Masoud Shariati-Rad*,
Tahereh Mohseninasab and
Fatemeh Parno
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. E-mail: mshariati_rad@yahoo.com; Fax: +98 833 4274559
First published on 9th January 2018
Herein, for the first time, we used a green synthetic approach, via the hydrothermal treatment of grape and onion without any functionalization, to produce reducing carbon dots (CDs). The method has the advantages of low cost, easy operation and being environmentally friendly. The as-synthesized grape and onion CDs were characterized by UV-Vis spectrophotometry, spectrofluorimetry, FTIR spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Interestingly, it was found that the synthesized CDs could reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+. Based on this finding, a method based on complexation with 1,10-phenanthroline was introduced for determination of Fe3+ and total iron in water samples. A response surface methodology was employed to explore the factors influencing the response, i.e. concentration of 1,10-phenanthroline and concentration of as-synthesized CDs. The proposed method provides a simple and sensitive colorimetric approach to detect Fe3+ over a wide linear range of 4.6–160 μM with a low detection limit of 0.1 μM. Moreover, for the first time, the reducing strength of CDs was estimated by the well-known Prussian blue assay.
The International Standards Organization (ISO) suggests a spectrophotometric method based on the formation of a colored complex between Fe2+ and 1,10-phenanthroline1 for determination of total dissolved iron in water samples. Since in the water samples, iron is present predominantly as Fe3+, it is necessary to first reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+.
Sequential determination of Fe2+ and Fe3+ includes firstly, complexation of Fe2+ with 1,10-phenanthroline in optimal conditions and secondly, reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ and then complexation of total iron with 1,10-phenanthroline. The difference between the results of two steps would provide the amount of Fe3+ and the results of the first step can be used to obtain the amount of Fe2+. For the reduction step, several reducing agents including sulfite,2 ascorbic acid,3–5 thioglycolic acid,6 photoreduction7 and predominately, hydroxylamine8,9 have been used. Evidently, these reduction processes involve using in most cases toxic chemical compounds which is against principles of green chemistry. Because of their non-toxicity, environmentally friendly nature, biocompatibility and fast response times, carbon dots (CDs) has been widely used in bio-related studies, and also in designing catalytic biosensors.10–13
Based on fluorescence property, CDs have been used to sensitive detection of a diverse array of salt ions specially Fe3+.14–17 It should be pointed out that in these studies, detection of metal ions is generally based on quenching CD fluorescence by metal ions including Fe3+. These methods usually have low selectivity. However, in a work reported by Iqbal et al.,18 a CD based sensor with 1,10-phenanthroline in its surface was prepared and used to selective and sensitive determination of Fe3+ and Fe2+. The sensor can only result in the total iron.
Heretofore, reducing ability of CDs has been mainly used in formation of Ag or Au nanoparticles and subsequent sensing of species like Ag+ or biothiols.19–25 It has been found that CDs can act as reducing agent for synthesis of AgNPs.20–24 The as synthesized NPs have been applied for determination of cysteine (Cys), homocysteine (Hcy) and glutathione (GSH).20 Au@C-dot has also been synthesized based on the reducing activity of CDs.25 The Au@C-dot composite can be applied as a colorimetric and fluorometric sensor for biothiols including amino acids, peptides, proteins and enzymes.25 Based on the reducing ability of CDs, an alloy nanocomposite with CD (AuAg@C-dots) was prepared and used for chlorine assay.26
Gao et al.27 observed that Ag+ exhibits an enhancement effect on the photoluminescence of synthesized CDs, which can be attributed to the reduction of Ag+ to silver nanoclusters (Ag0) on the surface of the CDs. Hg2+ detection was reported by UV-Vis absorbance changes of Ag@C-dots upon addition of Hg2+.19
It is not common to use carbon-based nanomaterials as the reducing agent in determination of other compounds. To the best of our knowledge, the metal ion detection and determination based on reducing ability of CDs has rarely been reported. As an example, the spectrofluorimetric detection of Ag+ based on its reduction by CDs has been reported by Gao et al.27
However, our aim in this work is to use CDs as reducing agent instead of toxic chemical compounds in sequential determination of Fe2+ and Fe3+. Moreover, we use a green method for preparing CDs.
For Prussian blue assay, gallic acid (3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid monohydrate) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany). Analytical reagent grade potassium hexacyanoferrate(III) (K3[Fe(CN)6]) and sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDS) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
For characterization of synthesized CDs, a Zeiss EM10C transmission electron microscope (TEM), an Alpha FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) and a Jasco FP_6200 spectrofluorimeter equipped with a Jasco ECT_272T temperature controller were employed.
Factors considered for the reaction of Fe3+ with 1,10-phenanthroline in the presence of CDs are concentration of CDs (x1) in mg L−1 and concentration of 1,10-phenanthroline (x2) in mol L−1. Levels of the factors in the experiments designed based on RSM and corresponding responses are shown in Table S1.† Response is the absorbance of the complex between reduced Fe3+ (Fe2+) and 1,10-phenanthroline at 510 nm.
Images captured by transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 1a and b) shows that the synthesized CDs are mostly spherical dots. These dots are well separated from each other with average sizes of 12.1 and 13.3 nm for grape and onion CDs, respectively.
UV-Vis absorption spectrum and fluorescence spectrum of CDs in water can be seen in Fig. 1c. Grape CDs show a main absorption band with maximum located at 284 nm which develops to about 500 nm. Shoulders at about 222 and 370 nm can also be observed in the UV-Vis spectrum of grape CD. For onion CD, the maximum absorption appears at 290 nm and shoulders appear at 220 and 360 nm (see Fig. 1c). The main absorption band of the two synthesized CDs can be attributed to the n–π* transition of CO.30 The low intensity band at about 220 nm which appears as a shoulder represents the π–π* transition of CC in aromatic structure.
An intense fluorescence spectrum was observed for the onion CDs after excitation at 390 nm with maximum intensity at 482 nm (see Fig. 1d). Grape CD also fluoresces after excitation at 390 nm (with maximum intensity at 486 nm). However, its intensity is much lower (see Fig. 1d).
For characterization of the surface groups of the synthesized CDs, FTIR spectra were recorded. Fig. S1† shows the FTIR spectrum of the as-synthesized CDs. The weak absorption band at 1703 cm−1 is attributed to the CO stretching band of the carboxylic acid groups conjugated with condensed aromatic carbon, while the broad absorption band at ∼3400 cm−1 is assigned to –OH groups.31 The absorption band for CO stretching in the region 1870 to 1600 cm−1 is perhaps the easiest band to recognize in IR spectrum and is extremely useful in analysis of carbonyl compounds.
The band at 1635 cm−1 for grape CD (1637 cm−1 for onion CD) is assigned to CC stretching vibration. These results indicate that the synthesized CDs have an aromatic skeleton.32,33 The bands at 2118 cm−1 and 2128 cm−1 can be attributed to C–N vibration for grape and onion CDs, respectively.34 In-plane vibration of CC for grape and onion CDs can be seen at 1450 cm−1 and 1416 cm−1, respectively.
The C–O stretching in phenols/alcohols occurs at a lower frequency range 1250–1000 cm−1. The coupling of C–O absorption with adjacent C–C stretching mode, makes it possible to differentiate between primary (∼1050 cm−1), secondary (∼1100 cm−1) and tertiary (∼1150 cm−1) alcohols and phenols (∼1220 cm−1). For the as-synthesized CDs, this characteristics band can be observed at 1075 and 1052 cm−1, for grape and onion CDs, respectively. The results are in accordance with the related observations in UV-Vis spectra. The observed hydrophilic –OH groups enable the as-obtained CDs to be well-dispersed in aqueous media.
Fig. 2 shows the spectra of the mixture Fe3+ plus 1,10-phenanthroline in the presence and absence of the synthesized CDs. As can be seen, in the absence of CDs, it cannot be seen the absorption peak at about 500 nm. However, in the presence of CDs, a peak located at 500 nm is observed. It must be mentioned that this peak is characteristics of the formation of complex between Fe2+ and 1,10-phenanthroline. Moreover, a color change from colorless to orange in the solutions is observed. This simply confirms that the synthesized CDs possess reducing ability. In published studies related to reducing ability of CDs, mainly Ag and Au@CDs composites have been prepared.19–25
The function of the reduction using CDs as the reducing agent can be related to the hydroxyl groups (–OH) on the surface of the synthesized CDs. Fe3+ can be reduced to Fe2+ and at the same time, the –OH converts to carbonyl groups (CO).
