when the deposited amount increased, while the carbon yield of coke decreased first and then increased gradually. Furthermore, as the deposited time increased, the carbon yields of petrochemicals, CO2 and CO increased greatly, whereas that of coke decreased. For the 2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5 catalyst, the effects of 2,4-DMQ treatment amount and treatment time were investigated. The experimental results showed that an increase in 2,4-DMQ treatment amount or treatment time could retard the generation of the target products, CO2 and CO but promote coke formation.


1. Introduction

HZSM-5 zeolite exhibits an excellent performance for catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) of lignocellulosic biomass.1–3 However, the acid sites on the external surface of HZSM-5 can cause coke formation during the CFP process,4,5 thus resulting in the blockage of pore openings and the deactivation of the HZSM-5 catalyst. A useful technology to retard coke formation and obtain high yields of target products is to eliminate the external acid sites of HZSM-5 catalyst but meanwhile retain the internal acid sites.6 Zhang et al. selectively inactivated the external acid sites of HZSM-5 catalyst by means of chemical liquid deposition of inert silica (SiO2-CLD), and the characteristics of silanized HZSM-5 samples were tested on the catalytic conversion of biomass pyrolysis-derived compounds.7 Their results showed that the modified HZSM-5 could promote the production of olefins and aromatics and reduce the coke yield compared to the parent HZSM-5. Bauer et al. also passivated the external acid sites of HZSM-5 catalyst by pre-coking treatment,8,9 and the pre-coked HZSM-5 showed a better shape-selective effect for the formation of target products and led to a reduced formation of undesirable compounds. In this study, we propose HZSM-5-based catalysts with external surface deposition of magnesium oxide (MgO) and 2,4-dimethylquinoline (2,4-DMQ) to improve the catalytic effect during a biomass CFP process, which has been seldom studied. It is obviously beneficial for the promotion of bio-oil quality in the biomass CFP process.

For MgO, magnesium acetate is used as the precursor, which will polymerize to large-molecule coordination compounds (see Fig. 1(a)) in aqueous solution.10 The generated large-molecule coordination compounds cannot enter the narrow inner channels, so their thermal decomposition will lead to the formation of MgO on the external surface of the HZSM-5 catalyst (eqn (1)). 2,4-DMQ, a bulky basic molecule, can poison the acid sites irreversibly, and its molecule diameter is greater than the pore diameter of HZSM-5 catalyst.11,12 Therefore, the external acid sites will be poisoned selectively when the HZSM-5 catalyst is treated with 2,4-DMQ, whereas the internal acid sites will be kept intact. The molecular structure of 2,4-DMQ is shown in Fig. 1(b).

 
(C4H6O4Mg)n + 4nO2nMgO + 4nCO2 + 3nH2O (1)


image file: c5ra08827e-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Molecular structures of the modifiers. (a) Large-molecule coordination compounds generated from magnesium acetate. (b) 2,4-DMQ.

In this work, the external acid sites of HZSM-5 catalyst were reduced or eliminated by the deposition of MgO and 2,4-DMQ. The obtained MgO or 2,4-DMQ modified HZSM-5 catalysts (referred to as MgO/HZSM-5 and 2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5, respectively) were used for the catalytic conversion of bio-derived furan, which is one of the most important intermediates in biomass CFP processes.13 For the MgO/HZSM-5 catalyst, the effects of deposited amount and deposited time were studied and analysed. For 2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5 catalyst, the effects of 2,4-DMQ treatment amount and treatment time were investigated and discussed.

2. Experimental

2.1 Materials

Magnesium acetate (analytical reagent, AR) and 2,4-DMQ (AR) were bought from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Furan (AR) was supplied by Aladdin Company. HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst (silicon-to-aluminum ratio: 50, particle diameter: 2–5 μm) was provided by the Catalyst Plant of Nankai University, with specific surface area (N2 porosimetry and D–R equation) of 332 m2 g−1 and pore volume of 0.19 cm3 g−1.

