Maki
Hayashi‡
a,
Hodaka
Sugimoto
a,
Hirotaka
Takahashi
b,
Motoaki
Seki
cd,
Kazuo
Shinozaki
e,
Tatsuya
Sawasaki
b,
Toshinori
Kinoshita
f and
Shin-ichiro
Inoue
*a
aDivision of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Chikusa, 464-8602, Nagoya, Japan. E-mail: shin@bio.nagoya-u.ac.jp; Fax: +81-52-789-4780; Tel: +81-52-789-4780
bProteo-Science Center (PROS), Ehime University, 3 Bunkyo-cho, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8577, Japan
cRIKEN Cluster for Pioneering Research, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
dRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, 1-7-22, Suehiro, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan
eGene Discovery Research Group, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, 3-1-1 Koyadai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan
fInstitute of Transformative Bio-Molecules (WPI-ITbM), Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan
First published on 23rd December 2019
Stomatal pores, which are surrounded by pairs of guard cells in the plant epidermis, regulate gas exchange between plants and the atmosphere, thereby controlling photosynthesis and transpiration. Blue light works as a signal to guard cells, to induce intracellular signaling and open stomata. Blue light receptor phototropins (phots) are activated by blue light; phot-mediated signals promote plasma membrane (PM) H+-ATPase activity via C-terminal Thr phosphorylation, serving as the driving force for stomatal opening in guard cells. However, the details of this signaling process are not fully understood. In this study, through an in vitro screening of phot-interacting protein kinases, we obtained the CBC1 and CBC2 that had been reported as signal transducers in stomatal opening. Promoter activities of CBC1 and CBC2 indicated that both genes were expressed in guard cells. Single and double knockout mutants of CBC1 and CBC2 showed no lesions in the context of phot-mediated phototropism, chloroplast movement, or leaf flattening. In contrast, the cbc1cbc2 double mutant showed larger stomatal opening under both dark and blue light conditions. Interestingly, the level of phosphorylation of C-terminal Thr of PM H+-ATPase was higher in double mutant guard cells. The larger stomatal openings of the double mutant were effectively suppressed by the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA). CBC1 and CBC2 interacted with BLUS1 and PM H+-ATPase in vitro. From these results, we conclude that CBC1 and CBC2 act as negative regulators of stomatal opening, probably via inhibition of PM H+-ATPase activity.
Recent studies have demonstrated that some signaling components act as positive regulators for blue light-dependent PM H+-ATPase activation in guard cells, including Blue Light Signaling 1 (BLUS1),8 Blue Light-dependent H+-ATPase Phosphorylation (BHP),9 and type 1 protein phosphatase (PP1).10 BLUS1 is a protein kinase that is a substrate for phots.8 BHP is another protein kinase, which has been shown to interact with BLUS1 in vivo and in vitro, and with PP1 in vitro.9 Based on the results of protein–protein interactions and pharmacological experiments, the phot signal is thought to be transmitted to BLUS1, BHP, PP1, and PM H+-ATPase, in this order.3,9 However, the mechanisms regulating these components are not fully understood, and an unidentified protein kinase that phosphorylates and activates PM H+-ATPase is believed to participate in this signaling. Guard cells of blus1 mutant showed slight stomatal closure and medium alkalization in response to blue light.8 The results suggest that there is a BLUS1-independent negative signaling in blue light-dependent stomatal opening. However, the signaling components involved in this process remain completely unknown.
Raf-like kinases Convergence of Blue Light and CO2 (CBC) 1 and CBC2 were identified as positive regulators in both blue light- and low CO2-induced stomatal opening.11 CBC1 is a substrate of phototropins in guard cells.11 CBC1 and CBC2 are involved in blue light-dependent inhibition of S-type anion channels without regulation of blue light-dependent PM H+-ATPase activation in guard cells.11
In addition to stomatal opening, phots mediate blue light responses including phototropism, chloroplast movement, leaf positioning, and leaf flattening, to promote photosynthesis and plant growth especially in weak light environments.8,12–14 To date, several interactors for phots have been reported;15 among these, three proteins have been characterized as phot substrates in addition to CBC1: ATP-Binding Cassette B19 (ABCB19),16 Phytochrome Kinase Substrate 4 (PKS4),17 and BLUS1. ABCB19 regulates phototropism; however, the involvement of this protein in other phot-mediated responses has not been determined. PKS1, 2, and 4 regulate phototropism, leaf flattening, and leaf positioning, but not chloroplast movement or stomatal opening.18,19 BLUS1 is specifically expressed in guard cells and regulates only stomatal opening in phot-mediated responses.8 ABCB19 is not a positive regulator of phototropism,16 and phosphorylation of PKS4 by phot1 negatively regulates phototropism.17 Therefore, there may be other phot substrates that act as positive regulators in phototropism and/or chloroplast movements and as regulators in the BLUS1-independent negative signaling for stomatal opening.
