Yating
Hu
*a,
Yu
Zhang
b,
Du
Yuan
a,
Xu
Li
b,
Yongqing
Cai
*c and
John
Wang
*a
aDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, 117576, Singapore. E-mail: msewangj@nus.edu.sg
bInstitute of Materials Research and Engineering, A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis, Singapore 138634
cInstitute of High Performance Computing, A*Star (Agency for Science, Technology and Research), 1 Fusionopolis Way, Connexis, Singapore 138632
First published on 14th August 2017
Mn3O4 with purposely tuned different morphologies, crystal structures and sizes is synthesized using a hydrothermal method with varying processing temperatures, together with the help of a surfactant. Systematic investigations, both by experimental and computational studies, into these Mn3O4 nanomaterials were conducted in order to find the most suitable morphology and a compatible electrolyte for energy storage applications. The Mn3O4 nanofibers with a tunnel size of 1.83 Å in the crystal structure show much higher volumetric capacitance (188 F cm−3 at a scan rate of 1 mV s−1 of cyclic voltammetry test) than two other morphologies/crystal structures, when using 1 M LiCl aq. as the electrolyte. It is demonstrated in this work that crystal morphology and particle size play important roles in determining the capacitance of an electrode material. In addition, the detailed structures, especially the atomic arrangements within the crystalline structure, are crucial in order to choose the most suitable electrolyte.
Conceptual insightsMn3O4, with a high theoretical specific capacitance of ∼1400 F g−1, is a highly promising electrode material for energy storage applications, although it is less studied compared to its MnO2 counterpart. To optimize the electrochemical performance of an electrode material, proper control of the morphology, particle size and crystal structure, and the matching electrolyte are key. In this work, three types of Mn3O4 materials with different morphologies, crystal structures and particle sizes are synthesized using a hydrothermal method, with the help of a suitable surfactant. The thermodynamic reasons behind the formation of different morphologies are discussed and the tunnel sizes in these different crystal structures are established by computational studies. The electrochemical performances of these Mn3O4 materials are then assessed in different electrolytes in order to determine the optimal conditions for supercapacitor applications. The Mn3O4 nanofibers with a tunnel size of 1.83 Å in the crystal structure show much higher volumetric capacitance than two other morphologies/crystal structures, when using 1 M LiCl aq. as the electrolyte. The systematic examination of the crystal structures, morphologies, and particle sizes of these materials and their compatibility with different electrolytes demonstrates a selection routine for the electrode material and suitable electrolyte. This could serve as a guide for future development of other supercapacitor electrode materials, in order to maximize the overall performances. |
In developing a supercapacitor electrode, one of the key considerations that affect the specific capacitance of crystallized MnOx-based electrodes is their crystal structures. For example, MnOx can crystallize into a tunnel-type structure, thus, the capacitance is largely dependent on the features in close relation to the tunnel size and cation intercalation.7 The tunnel size in α-MnO2 and δ-MnO2 is 4.6 and 7.0 Å, respectively, which are suitable for intercalation/de-intercalation of K+ (with ion size of 3.0 Å in water). On the other hand, the tunnel sizes in λ-MnO2 and β-MnO2 are smaller than the effective size of K+ in KOH or other K+ based aqueous electrolytes, therefore, their capacitances are expectedly lower in K+ based electrolytes.1 Manganese can exist in a number of stable oxides, such as MnO, Mn3O4, Mn2O3 and MnO2. These oxides have been reported with a wide diversity of crystal forms, nanoparticle morphology, and level of porosity. Therefore, they exhibit a variety of distinct electrochemical properties.7,10
Similar to MnO2, Mn3O4 is an interesting electrode material for applications in supercapacitors, because of its low cost, environmental compatibility, and high natural abundance.11 The charge storage of Mn3O4 is mainly by Faradaic reactions occurring on the electrode surface with electrolytes, which involves the surface adsorption of electrolyte cations on Mn3O4. In addition, Mn3O4 is highly psedocapacitive, and exhibits a very high theoretical specific capacitance of ∼1400 F g−1.11 It shows similar electrochemical behavior to that of MnO2 as the redox reactions between the III and IV oxidation states of Mnx+ ions occur spontaneously during the charge–discharge process.12 Different processing techniques have been demonstrated to successfully lead to Mn3O4-based materials for use in supercapacitors, such as electrostatic spray deposition,13 hydrothermal growth14–16 and chemical batch deposition.17,18 High gravimetric capacitance (e.g., 420 F g−1 at the scan rate of 5 mV s−1 in cyclic voltammetry) has been reported for the hydrothermally synthesized Mn3O4/MWCNT (multi-walled carbon nanotubes) nanocomposites, however with very poor stability.14 In a recent work, hydrothermally synthesized Mn3O4 nanoparticles are shown with a volumetric capacitance of 55 F cm−3 (equivalent to 152 F g−1) and much improved cycling ability, due to the coexistence of reduced graphene oxide (rGO).19 In addition, the capacitance can be much improved with the nanocomposite consisting of Mn3O4 nanofibers and porous carbon aerogels obtained from anodic-electrochemical deposition (503 F g−1), but limited by the low loading mass.20 Compared to MnO2, Mn3O4 is still much less studied for electrochemical applications.11
In order to achieve a specific capacitance towards the high theoretical value of Mn3O4, it would be of interest to study the different morphologies and crystal structures and their effects on the electrochemical performances. In this work, we have investigated the different morphologies successfully developed by tuning the hydrothermal temperature and controllable crystallite sizes for Mn3O4 nano-octahedrons with the help of surfactant. The thermodynamics behind the formation of these different morphologies are discussed and the tunnel sizes of these different crystal structures are established through computational studies (1.83 to 2.04 Å). The electrochemical performances of these Mn3O4 nanomaterials are then assessed in different electrolytes in order to determine the optimal matching conditions for supercapacitor applications.
