Venkatanarayana Pappula and
Subbarayappa Adimurthy*
Academy of Scientific & Innovative Research, CSIR – Central Salt & Marine Chemicals Research Institute, G. B. Marg, Bhavnagar-364 002, Gujarat, India. E-mail: adimurthy@csmcri.org
First published on 14th September 2016
An organic solvent-free process for the preparation of 2,6-dibromo-4-nitroaniline, (an important intermediate in the synthesis of azo disperse dyes) from 4-nitroaniline using 2:1 bromide–bromate salts under an aqueous acidic medium at ambient conditions has been developed. The 2:1 bromide–bromate couple could be obtained by mixing pure NaBr/NaBrO3 salts or by adjusting the 5:1 mole ratio of NaBr/NaBrO3 (obtained in an aqueous solution as an intermediate from the bromine manufacture industry by a cold process) to 2:1 by the addition of a suitable oxidant. After completion of the reaction the product was purified by simple filtration and washing with water. The aqueous acidic filtrate was recycled up to five times without loss of purity and yield of the product. The method was extended to other aromatic substrates.
Bromination of aromatic substrates is a fundamental reaction in organic chemistry1 due to the importance of the resultant bromo-products which are used as intermediates in the synthesis of various pharmaceutical industries2 azo-disperse dyes,3 flame retardants,4 pesticides5 and herbicides.6 Particularly, 2,6-dibromo-4-nitroaniline (DBPNA) is a very important intermediate in the azo-disperse dye industry and in the synthesis of star polyfluorenes which are useful in photovoltaic applications.7 In addition to the above industrial applications, the antifungal behaviour of this molecule made it a pharmaceutically important product.8 DBPNA is a main building block in the synthesis of Nanoputians.9 Due to the important applications of bromo compounds, a number of brominating reagents have been developed by various groups. Among those reagents, liquid bromine is a very classical reagent for industrial production of desired bromo compounds despite its hazardous nature. To overcome the hazardness and handling problems associated with liquid bromine at large scale, we have introduced a new concept of using liquid bromine intermediate, which consists an aqueous solution of 5:1 bromide–bromate mole ratios during the liquid bromine recovery by cold process.10 This 5:1 mole ratio of Br−/BrO3− could be used for various bromination reactions in combination of mineral acids and suitable oxidants as desirable. Alternately, the 5:1 Br−/BrO3− could be converted to 2:1 mole ratios using oxidants like sodium hypochlorite and can be used for aromatic substitution reactions under aqueous conditions (Scheme 1).11 During the bromination process of organic substrates, the addition of any mineral acids to the aqueous solution containing 2:1 Br−/BrO3− salts generates hypobromous acid (BrOH) which is accountable for electrophilic substitution reactions.
Based on our published reports, one of the textile dye manufacturing industry in India12 approached us to develop a process for the preparation of the dye intermediate 2,6-dibromo-4-nitroaniline from para-nitroaniline (PNA) using our concept of environment-friendly bromination process to dispense the problems associated with liquid bromine. Accordingly, we undertook the process development of the desired molecule, and performed the reactions using alkaline intermediate as well as constituted bromide–bromate salts to achieve the desired yield, purity, product colour and its effluent recyclability which are discussed in this report.
Initially, we performed the reactions with bromide–bromate salts and different mineral acids, solvents at lab scale (1–2 g of PNA) experiments (see Table S1, ESI†). After screening of different conditions, we found that, the good yield of the desired product could be obtained by the addition of brominating reagent solution slowly to the aqueous acidic PNA slurry, rather than addition of acid to the solution containing PNA and aqueous brominating solution. This mode of addition was also advantageous for the recycling of the acidic filtrate after collecting the product by filtration under organic solvent-free conditions. Then, we tested the reaction with brominating reagent prepared from aqueous alkaline intermediate. The alkaline bromine intermediate solution which contains 5:1 mole ratio of NaBr/NaBrO3 was selectively oxidized to 2:1 ratio of NaBr/NaBrO3 by the controlled addition with NaOCl solution (Scheme 1, eqn (1)). These 2:1 (NaBr/NaBrO3) aqueous solution and constituted bromide–bromate salts were used for the bromination of PNA at 10.0 gram scale and the results are discussed in Table 1.