In this study, we screened Arabidopsis protein kinases physically interacting with phots, and obtained the CBC1. We then performed functional analyses of CBC1 and its closest homolog, CBC2, to determine their roles in phot-mediated responses. We showed that both kinases are not involved in the phot-mediated responses except for stomatal opening. Unlike the results of a previous report,11 we showed that CBC1 and CBC2 function as negative regulators of the guard cell PM H+-ATPase phosphorylation in the blue light-dependent stomatal opening.
To detect interactions between FLAG-tagged phots and protein kinases, 5 μL of each protein-synthesized mixture was mixed and reacted in a 20 μL reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 100 mM potassium acetate, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM DTT, 5 μg mL−1 anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mg mL−1 bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.1 μL streptavidin-coated donor beads, and 0.1 μL anti-IgG acceptor beads at 23 °C for 1 h. Luminescent signals were analyzed using the Amplified Luminescent Proximity Homogeneous Assay Screen (AlphaScreen) detection program (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences).24
Following in vitro protein synthesis, a reaction mixture containing a GST-tagged protein and one containing a His-tagged protein were mixed in equal amounts and added to 0.5% TritonX-100. The mixtures were incubated with 30 μL glutathione-Sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare) for 30 min at 4 °C. GST-tagged proteins were then purified with glutathione-Sepharose 4B from the mixture and washed three times with Tris-buffered saline (TBS); boundary matrices were then solubilized by adding 20 μL sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer [5% (w/v) SDS, 30 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 3 mM EDTA, 30% (w/v) sucrose, 0.012% (w/v) Coomassie Brilliant Blue, 15% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol]. Solubilized samples were subjected to SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on 10% acrylamide gel and immunoblotted using anti-GST or His-antibody (Sigma-Aldrich).
CBC1 (At3g01490) and its closest homolog CBC2 (At5g50000) belong to the Raf-like kinase subfamily of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK) family.29,30 The Raf-like kinase subfamily of the MAPKKK family contains the B and C clades. The C clade contains seven groups (C1–C7) and both CBCs belong to group C7, which contains five members.29 To confirm the interaction between phots and either CBC1 or CBC2, we performed in vitro pull-down assays (Fig. 1B and C). All proteins in the assays were found to be similarly expressed using the wheat germ cell-free protein synthesis system. GST, GST-tagged CBCs, and His-tagged phots were individually expressed using an in vitro translation system, and a mixture containing GST, GST-CBC1, or GST-CBC2 was mixed with one containing His-phot1 or His-phot2. GST or GST-tagged CBC protein was then purified from the mixture using glutathione Sepharose 4B beads. When GST, GST-CBC1, and GST-CBC2 were purified, His-phot1 or His-phot2 was co-purified with only GST-CBC1 and GST-CBC2 (Fig. 1B and C). These results indicate that CBC1 and CBC2 interact with both phot1 and phot2 in vitro. Binding of CBC proteins with phot1 was similarly detected in in vitro pull-down and BiFC assays of a previous study.11 Our results showed that phot2 also interacts with both CBC proteins in vitro. Therefore, these CBC kinases may have the same functions in phot-mediated signaling.
We then investigated phot-mediated responses in the single and double mutants of cbc1 and cbc2-2. First, we measured phototropic curvature in the hypocotyls of etiolated seedlings (Fig. 2A). Phototropic bending was induced in cbc1, cbc2-2, and cbc1cbc2-2 by unilateral blue light (0.1 μmol m−2 s−1) to an extent similar to that of the WT, unlike the phot1phot2 mutant.
Next, chloroplast relocation movements were determined in the cbc mutants using a slit-band assay (Fig. 2B).25,31,32 To induce chloroplast accumulation and avoidance responses, rosette leaves were locally irradiated by weak blue light (1 μmol m−2 s−1) and strong blue light (90 μmol m−2 s−1), respectively, through a 2 mm slit. Chloroplast accumulation and avoidance responses change the color of the local irradiated leaf area to darker and lighter green, respectively. As shown in Fig. 2B, leaves of all cbc mutants showed chloroplast accumulation and avoidance responses similar to those of WT. In contrast, phot1phot2 leaves showed no color changes in response to weak or strong blue light.
Rosette leaves of phot1phot2 curled downward, whereas those of WT were flat under our growth conditions (Fig. 2C). Leaves of single and double mutants of cbc1 and cbc2-2 were similarly flat, similar to those of WT under the same conditions.
Together, these results indicate that cbc1, cbc2-2, and cbc1cbc2-2 mutants have no lesions in the context of phot-mediated phototropism, chloroplast movement, or leaf flattening.
Fig. 3 Effects of CBC1 and CBC2 mutations on blue light-dependent stomatal responses. (A) Blue light-dependent stomatal opening in epidermises of WT, phot1phot2, cbc1, cbc2-2, and cbc1cbc2-2 mutant plants. Epidermal fragments were isolated from dark-adapted plants and treated with or without light (RL + BL) (red light, 50 μmol m−2 s−1; blue light, 10 μmol m−2 s−1) for 3 h. Values are means ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3); 30 stomata were measured in each experiment. Differences from WT were evaluated using Student's t test (**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05). (B) Photographs of leaf epidermises of WT and cbc1cbc2-2. Leaf epidermal fragments were treated as described above and photographed. (C) Immunohistochemical detection of plasma membrane (PM) H+-ATPase phosphorylation in guard cells of WT and cbc1cbc2-2. Blue light- or fusicoccin (FC)-dependent phosphorylation of guard cell PM H+-ATPase was performed as described previously.9,26 Anti-phosphorylated penultimate Thr residue antibodies were used as primary antibodies in immunohistochemical staining. Epidermal fragments were isolated as described above and incubated under red light (50 μmol m−2 s−1) for 20 min (RL), and then under blue light (10 μmol m−2 s−1) for 2.5 min, superimposed over red light (RL + BL). Subsequently, we applied 10 μM FC to dark-adapted epidermis for 5 min (FC). Typical fluorescence images are shown. Signal intensity was obtained by quantifying fluorescent images as described previously.26 Values are means ± SD (n = 3); 30 stomata were measured in each experiment. Data are expressed relative to Blue WT values. Differences from WT were evaluated using Student's t test (**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05). |
Phot signaling activates guard cell PM H+-ATPase through C-terminal penultimate Thr phosphorylation in a blue light-dependent manner.6,26,35 The previous study indicated that blue light-dependent phosphorylation of PM H+-ATPase was not impaired in cbc1cbc2 guard cell protoplasts.11 Since stomata in cbc1cbc2-2 epidermis opened larger than those in WT under both dark and light conditions (Fig. 3A and B), we next examined blue light-dependent phosphorylation of PM H+-ATPase in WT and cbc1cbc2-2 guard cells using an immunohistochemical technique (Fig. 3C).9,26 Guard cell PM H+-ATPase was barely phosphorylated in WT epidermis by red light (Fig. 3C: RL) and was phosphorylated by blue light superimposed on red light (Fig. 3C: RL + BL). Interestingly, guard cell PM H+-ATPase in the cbc1cbc2-2 epidermis was slightly phosphorylated by red light and strongly phosphorylated by blue light. The amount of guard cell PM H+-ATPase was similar between WT and cbc1cbc2-2 guard cells (Fig. S2†). Phosphorylation levels of PM H+-ATPase in cbc1cbc2-2 guard cells were approximately double those in WT guard cells under both red and blue light conditions (Fig. 3C: graph).
We determined the effect of the PM H+-ATPase activator fusicoccin (FC) on C-terminal Thr phosphorylation of PM H+-ATPase in guard cells. FC activates guard cell PM H+-ATPase and induces stomatal opening at saturation, without blue light irradiation.33–35 FC indirectly inhibits the dephosphorylation of phosphorylated PM H+-ATPase and accumulates the phosphorylated form of PM H+-ATPase.4,36,37 In guard cells of the WT epidermis, PM H+-ATPase was strongly phosphorylated by FC, to a greater extent than that seen under blue light (Fig. 3C: RL + BL and FC). In contrast to these results, guard cell PM H+-ATPase in the cbc1cbc2-2 double mutant was strongly phosphorylated by blue light, to an extent similar to that of FC-treated WT guard cells. Therefore, phosphorylation levels of PM H+-ATPase were similar between blue light and FC treatments in double mutant guard cells (Fig. 3C: RL + BL and FC). FC-dependent PM H+-ATPase phosphorylation was similar between WT and double mutant guard cells. Our results indicate that CBC1 and CBC2 negatively regulate PM H+-ATPase phosphorylation in guard cells.
To clarify whether the difference of stomatal phenotypes between two studies of Hiyama et al. and ours was derived from the difference of cbc2 mutant alleles, we compared blue light-dependent stomatal opening between cbc1cbc2 and cbc1cbc2-2 mutants (Fig. S3†). We found that cbc1cbc2 and cbc1cbc2-2 mutants similarly showed promotion of stomatal opening under both dark and light conditions in our experiments.
First, we observed ABA-inhibited stomatal opening. Epidermal fragments were isolated from leaves of dark-adapted plants and treated with ABA in the dark. Epidermal samples were then irradiated for 3 h. Stomata in the WT epidermis opened in response to light (RL + BL) in the absence of ABA; however, stomatal opening was strongly inhibited under light in the presence of ABA (Fig. 4A). The inhibitory effect of ABA was similarly observed in the cbc1cbc2-2 epidermis. Next, we observed ABA-induced stomatal closure under light conditions. Epidermal fragments were isolated from leaves and irradiated for 3 h to open stomata. The epidermis was then treated with ABA and incubated under light for 3 h. WT stomata effectively closed in response to ABA under light (Fig. 4B). Stomatal closure was similarly induced by ABA application in the cbc1cbc2-2 epidermis. Together, these results indicate that cbc1cbc2-2 stomata open to a greater extent than those of WT but responded to ABA by closing normally.
