Y2BaZnO5:Er3+ microcapsules with enhanced upconversion by vanadium ion codoping

Hom Nath Luitel*, Rumi Chand, Toshio Torikai, Mitsunori Yada and Takanori Watari*
Department of Advanced Technology Fusion, Saga University, Honjo-1, Saga, 850-8502, Japan. E-mail: mehomnath@yahoo.com; watarit@cc.saga-u.ac.jp; Fax: +81 952 28 8548; Tel: +81 952 28 8683

Received 7th December 2015 , Accepted 19th January 2016

First published on 22nd January 2016


Abstract

Microcapsules of Y2BaZnO5:Er3+ nanocrystals were successfully prepared by a simple hydrothermal method using citric acid as chelating agent. The sizes of the spherical microcapsules varied between 1–5 μm with a wall thickness of about 50–100 nm. The underlying microcapsule formation mechanism was discussed using the gas-bubble-assisted Ostwald ripening process. The Y2BaZnO5:Er3+ microcapsules exhibited characteristic upconversion (UC) emissions of Er3+ with intense yellowish orange color under dual laser pumping at 808 nm as well as 980 nm. Concentration dependent studies revealed that the optimum Er3+ concentration for intense UC at 550 nm and 660 nm was 5 mol% and 7 mol%, respectively. In addition, the optimum Er concentration differed from the excitation wavelength indicating a different UC mechanism. Importantly, the optimum amount of the V5+ co-doping into the Y2BaZnO5:Er3+ phosphors intensified the UC intensity by more than 3 fold. The Y2BaZnO5:Er3+,V5+ phosphor exhibited intense yellowish UC pumped by an 808 nm laser and will have potential applications for in vivo biological labelling, and biomedical imaging and therapies.


1. Introduction

Upconversion is a process in which two or more low-energy photons are converted to a single high-energy photon. Various processes can lead to upconversion, including two/three/multiple-photon absorptions, ground state followed by excited state absorption, energy transfer upconversion, second harmonic generation, and photon avalanche.1,2 Since its discovery in the 1960s, upconversion (UC) has been the focus of many researchers.2–5 These UC materials with strong luminescence in the NIR to visible to near UV region have been extensively investigated in recent years due to their potential applications in solar cells,3 novel 3D display technologies,2,6,7 inks for secure printing,8 optical communication and amplifiers,9,10 high density optical storage,2 infrared detection and sensors,11 and more recently biomedical labelling, imaging and therapies.4,12,13

Lanthanide ions are often employed as UC luminescence centres due to the abundant energy states of 4f configurations in Ln3+ ions and hence the UC emission proceed via various excited state absorption (ESA) and energy transfer (ET) pathways. Among the various lanthanide ions, Er3+, Ho3+, Tm3+, Nd3+ and Pr3+ were studied for UC luminescence.9,13–17 However, there are very limited f–f transitions from ground state of these RE3+ ions whose energy matches the energy of the excited photons, thus the ground state absorption (GSA) of these ions is extremely poor. The Yb3+ is the most commonly used sensitizer in UC luminescence to harvest pump photons and subsequently promotes neighbouring activator ions (like Er3+) to the excited states because of its wider absorption cross-section around 980 nm, simple two-level structure ensuring its very high quenching concentration and large spectral overlap (Yb3+; 2F5/2 to 2F7/2) with Er3+ absorption (5I8 to 5I6) which ensures efficient energy transfer from Yb3+ to Er3+ and other RE3+ ions.4,6,9 Thus, UC luminescence of RE3+ in RE3+/Yb3+ co-doped systems have been extensively studied, and predominant green to red UC emissions have been obtained, especially in low phonon energy hosts, such as fluoride,18,19 garnets,9,16 sulfide and oxy-sulfide16,20 and glasses.9,19

For bio-imaging and therapies, nanoparticles with high brightness with continuous emission are desired. In addition, they should be resistant to photo-bleaching. Lots of effort has been made to utilize NaYF4:Er3+ for bioimaging and therapies.2,4,12,21,22 However, they suffer severely due to high toxicity, low sensitivity, and low penetration depth of 980 nm laser in the body tissue, since the excellent optical window of the body tissue is 700–900 nm.23 Importantly, present upconversion nanoparticles (UCNP) suffer badly due to their low efficiency.20 In UC based techniques, detection sensitivity depends on the luminescence intensity of the phosphor. Recently, several attempts in case of UCNPs have been made to increase the luminescence intensity, such as codoping with sensitizer ions,9,14,24 crystal surface coating,2,25 core/shell synthesis,26 etc., but most of them are not enough to improve the UC intensity to desire level (should be pumped by as low as 1 mW laser power to protect human tissue from burning by laser heat). Hence, the luminescence intensity enhancement of UCNPs is still a challenging topic.

Compared to the huge number of studies on the NaYF4:Yb,Er nanocrystals, very small effort has been paid on the work of oxide based UC phosphors.9–11,13–15,17,19,20,24,27 Moreover, the study of 808 nm excited visible UC luminescence has not been in focus despite most suitable spectral range for the bioimaging and therapies due to best match of optical window of body tissue (700–900 nm). We have previously reported efficient oxide based NIR to NIR upconversion phosphor (CaMoO4:Tm,Yb,K) pumped by 980 nm laser.28 However, the 980 nm laser has low penetration depth compared to the 808 nm laser. Thus, in this paper we present efficient dual NIR laser (808 nm and 980 nm) pumped VIS UC emission in an oxide based sub micrometer phosphor, Y2BaZnO5:Er3+. Further, V5+ co-dopant has been identified first time for the enhancement of the UC intensity of Er3+ ions. Luminescence and absorbance measurements were reported for a series of Er3+-doped and Er3+, V5+ co-doped nanocrystalline microcapsules to achieve the highest UC intensity and to provide insight in the mechanism responsible for the UC luminescence.

2. Experimental

2.1 Sample preparation

Y2BaZnO5 phosphor doped with Er3+ and/or V5+/Yb3+ ions were prepared by a simple hydrothermal (HT) process. In a typical hydrothermal reaction, 10 mM mixture of metal ions viz. Y, Ba, Zn, RE and/or Yb, V (Y(NO3)3·6H2O, Ba(NO3)2, Zn(NO3)3·6H2O, Er(NO3)3·5H2O, Yb(NO3)3·5H2O, NH4VO3) were prepared in a beaker with distilled water by constant stirring with magnetic stirrer. Citric acid was used as chelating agent (total metal ions to citric acid ratio was fixed to 4[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1) and urea as precipitating agent (total metal ions to urea was fixed to 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]40). The pH of the resulting solution was adjusted by aqueous ammonia/nitric acid. 30 ml of the mixture was poured into a 50 ml Teflon lined stainless steel autoclave and kept at 120 °C for 12 hours. The white solid obtained was centrifuged, washed multiple times with distilled water followed by ethanol and freeze dried for 12 h. Each sample was further calcined at 700–1200 °C for 3 h to get the final highly crystalline Y2BaZnO5:Er3+ phosphor.

2.2 Characterizations

Phase identification was carried out using a Shimadzu XRD-6300 instrument with Cu Kα radiation. The morphology of the phosphor particles were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi-S3000N). Elemental analysis and mass percentage of the constituent ions were estimated using EDX coupled with SEM. Before SEM measurements, each sample was coated roughly 5 nm in thickness with platinum–palladium using Hitachi E-1030 ion sputter. Precise elemental analysis for the powder sample was carried out using Rayny EDX-800HS energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. The upconversion (UC) emission spectra, pumped by 808 nm and/or 980 nm cw laser (≤1–200 mW output power) were recorded using USB 4000 UV-VIS-NIR miniature fiber optic spectrometer (Ocean optics). Absorbance spectra were recorded using Shimadzu 6545 UV-VIS-IR spectrometer using integration sphere mounting the sample in quartz slides. All measurements were carried out at room temperature unless specified.

3. Results and discussion

Fig. 1(a) presents the phase analysis of Y2BaZnO5 doped with different moles of Er3+ ions. The XRD patterns of all the samples agree very well with the Y2BaZnO5 standard JCPDS pattern (52-1688) and no distinguished secondary phases were identified. The Y2BaZnO5 consists of orthorhombic crystal structure with Pnmb space group as depicted in Fig. 1(b). Further, isotropic substitution by Er3+ (and Yb3+) in to the Y3+ sites did not altered the Y2BaZnO5 phase. Cell parameters obtained from the XRD data of the typical sample (3 mol% Er doped Y2BaZnO5) were; a = 7.068 Å, b = 5.705 Å and c = 12.334 Å, slightly smaller than the reported data of pure host [JCPDS: 52-1688], which is attributed to the slightly smaller ionic radii of the Er3+ (0.100 nm) compared to the host ion Y3+ (0.102 nm).29 Very similar XRD patterns without distinguished impurity was observed by co-doping with various Yb3+ moles as shown in ESI.
image file: c5ra26042f-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) XRD patterns of various moles of Er3+ substituted Y2BaZnO5:Er3+ phosphors and (b) crystal structure created by VESTA program.