Entry | BrOH used | H+ source (equiv.) | Yield of 2 (%) | GC-purity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions unless otherwise noted: the reactions were carried out at 10 g PNA, aqueous brominating reagent solution, at room temperature, 4 h.b Purity by HPLC assessed by Colourtex Industry.c Reaction performed at 100 g scale of PNA. | ||||
1 | NaBr/NaBrO3 (2:1) | HCL (3) | 85 | 93 |
2 | NaBr/NaBrO3 (2:1) | HNO3 (3) | 84 | 86 |
3 | NaBr/NaBrO3 (2:1) | H2SO4 (2) | 94 | 100 |
4 | NaBr/NaBrO3 (2:1) | H2SO4 (1.5) | 95 | 100(96.8)b |
5 | NaBr/NaBrO3 (2:1) | H2SO4 (1) | 86 | 85 |
6 | Alkaline bromine (2:1) | H2SO4 (1.5) | 95 | 100 |
7c | Alkaline bromine (2:1) | H2SO4 (1.5) | 91 | 100(90.3)b |
As the product DBPNA was obtained in 95% yield with 100% purity by GC, by conducting the reaction only in water, without any column separation but, by simple filtration and washing with water (Table S1†). Then we scaled up the reaction to 10.0 g starting substrate (PNA) to check the feasibility of the reaction (Table 1). The reaction of PNA with 2:1 ratio of NaBr/NaBrO3 and three equivalents of hydrochloric acid (w.r.t. PNA), 84% yield of DBPNA was obtained with 94% purity (Table 1, entry 1). The same reaction with nitric acid gave 85% yield with reduced purity (Table 1, entry 2). However, with two equivalents of sulfuric acid H2SO4 the reaction gave 94% yield with 100% purity (Table 1, entry 3). By decreasing the amount of acid to 1.5 equivalents also the same yield of the product was obtained with same purity (Table 1, entry 4). A sample of this product was also tested and evaluated by the Colourtex Industry to meet their requirements.13 Further, reducing the H2SO4 to one equivalents, both the yield and purity was dropped to 86% and 85% respectively (Table 1, entry 5). Maintaining the H2SO4 at 1.5 equivalents (w.r.t. PNA), the same reaction was performed with the brominating reagent prepared from the alkaline bromine intermediate, the similar yield of DBPNA was obtained (Table 1, entry 6). To validate the method, batch scale experiment was conducted at 100 g of PNA. At large scale, small amount of mono bromo product was observed with 91% yield of the desired product.14
As stated the product was obtained in a required purity by filtration, and washing, the filtrate was acidic in nature (as 0.5 equivalent excess acid was used for the reaction to obtain good yield of the product) and not suitable to dispose as such. Hence the filtrate containing 0.5 equivalents of acid was collected after filtration of solid product and it was recycled in the following cycle by the addition of one equivalent of acid along with the required quantities of NaBr and NaBrO3 with minimum amount of water to dissolve the salts. In this way we performed up to five such recycles of the filtrate and the results are presented in Fig. 1. As can be seen from the Fig. 1, the similar yield of DBPNA and purity was obtained up to five cycles.
After filtration of the reaction mixture the filtrate containing excess acid is collected and reused for the next cycle. H2SO4 required for the synthesis of dibromo-para-nitroaniline is 1.5 equivalents in fresh cycle. Excess of 0.5 equivalents of H2SO4 was recycled along with aqueous effluent for next recycles. The yield and purity of the product doesn't affect up to 5 continuous recycles of the aqueous effluent. 1 equiv. of H2SO4 only used for up to five recycles. By recycling the acidic filtrate not only reduces the acid requirement, but also minimize the effluent discharge which contains hazardous waste into the environment.
The same bromination procedure was extended to other representative industrially important aromatic substrates (Table 2). Bromination of aniline with three equivalents of aqueous brominating reagent gave 94% of tribromoaniline by simple filtration and washing with water (Table 2, entry 1). Similarly, the bromination of other aniline derivatives were performed with two equivalents of brominating reagent, and obtained the corresponding dibromo derivatives in good yields (91–95%) (Table 2, entries 2–6). Tribromination of phenol and mono bromination of anisole were obtained in 90% and 95% yields respectively (Table 2, entries 7 and 8).
Entry | Substrate | Product | Yield (%) | Purityb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions unless otherwise stated: all the reactions were performed at 5.0 mmol scale, at room temperature, 4 h reaction time, for entries 1 and 7, three equivalents of BrOH & two equivalents of H2SO4, for entries 2–6, two equivalents of BrOH & 1.5 equivalents of H2SO4 and for entry 8, one equivalent of each BrOH and H2SO4 were employed, yields of crude product obtained after filtration and washing with water without column separation.b Purity based on area% by GC.c Product extracted with DCM. | ||||
1 | 94 | 100 | ||
2 | 95 | 100 | ||
3 | 94 | 100 | ||
4 | 94 | 100 | ||
5 | 92 | 100 | ||
6 | 93 | 100 | ||
7 | 90 | 100 | ||
8c | 95 | 100 |
For recycling reactions, to the filtrate collected in the first batch was added another one equivalent of H2SO4, (7.24 g; 73.9 mmol), fresh 10 g of PNA, stirred for five minutes. Then the same quantities of aqueous brominating reagent solution as indicated above was added and the same procedure was followed up to five cycles. The yields and purity of recycled are indicated in Fig. 1.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: 1H and 13C NMR spectra, optimization reactions and product analysis data by Colourtex Industry. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ra13680j |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |