Yilong Jing,
Lijun Jia*,
Yuhang Zheng and
Huaiwu Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, PR China. E-mail: jlj991210@163.com
First published on 17th October 2019
In this paper, single flake-like strontium hexaferrite was directly synthesized via a modified hydrothermal approach without high-temperature annealing. To determine the main factors governing the formation of the hexaferrite phase and impurity α-Fe2O3, effects of alkali environment and concentrations of metal ions on phase composition, grain growth, and magnetic properties were systematically analyzed. Results from XRD, FESEM and FT-IR analyses indicated that initial alkali concentration was the key factor influencing the phase composition of particles. Suitable initial alkali environment can enhance the nucleation and growth of ferrite, and inhibit the formation of by-product α-Fe2O3 at the same time. It was also found that the increase in initial concentration of strontium ions could improve the nucleation of hexaferrite and reduce the grain size, and consequently, change the magnetic performance of hexagonal particles. When the molar ratios of ferric ions to strontium ions were constant, the average grain size did not change significantly with the initial concentration of iron ions, which could be attributed to high levels of strontium ions and hydroxyl ions in the reaction system. The above-mentioned results indicate that the optimized hydrothermal conditions are beneficial for the formation of a single phase and for controlling the particle size and magnetic properties of M-type hexaferrite.
To date, several methods have been developed for the synthesis of hexaferrite in the laboratory, including high temperature solid-state reaction method,6 co-precipitation method,7–10 sol–gel method,11,12 and hydrothermal method.13–17 An effective way to change the magnetic properties and the microwave absorption performance of hexagonal ferrite is to replace the ferric ions (Fe3+) by other metal ions.18 Trukhanov et al.19 found that substitution of Fe3+ cations by Ga3+ cations could increase the frequency range of intense absorption of electromagnetic energy. Li et al.20 studied the partial cationic inversion-induced magnetic hardening of nickel ferrite nanowires. Deng et al.21 found that introduction of Zr4+ ion in BaFe12O19 to substitute Fe3+ ion sharply decreased the coercivity while the saturation magnetization remained constant. Chen et al.22 reported that strontium ferrites/graphene (SrFe12O19/G) composites exhibited better absorption properties than pristine SrFe12O19 particles.
The low temperature hydrothermal synthesis technique for hexaferrite has attracted a great deal of research attention as it allows greater control over the crystalline structure and outward appearance. Studies have shown that high concentration of alkaline medium, long time of hydrothermal reaction (usually longer than 10 hours) at low temperatures (180–240 °C), appropriate molar ratio of hydroxyl ions to nitrate radical ions (RO/N) and ferric ions to strontium ions (RF/S) are beneficial conditions for the synthesis of hexaferrite. However, even under these optimal conditions, traces of α-Fe2O3 impurity are generally found in the product prepared by traditional hydrothermal synthesis.14–17 Some attempts have been made to promote the formation of hexaferrite with high temperature annealing treatment (above 1000 °C), but this method causes other problems, including poor uniformity of crystal dimensions.17,23,24 Another approach proposed to achieve quasi-pure M-type hexaferrite involves pretreatment with CO32−-free alkaline solution, but the complicated operation makes this method unsuitable for practical application.25
In this work, a new approach was developed for the direct synthesis of pure M-type strontium hexaferrite through hydrothermal treatment without high-temperature annealing. The effects of alkali addition on the competitive growth of hexaferrite phase and the related mechanism were analyzed. Then, the relationship between the molar ratio of ferric ions to strontium ions (RF/S) and the micromorphology and magnetic properties of the as-synthesized specimens was investigated and discussed.
The crystalline phase of synthesized samples was identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Dandong DX-2700, China) using CuKα radiation (wavelength λ = 1.5405 Å) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700, USA). The microstructures were observed by a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, JSM-7500F, USA). The magnetic properties of powder samples were tested with vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) with an applied field of 15 kOe. Raman spectra were recorded using a micro-Raman spectrometer (LabRAM HR Evolution, excitation wavelength of 633 nm). The Curie temperature was established by Magnetic Thermogravimetric Analysis (MTGA) up to 800 K using a TA instruments thermobalance.
Fig. 1 XRD patterns of specimens with different initial concentration of ferric ions: (a) 0.25 mol L−1; (b) 0.375 mol L−1; (c) 0.5 mol L−1; (d) 0.625 mol L−1. |
Similar to γ-Fe2O3 and α-FeOOH, Fe(OH)3 (or H3FeO3) in freshly prepared composite slurry is amphoteric and dissolves in hot alkaline solution to form tetrahydroxo ferrates (III), [Fe(OH)4]−(aq), i.e.