2.2 Preparation of MgO/HZSM-5 catalyst

First, magnesium acetate aqueous solution with a regulated concentration was prepared. Then, it was mixed with HZSM-5 catalyst in a beaker at room temperature using a magnetic stirrer for a certain deposition time. Second, the prepared slurry was dried at 120 °C for 12 h. Finally, the dried sample was put into a muffle furnace for calcination (550 °C, 6 h) to obtain the MgO/HZSM-5 catalyst required. Samples with different deposited amounts and deposition times were prepared.

2.3 Preparation of 2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5 catalyst

During our experiments, 2,4-DMQ was directly introduced into the heated reactor with the desired flow rate and injection time (see Fig. 2). The 2,4-DMQ is vaporized and then poisons the catalyst when passing through the reactor. In this paper, 2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5 catalyst samples with different 2,4-DMQ treatment amounts and treatment times were studied.
image file: c5ra08827e-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of the experimental setup. (1) N2 gas cylinder. (2) Flowmeter. (3) Injection pump (furan). (4) Injection pump (2,4-DMQ). (5) Quartz tubular reactor. (6) Electric heater. (7) HZSM-5 catalyst. (8) Thermocouple. (9) Temperature controller. (10) Condenser. (11) Gas bag.

2.4 Determination of acid sites on the external surface

The catalytic cracking of 1,3,5-triisopropylbenzene (1,3,5-TIPB, analytical grade chemical, Sigma-Aldrich Corporation) was carried out in a fixed bed to determine the extent of inactivation of the external acid sites of the modified HZSM-5 catalysts.14,15 The molecular diameter of 1,3,5-TIPB is greater than the pore diameter of HZSM-5. Hence, 1,3,5-TIPB cannot enter the narrow inner channels, and its cracking can only take place on the external surface of HZSM-5. 0.1 g HZSM-5 catalyst was put in a horizontal tubular reactor (15 mm i.d. and 1000 mm length) and pretreated at 500 °C for 1 h in a continuous helium flow (30 ml min−1). To start the cracking reaction, the reaction temperature was adjusted to 300 °C, and 1,3,5-TIPB was introduced into the catalyst fixed bed with a injection pump. During the cracking reaction, the weight hourly space velocity (W/F) was kept at 4.0 g h mol−1. Each experiment ran for 25 min. After the reaction, the products were collected by a condenser and analyzed by a gas chromatography/mass spectrometer (GC/MS) instrument (7890A/5975C, Agilent).

2.5 Experimental setup

A schematic of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2. The catalytic conversion of furan with modified HZSM-5 catalysts was investigated in a laboratory-scale quartz tubular reactor (5) with an inner diameter of 15.5 mm, which was externally heated by an electric heater (6). 100 mg HZSM-5 catalyst was placed on a sieve plate in the reactor. During the experiments, nitrogen was applied as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 180 ml min−1. When furan was introduced into the reactor by an injection pump (3), it is be vaporized and passes through the catalyst layer, resulting in its conversion and the formation of target products. For each experiment, the running time was 25 min, the reaction temperature was kept at 550 °C, and the total mass of influent furan was 50 mg. The bio-oil was collected in the condenser, and the noncondensable gas products were collected in a gas bag. In addition, injection pump (4) was used for 2,4-DMQ supply, and the desired 2,4-DMQ treatment amount and treatment time could be set before each experiment.

2.6 Product analysis and data processing

During the experiments, carbon yield and carbon selectivity were calculated and analysed, and the carbon yield was defined as:
 
image file: c5ra08827e-t1.tif(2)

For the 2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5 catalyst, the converted feedstock included furan and 2,4-DMQ. After each experiment, the spent HZSM-5 catalyst sample was collected carefully and dried at 120 °C for 1 h in a drying oven. Then the dried sample was fully combusted (600 °C, 30 min) in a glass tube under an O2 atmosphere (100 ml min−1) so that the coke yield was obtained. The mass of generated CO2 was obtained through the sodium hydroxide absorption method, thus the carbon yield of coke could be determined. The bio-oil yield was obtained from the weight difference of the condenser before and after every experiment. In addition, the noncondensable gas yield was calculated from the difference.