Fig. 2 reveals the morphology of various Y2BaZnO5:0.03Er phosphor particles as prepared hydrothermally at 120 °C for 12 h as well as heat treated at 1000 °C. The SEM images revealed that almost mono-dispersed microcapsules of size between 1 to 5 μm were obtained. A closer look of the SEM images as shown in the Fig. 2(b) and (c) suggested that the microcapsules are really hollow with wall thickness ranging between 50–200 nm (see ESI Fig. S1 for detail). The wall of the micro-capsules consisted of nanoparticles of size between 30–100 nm. Further, some non-oriented nanograins were observed whose particles dimensions varied between some tens of nanometers up to 200–300 nm as shown in Fig. 2(d). It is important to state that the microcapsules were stable up to relatively high temperatures, ∼1000 °C as shown in Fig. 2(e) and the ESI Fig. S2. During the thermal treatment process, the size of the microcapsules slightly reduced, but the capsular shape remained intact. However, further increase of sintering temperatures above 1000 °C destroyed the microcapsules and formed agglomerated nanoparticles as shown in Fig. S2. The EDX spectrum of the selected surface of microcapsules (Fig. 2(f)) proved that the microcapsules really consisted of Y2BaZnO5 phase. Further, precise compositional analyses were carried out using X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (see ESI S4 for the mass composition). The elemental compositions confirmed that the doped ions, especially Er, Yb and V were really incorporated in to the Y2BaZnO5 matrix.


image file: c5ra26042f-f2.tif
Fig. 2 SEM images of Y2BaZnO5:0.03Er hollow spheres as prepared hydrothermally at 120 °C for 12 h under different magnifications (a–d), sample (a) heat treated at 1000 °C for 3 h (e), and EDX spectra of selected area (f).

Under, these experimental results, the formation mechanism of those microcapsules can be outlined by gas-bubble-assisted Ostwald ripening through self templated, self-assembly process as shown in the scheme of Fig. 3.30 First, citric acid dissolved in the solution and citrate anions were formed. Then the metal ions get complexes with the citrate molecules and controlled precipitation through hydrolysis forms crystal nuclei or nanograins. As the reaction progress, the nanograins have tendency to aggregate to minimize the total surface energy. Thus, at high temperature hydrothermal treatment process, nanograins begin to aggregate via an Ostwald ripening process and form the aggregated structures.31 During the hydrothermal treatment at high pressure, these aggregates roll over smoothly and form spherical balls. During the progress of the HT treatment time, more nanograins self-assemble on to the surface of the sphere to minimize the total surface energy and bigger spheres are expected. Here, each sphere acts as a template for nanograins formed from the same sphere itself. This Ostwald ripening and gas-bubble-assisted-assembly process going on, more and more nanograins attached on the surface of the sphere and bigger balls are formed. The spherical, somehow solid or semi solid spheres as depicted in the ESI S3(b) and (b-1) can be well explained by above mention mechanism. However, if excess urea (metal ions/urea = 1/40) was used, microcapsules with hollow architectures were formed as depicted in Fig. 2 and ESI S3(a) and (a-1). As mentioned by Liu et al.,30 when excess urea is used during the HT treatment process, ammonia/N2 gas-bubbles were continuously generated. These gas-bubbles provide aggregation centres for nanograins and gas-bubble-nanograins aggregates are formed as shown in scheme in Fig. 3. Here, the citrate ions acts as surfactants and inhibits the hydrolysis of the metal cations used in the reactions (here, Zn2+, Ba2+, Y3+, RE3+) and facilitates the slow growth of the nanoparticles, otherwise nanograins agglomerates rapidly and forms irregular solids. Further, citrate ions increased the viscosity of the HT solution. At viscous solution, stabilized gas-bubbles form regular hollow cores. Further, slow precipitation and movement rate of nanograins in viscous solution allow enough time to form regular spheres. This Ostwald ripening and gas-bubble-assisted-assembly process going on, more and more nanograins attached on the surface of the sphere and bigger balls with thicker wall are formed as shown in the ESI Fig. S3(a) and (a-1). A similar Ostwald self-assembled, self-templated process of CeO2, ZnO and Al2O3 spheres formation has been reported in gas-bubble free conditions.31–34 The size of the microcapsules, void size are expected to change according to the air-bubble size whereas the wall thickness are expected to control according to the HT reaction time and concentration of the citrate anions (rate of metal ions hydrolysis). The core size of the microcapsules varied remarkably in our results due to formation of different sizes air-bubbles. The air-bubble size could be control according to the citrate concentration (viscosity of the solution) and rate of bubbles formation (concentration of urea) and underlined phenomena are being carried out and expected to publish elsewhere in near future.


image file: c5ra26042f-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Schematic illustration of the formation mechanism of Y2BaZnO5:Er microcapsules by gas-bubble-assisted Ostwald ripening.

The UC emission phenomena of the Er3+ and Er3+ codoped with Yb3+ were studied by 808 nm as well as 980 nm laser excitation at room temperature and results are presented in Fig. 4. Y2BaZnO5:Er phosphors exhibited green emission centered around 520–560 nm corresponding to the (2H11/2, 4S3/24I15/2) electronic transition and comparatively stronger orange emission band centered around 650 nm corresponding to the (4I9/24I15/2) electronic transition of Er3+ ion. With increasing Er concentration, both the 808 nm pumped as well as 980 nm pumped UC intensity increased up to 7 mol% Er. However, the increased trend differ remarkably for the green and orange emission bands as well as under pumping energy. Under both 808 nm and 980 nm pumping, the orange emission peak monotonically increased with increasing Er concentration, even though the increase was much pronounced at 808 nm pumping (>40 fold increase, see inset in Fig. 4(a) and (b)). However, the increase of green peak was less pronounced under both 808 nm (∼10 fold increase, see inset in Fig. 4(a)) and 980 nm pumping (∼5 fold increase, see inset in Fig. 4(b)). Further, the green emission peak saturated as early as ∼3 mol% Er ions concentration but the orange emission peak was not saturated until 7 mol% Er. It is worth mentioning that the concentration quenching was started at lower concentration under 980 nm pumping compared to the 808 nm pumping. Obviously, 808 nm photons were absorbed by Er ions itself corresponding to (4I15/24I9/2) electronic transition, but 980 nm was absorbed by Yb (2F7/22F5/2) and energy transfer from Yb → Er generates the Er UC. It is assumed that cross relaxation from higher energy states (2H11/2, 4S3/2) to lower energy states (4I9/2) of Er ions and Er (4I11/2) to Er (4I11/2) energy migrations were pronounced earlier under 980 nm excitation. When 808 nm laser was used, direct two step absorption followed by lattice relaxation easily populates higher energy states of Er (2H11/2, 4S3/2) and concentration quenching was observed at relatively higher Er concentrations (>7 mol% Er). However, under low energy excitation (980 nm), the phonon assisted relaxation from 4I11/2 to the lower lying 4I13/2 states is more pronounced, thus it is difficult to populate higher energy states (2H11/2, 4S3/2) to generate green UC. The detail UC mechanism will be discussed later.


image file: c5ra26042f-f4.tif
Fig. 4 UC emission profiles of Y2BaZnO5:x mol% Er, 7 mol% Yb phosphors: (a) excitation at 808 nm and (b) excitation at 980 nm. Insets are the integrated intensities of green (520–570 nm) and red (640–690 nm) emissions as a function of Er ions concentration.

