Xiaopeng
Han
ab,
Fangyi
Cheng
a,
Chengcheng
Chen
a,
Fujun
Li
*a and
Jun
Chen
ac
aKey Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education), College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
bKey Laboratory of Advanced Ceramics and Machining Technology (Ministry of Education), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
cCollaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. E-mail: fujunli@nankai.edu.cn
First published on 11th April 2016
Rational design and synthesis of cathode catalysts are crucial for enhancing the performance of rechargeable Li–O2 batteries. Here, we report a controlled synthesis of the nanocomposite, Co3O4 nanohorns coated with MnO2 nanosheets on a Ni foam (Co3O4@MnO2/Ni). It integrates the catalytic activities of oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions and functions as a carbon- and binder-free cathode catalyst for rechargeable Li–O2 batteries. This nanocomposite catalyst presents a small discharge/charge voltage gap of 0.76 V (a low polarization) and a long cycle life of 170 cycles at 300 mA g−1, coupled with an ionic liquid-based electrolyte, 0.5 M lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (EMITFSI), which are much better than those based on the individual Co3O4 and MnO2 cathodes. The enhanced electrochemical performance is ascribed to the integrated bifunctional catalytic activities and the porous micro/nanostructure of the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite, as well as the ionic liquid-based electrolyte, indicating its promising application in rechargeable Li–O2 batteries.
Conventional air cathodes consist of a catalyst supported on carbon black and a polymer binder. Unfortunately, carbon was revealed to be unstable in a highly oxidizing environment of cathodes, especially at high voltages. It can spontaneously react with the discharge product Li2O2 to form lithium carbonates, which are difficult to be decomposed, and thus induce high discharge/charge overpotentials.22–24 In addition, the polymer binders, such as poly(vinylidene fluoride) and polyethylene oxide, are vulnerable to O2− anions, which are intermediates of the ORR process.25,26 Therefore, employment of carbon- and binder-free air cathodes in place of the carbon counterparts is essential to circumvent or suppress side reactions for rechargeable Li–O2 batteries with long cycle life.
Herein, we report a controlled synthesis of the nanocomposite of Co3O4 nanohorns coated with MnO2 nanosheets on a Ni foam (Co3O4@MnO2/Ni) via a facile hydrothermal method. This nanocomposite integrates the respective ORR and OER catalytic activities, and works as a carbon- and binder-free cathode catalyst for Li–O2 batteries. In combination with an ionic liquid (IL)-based electrolyte, 0.5 M lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (EMITFS), which has a low vapor pressure, wide electrochemical potential window and high chemical stability,27 the resultant Li–O2 batteries present a small discharge/charge voltage gap of 0.76 V and a long cycle life of 170 cycles of discharge and charge at 300 mA g−1. This suggests the feasibility of a catalyst design strategy for integrating the functionalities of the individual materials and its potential application as a cathode catalyst for Li–O2 batteries.
The nanocomposite of Co3O4 nanohorns coated with MnO2 nanosheets on a Ni foam (Co3O4@MnO2/Ni) was prepared by the growth of MnO2 nanosheets on Co3O4 nanohorns via a carbon assisted reaction route. The synthetic procedures are schematically described in Scheme 1. The Co2(OH)2CO3 precursor was firstly obtained by a hydrothermal process at 90 °C, and its further annealing at 250 °C for 4 h resulted in the formation of porous Co3O4 nanohorns on a Ni foam. The as-synthesized Co3O4/Ni was immersed into a 0.3 M aqueous glucose solution for 24 h. After carbonization of the coated glucose in an Ar atmosphere at 450 °C for 2 h, a thin carbon layer was produced on Co3O4 nanohorns in Co3O4/Ni. Then, the carbon coated Co3O4/Ni was transferred into an 80 mL Teflon-lined stainless autoclave containing 50 mL of 0.04 M KMnO4 solution, which was heated to 120 °C and kept for 3 h. Thus, the thin carbon layer as a sacrificial template reacted with KMnO4 to generate MnO2 nanosheets on Co3O4 nanohorns. Finally, the nanocomposite of Co3O4@MnO2/Ni was obtained by washing with distilled water and ethanol three times and dried at 60 °C in a vacuum oven. With similar procedures, the bare MnO2 nanosheets on Ni foam (MnO2/Ni) were prepared by coating glucose onto the Ni foam, carbonization, and then hydrothermal treatment in the presence of KMnO4 at 120 °C. Simultaneously, Co3O4 nanomaterials were synthesized with similar procedures to those supported on a Ni foam. MnO2 nanomaterials were obtained via a hydrothermal treatment of 20 mg carbon black (Vulcan XC-72) and 50 ml of 0.04 M KMnO4 at 120 °C for 3 h after ultrasonic dispersion.