The components of the bio-oil were identified using a GC/MS instrument (7890A/5975C, Agilent). A GC/MS injector temperature of 275 °C and interface temperature of 300 °C were held. The GC separation was carried out using a capillary column named HP-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm). A split ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]80 was used. Typical operating conditions of MS were ionization energy 70 eV, and scan rate was 35–550 amu s−1. The chromatographic peaks were discriminated and analyzed by means of the NIST MS library. Gaseous products were analyzed using a Varian CP4900 gas chromatography (GC)/thermal conductivity detector (TCD) with a 5 Å molecular sieve column and a PPQ column. High-purity argon (99.999%) was used as the carrier gas. The temperatures of the injector and the detector were set at 120 °C. The temperatures of the 5 Å molecular sieves and PPQ column were kept at 80 and 150 °C, respectively.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Acidity characteristics of HZSM-5 catalysts

A simple comparison of the acidity characteristics of the parent and modified HZSM-5 catalysts is given in Table 1. Here, 2,4-DMQ was introduced into the heated reactor to passivate the outer surface of the HZSM-5 without feeding furan. Then the obtained 2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5 catalyst was collected for acidity analysis. The acidity characteristics of HZSM-5 samples were analyzed by ammonia TPD. As can be seen, both MgO and 2,4-DMQ treatment led to a decrease in the total acid sites (both weak acid sites and strong acid sites) of the HZSM-5 catalyst, because some external acid sites were passivated under these conditions. It is anticipated that the modified HZSM-5 could inhibit coke formation and fine-tune catalytic performance.
Table 1 Acidity characteristics of parent and modified HZSM-5
Catalyst Acidity characteristics (NH3-TPD) Catalytic conversion efficiency of 1,3,5-TIPB (%)
Total acid sites (mmol NH3/g) Weak acid sites (<300 °C, mmol NH3/g) Strong acid sites (>300 °C, mmol NH3/g)
a Deposition conditions for MgO/HZSM-5: deposited amount of 4% and deposition time of 6 h.b Deposition conditions for 2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5: mass ratio of 2,4-DMQ to HZSM-5 catalyst of 3 × 10−4 mol h−1 g−1 and treatment time of 10 min.
Parent HZSM-5 1.435 0.578 0.857 14.9
MgO/HZSM-5a 0.869 0.417 0.452 9.2
2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5b 1.194 0.507 0.687 6.3


In our present study, 1,3,5-TIPB was selected as a probe molecule as its catalytic cracking conversion over HZSM-5 took place only on the external surface. Hibino et al. carried out experiments to investigate the adsorption of 1,3,5-TIPB on the parent and silanized HZSM-5, and their results showed that no adsorption of 1,3,5-TIPB was observed, proving that 1,3,5-TIPB was converted by HZSM-5 rather than adsorbed.16 Namba et al. also reported that the conversion of 1,3,5-TIPB corresponded to the relative amount of acid sites on the external surface of HZSM-5 crystallites.17 Table 1 also shows the conversion efficiencies of 1,3,5-TIPB over parent and modified HZSM-5 catalysts. As can be seen, conversion of 1,3,5-TIPB decreased significantly over MgO/HZSM-5 and 2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5 compared to parent HZSM-5, indicating that MgO and 2,4-DMQ treatment could selectively inactivate the external surface.

3.2 Catalytic conversion of furan over MgO/HZSM-5

3.2.1 The effect of the amount of MgO deposited. The carbon yields of chemicals from the catalytic conversion of furan are shown in Fig. 3. The tested MgO/HZSM-5 catalysts were prepared at a deposition time of 6 h, and the amounts of deposited MgO were 0%, 1%, 2%, 4%, 6% and 8%, respectively.
image file: c5ra08827e-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Carbon yields of chemicals from the catalytic conversion of furan over MgO/HZSM-5 catalysts with different amounts of MgO deposited. (a) Carbon yields of aromatics, olefins and total chemicals. (b) Carbon yields of coke, CO2 and CO. (c) Selectivities of C2–C5 olefins. (d) Selectivities of aromatics.