Fig. 1 TEM images: (a) MO-F, (b) MO-R, and (c) MO-O0, and high resolution TEM showing lattice fringes of the samples (d) MO-F, (e) MO-R and (f) MO-O0. |
Individual morphologies of Mn3O4 nanoparticles have been reported, such as, Mn3O4 nanofibers synthesized by electrospinning;26,27 Mn3O4 nanorods synthesized by methods such as a hydrothermal process of different starting materials at 120 °C, grown on Ni foam or with graphene oxide (GO);11,28 and Mn3O4 nano-octahedrons synthesized by a hydrothermal process at 200 °C used as a starting material for a Li ion battery electrode.29,30 To the best of our knowledge, there is no study on the temperature effect of the hydrothermal reaction on the morphology and crystal structures of Mn3O4, as well as their electrochemical performance in comparing the Mn3O4 of different morphologies.
Fig. 2 shows X-ray diffraction (XRD) results for these three samples. It is obvious that they exhibit different crystal structures, although they all are of Mn3O4 (JCPDS #086-2337, #18-0803 and #24-0734). The high resolution TEM images of all three morphologies show good crystallinity and the corresponding crystal planes observed are (220), (211) and (200) for samples MO-F, MO-R and MO-O0, respectively (Fig. 1d–f). It is known that metal oxide crystals with high index planes (with at least one miler index larger than 1) exposed can result in improved chemical or physical performances, due to higher densities of atom steps, edges, kinks, and dangling bonds, which usually show high chemical activity.31,32 Based on the XRD traces, the nanofibers exhibit an orthorhombic crystal structure (space group Pmab) while the nanorods and nano-octahedrons exhibit tetragonal crystal structures (both are in space group I41/amd with different lattice constants).33–36 In general, the conversion from the kinetically favored tetragonal form to the thermodynamically favored orthorhombic form is believed to be driven by an enthalpy gain.37 The orthorhombic structure, which is of lower space-group symmetry is of higher energy and in a relatively metastable state, compared to the tetragonal form which has higher symmetry. This is proved by the density functional theory (DFT) calculations for the total energy of the three phases (Table 1), as the orthorhombic structured sample MO-F has the highest total energy. Therefore, the high-energy orthorhombic structured nanofibers are formed and stabilized at the lowest temperature of a hydrothermal reaction (85 °C), and the tetragonal structured nanorods and nano-octahedrons are formed at the relatively high temperatures of the hydrothermal reaction (140 and 180 °C), in the present work.
Fig. 2 XRD patterns: (a) MO-F, (b) MO-R, and (c) MO-O0, and (d) the crystal structures of the tetragonal and orthorhombic Mn3O4 structures (space group I41/amd and Pmab). |
Sample | Space group | JCPDS # | Total energy calculated (eV) |
---|---|---|---|
MO-F | Orthorhombic | 086-2337 | −230.47 |
MO-R | Tetragonal | 18-0803 | −231.83 |
MO-O0 | Tetragonal | 24-0734 | −231.78 |
Based on the crystallography data of the three samples, their structures are shown by the schematic figures (see Fig. 2d). Viewed from the c direction of the crystals, it can be seen that both the tetragonal and orthorhombic structures of Mn3O4 have 2 × 2 tunnel structures (as shown by the unit cells marked out in Fig. 2d). Our calculations (more details are shown in Fig. S1, ESI†) suggest that the tunnel size for the two tetragonal phases of Mn3O4 are 2.044 and 2.038 Å (i.e., sample MO-R and MO-O, respectively), while the one for the orthorhombic phase Mn3O4 is 1.83 Å (for sample MO-F).