As absorbance–time plots in Fig. 3 show, time does not have a significant effect of the response for both synthesized CDs. However, for assurance of the completeness of the reduction and saving time, 2 min was selected as the time for contact of Fe3+ with CDs.
The relation between the response and the factors can be shown by the following polynomial equation:
Y = b0 + b1x1 + b2x2 + b11x1x1 + b22x2x2 + b12x1x2 |
Term | Coefficient | t | p |
---|---|---|---|
Grape CD | |||
Constant | 0.635 | 13.3 | 0.000 |
x1 | 0.202 | 5.1 | 0.001 |
x2 | 0.160 | 4.2 | 0.004 |
x1x1 | −0.189 | −4.3 | 0.004 |
x2x2 | −0.058 | −1.4 | 0.200 |
x1x2 | 0.092 | 1.7 | 0.128 |
Onion CD | |||
Constant | 0.617 | 9.3 | 0.000 |
x1 | 0.153 | 2.8 | 0.028 |
x2 | 0.174 | 3.3 | 0.014 |
x1x1 | −0.173 | −2.8 | 0.028 |
x2x2 | −0.066 | −1.1 | 0.290 |
x1x2 | 0.038 | 0.5 | 0.625 |
Column “Coefficient” in Table 1 includes the coefficient of each term in the above polynomial equation. Sign of these coefficients is important. For example, sign of the coefficients for x1 and x2 terms in the case of onion and grape CDs are positive. This shows that by increasing the concentration of CDs (x1) and 1,10-phenanthroline (x2), the response is increased. The columns “t” and “p” show the statistical significance of different terms. The larger the t statistics, the higher the significance of the corresponding term. The p value indicates the probability of the effect of chance in the importance of each term. Therefore, lower p values indicate that the corresponding term is significant. From Table 1, it can be concluded that concentration of CDs (x1) and 1,10-phenanthroline (x2) are significant factors in the reaction of Fe3+ with 1,10-phenanthroline in the presence of both CDs since corresponding p values are very small (<0.05, testing at 95% confidence level). Moreover, coefficients of these terms in the model are positive. This means that higher concentrations of 1,10-phenanthroline and CDs result in the higher responses. Square terms relating the concentration of CDs are also significant. Therefore, it would be observed that the effect of this factor be dependent on its level.
Fig. 4 shows the variation of the response with simultaneous change in the level of two factors. As can be seen, response surfaces are very similar in the presence of grape and onion CDs. Curvature in the response surface upon change in the level of x2 in both cases is evident. It can be seen that in higher concentrations of CDs and relatively high concentrations of 1,10-phenanthroline, the response is higher.
Fig. 4 Response surfaces obtained based on the models with the coefficients reported in Table 1 for concentration of CDs and 1,10-phenanthroline by (a) grape CDs and (b) onion CDs. |
Response surface optimization showed that, in the presence of the both CDs, the maximum response can be achieved by 1700.0 mg L−1 of CD and 9.00 × 10−3 mol L−1 of 1,10-phenanthroline. These amounts can readily been deduced from the response surfaces in Fig. 4.
Here, the analytical calibration curves were obtained by using CDs as reducing agent for Fe3+ and 1,10-phenanthroline as complexing agent in optimal conditions. In the presence of different concentrations of Fe3+, absorbances of the mixture of CDs and 1,10-phenanthroline were recorded at 510 nm. The analytical characteristics of the calibration curves have been included in Table S2.†
The statistical parameters in Table S2† show that determination of Fe3+ with two synthesized CDs can be performed with similar sensitivity (LODs: 1.0 × 10−7 and 1.2 × 10−7 and slopes: 7484.4 and 6732.7 by grape and onion CDs, respectively). F-Statistics of the two calibration curves are very high (5607.7 and 3471.9 for grape and onion CDs, respectively) which indicate that variation in the response is significantly due to the change in concentration of Fe3+. In Table S2,† the analytical characteristics of the calibration of Fe2+ in the presence of 1,10-phenanthroline have also been reported. As is expected, characteristics indicating the sensitivity like slope are higher relative to those obtained by calibration of Fe3+-CD in the presence of 1,10-phenanthroline. The slopes for calibration of Fe3+ in the presence of 1,10-phenanthroline for grape and onion CDs are 7484.4 and 6732.7, respectively and for Fe2+ in the presence of 1,10-phenanthroline is 8293.7. In fact, the ratio between the slopes by Fe3+ and by Fe2+ can be considered as an estimate of the Fe3+ to Fe2+ conversion for each CD.