It should be pointed that the catalytic conversion of bio-derived furan over HZSM-5 will lead to the production of hydrocarbons (mainly aromatics and olefins), CO2, CO and oxygenated organic compounds. The HZSM-5 catalyst can favor the formation of aromatics and olefins due to its unique pore structure. Therefore, aromatics and olefins were selected as the target products in our study, and our paper focuses on the carbon yields and selectivities of aromatics and olefins. From Fig. 3(a) we can see that the deposition of MgO promoted the carbon yields of aromatics, C2–C5 olefins and total chemicals (aromatics + C2–C5 olefins). Moreover, when the deposited amount of MgO increased from 0% to 8%, the carbon yields of aromatics, C2–C5 olefins and total chemicals tended to increase at first and then decrease slightly, while the maximum values were achieved at a deposited amount of 4%. The carbon yields of CO2 and CO showed the same tendency (see Fig. 3(b)), whereas that of coke decreased first and then increased gradually. The deposition of MgO passivated the outer surface of the HZSM-5 catalyst, and as a result, the number of external acid sites decreased largely, thus restraining the formation of coke and promoting the subsequent shape-selective reactions. Furthermore, it is reported that MgO could crack some heavy compounds into smaller oxygenated organic compounds,18 and these oxygenates would suffer deoxygenation reactions inside the internal structure, which was also conducive to the production of aromatics, olefins, CO2 and CO. Therefore, the carbon yields increased and the carbon yield of coke decreased. However, redundant MgO deposited would give rise to the pore mouth blockage and prevent the desired reactions. Consequently, a further increase in the amount of MgO deposited led to a decrease in petrochemical yield and increase in coke yield. The selectivities of C2–C5 olefins and aromatics are shown in Fig. 3(c) and (d). The aromatics included benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, indene and naphthalene. Obviously, the deposition of MgO increased the selectivities of propylene, butylene and xylene, and decreased the selectivities of ethylene and C5 olefin. In addition, when the amount of MgO deposited increased from 0 to 8%, the selectivity of benzene decreased at first and then increased, whereas that of toluene increased at first and then decreased. The selectivities of ethylbenzene, indene and naphthalene remained almost constant.

3.2.2 The effect of MgO deposition time. The carbon yields of chemicals from the catalytic conversion of furan are shown in Fig. 4. The tested MgO/HZSM-5 catalysts were prepared at a deposited amount of 4%, and the deposition times were 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 h, respectively.
image file: c5ra08827e-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Carbon yields of chemicals from the catalytic conversion of furan over MgO/HZSM-5 catalyst with different MgO deposition times. (a) Carbon yields of aromatics, olefins and total chemicals. (b) Carbon yields of coke, CO2 and CO. (c) Selectivities of C2–C5 olefins. (d) Selectivities of aromatics.

Obviously, the MgO deposition time has a great impact on the product distribution of the furan catalytic conversion over MgO/HZSM-5 catalyst. When the deposition time increased from 1 to 10 h, the carbon yields of aromatics, C2–C5 olefins, total chemicals, CO2 and CO increased greatly. Meanwhile, the carbon yield of coke decreased over the range of deposition time studied. The main reason is that a longer deposition time would make the deposition more uniform,7 so more external acid sites of HZSM-5 catalyst would be covered by MgO in this condition. From Fig. 4(c) and (d), we can see that the selectivities of ethylene and benzene decreased, while the selectivities of propylene, butylene and toluene increased with increasing deposition time. In addition, the selectivities of C5 olefin, ethylbenzene, xylene, indene and naphthalene fluctuated.