As mentioned above, the ionic dimension for K+ is 3.0 Å in water, thus, K+ could not tunnel through the bulk of these Mn3O4 nanocrystals and redox reactions could take place only at the surface of the electrode material. Therefore, although KOH aq. is a widely accepted electrolyte for a number of transition metal oxides, it is not suitable for the Mn3O4 materials in this work. The ion size in water could be calculated, mainly based on the equation below:38
Rion = dion–water − Rwater |
Different amounts of CTAB were added into the precursors prior to the gel formation of Mn3O4 to develop nano-octahedrons of different sizes. The concentrations of CTAB in the three samples (MO-O1, MO-O2 and MO-O3) were controlled at 5.0 × 10−3, 9.0 × 10−3 and 1.2 × 10−2 M, respectively, while the sample MO-O0 had no CTAB added. As shown in Fig. 3, Mn3O4 nano-octahedrons of various sizes could be obtained. By adding CTAB (concentration of 5.0 × 10−3 or 9.0 × 10−3 M), the Mn3O4 nano-octahedrons increased in size from ∼30 nm to ∼50 and ∼200 nm (Fig. 3a–c). At a concentration of 1.2 × 10−2 M, the nano-octahedrons start to transform into nanocubes in addition to the size increasing from 200 nm to 300 nm (Fig. 3d). The rather uniform morphologies observed for these nano-octahedrons are shown by SEM images (Fig. S2, ESI†). It was noted that the aqueous dispersion of nano-octahedrons became darker in appearance, due to the size change (inset of Fig. 4a). Indeed, the average hydrodynamic sizes measured by the dynamic light scattering (DLS) indicates that adding CTAB had caused an increase in the particle size (Fig. 4a). The discrepancy in sizes measured between the TEM and the DLS measurements is due to the aggregation of smaller nano-octahedrons.
When the CTAB aqueous solution is added into KMnO4 aqueous solution, the CH3(CH2)15N(CH3)3+ ions from CTAB will attract MnO4− ions through electrostatic interactions. Due to the bulky CTAB micelle formed and being positively charged, MnO4− ions will be attracted to the CTAB micelle. Therefore, the local concentration of MnO4− ions is much increased (as shown in the scheme in Fig. 4c). As the inorganic species can form a stable crystalline Mn3O4 structure with high lattice energy, they show a strong tendency to precipitate from the solution and form Mn3O4 nano-octahedrons; the surfactant remains in solution and continues to accumulate MnO4− ions for the growth of Mn3O4 nano-octahedrons. With an increasing concentration of CTAB, a larger number of micelles are formed. Under electrostatic interactions, there are much more MnO4− ions around the micelles during the nuclei growth stage, thus, larger nano-octahedrons are formed.48 However, on the other hand, when the CTAB concentration is too high (e.g., 1.2 × 10−2 M for sample MO-O3), the nano-octahedrons start to transform into nanocubes (Fig. 3d and Fig. S2, ESI,† where the nano-octahedrons are marked out in yellow and nanocubes in red). These nanocubes are in a Mn2O3 crystal structure, based on the XRD phase identification results (Fig. S3, ESI†). This could be due to the fact that when the local concentration of MnO4− is too high, the reduction of MnO4− by pyrrole is not complete. Thus, some Mn2O3 is formed instead of pure Mn3O4 nanocrystals.
To further confirm this hypothesis, the zeta potential of the mixture of CTAB and KMnO4 aqueous solutions, pure KMnO4 aqueous solution (0 M CTAB) and CTAB (0.01 M) aqueous solution alone were measured (Fig. 4b). The 0.01 M CTAB aqueous solution showed a zeta potential of 50 mV, due to the micelles formed within the solution (CMC of CTAB in water is 1 × 10−3 M). In the presence of KMnO4, the zeta potentials of the mixture solutions were all negative, indicating that the negatively charged MnO4− ions are surrounding the micelle. When the concentration of CTAB is increased, the number of micelles thus increases, but the number of MnO4− ions distributed to each micelle decreases. It therefore reduces the absolute value of the zeta potential.43 To verify whether or not the CTAB was thoroughly removed from the sample after washing the hydrothermal product with DI water, FTIR analyses of the dried powders were conducted (Fig. S4a, ESI†). As shown by the FTIR spectrum, there is no stretching bands at around 3000 cm−1 (the symmetric and asymmetric stretching bands of the methylene chains in CTAB molecules are at around 2850 and 2920 cm−1, respectively).37 The bands at around 500–700 cm−1 correspond to the Mn–O stretching and bending vibrations,49 and the remaining bands at 956, 1101 and 1155 cm−1 correspond to the C–O and O–H groups from the minimal amount of the hydrothermal reaction residuals. In addition, as shown by the TGA result (Fig. S4b, ESI†), the weight drop observed at around 200 °C is less than 0.5%, indicating that there is a minimal amount of CTAB or other residuals left (the thermal decomposition temperature for CTAB is known to be around 240 °C). The slight increase in the sample weight at around 450 °C might well be due to the oxidation of Mn3O4 to MnO2.