Fig. 5 represents the effect of Yb3+ ions concentration at fixed 3 mol% Er ions concentration. Under 980 nm excitation, the intensities of the green emissions band gradually increased with increasing Yb3+ ions concentration up to 15 mol% above that it started decreasing (Fig. 5(b)). However, the orange emission band monotonically increased even up to 20 mol%. Completely different trend was observed when 808 nm laser was used; green band decreased with increasing Yb concentration from the beginning but orange band increased first up to 10 mol% Yb and then decreased further increasing its concentration. When direct Er is excited by 808 nm laser, with increasing Yb concentration back transfer of excited photons from 4I11/2 (Er) to 2F5/2 (Yb) increases which decreases the photons population at 4I11/2 (Er) states and consequently the excitation from 4I11/2 (Er) to higher states 4F7/2 (Er) is suppressed and decreased the green UC. On the contrary, at low Yb ions concentrations, the competition between energy transfer from 4I11/2 (Er) → 2F5/2 (Yb) to internal relaxation to lower lying states (4I11/2 (Er) → 4I13/2 (Er)) increases followed by upper states population (4I13/24F9/2) through ESU process increases the orange upconversion. But as the Yb concentration further increased beyond 10 mol%, the energy transfer from 4I11/2 (Er) → 2F5/2 (Yb) exceeds the internal relaxation leading to quenching of the Er upconversion. This concentration quenching effect could be explained by the energy transfer between the nearest activator to sensitizers and sensitizer to sensitizer internal relaxation. As the dopants concentration increased, the distance between dopants ions shrinks allowing non-radiative energy migration such as exchange, dipole or multi-pole interactions. Further, at higher rare ions concentrations, the solid solubility limits reached the maximum and a secondary phase appeared and hampered the UC emission.


image file: c5ra26042f-f5.tif
Fig. 5 UC emission profiles of Y2BaZnO5:3 mol% Er, x mol% Yb phosphors: (a) excitation at 808 nm and (b) excitation at 980 nm laser. Insets are the integrated intensities of green (520–570 nm) and red (640–690 nm) emissions as a function of Yb ions concentration.

According to Judd–Ofelt theory, the partially forbidden intra 4f–4f transitions are enabled by crystal field coupling with the unoccupied electronic configurations of the rare earth ions in higher energies or with ligand to metal charge transfer configuration.35 At low symmetry, not only the degeneracy of the free ions states removed, the transition probabilities also increased due to the overall increase in the crystal field strength. Thus, to develop highly efficient UC phosphors that utilizes the specific energy level schemes of the rare earth ions, symmetry breaking is one of the most promising way. Use of monovalent charge compensator ions (such as Li+, Na+, K+, Ag+ etc.) showed promising effect on the enhancement of emission intensity of the alkali or alkaline earth based materials.36–39 S. Das et al. explained that the K+ ions addition on the CaSO4:Dy3+ phosphor and enhanced the PL intensity significantly.40 J. H. Chung et al. significantly increased the UC intensity of CaMoO4 blue phosphor by excess Li+ ions addition.41 We have previously reported many fold improvement of UC intensity of blue, green and orange emissions in CaMoO4:RE3+ (Tm/Er/Ho) by alkali metal ions substitution at the divalent Ca2+ ions sites and explained the effect by distortion of the crystal field of RE3+ (Tm/Er/Ho) ions due to size and charge difference.13,39 Recently, Y. Hu et al. remarkably improved the red UC of NaYF4:Yb,Er by Fe3+ and Mn2+ doping and explained the underlined mechanism due to crystal field and symmetry lowering around the Er ions enhancing the f–f transition probabilities.22 However, they have used very high concentration of Fe and Mn ions that significantly altered the crystal phase. Herein, we have reported for the first time, the significant improvement of the both green and orange upconversion in oxide based phosphor using the very similar crystal field breaking and symmetry lowering technique by doping very small amount of the V5+ ions into the Y2BaZnO5:Er phosphor.

Fig. 6(a) shows the effect of V5+ ions substitution on the green and orange emission of the Y2BaZnO5:3 mol% Er phosphors excited by 808 nm. Substitution of V5+ ions significantly intensified the UC emission intensities of both the green and orange emission bands upto 3 mol% V5+ ions substitution, which was more than 3 times compared to the V5+ ions unsubstituted sample as shown in the inset of Fig. 6(a). Further increase of V5+ ions above 3 mol% decreased the UC intensity. We have recorded the absorption spectra of selected samples and expressed in Fig. 6(b). There was no significant absorption band related to the V5+ ions. However, the Er3+ related absorption band were improved significantly compared to the V5+ ions undoped sample. It confirmed that the improvement of the UC intensity was not related to the sensitization effect of the V5+ ions like Yb3+ rather it is related to the change of crystal field and its symmetry around the Er3+ ions due to the V5+ ions substitution. As seen from the XRD in Fig. 7, the doping of V5+ ions showed significant change in the XRD peak position to higher 2θ value indicating shrinkage of lattice due to substitution of bigger Zn2+ (0.090 nm) sites by smaller V5+ (0.070 nm) sites. It suggests that the V5+ ions occupied the Zn sites in the host lattice. The small V5+ ions with higher charge density significantly distort the crystal field around the Er3+ ions in the Y2BaZnO5 matrix that cause severe crystal field break and disorder around Er3+ ions. This causes the redistribution of electron cloud around the Er3+ ions, as a consequence, the 4f–4f transition probabilities of Er3+ ions increased and significantly increases the UC emission intensities.7,22,35,38,42,43 However, at higher V concentrations, secondary phase was clearly observed marked by stars in the Fig. 7 and hampered the UC.