3.3 Catalytic conversion of furan over 2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5 catalyst

2,4-DMQ could eliminate the external acid sites of HZSM-5 catalyst selectively. However, on the other hand, it may also act as a coke precursor and provide the growing space for coke growth on the outer surface of the HZSM-5 catalyst. It was not clear whether the 2,4-DMQ deposition would be positive or negative, and it has been studied in this paper.
3.3.1 The effect of 2,4-DMQ treatment amount. The carbon yields of chemicals from the catalytic conversion of furan are shown in Fig. 5. During these experiments, the tested HZSM-5 catalysts were treated with 2,4-DMQ and the mass ratios of 2,4-DMQ to HZSM-5 catalyst were 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 × 10−4 mol h−1 g−1, respectively. The treatment time was kept at 10 min.
image file: c5ra08827e-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Carbon yields of chemicals from the catalytic conversion of furan over 2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5 catalyst with different 2,4-DMQ treatment amounts. (a) Carbon yields of aromatics, olefins and total chemicals. (b) Carbon yields of coke, CO2 and CO. (c) Selectivities of C2–C5 olefins. (d) Selectivities of aromatics.

From Fig. 5(a) and (b), we can see that the carbon yields of aromatics, C2–C5 olefins, total chemicals, CO2 and CO decreased with the increase in the 2,4-DMQ treatment amount, while the carbon yield of coke increased significantly. It was found that 2,4-DMQ seemed to accelerate rather than retard coke formation. 2,4-DMQ could poison the external acid sites of the HZSM-5 catalyst selectively. However, when it was adsorbed on the external acid sites, the benzene ring in its structure could easily suffer from electrophilic substitution reactions with other chemicals and function as an aromatic coke precursor,19–23 thus resulting in the production of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and promotion of coke formation. Consequently, the carbon yields of the target products decreased but the coke yield increased. As shown in Fig. 5(c) and (d), the selectivities of ethylene and benzene increased, while that of butylene and C5 olefin decreased with increasing mass ratio of 2,4-DMQ to HZSM-5 catalyst. It seems that 2,4-DMQ treatment could promote the production of low-carbon content compounds.

3.3.2 The effect of the 2,4-DMQ treatment time. The carbon yields of chemicals from the catalytic conversion of furan are shown in Fig. 6. During these experiments, the tested HZSM-5 catalysts were treated with 2,4-DMQ and the treatment times were 0, 10 and 20 min. The mass ratio of 2,4-DMQ to HZSM-5 catalyst was kept at 3 × 10−4 mol h−1 g−1.
image file: c5ra08827e-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Carbon yields of chemicals from the catalytic conversion of furan over 2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5 catalyst with different 2,4-DMQ treatment times. (a) Carbon yields of aromatics, olefins and total chemicals. (b) Carbon yields of coke, CO2 and CO. (c) Selectivities of C2–C5 olefins. (d) Selectivities of aromatics.

From Fig. 6(a) and (b), we can see that the carbon yields of aromatics, C2–C5 olefins, total chemicals, CO2 and CO decreased over the range of 2,4-DMQ treatment times studied, while that of coke increased significantly from 36.5% to 41.5%. The effect of the 2,4-DMQ treatment time could be explained as follows. Obviously, more 2,4-DMQ would be adsorbed on the external acid sites of HZSM-5 catalyst as a result of longer treatment time. Therefore, these coke precursors would inevitably accelerate the production of coke and retard the generation of other chemicals. As shown in Fig. 6(c) and (d), a treatment time of 10 min produced the highest selectivities of ethylene and benzene and the lowest selectivities of C5 olefin, ethylbenzene and indene. In addition, the selectivities of propylene, toluene, xylene and naphthalene increased, whereas that of butylene decreased with increasing 2,4-DMQ treatment time.

Although both MgO and 2,4-DMQ can passivate or eliminate the external acid sites of HZSM-5 catalyst, their experimental results are totally different. Maybe organics which have benzene rings in their molecular structures should not be selected as the modifiers, and we will do more research to evaluate the influence of different modifiers in the future.

4. Conclusion

Both MgO and 2,4-DMQ treatment could reduce the total acid sites (both weak acid sites and strong acid sites) and external acid sites of HZSM-5. In this work, MgO and 2,4-DMQ modified HZSM-5 catalysts were used for catalytic furan conversion. For the MgO/HZSM-5 catalyst, the carbon yields of aromatics, C2–C5 olefins, total chemicals, CO2 and CO increased first and then decreased with an increase in amount of MgO deposited, whereas that of coke decreased first and then increased. Furthermore, when the deposition time was increased, the carbon yields of petrochemicals, CO2 and CO increased, while that of coke decreased. For the 2,4-DMQ/HZSM-5 catalyst, a larger 2,4-DMQ treatment amount or longer treatment time could reduce the carbon yields of the target products, CO2 and CO but promote coke formation.