Fig. 1 XRD patterns (a, b) and Raman spectra (c) of the as-synthesized Co3O4/Ni and Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposites. |
The Co3O4 nanohorns on a Ni foam (Co3O4/Ni) and the precursor of Co3O4@MnO2/Ni as shown in Scheme 1 are presented in the SEM image in Fig. 2a. It can be seen that the large-scale, dense and uniform Co3O4 nanohorns are vertically grown on the skeleton of the Ni foam. These nanohorns are several micrometers in length, as displayed in Fig. 2a and Fig. S1 (ESI†) under various magnifications. The micro/nanostructure and morphology of the Co3O4 nanohorns are dependent on the initial hydrothermal conditions, as revealed in Fig. S2, ESI.† The optimal temperature and duration are determined to be 90 °C and 10 h. The cross sectional image of the Co3O4/Ni nanocomposite in Fig. 2b displays the Co3O4 nanohorns of 1.5 μm in length and 100 nm in diameter. It is noted that the Co3O4 nanohorn is composed of numerous nanoparticles, which are connected to each other to form a highly porous structure, as depicted in the TEM image in Fig. S1, ESI.† The lattice spacing of 0.28 nm in the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image in Fig. S1 (ESI†) is in accordance with the (220) facet of Co3O4 in the XRD patterns in Fig. 1a. These suggest that the dense Co3O4 nanohorns are in situ formed on the Ni foam in the Co3O4/Ni nanocomposite via hydrothermal treatment.
With the formation of thin layers of MnO2 nanosheets on the Co3O4 nanohorns in Co3O4/Ni via the reaction of carbon and KMnO4, the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite is obtained, as depicted in Scheme 1. The top view of the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite is shown in Fig. 2c. The diameter of Co3O4@MnO2 increases and its surface becomes porous after coating with MnO2. The TEM observation in Fig. 2d shows that the MnO2 is in the form of thin layers of nanosheets on a Co3O4 nanohorn. This kind of nanosheet morphology is related to the preferential growth of MnO2 with the layered brucite crystallographic structure.28,31 The interplanar spacing of the MnO2 nanosheets is estimated to be 0.67 nm in the HRTEM image in Fig. 2e, which corresponds to the (001) plane of the birnessite-type MnO2. The nanosheets of thin-layered MnO2 are in agreement with the weak diffraction peaks in the XRD pattern in Fig. 1b. Moreover, the EDS mappings of the Co3O4@MnO2 nanocomposite in Fig. 2f unambiguously confirm that MnO2 is coated on the surface of a Co3O4 nanohorn. No carbon residue can be detected in the EDS mappings of the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite, which is consistent with the Raman spectra in Fig. 1c and the EDS spectrum in Fig. S3, ESI.† The weight ratio of Co3O4 to MnO2 in the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite is estimated to be 1:1, based on the EDS spectrum in Fig. S3, ESI.† Under similar hydrothermal conditions to Co3O4@MnO2/Ni, the MnO2 nanosheets on a Ni foam (MnO2/Ni) were also synthesized for comparison and are presented in Fig. S4, ESI.† The oxide nanocomposite structures can be generated on Ni foams by the post conversion strategy.
The electrocatalytic properties of the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite as a bifunctional catalyst for Li–O2 batteries were evaluated. Fig. 3a shows the first discharge/charge curves of the Li–O2 batteries with the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni, Co3O4/Ni, and MnO2/Ni cathodes at a current density of 100 mA g−1. The Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite displays a significantly improved discharge voltage and a reduced charge voltage as shown in Fig. 3a and b. This results in a small discharge/charge voltage gap of 0.76 V, which is ca. 250 and 370 mV lower than those of the Co3O4/Ni and MnO2/Ni cathodes, respectively. The charge plateaus are corresponding to the decomposition of the discharge products, since the EMITFSI IL-based electrolyte has good electrochemical stability of up to 5.3 V.32 The round-trip efficiency based on the ratio of the discharge voltage to charge voltage is calculated to be 78% with a capacity limit of 1000 mA h g−1, higher than 74 and 69% of the Co3O4/Ni and MnO2/Ni cathodes as shown in Fig. 3b, respectively. It is notable that both the discharge and charge voltages of MnO2/Ni are higher than those of Co3O4/Ni. This suggests that the MnO2 is more active in the ORR process and Co3O4 is beneficial for the OER process. The integration of MnO2 and Co3O4 into the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite therefore presents a synergistic effect by showing higher discharge and lower charge voltages than the individual MnO2/Ni and Co3O4/Ni cathodes.