image file: c5ra26042f-f6.tif
Fig. 6 UC emission profiles of Y2BaZnO5:3 mol% Er, x mol% V phosphors (excitation at 808 nm) and (b) absorption spectra of selected samples. Inset in (a) is the integrated intensities of green (520–570 nm) and red (640–690 nm) emissions as a function of V ions concentration.

image file: c5ra26042f-f7.tif
Fig. 7 (a) XRD profiles of the Y2BaZnO5:3 mol% Er, x mol% V phosphors and (b) portion of XRD patterns showing peak shift with V doping concentration.

Fig. 8 shows the 442 nm excited stokes emissions of Er recorded from 500 nm to 1050 nm range. Due to sufficiently strong excitation and hence population of upper excited states various fn → fn transitions were observed besides certain bands observed at 808 nm and 980 nm excitation. The inset of Fig. 8 shows the normalised emission intensity (integrated over whole range viz. 540–1030 nm) as a function of V ions concentration. The same trend was found for the variation of emission intensities with V substitution as observed while pumping at 808 nm. It further implies that all the electronic transitions of Er were intensified significantly by V-doping.


image file: c5ra26042f-f8.tif
Fig. 8 PL emission profiles of Y2BaZnO5:3 mol% Er, x mol% V phosphors excited at 442 nm. Inset is the normalised emission intensity (integrated over 540–1030 nm) as a function of V ions concentration.

Fig. 9 shows the excitation power dependence of green and orange UC emissions in the Y2BaZnO5:Er phosphors. It is well known that for unsaturated UC processes, the number of photons required to populate the upper lying states can be obtained by the following general equation:

IPn
where n is a number of pumping photons required to excite the emitting state, I is the UC intensity and P is the laser pumping power. The calculated result (Fig. 9) indicates that the slope is ∼1.96 for orange UC, 1.97 for green UC emissions. This result indicates that the green (2H11/2/4S3/24I15/2) and orange (5F5/5F4/5S25I8) upconversion processes involves two photons upconversion processes.4,5,15,20,44


image file: c5ra26042f-f9.tif
Fig. 9 (a) Pump power dependence upconversion intensity of Y2BaZnO5:3 mol% Er, 7 mol% Yb phosphors by 808 nm laser excitation. Inset is the n dependent UC relationship from pump power verses UC intensity and (b) simplified energy level diagrams of Er3+(Yb3+):Y2BaZnO5 phosphors.