Fe3+(aq) + 3OH− → H3FeO3(s) | (1) |
H3FeO3(s) + OH− → [Fe(OH)4]−(aq) | (2) |
The main product SrFe12O19(s) is expected from the reaction between [Fe(OH)4]−(aq) and hydrated strontium ions, Sr2+(aq). The overall reaction in the kettle can be given by the following equation:
12[Fe(OH)4]−(aq) + Sr2+(aq) → SrFe12O19(s) + 10OH− + 19H2O | (3) |
Combining eqn (1)–(3), an equation for the overall reaction can be given as:
Sr2+(aq) + 12Fe3+(aq) + 38OH− → SrFe12O19(s) + 19H2O | (4) |
However, side reactions may occur, especially when the conditions are less favorable for the synthesis of main product.
[Fe(OH)4]−(aq) → α-Fe2O3(s) + 2OH− + H2O | (5) |
According to the nucleation mechanism reported in previous studies,26–28, [Fe(OH)4]−(aq) is aggregated into larger aggregates [Fe(OH)4]x−x(aq) in the presence of OH−, which then react with Sr2+(aq) ions, forming intermediate complexes and subsequently the target compounds. Increasing the reactant concentration would increase the probability for successful collisions between the necessary constituent species needed for the formation of hexaferrite nuclei. On the other hand, the by-product α-Fe2O3 was formed because of the reduced concentration of OH− ions, as shown in Fig. 1(a) and (b). These results suggest that the alkaline environment plays an important role in the hydrothermal synthesis of hexaferrite.
On this basis, a simple empirical relation including the initial concentration of hydroxyl ions and the initial concentration of ferric ions in the reaction system was proposed for the hydrothermal synthesis of pure hexaferrite and the correctness of this formula was verified by experiments. The total content of hydroxyl ions can be divided into two parts: the quantity of consumed ions (cconOH) and the remaining quantity (cremOH), i.e. cOH = cremOH + cconOH. From eqn (4),
Fig. 2 shows the XRD patterns of the as-synthesized powders with different initial concentrations of hydroxyl ions and constant cFe of 0.5 mol L−1 and RF/S of 8. The XRD results showed that the main phase of all products was magnetoplumbite phase. Moreover, the impurity α-Fe2O3 was detected in trace amounts in the specimens when the initial concentration of hydroxyl ions was greater than 2.68 mol L−1. This data can be used to calculate the value of cremOH. Subsequently, the relationship between the optimum initial alkali concentration and the initial concentration of ferric ions in reaction system was obtained as follows:
cOH = 1.096 + 3.167cFe | (6) |
Fig. 2 XRD patterns of specimens with different initial concentration of hydroxyl ions: (a) 2.34 mol L−1 (b) 2.68 mol L−1 (c) 3.06 mol L−1 (d) 3.40 mol L−1 (e) 3.74 mol L−1. |
A set of experiments was designed to evaluate whether this formula was reasonable, and the corresponding results are given in Fig. 3–9 and Table 1. As shown in Fig. 3, only hexaferrite phase was detected in the XRD patterns without any impurity within the measurable limits. Fig. 4 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of the sample (initial concentration of ferric ions is 0.5 mol L−1) and its corresponding Rietveld refinement mode.6 Table 2 shows the Curie temperature, the finishing parameters and the lattice constants of samples with initial ferric ions concentration between 0.2 to 0.7 mol L−1. It can be seen that with the increase in initial concentration of ferric ions, the unit-cell parameters a and c changed only slightly and the Curie temperature of these samples also remained stable.29
cFe (mol L−1) | σs (emu g−1) | σr (emu g−1) | Hc (kA m−1) |
---|---|---|---|
0.2 | 48.41 | 16.17 | 74.3 |
0.3 | 50.52 | 17.84 | 82 |
0.4 | 50.84 | 17.52 | 81.9 |
0.5 | 53.41 | 17.24 | 72.1 |
0.6 | 50.16 | 16.81 | 76.4 |
0.7 | 50.64 | 17.95 | 84.8 |
Fig. 3 XRD patterns of specimens with different initial concentration of ferric ions: (a) 0.2 mol L−1; (b) 0.3 mol L−1; (c) 0.4 mol L−1; (d) 0.5 mol L; (e) 0.6 mol L−1; (f) 0.7 mol L−1 (RF/S = 8). |
x (mol L−1) | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
a/b (Å) | 5.87 | 5.88 | 5.85 | 5.89 | 5.89 | 5.87 |
C (Å) | 23.01 | 23.06 | 22.96 | 23.06 | 22.95 | 23.03 |
Tc (°C) | 445.0 | 442.6 | 442.3 | 443.0 | 437.9 | 444.3 |
Fig. 5 presents the FT-IR spectra in the range of 400–800 cm−1 for the specimens prepared with various initial concentrations of ferric ions. The FT-IR spectral data of the specimens were found to be in good agreement with the data reported in literature.14,30 The absorption bands at 551 cm−1, 588 cm−1 and 656 cm−1 could be assigned to the tetrahedral and octahedral sublattices of ferrite, respectively. The band at 436 cm−1 corresponds to the lattice vibration modes of characteristic fivefold ionic positions of hexaferrite. Fig. 6 presents the Raman spectra in the range of 200–1000 cm−1 for the specimens prepared with various initial concentrations of ferric ions. The Raman spectral data of the specimens were found to be in good agreement with the data reported in literature.31,32 The major peaks observed at about 684.2, 528, 409.5 and 330 cm−1 were consistent with the magnetoplumbite structure. The peaks at 684 cm−1 can be assigned to Fe–O bonds at the tetrahedral 4f1 and bipyramidal 2b sites.33 From the above-mentioned results, it can be concluded that suitable remaining concentration of hydroxyl ions in the reaction system can effectively inhibit the formation of by-product α-Fe2O3.
