Takayo
Moriuchi-Kawakami
*a,
Yuria
Sekiguchi
a,
Shintaro
Hattori
a,
Takahiro
Otsuki
a,
Keiichi
Fujimori
a,
Toshiyuki
Moriuchi
b and
Yoshiaki
Urahama
c
aDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Osaka Institute of Technology, 5-16-1 Omiya, Asahi, Osaka 535-8585, Japan. E-mail: takayo.moriuchi@oit.ac.jp; Fax: +81 (6)69572135; Tel: +81 (6)6954 4279
bDivision of Molecular Materials Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, 3-3-138 Sugimoto, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka 558-8585, Japan
cGraduate School of Engineering, University of Hyogo, 2167 Shosha, Himeji, Hyogo 671-2201, Japan
First published on 22nd May 2020
The proton spin–spin relaxation times (T2) of ion-selective electrode membranes with differences in the polymerization degree of the incorporated poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) polymers were investigated. T2 measurements were performed using Hahn-Echo, Solid-Echo and Carr–Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) pulse sequences. Analyses of the T2 measurements by Hahn-Echo pulse sequences could realize the estimation of the homogeneity and compatibility for a series of ion-selective electrode membranes and reveal a relationship with the electromotive force (EMF) response in the low-concentration region of the Na+ ions. On the other hand, the normalized derivative spectra from T2 measurements by Solid-Echo and CPMG pulse sequences could approximately visualize the degree of plasticization for such potentiometric polymeric membranes. Moreover, differences in the polymerization degrees of the incorporated PVCs were scarcely found to affect the selectivity coefficients of the Na+-ISEs based on bis(12-crown-4).
Na+-ISEs based on bis(12-crown-4) are solvent polymeric membrane electrodes and the plasticized potentiometric PVC membranes are generally prepared by the dissolving of an appropriate amount of bis(12-crown-4), 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether (o-NPOE) as the membrane plasticizer, PVC as the polymer, and sodium borate as a salt additive.4–6 The prepared potentiometric PVC membranes are homogeneous and flexible. In potentiometric polymeric membranes, bis(12-crown-4) as an ionophore mainly discriminates ions. Various bis(12-crown-3) derivatives were thus designed as an alternative ionophore to bis(12-crown-4), and the Na+-ISE based on bis(12-crown-3) showed a four-fold higher discrimination of the Na+ ions against K+ ions than that based on bis(12-crown-4).7 The ionophores of the Na+-ISEs are immobilized into the plasticized PVC membranes. Although the incorporated PVC polymers of Na+-ISEs may also influence their ion-sensing behavior, investigations into the ion-sensing behavior of the potentiometric membranes prepared from PVCs with different degrees of polymerization have yet to be carried out. Furthermore, a suitable and valid analysis method to evaluate the differences of such potentiometric polymeric membranes has yet to be developed.
In this study, five potentiometric PVC membranes of Na+-ISEs were prepared from PVCs with different degrees of polymerization and their ion-sensing behaviors were investigated by potentiometric measurements. Due to its extensive utilization to commercial Na+-ISEs for clinical examinations, bis(12-crown-4) was chosen as the model ionophore. We have developed an evaluating method for the plasticization of such potentiometric PVC membranes and elucidated its correlation with the ion-sensing properties. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation measurements have been applied to studies on the morphology, structures and dynamics of polymers.8–11 Pulsed NMR experiments are very convenient to quickly determine the proton longitudinal (or spin–lattice) (T1) and transverse (of spin–spin) (T2) magnetization relaxation times.12 In particular, the proton transverse relaxation times T2 are the most suitable tools to demonstrate differences in the physical properties such as molecular mobility.13–16 We have previously demonstrated that the degree of plasticization in potentiometric polymeric membranes of Ag+-ISEs based on 5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl porphyrin with differences in the type and weight of the membrane plasticizer is quantitatively exhibited in the T2 values of the major fractions F.17,18 Here, the plasticization of the potentiometric PVC membranes of Na+-ISEs based on bis(12-crown-4) prepared from PVCs with different degrees of polymerization is investigated with T2 measurements by applying three pulse sequences (Hahn-Echo,19 Solid-Echo20 and CPMG12). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report elucidating the correlation between the ion-sensing properties and the proton transverse relaxation times T2 data for a series of ion-selective electrode membranes prepared from PVCs with different degrees of polymerization.