The CV and Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) of these hybrid papers were measured using Swagelok 2-electrode cells in 1.0 M Na2SO4 and LiCl aqueous electrolytes, respectively. The loading of active materials for all samples is controlled at about 0.8 g cm−3. It is known that MnOx materials do not show redox peaks in their CV curves, as the pseudocapacitive charge storage mechanism is based on the successive multiple surface redox reactions.62 Based on the experimental results (Fig. 5e–h and Fig. S5, ESI†), we have three main observations. Firstly, the volumetric capacitance calculated from CV measurements showing that sample MG-F (hybrid Mn3O4 nanofibers/rGO paper) exhibits the highest volumetric capacitance in both electrolytes (Fig. 5g and h), assumed mainly due to the smallest dimension (i.e., 10 nm in diameter) that possesses a higher surface area than that of either nanorods or nano-octahedrons (surface area measured by N2 adsorption results shown in Fig. S6, ESI†), as well as the uniform distribution among the rGO sheets. The hybrid paper with smaller Mn3O4 nano-octahedrons (sample MG-O0) shows a lower capacitance than the one with bigger Mn3O4 nano-octahedrons (sample MG-O2), due to the aggregation of the small nano-octahedrons that would reduce the effective surface of the redox reaction for Mn3O4. The impedance results show that the electrical conductivities of all samples except for sample MG-O0 are very close to each other. MG-O0 shows a much higher diffusion resistance due to the aggregated nano-octahedrons (Fig. S5a, ESI†), as discussed above.
Secondly, when comparing individual samples measured in two different electrolytes, the volumetric capacitance obtained using 1 M LiCl aq. is much higher than that using a 1 M Na2SO4 aq. electrolyte, especially at low scan rates (volumetric capacitance for all samples under different scan rates of CV measurements and in different electrolytes are listed in Table S1, ESI†). For example, sample MG-F shows 31% increment in terms of volumetric capacitance at the scan rate of 1 mV s−1 of CV measurements, when using 1 M LiCl aq. as the electrolyte instead of 1 M Na2SO4 aq. As mentioned earlier, the size range of Li+ in water is well below the dimensional range of the tunnel sizes of all three different Mn3O4 crystal structures (1.14 to 1.44 Å for Li+vs. 1.83 to 2.04 Å for the tunnel sizes). Therefore, the Li+ in water has very high opportunities of tunnelling through into the bulk of these Mn3O4 materials. On the other hand, the size range of Na+ in water is 1.84 to 2.04 Å, which is about the same as the tunnel sizes of the Mn3O4 nanorods and nano-octahedrons, and bigger than the tunnel size of the nanofibers. Thus, the possibility of Na+ tunnelling through these Mn3O4 materials is low, especially for the nanofibers. As a result, redox reactions involving Na+ mainly take place on the surface of the Mn3O4 nanocrystal electrodes, while those involving Li+ could take place not only on the surface of the electrode but also in the bulk.
However, it is also observed that the difference in volumetric capacitance by using these two electrolytes at high scan rates is quite small. In other words, the retain rates of volumetric capacitance obtained by using LiCl are lower than those with Na2SO4 aq. electrolytes. This might well be due to the fact that, at high scan rates, the redox reactions in the bulk are limited by the slow ion diffusion.63 In addition, the cycling stabilities of all four samples are tested at 2 A cm−3 current density, in 1 M LiCl aq. for 10000 cycles (Fig. S7, ESI†). The Mn3O4 nanofibers and nanorods showed better stabilities upon cycling (∼80% retention after 10000 cycles of charge–discharge), mostly due to better dispersion and less aggregation upon cycling. When compared to other Mn3O4-based supercapacitor electrodes, the Mn3O4 nanofiber also shows great improvement in terms of volumetric capacitance.64,65
In short, while crystal morphology plays an important role in determining the capacitance of an electrode material (e.g., higher surface area can contribute to more redox active sites), it is also important to study the detailed crystal structure, especially the atomic arrangements within the crystalline structure, in order to choose the most suitable electrolyte. For example, the Mn3O4 nanofiber material with a tunnel size of 1.83 Å in the crystal structure shows a much higher volumetric capacitance than the other two morphologies/crystal structures, when using 1 M LiCl aq. as the electrolyte. Therefore, it is highly recommended that for future study of other supercapacitor electrode materials, a systematic examination of the crystal structures, morphologies, and particle sizes of the material as well as the compatibility with different electrolytes should be carried out, similar to what has been done in this work, in order to maximize the electrochemical performances.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental details and supporting results. See DOI: 10.1039/c7nh00078b |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 |