The cycling stability of the Li–O2 battery with the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite is displayed in Fig. 3c. It can be operated for 170 cycles with stable terminal discharge voltages above 2.0 V and charge voltages below 4.7 V at 300 mA g−1. This is in sharp contrast to the cycle life of 88 and 64 cycles for the individual Co3O4 and MnO2 cathodes, respectively. For references, the mechanical mixture of Co3O4 and MnO2 nanomaterials, which are composed of nanohorns and nanosheets, respectively, is displayed in Fig. S5, ESI.† They present similar morphologies to those in the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite, and have the same size dimensions. The as-synthesized Co3O4 and MnO2 with a weight ratio of 1:1 were mechanically mixed with carbon (designated as Co3O4/MnO2/C) and coated onto a Ni foam. It leads to reduced reversibility (61 cycles), as presented in Fig. S6, ESI.† Compared to MnO2/Ni in Fig. 3, Co3O4/MnO2/C shows comparable discharge voltages and slightly lower charge overpotentials during the cycles. This suggests the function of Co3O4 in catalyzing the OER. The battery performance based on the presented Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite is competitive by referring to the reported results on Co and/or Mn-based oxide electrocatalysts, as shown in Table S1.† This indicates the structural advantages of the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite: (i) homogeneous integration of the catalytically active sites of both MnO2 and Co3O4 for ORR/OER ensures good rechargeability, (ii) its vertical growth on a Ni foam enables facile electron transport and its function as a carbon- and binder-free cathode to restrain the carbon and binder involved side reactions, (iii) the void space between the Co3O4@MnO2 nanocomposites benefits electrolyte permeation and accommodation of the discharge product. Furthermore, an ether-based electrolyte, 1 M LiTFSI in tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (TEGDME), was also employed in the Li–O2 batteries with the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite. It presents 100 cycles of discharge and charge versus 170 cycles in the IL-based electrolyte counterpart, as depicted in Fig. S6, ESI.† The inferior performance of the TEGDME-based electrolyte may be attributed to slow decomposition of the electrolyte, which leads to formation of irreversible by-products, like lithium carbonate or carboxylates.33,34 The micro/nanostructure and bifunctional electrocatalytic activities of the carbon- and binder-free Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite, as well as the stable IL-based electrolyte, ensure good electrochemical performance of the Li–O2 batteries.
During the cycles, the discharged and charged Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite cathodes were characterized by SEM and Raman spectroscopy, as displayed in Fig. 4. The Co3O4@MnO2/Ni cathode after the 10th discharge is shown to be covered by the mossy-like discharge product shown in Fig. 4a. It tends to aggregate in the void space between Co3O4@MnO2. In the following charge, the discharge product is reversibly decomposed to show the void space, and the porous structure of the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni cathode is recovered, as presented in Fig. 4b. The discharge product is identified to be Li2O2 by the Raman spectrum in Fig. 4c, and decomposed in the following charge with the disappearance of the characteristic Raman vibration band of Li2O2. In the 50th cycle of discharge and charge, the reversible formation and decomposition of Li2O2 at the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni cathode are monitored in the Raman spectra in Fig. 4c. But, at the Co3O4/MnO2/C cathode, in addition to the discharge product Li2O2, Li2CO3 is also detected by Raman spectroscopy in the 50th cycle as shown in Fig. 4d. In contrast, almost no Li2CO3 can be found at the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni cathode during the cycles as shown in Fig. 4c. Thus, the carbon- and binder-free in situ formed Co3O4@MnO2/Ni nanocomposite can effectively suppress the formation of lithium carbonate. The remarkable electrochemical performance of the Li–O2 battery based on the Co3O4@MnO2/Ni cathode originates from the integrated ORR and OER catalytic activities, efficient electron transfer through the networks of Co3O4 nanohorns grown on the Ni foam, and the porous micro/nanostructure that facilitates oxygen transport, electrolyte permeation, and accommodation of the discharge product Li2O2.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Synthesis and electrochemical characterization details, additional SEM and TEM images, EDS data and cyclic stability in different electrolytes. See DOI: 10.1039/c6qi00066e |
This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2016 |