Ning Wang*ab,
Zhangzhong Wangab,
Yajie Chuab,
Jialin Chengab,
Hao Yuab,
Jindu Huangc,
Renjie Huod and
Chunli Guoe
aSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, PR China. E-mail: ymzsts1495@outlook.com; Fax: +86 15951727781; Tel: +86 15951727781
bJiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Structural Materials and Application Technology, Nanjing 211167, PR China
cSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Advanced Metallic Materials, Nanjing 211189, PR China
dDepartment of Mechanic Engineering, Guidaojiaotong Polytechnic Institute, Shenyang 110023, PR China
eCollege of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, PR China
First published on 4th July 2019
Uniform 3D bi-continuous nanoporous Cu–Ag solid solution (NPCS) and nanoporous copper (NPC) were successfully synthesized by dealloying Cu70Y28Ag2 and Cu72Y28 metallic glasses, respectively, which was confirmed by using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The SEM and TEM images show that the ligament size of NPCS (dSEM = 65 nm, dTEM = 45 nm) is much smaller than that of NPC (dSEM = 402 nm, dTEM = 370 nm), which reveals that the ligaments of NPC can be significantly refined by the substitution of 2 at% Ag for Cu in the amorphous precursor. The obtained NPCS exhibits much larger specific surface area and higher total pore volume (SBET = 8.34 m2 g−1, Vp = 0.093 cm3 g−1) compared to NPC (SBET = 1.77 m2 g−1, Vp = 0.050 cm3 g−1). Furthermore, the catalytic activities of the samples were evaluated by decomposing methyl orange (MO) dye under the irradiation of ultrasound. The results show that NPCS with an extreme fine microstructure displayed superior sono-Fenton-like catalytic activity compared to NPC and commercial copper foil.
In the Fenton-like system, transition metal catalyst was need to react with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to produce high active hydroxyl radicals (·OH).11 Unfortunately, traditional metal powder catalyst is hard to be recycled, while metal foil has low catalytic activity owing to its small specific surface area.6 Therefore, nanoporous metals (NPM) with both large specific surface area and high recovery can be an excellent choice for constructing sono-Fenton-like catalytic system. In recent decades, many methods (template, hydrothermal and dealloying) were used to fabricate nanoporous metals.12–15 Among them, dealloying has been considered to be the most promising method because it is readily available for obtaining various nanoporous metals with 3D bi-continuous structures. For example, Rizzi et al.16 reported that uniform nanoporous gold (NPG) can easily be prepared by dealloying Au40Cu28Si20Ag7Pd5 glassy alloys, Jin et al.17 reported that monolithic nanoporous silver (NPS) can be fabricated through dealloying of Ag60.5Ca39.5 amorphous ribbons, and Wang et al.18 reported that homogeneous nanoporous copper (NPC) can be synthesized via chemical dealloying Cu74Ce26 metallic glasses.
Compared with nanoporous noble metals (nanoporous gold (NPG),19 nanoporous silver (NPS),20 nanoporous palladium (NPPd),21 nanoporous platinum (NPPt)22), nanoporous copper (NPC) and nanoporous Cu-based solid solution material are more attractive owing to both cost-effectiveness and high catalytic activity.18 More importantly, as an efficient transition metal catalyst, copper as well as iron is often used in Fenton/Fenton-like catalytic process.10,23,24 In view of the facts that iron can not be existed in the form of nanoporous metals (NPM), which are very applicable for the sono-Fenton-like catalytic process, nanoporous Cu-based material should be a better choice. Among all the nanoporous Cu-based material, nanoporous Cu–Ag solid solution can be the perfect candidate material to construct sono-Fenton-like catalytic system, which can be attributed to the following three points: (1) silver is a stable noble metal. Hence, nanoporous Cu–Ag solid solution has better oxidation resistance compared with pure nanoporous copper, thus increasing the stability of nanoporous metal materials. Moreover, silver is much cheaper than other stable noble metals (gold, palladium and platinum). (2) The surface diffusion coefficient of Ag atoms is much lower than that of Cu atoms, which can act as a diffusion barrier to restrict the long distance diffusion of Cu atoms in the dealloying process.25 Consequently, nanoporous Cu–Ag solid solution fabricated by dealloying possesses very fine microstructure, thus leading to a high sono-catalytic activity.6 (3) Nanoporous Cu–Ag solid solution of uniform composition and microstructure can be obtained by dealloying: Ag and Cu elements have the same chemical properties, the substitution of Ag element for Cu element in Cu-based metallic glasses can improve its glass forming ability (GFA).26 The resulting fully amorphous alloys have a unique disordered atomic structure without grain boundaries, dislocations and segregations,27,28 which is readily available for dealloying synthesis of uniform nanoporous materials.
There are some reports about dealloying synthesis of nanoporous Cu–Ag alloys. Dan et al.25 have synthesized nanoporous Cu–Ag alloys with Ag atoms concentrated at the grain boundary through dealloying of the Cu39Ti60Ag1 and Cu38Ti60Ag2 glassy alloys in hydrofluoric acid (HF) solutions. Unfortunately, highly toxic HF solution was used in this dealloying process, which can pollute the human environment and threaten people's health. Li et al.29 have prepared a 3D nanoporous bimetallic Cu–Ag alloy with some Cu atoms separated from the metastable nanoporous matrix via chemical dealloying Mg65Ag12.5Cu12.5Y10 amorphous ribbons in sulphuric acid (H2SO4) aqueous solution. Which is yet unsatisfying is that the preparation procedure of Mg65Ag12.5Cu12.5Y10 alloy ingots is very complex, it involves the smelting of Cu–Y pre-alloy and the melting of volatile Mg, hence the alloy ingots need be produced by using both arc-melting furnace and high-frequency induction furnace. Furthermore, for above two dealloying techniques, the synthesized nanoporous Cu–Ag alloys are uneven, Ag or Cu atoms can be found in the dealloying products. In this work, easily obtained Cu70Y28Ag2 metallic glasses were used as precursors and non-toxic dilute H2SO4 solution was used as aggressive medium to prepare uniform nanoporous Cu–Ag solid solution (NPCS), and then the fabricated NPCS was applied in the sono-Fenton-like catalytic degradation of methyl orange (MO). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about the sono-Fenton-like process of nanoporous Cu–Ag solid solution.
The phase composition and chemical valence of the samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a D8-Discover diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using a PHI-5000 Versa Probe spectrometer with Al-Kα radiation (hγ = 1486.6 eV), respectively. The microstructures of obtained dealloying specimens were investigated by FEI-3D scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and G2-20 transmission electron microscopy (TEM), respectively. The size of the metal ligaments was statistically measured by a single length chord method over 100 sites of SEM/TEM morphologies. In addition, a Quantachrome Autosorb-IQ2 analyzer was used to measure the specific surface area (SBET) and total pore volume (Vp) of the nanoporous materials.
The sonocatalytic activities of the samples were evaluated by the degradation of MO under the irradiation of the ultrasound. In this experiment, 100 mL MO solution (20 mg L−1), 50 mg catalyst and 0.5 mL 30 wt% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were put into a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask. Prior to the irradiation, the whole suspension was stirred in the dark for 30 min to ensure the establishment of the adsorption–desorption equilibrium. Then, the degradation reactions were conducted in a serial-ultrasonic apparatus (KH-300DB, Kunshan Ultrasonic Apparatus Company, China) with a frequency of 40 kHz and output power of 4800 mW cm−2 at 333 K. The concentration of MO solution was evaluated by measuring the change in maximum absorbance through TU-1810 UV-vis spectrophotometer.
In view of the facts that Ag element can not be detected in XRD patterns of as-dealloyed Cu70Y28Ag2 ribbons, the high resolution XPS spectrum of Ag 3d was measured to confirm the phase composition of the dealloying products. Fig. 1c presents Ag 3d spectra of the sample prepared by dealloying Cu70Y28Ag2, the binding energies of Ag 3d3/2 and Ag 3d5/2 are observed at 374.5 and 368.5 eV, respectively. Obviously, the splitting energy of 6 eV is in agreement with the standard spectrum of Agm.30 Combining this result with the XRD result, it can be concluded that as-dealloyed Cu70Y28Ag2 ribbons are in form of fcc Cu–Ag solid solution.
Fig. 2a and b depicts SEM images of the samples by dealloying Cu72Y28 and Cu70Y28Ag2 amorphous ribbons, respectively. The images all exhibit 3D bi-continuous and interpenetrating nanoporous structures. Based on the results of SEM, XRD and XPS can confirm that nanoporous copper and nanoporous Cu–Ag solid solution have been successfully prepared. For convenience, the samples synthesized by dealloying Cu72Y28 and Cu70Y28Ag2 are labeled as NPC and NPC and NPCS, respectively. It is obvious that the ligaments of NPCS is significantly finer than that of NPC, suggesting that the metal ligaments can be significantly refined by the substitution of 2 at% Ag element for Cu in Cu-based amorphous precursor. This is because that the surface diffusion coefficient of Ag atoms in a vacuum is two orders lower than that of Cu atoms.11 Hence, Ag atoms which are uniformly distributed in amorphous precursor not only can recombine with Cu atoms to form the skeleton of the ligaments in the dealloying process, but also can act as a diffusion barrier to restrict the long distance diffusion of Cu atoms,25 achieving the goals of refining the ligaments of nanoporous materials. Moreover, the EDS results show that the nanoporous material synthesized by dealloying Cu–Y metallic glasses is composed of Cu element, while the one fabricated by dealloying Cu–Y–Ag alloys consists of both Cu and Ag elements, indicating that Y has been completely removed from the precursor alloys and the remaining inert metal elements form a framework of nanoporous structure. The results agree well with the XRD and XPS results.