Fig. 7(a)–(f) present the FESEM images of the products, which clearly show the presence of uniformly distributed hexagonal flakes about 2 microns in diameter. With increase in the cFe, the average grain size did not change significantly. The room temperature special magnetic hysteresis (σ–H) loops of the specimens with different values of cFe are shown in Fig. 8 and Table 1. The magnetic properties of the specimens varied only slightly due to their similar composition and crystallinity. The specimen with cFe of 0.5 mol L−1 (S-0.5) exhibited special saturation magnetization (σs) of 53.41 emu g−1, remanent magnetization (σr) of 17.24 emu g−1, and coercive force (Hc) of 72.1 kA m−1. In order to verify the uniaxial anisotropy of SrFe12O19 hexagonal structure, the mixed slurry of powder S-0.5 and melted paraffin was coated and solidified on the glass slide. Then, magnetic field was applied perpendicular to the glass surface. Fig. 9 shows the hysteresis loops for a square piece of specimen with the field applied perpendicular or parallel to the glass surface. It can be seen from the loops that the easy magnetic axis was perpendicular to the glass surface and the hard magnetic axis was in the plane perpendicular to the easy magnetic axis at room temperature.
Fig. 8 Special magnetic hysteresis (σ–H) loops of specimens with different initial concentration of ferric ions. |
Fig. 9 Hysteresis loops obtained by vibrating sample magnetometer for the sample S-0.5 oriented with magnetic field and congealed in paraffin. |
Fig. 10 XRD patterns of specimens with different molar ratios of ferric ions to strontium ions: (a) RF/S = 2; (b) RF/S = 3; (c) RF/S = 4; (d) RF/S = 8. |
Fig. 11 FESEM micrographs of specimens with different molar ratios of ferric ions to strontium ions: (a) RF/S = 2; (b) RF/S = 3; (c) RF/S = 4; (d) RF/S = 8. |
FESEM micrographs of the specimens prepared with different molar ratios of ferric ions to strontium ions are shown in Fig. 11. As the initial concentration of strontium ions increased, the average diameter of hexagonal flakes decreased from ∼2 μm to ∼1 μm, and the thickness also reduced significantly. Namo measurement software was used to determine the average and the median thickness values of all flake-like M-type SrM in Fig. 11. It was found that both values were less than 0.1 μm. M-type hexaferrite with lower Gibbs free energy is the thermodynamically preferred product compared with α-Fe2O3.25
The SrM structural unit consists of four parts, which are S, R, S* and R*.1 The ionic radius of Sr2+ (1.27 Å) is similar to that of O2− (1.38 Å). It was assumed that in a hydrothermal environment, [Fe(OH)4]−(aq) is aggregated into larger aggregates [Fe(OH)4]x−x(aq) in the presence of OH−. The higher temperature make Sr2+ substitute the position of O2− in the crystal. This process destroyed the spinel structure which is already formed and results in the synthesis of Sr2+ layer which is equivalent to an intercalation layer.34 Through pyrolytic exfoliation,35,36 these intercalation layers induce the M-type Fe2O3 platelets to be stripped and recombined into the required SrM platelets.7 It can be observed that some hexagonal crystals have small hexagonal thin layers attached to the surface (Fig. 11), which were interpreted as direct evidence.
Combined with the previous discussion, it can be concluded that at the right temperature, the reaction always proceeds in the direction of the synthetic SrM. The increase in concentration of Sr2+ ions accelerates this process. Consequently, more SrM can be synthesized by exfoliation and self-synthesis in a shorter period of time. It can be seen from eqn (3) that high concentration of strontium ions was favorable for the nucleation of hexaferrite at the same concentrations of OH− and [Fe(OH)4]−, which could lead to small grain size.
The magnetic properties of these samples are listed in Table 3. It can be seen that with the decrease in cSr, the values of σs increased from 32.64 to 53.57 emu g−1 while the values of Hc decreased from 95.7 to 71.4 kA m−1, which was due to reduced size of hexaferrite flakes.
RF/S | σs (emu g−1) | σr (emu g−1) | Hc (kA m−1) |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 32.6 | 14.5 | 95.7 |
3 | 40.9 | 15.6 | 88.5 |
4 | 48.8 | 16.3 | 83.6 |
8 | 53.6 | 17.6 | 71.4 |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9ra06246g |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 |