Potentiometric PVC membrane | Degree of polymerization n | FID analysesa | Average T2 (ms) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T 2M (μs) | F M (%) | T 2L (ms) | F L (%) | |||
a Estimated from FID signals obtained by the Hahn-Echo pulse sequence. | ||||||
Membrane 1 | 800 | 742.88 | 26.2 | 7.25 | 73.8 | 5.55 |
Membrane 2 | 1000 | 204.03 | 9.6 | 4.57 | 90.4 | 4.15 |
Membrane 3 | 1300 | 170.54 | 6.5 | 5.07 | 93.5 | 4.75 |
Membrane 4 | 1700 | 356.74 | 27.1 | 8.57 | 72.9 | 6.34 |
Membrane 5 | 2500 | 317.18 | 32.4 | 26.77 | 67.6 | 18.2 |
Fig. 1 FID signals with the Hahn-Echo pulse sequence of the five potentiometric polymeric membranes 1–5. |
The T2 values and their respective fractions F, calculated by fitting the FID signal to the Weibull function,22 are summarized in Table 1. Each FID signal of the examined membranes was found to reflect two kinds of components having relaxation times T2L (long) and T2M (intermediate).29 The longer T2L and the shorter T2M are attributed to mobile species such as o-NPOE and sluggish species such as PVCs, respectively.
The PVCs used consist of an immobile component with an extremely short T2 value29 (T2S) (ca. 15 μs by applying the Solid-Echo pulse sequence), however, precise T2 measurements could not be carried out by the Hahn-Echo pulse sequence due to their significant time consumption. The prepared potentiometric polymeric membranes incorporated 28.1 wt% PVC. In membrane 5, the incorporated polymer had the highest PVC molecular weight PVC (n = 2500). Membrane 5 showed an incomparably long T2L value (26.77 ms) with the major fraction FL (67.6%) and a moderate T2M value (317.18 μs) with the fraction FM (32.4%). This means that membrane 5 consists of a highly mobile component of 67.7% and relatively immobile component of 32.4%. Since membrane 5 possessed the longest T2L value and comparable amounts of the major fraction FL, it also provided the largest average T2 value (18.2 ms). In our previous paper, the average T2 values exhibited the degree of plasticization for the potentiometric polymeric membranes.18 The degree of plasticization is potentially displayed as the position, area and breadth of the normalized derivative spectra peaks. In the case of similar membranes, the average T2 values will indicate the degree of plasticization for the whole membranes since they will adapt closely with changes in the position, area and breadth of the normalized derivative spectra peaks. In the case of membrane 5, its large average T2 value indicates a large degree of plasticization. Considering the fraction FL value in Table 1, however, it seems that o-NPOE as a membrane plasticizer could not very well permeate the polymer chains of the incorporated PVC, leading to a worsening of the compatibility of PVC with the o-NPOE in membrane 5. On the other hand, membranes 2 and 3 incorporating PVCs with polymerization degrees n = 1000 and 1300 consisted of almost all mobile components accompanied by the major fractions FL (90.4 and 93.5%) and providing the relatively longer T2L values (4.57 and 5.07 ms), respectively. These results indicate that o-NPOE as a membrane plasticizer could permeate the polymer chains of the incorporated PVCs well, leading to excellent homogeneity and compatibility.
Membranes 1 and 4 incorporating PVCs with polymerization degrees n = 800 and 1700 exhibited relatively longer T2L values (7.25 and 8.57 ms) with major FL fractions (73.8 and 72.9%), respectively. Membranes 1 and 4 also possess relatively immobile components, which showed relatively shorter T2M values (742.88 and 356.74 μs) accompanied by moderate fractions FM (26.2 and 27.1%), respectively. The average T2 value of membrane 4 (6.34 ms) was higher than that of membrane 1 (5.55 ms), while it is noteworthy that membrane 1 had the largest T2M value (742.88 μs) among the membranes 1–5. Therefore, it is presumed that the homogeneity and compatibility of membrane 1 are superior to those of membrane 4.
The plots for the polymerization degrees of the incorporated PVCs vs the average T2 values are given in Fig. 2. T2 measurements by applying the Hahn-Echo pulse sequences demonstrated that the membrane which exhibits the minimum average T2 value would be the most suitable membrane with excellent homogeneity and compatibility.
Since the relaxation peaks of all the PVCs (n = 800, 1000, 1300, 1700 and 2500) appeared only in short-time regions up to 30 μs, the normalized derivative spectra of the PVCs themselves were very similar (Fig. S3†). Therefore, no difference in the degree of plasticization for the PVCs was observed in the normalized derivative spectra of the PVCs themselves. On the other hand, a remarkable difference between the potentiometric polymeric membranes 1–5, PVCs and o-NPOE was clearly observed in the normalized derivative spectra (Fig. 3). These results establish that the membrane plasticizer o-NPOE permeates the PVC polymer chains and the constraints on the molecular motions of PVC are dramatically reduced, while constraint on the molecular motions of o-NPOE are, in contrast, markedly increased.