According to above results the upconversion mechanism of Y2BaZnO5:Er phosphor can be generalized as in Fig. 9(b). The UC mechanism under 980 nm lasers pumping was well studied and can be seen in detail at ref. 11 and 20. Under 808 nm lasers pumping, the 4I9/2 state gets populated (4I15/24I9/2). Successive excitation (excited state absorption, ESA) of the 4I9/2 state populates the 2H9/2 state. From the 2H9/2 state the excited photons relax nonradiatively to the 2H11/2 and then to the 4S3/2 level, from where green emission is observed (2H11/2/4S3/24I15/2; green emission). At the same time, photons from the 4I9/2 state relax nonradiatively to the 4I11/2 state. The lifetime of 4I11/2 state is comparatively long,15 the energy transfer upconversion (ETU) from the nearby Er3+ ions populates the 2H11/2 and then to the 4S3/2 levels through the nonradiative relaxation from higher 4F3/2 and 4F7/2 states and radiative transition from the 2H11/2/4S3/2 levels gives the prominent green emission (2H11/2/4S3/24I15/2). The non radiative relaxation from the 4S3/2 state to the low lying 4F9/2 state or radiative relaxation from the (4F3/2/4F7/2) to the 4F9/2, populates the 4F9/2 state, from where transition to the ground state (4I15/2) generates the red UC (4F9/24I15/2; red emission). Here, important point is that when Er concentration was high enough, ETU dominates, which populates only 4F9/2 states as a consequence, the red UC will be prominent. It means, the quenching concentration of the red UC is comparatively larger than the green UC due to competition between ETU and ESA at higher Er concentration. It can be further supported by the indirect 980 nm pumping through Yb3+ ions. When 980 nm laser is used, the 2F5/2 states of Yb3+ gets populated. Then non-resonant energy transfer from the 2F5/2 (of Yb3+) level to the 4I11/2 level of Er3+ populates the 4I11/2 level. Nonradiative relaxation to the 4I13/2 level followed by ETU populates the 4F9/2 states to generate red UC. At the same time, due to long life time of the 4I11/2 state, the 2H11/2 and 4S3/2 states get populated partially through nonradiative relaxation from 4F7/2. Thus, excited state population of the 2H11/2 and 4S3/2 states are comparatively low than the population of the 4F9/2 states while pumping at 980 nm, which is seen as strong red and weak green UC at 980 nm pumping but strong green and weak red UC at stronger (808 & 442) nm pumping.

4. Conclusion

A facile hydrothermal method was used to synthesize microcapsules of Y2BaZnO5:Er3+ upconversion phosphor. Spherical balls of 1–5 μm size and hollow architectures of about 50 nm shell thickness were fabricated by HT treatment and these microcapsules were stable even at high temperature of 1000 °C. The underlined microcapsule formation mechanism was discussed using gas-bubble-assisted Ostwald ripening process. Yellowish green UC emissions were achieved by pumping with 808 as well as 980 nm lasers. The optimum Er3+ doped concentration for 550 nm and 660 nm UC luminescence intensities were 5 mol% and 7 mol%, respectively. In addition, the optimum Er concentration differed from the excitation wavelength indicating different mechanism under 808 and 980 nm pumping. Importantly, optimum amount of the V5+ co-doping into the Y2BaZnO5:Er3+ phosphors intensified the UC intensity by more than 3 fold. The redistribution of electron cloud around the Er3+ ions by crystal field distortion and symmetry lowering of the crystal after introducing V5+ was suggested to be the origin of the UC improvement. The Y2BaZnO5:Er3+,V5+ phosphor exhibited very intense yellowish UC pumped by 808 nm laser and will have potential applications for the in vivo biological labelling, biomedical imaging and therapies.