Fig. 2c and d presents the TEM images of NPC and NPCS. The images show that the samples consist of a bi-continuous pore-to-ligament nano-structure and NPCS has much finer ligament structure than NPC. The results are consistent with the SEM results. By measuring from TEM images, the sizes of ligaments of NPC and NPCS are estimated to be 370 and 45 nm, while the ones measured by previous SEM images are evaluated to be 402 and 65 nm, respectively (displayed in Table 1). The reason can be explained as follows: owing to the concentration gradient of H2SO4 solution in the corrosion ribbons, the dealloying samples have finer nanoporous structures in its internal region, which can be obtained by ion beam thinning and measured by TEM. Fig. 3 shows EDS element mapping of the NPCS sample, the images indicates that Cu and Ag elements are uniformly distributed in the as-dealloyed Cu70Y28Ag2 ribbons and uniform Cu–Ag solid solution was formed. Table 1 shows that NPCS (SBET = 8.34 m2 g−1, Vp = 0.093 cm3 g−1) with finer microstructure has far larger specific surface area and higher total pore volume than NPC (SBET = 1.77 m2 g−1, Vp = 0.050 cm3 g−1), which are measured by BET method.
Samples | dSEM (nm) | dTEM (nm) | SBET (m2 g−1) | Vp-total (cm3 g−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
NPC | 402 ± 37.1 | 370 ± 35.0 | 1.77 ± 0.58 | 0.050 |
NPCS | 65 ± 11.9 | 45 ± 10.6 | 8.34 ± 1.31 | 0.093 |
Fig. 3 (a) EDS element mapping of the NPCS sample; the distribution of each element: (b) Cu Kα, (c) Ag Lα. |
To investigate the catalytic activity of nanoporous Cu–Ag solid solution, the experiment of methyl orange (MO) sono-degradation was carried out. Fig. 4a shows the sonocatalytic degradation curves of MO. It can be seen that only 35.2% and 32.3% of MO were degraded over the commercial copper foil and silver foil within 15 min, respectively, while up to 63.6% and 81.0% of MO were decomposed over the NPC and NPCS sample within the same time, respectively. Obviously, nanoporous Cu-based material has higher catalytic activity compared to the pure metal foil. The reason can be attributed to 3D bi-continuous nanoporous structure of NPC and NPCS.
Fig. 4 (a) Sonocatalytic degradation of MO versus reaction time, (b) linear transform ln(C/C0) of the kinetic curves of MO degradation. |
Fig. 4b demonstrates linear relationships between ln(C/C0) and ultrasound irradiation time (t), revealing that these degradation processes obey pseudo-first-order kinetics. Therefore, Langmuir–Hinshelwood model (eqn (1))31,32 can be used to calculate to the values of the reaction rate constant:
ln(C/C0) = −kt | (1) |
Fig. 5 shows the SEM images of NPC and NPCS after reaction. It can be seen that only a few metal nanoparticles break away from the nanoporous metal and the structure of nanoporous metal partly break apart, indicating that the catalysts have certain stability in the structure.
The sono-Fenton-like process of NPCS is similar to that of NPC,6,18 which can be described as follows: under the radiation of ultrasound, fine Cu–Ag ligaments react with H2O2 to generate Cu+, Ag+ and high activity hydroxyl radicals (·OH), subsequently the Cu+ which is produced in the previous step further react with H2O2 to form Cu2+ and ·OH. At the same time, Cu2+, Cu+ and Ag+ combine with electrons (e−) to be reduced back to Cu+, Cu and Ag, respectively, thus allowing the sono-Fenton-like process to go and return in following a circle. Finally, ·OH produced by this process decomposes MO molecules into oxidation product. The reactions can be described as eqn (2)–(7):
Cu–Ag ligaments + H2O2 + H+ + ))) (ultrasound) = Cu+/Ag+ + H2O + ·OH | (2) |
Cu+ + H2O2 + H+ + ))) (ultrasound) = Cu2+ + H2O + ·OH | (3) |
Cu2+ + e− = Cu+ | (4) |
Cu+ + e− = Cu | (5) |
Ag+ + e− = Ag | (6) |
·OH + MO → oxidation product | (7) |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9ra03247a |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 |