In the normalized derivative spectra of membranes 1–5, the relaxation peaks of PVC originally in the short-time region were significantly diminished but most shifted to the wider field of the long-time regions by plasticization. The T2 relaxations of membranes 1–5 were found in a wide field of the long-time regions of 200 μs to 250000 μs. The bottoms of large relaxation peaks for the investigated potentiometric polymeric membranes (excluding membrane 5) appeared at around 10000 μs. Although the differences between membranes 1–4 could be visualized (Fig. 3 and S4†), they were in large part in accordance with results by the Hahn-Echo pulse sequence, as illustrated in Fig. 2. Membrane 5 exhibited a relaxation peak in the relatively longer time region than membranes 1–4 due to its largest average T2 value and this was in good accordance with results by the Hahn-Echo pulse sequences. Thus, T2 measurements by applying the Solid-Echo and CPMG pulse sequences proved that the normalized derivative spectra could approximately visualize the degree of plasticization for the potentiometric polymeric membranes with differences in the polymerization degrees of the incorporated PVC polymers. Unlike the Hahn-Echo pulse sequence, however, the small differences between membranes 1–4 could not be characterized precisely in the normalized derivative spectra (Fig. 4S†). That is, it was not possible to elucidate detailed differences between the potentiometric polymeric membranes resulting from the polymerization degree of the incorporated polymers by T2 measurements with the Solid-Echo and CPMG pulse sequences.
Potentiometric PVC membrane contained in Na+-ISE | Degree of polymerization n | Calibration graphs | |
---|---|---|---|
Slope/mV per decade | Linear range/logaNa+ | ||
Membrane 1 | 800 | 59.86 | −3.71 to −1.10 |
Membrane 2 | 1000 | 59.15 | −3.13 to −1.10 |
Membrane 3 | 1300 | 59.17 | −3.61 to −1.10 |
Membrane 4 | 1700 | 59.51 | −3.61 to −1.10 |
Membrane 5 | 2500 | 59.11 | −3.13 to −1.10 |
The Na+-ISE of membrane 3 responded to the Na+−activity changes with slopes of 59.17 mV decade−1 over an activity range of 10−3.6 to 10−1.1 M (Table 1). Fig. 4 clearly shows that the Na+-ISE of membrane 1 showed the best EMF response under 10−3.6 M of the Na+ ions. The Na+-ISE of membrane 3 provided the best Nernstian response from 10−3.6 M to 10−1.1 M and the worst EMF response under 10−3.6 M of the Na+ ions. As for the Na+-ISEs of membranes 1–5, the differences resulting from the polymerization degrees of the incorporated PVCs were observed for the potential responses in the low-concentration region under 10−3.6 M of the Na+ ions. These results, as shown in Fig. 4, agreed to some extent with the FID signals illustrated in Fig. 1: the FID signal intensity at 12.0 ms becomes lower and the EMF response under 10−3.6 M of the Na+ ions is enhanced. Generally, the transverse relaxation of the proton magnetization occurs, then the FID signal intensity decreases. When the FID signal intensity at 12.0 ms is lower, the proton transverse magnetization relaxation occurs more quickly. Therefore, it was demonstrated by applying the Hahn-Echo pulse sequence that the EMF response under 10−3.6 M of the Na+ ions was enhanced when the proton transverse magnetization relaxation at 12.0 ms in the T2 measurement proceeded more greatly.
The selectivity coefficients of the Na+-ISEs of membranes 1–5 were obtained from EMF measurements under the presence of various interfering cations. Fig. 5 illustrates the selectivity coefficients of five ISEs determined by the fixed interference method (FIM).1,2,26 All of the examined ISEs exhibited good ion-selectivity for the Na+ ion, and the differences resulting from the polymerization degrees of the incorporated PVCs were negligible, as observed by their selectivity coefficients for the Na+ ions. These results are similar to those obtained showing that differences in the polymerization degrees of the incorporated PVCs were scarcely found in the Nernstian responses of the examined Na+-ISEs. This is probably because the acquired selectivity coefficients are determined under the Nernstian responses for the Na+ ions.
Fig. 5 Selectivity coefficients of Na+-ISEs of membranes 1–5 determined by the fixed interference method (FIM). |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Digital images, high-precision transverse magnetization data and expanded normalized derivative spectra. See DOI: 10.1039/c9an02355k |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 |