In Fig. 5, absorbance changes of the mixture of onion CDs and 1,10-phenanthroline in the presence of different concentrations of Fe3+ and corresponding calibration curve have been shown. The emergence of the absorption band is due to the reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ and subsequent formation of complex between Fe2+ and 1,10-phenanthroline.
Fe3+ is the predominate species of iron in the natural water samples. Hence, determination of total iron based on an analysis for Fe2+ requires firstly reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+. Here, CDs were introduced as reducing agent in this step.
Results of the analysis of different water samples by the proposed method have been included in Table 2. Concentration of Fe2+ in real samples was calculated based on an independent calibration curve constructed by plotting absorbances at 510 nm of acidic hydrochloric solution (0.5 mol L−1) of 1,10-phenanthroline (0.01 mol L−1) after addition of different amounts of Fe2+ in the absence of CDs. Analyzing the same samples but now in the presence of CDs would give the total iron content (Fe2+ plus Fe3+) of the sample. For obtaining concentration of Fe3+ in the analyzed samples, it is only needed to subtract the result in the absence of CDs from the result in the presence of CDs.
Sample | Grape CD | Onion CD | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Added (Fe3+) | Found | REa (%) | RSDb (%) | Added (Fe3+) | Found | RE% | RSD% | AA (ppb) | |
a Relative error of prediction.b Relative standard deviation.c Not detected. | |||||||||
Tap water | |||||||||
0.00 | N.D.c | — | — | 0.00 | N.D. | — | — | 4.5 | |
5.00 × 10−5 | 5.18 × 10−5 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 6.00 × 10−5 | 5.85 × 10−5 | −2.3 | 5.2 | ||
Niloufar mirage water | |||||||||
0.00 | N.D. | — | — | 0.00 | N.D. | — | — | 6.6 | |
5.00 × 10−5 | 4.56 × 10−5 | −8.7 | 6.5 | 6.00 × 10−5 | 5.80 × 10−5 | −3.2 | 8.2 | ||
Qar-e-Sou River water | |||||||||
0.00 | N.D. | — | — | 0.00 | N.D. | — | — | 7.0 | |
5.00 × 10−5 | 4.84 × 10−5 | −3.2 | 2.0 | 6.00 × 10−5 | 5.50 × 10−5 | −7.7 | 4.8 |
Spiked deionized water | Added (Fe3+) | Found (Fe3+) | Added (total iron) | Found (total iron) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Grape CD | ||||
3.00 × 10−5 | 3.10 × 10−5 | 6.00 × 10−5 | 6.35 × 10−5 | |
RSD% | 6.5 | 2.9 | ||
Onion CD | ||||
3.00 × 10−5 | 3.12 × 10−5 | 6.00 × 10−5 | 6.38 × 10−5 | |
RSD% | 6.4 | 2.9 |
In the analyzed real water samples, it was not detected any iron species by the proposed method. However, analysis of the spiked samples resulted in satisfactory statistics for accuracy and precision (RE% and RSD% values are below 10%). For validating the proposed method, the same samples were also analyzed by standard method of atomic absorption spectroscopy. By the standard method, total iron contents of the samples were obtained in the ppb level which is below the determination level of the proposed method.
Water samples containing known amounts of Fe3+ and Fe2+ were also selected to analysis by the proposed method. Results of analysis of these samples have also been reported in Table 2. As can be deduced from the results in Table 2, total iron and Fe3+ concentration in these samples have been recovered with low RE% and RSD% values. Relatively low values of RSD% indicate that the proposed method is reproducible.
The estimated reducing strengths of the grape and onion CDs are 25.50 and 21.94 mg of gallic acid per g of the analyte, respectively. This means that for example, 1.0 g of the grape CD have a reducing strength equivalent to 25.50 mg of gallic acid. Moreover, reducing strength of grape CD is higher than reducing strength of onion CD. Higher reducing strength of grape CD was also deduced by comparison of the slope of the calibration curves in Section 3.5.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7ra12139c |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018 |