Notes and references

  1. J. Wang and P. A. Tanner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 947–949 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. J. Zhou, Q. Liu, W. Feng, Y. Sun and F. Li, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 395–465 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. X. Huang, S. Han, W. Huang and X. Liu, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 173–201 RSC.
  4. X. Li, F. Zhang and D. Zhao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 1346–1378 RSC.
  5. W. Kaiser and C. Garrett, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1961, 7, 229–231 CrossRef CAS.
  6. P. Du, Z. Xia and L. Liao, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2015, 2015, 5 Search PubMed.
  7. B. Zhou, B. Shi, D. Jin and X. Liu, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2015, 10, 924–936 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. L. Hesselink, J. Ralston and R. Macfarlane, Science, 1996, 273, 1185 Search PubMed.
  9. Q. Zhang, G. Chen, G. Zhang, J. Qiu and D. Chen, J. Appl. Phys., 2010, 133, 034507 Search PubMed.
  10. B. P. Singh, A. K. Parchur and R. K. Singh, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 3480–3489 RSC.
  11. H. N. Luitel, K. Ikeue, R. Okuda, R. Chand, T. Torikai, M. Yada and T. Watari, Opt. Mater., 2014, 36, 591–595 CrossRef CAS.
  12. Y. Min, J. Li, F. Liu, P. Padmanabhan, E. Yeow and B. Xing, Nanomaterials, 2014, 4, 129–154 CrossRef.
  13. H. N. Luitel, R. Chand, T. Torikai, M. Yada and T. Watari, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 17034 RSC.
  14. I. Etchart, A. Huignard, M. B. Erard, M. N. Nordin, I. Hern Andez and R. J. Curry, et al., J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 3989–3994 RSC.
  15. A. Lupei, V. Lupei, C. Gheorghe, A. Ikesue and E. Osiac, Opt. Mater., 2009, 31, 744–749 CrossRef CAS.
  16. C. Strümpel, M. McCann and G. Beaucarne, et al., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2007, 91, 238–249 CrossRef.
  17. Y. Zhou, X. H. He and B. Yan, Opt. Mater., 2014, 36, 602–607 CrossRef CAS.
  18. N. C. Dyck, F. C. J. M. Van Veggel and G. P. Demopoulos, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2013, 5, 11661–11667 CAS.
  19. J. de Wild, A. Meijerink, J. K. Rath, W. G. J. H. M. van Sark and R. E. I. Schropp, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 4835 CAS.
  20. M. Pokhrel, A. K. Gangadharan and D. K. Sardar, Mater. Lett., 2013, 99, 86–89 CrossRef CAS.
  21. X. Shang, P. Chen, T. Jia, D. Feng, S. Zhang and Z. Sun, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 11481–11489 RSC.
  22. Y. Hu, X. Liang, Y. Wang, E. Liu, X. Hu and J. Fan, Ceram. Int., 2015, 41, 14545–14553 CrossRef CAS.
  23. R. Weissleder, Nat. Biotechnol., 2001, 19, 316–317 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. D. Adikaari, I. Etchart, P. H. Guéring, M. Bérard, S. R. P. Silva and A. K. Cheetham, et al., J. Appl. Phys., 2012, 111, 094502 CrossRef.
  25. C. Li and J. Lin, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 6831 RSC.
  26. M. C. Tan, L. Al-Baroudi and R. E. Riman, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2011, 3, 3910–3915 CAS.
  27. B. Xue and J. Sun, Infrared Phys. Technol., 2014, 62, 45–49 CAS.
  28. E. D. Sternberg, D. Dolphin and C. Brickner, Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 4151–4202 CrossRef CAS.
  29. http://www.abulafia.mt.ic.ac.uk/shannon/ptable.php.
  30. X. Liu, Y. Li, W. Zhu and P. Fu, CrystEngComm, 2013, 15, 4937–4947 RSC.
  31. C. Cao, Z. Cui, C. Chen, W. Song and W. Cai, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 9865–9870 CAS.
  32. S. Cho, J. Jang, S. Jung, B. R. Lee, E. Oh and K. Lee, Langmuir, 2009, 25, 3825–3831 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. G. Xue, X. Huang, N. Zhao, F. Xiao and W. Wei, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 13385–13391 RSC.
  34. H. N. Luitel, R. Chand, T. Torikai, M. Yada and T. Watari, Int. J. Photoenergy, 2013, 2013, 40613 CrossRef.
  35. M. F. Reid, Crystal field handbook, Cambridge Univ. press, 2000 Search PubMed.
  36. H. N. Luitel, T. Watari, R. Chand, T. Torikai and M. Yada, J. Mater., 2013, 2013, 613090 Search PubMed.
  37. S. Das, A. Amarnath Reddy and G. Vijaya Prakash, Ceram. Int., 2012, 38, 5769–5773 CrossRef CAS.
  38. S. Dutta, S. Som and S. K. Sharma, Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 9654–9661 RSC.
  39. H. N. Luitel, R. Chand and T. Watari, Displays, 2016, 42, 1–8 CrossRef CAS.
  40. S. Das, A. Amarnath Reddy and G. Vijaya Prakash, Ceram. Int., 2012, 38, 5769–5773 CrossRef CAS.
  41. J. H. Chung, S. Y. Lee, K. B. Shim, S. Y. Kweon, S. C. Ur and J. H. Ryu, Appl. Phys. A, 2012, 108, 369–373 CrossRef CAS.
  42. B. S. Cao, Y. Y. He, L. Zhang and B. Dong, J. Lumin., 2013, 135, 128–132 CrossRef CAS.
  43. F. Wang, Y. Han, C. S. Lim, Y. Lu, J. Wang and J. Xu, et al., Nature, 2010, 463, 1061–1065 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  44. L. Liu, H. Jiang, Y. Chen, X. Zhang, Z. Zhang and Y. Wang, J. Lumin., 2013, 143, 423–431 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra26042f

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.