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (no. 2013CB228106), the National Natural Science Fund Program of China (no. 51276040), the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University (no. YBJJ1430), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and the scientific innovation research program of college graduate in Jiangsu province (no. KYLX_0183), China Scholarship Council (CSC), as well as Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund, North Central Regional Sun Grant Center at South Dakota State University through a grant provided by the US Department of Agriculture (2013-38502-21424) and a grant provided by the US Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary (DTOS59-07-G-00054).

Notes and references

  1. Z. Du, B. Hu, X. Ma, Y. Cheng, Y. Liu, X. Lin, Y. Wan, H. Lei, P. Chen and R. Ruan, Bioresour. Technol., 2013, 130, 777–782 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. B. Zhang, Z. Zhong, K. Ding, Y. Cao and Z. Liu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53, 9979–9984 CrossRef CAS.
  3. B. Kunwar and T. Mlsna, Proceedings of the 245th ACS National Meeting and & Exposition, 2013, vol. 58, pp. 90–92 Search PubMed.
  4. B. Zhang, Z. Zhong, K. Ding and Z. Song, Fuel, 2015, 139, 622–628 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. T. R. Carlson, Y. Cheng, J. Jae and G. W. Huber, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 145–161 CAS.
  6. P. Matias, J. M. Lopes, S. Laforge, P. Magnoux, M. Guisnet and F. R. Ribeibo, Appl. Catal., A, 2008, 351, 174–183 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. H. Zhang, M. Luo, R. Xiao, S. Shao, B. Jin and G. Xiao, Bioresour. Technol., 2014, 155, 57–62 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. F. Bauer, W. Chen, Q. Zhao, A. Freyer and S. Liu, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2001, 47, 67–77 CrossRef CAS.
  9. F. Bauer, W. Chen, E. Bilz, A. Freyer, V. Sauerland and S. Liu, J. Catal., 2007, 251, 258–270 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. J. Wang, B. Zhao and Y. Xie, Acta Phys.–Chim. Sin., 2001, 17, 966–971 CAS.
  11. S. Laforge, D. Martin and M. Guisnet, Appl. Catal., A, 2004, 268, 33–41 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. H. Wei, K. Liu, S. Xie, W. Xin, X. Li, S. Liu and L. Xu, J. Catal., 2013, 307, 103–110 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. Y. Cheng and G. W. Huber, ACS Catal., 2011, 1, 611–628 CrossRef CAS.
  14. J. Kim, A. Ishida, M. Okajima and M. Niwa, J. Catal., 1996, 161, 387–392 CrossRef CAS.
  15. J. Zhang, W. Qian, C. Kong and F. Wei, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 2982–2988 CrossRef CAS.
  16. T. Hibino, M. Niwa and Y. Murakami, Zeolites, 1993, 13, 518–523 CrossRef CAS.
  17. S. Namba, A. Inaka and T. Yashima, Zeolites, 1986, 6, 107–110 CrossRef CAS.
  18. R. Li, Z. Zhong, B. Jin and A. Zheng, Bioresour. Technol., 2012, 119, 324–330 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. C. Fu and A. M. Schaffer, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 1985, 21, 68–75 CrossRef.
  20. A. Corma, V. Fornes, J. B. Monton and A. V. Orchilles, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1987, 26, 882–886 CrossRef CAS.
  21. T. Ho, A. R. Katritzky and S. J. Cato, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1992, 31, 1589–1597 CrossRef CAS.
  22. H. S. Cerqueira, G. Gaeiro, L. Costa and F. R. Ribeiro, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2008, 292, 1–13 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. B. Zhang, Z. Zhong and Z. Fu, J. Cent. South Univ., 2015, 22, 82–87 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.