Fig. 4 Effects of CBC1 and CBC2 mutations on abscisic acid (ABA)-inhibited stomatal opening and ABA-induced stomatal closure. (A) Inhibition of stomatal opening by ABA in WT and cbc1cbc2-2 epidermises. Epidermal fragments were isolated from dark-adapted plants and kept in the dark (Dark–ABA), or irradiated with light (RL + BL–ABA) as described in Fig. 3A. Light conditions were as described in Fig. 3A. ABA (20 μM) was applied to the epidermis for 3 h under light (RL + BL + ABA). As an ABA solvent control, the same amount of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to the –ABA samples. (B) ABA-induced stomatal closure in WT and cbc1cbc2-2. Epidermal fragments were illuminated with light for 3 h to open stomata, and then ABA (20 μM) or DMSO was applied under light for 3 h. Values are means ± SD (n = 3); 30 stomata were measured in each experiment. Differences from WT were evaluated using Student's t test (**P < 0.01). |
We next determined the subcellular localization of the CBC1 and CBC2 proteins by transient expression of GFP-fused proteins. GFP, CBC1-GFP, and CBC2-GFP proteins were expressed in V. faba guard cells via particle bombardment under the control of the 35S promoter (Fig. 5B). The fluorescence signal from GFP alone was observed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus. However, fluorescence signals from CBC1-GFP and CBC2-GFP were observed only in the cytoplasm. The results agree with those of the previous study using Arabidopsis transgenic plants.11 Together, these results indicate that both CBC proteins are expressed in guard cell cytoplasm as reported previously.11
Fig. 6 Interactions of CBC1 and CBC2 with Blue Light Signaling1 (BLUS1) and PM H+-ATPase in in vitro pull-down assays. (A) In vitro pull-down assay of GST-CBC1/CBC2 and His-BLUS1. (B) In vitro pull-down assay of GST-CBC1/CBC2 and His-AHA1. Experiments were performed as described and shown in Fig. 1B and C. |
In contrast to our conclusion, Hiyama et al. concluded that CBC1 and CBC2 redundantly function as positive regulators of blue light-dependent stomatal opening from the results of stomatal aperture measurements with leaf epidermises and stomatal conductance assays with intact leaves using cbc1cbc2 mutant.11 To address the difference in stomatal apertures in the previous and this studies, we compared blue light-dependent stomatal opening between cbc1cbc2 and cbc1cbc2-2 epidermises (Fig. S3†). The results showed that stomata in both double mutant epidermises opened larger than those in WT under both dark and blue light conditions, indicating that the phenotypic difference is not derived from difference in the cbc2 mutant alleles. In Hiyama et al., stomata in WT epidermis opened relatively large (about 2 μm) even in the dark.11 We speculate that it was difficult to evaluate the opened stomata phenotype of cbc1cbc2 epidermis in their experiments. These differences in stomatal aperture may be brought about by difference in the growth conditions of plants. However, we did clearly observe stomatal opening in response to blue light in cbc1cbc2-2 and cbc1cbc2 mutant epidermises in our experiments (Fig. 3A, B and Fig. S3†); therefore, we believe that functions of CBC1 and CBC2 as positive regulators are not so strong in the blue light-dependent stomatal opening. In both Hiyama et al. and our studies, difference of stomatal aperture between dark and light was less in the cbc1cbc2 double mutants than in WT. In this point, both studies show similar stomatal phenotypes. Thus, Hiyama et al. might conclude that CBC1 and CBC2 function as a positive regulator in blue light-dependent stomatal opening. Hiyama et al. also showed that cbc1cbc2 mutant leaves exhibited strong impairment of stomatal opening in response to a low CO2 concentration in stomatal conductance assays, and concluded that CBC1 and CBC2 function as positive regulators of both blue light-dependent and low CO2-dependent stomatal opening.11 More recently, Ando and Kinoshita (2018) also measured stomatal apertures using whole leaves of cbc1cbc2 mutant and they showed strong impairment of blue light-dependent stomatal opening compared to WT plants.42 Measurements of blue light-dependent stomatal opening using intact leaves made it impossible to separate out the effects of low CO2-dependent stomatal opening, because CO2 is consumed by photosynthesis during light irradiation on the inner side of the leaf. High Leaf Temperature 1 (HT1) specifically mediates CO2-dependent stomatal movement; however, attenuation of blue light-dependent stomatal opening was observed in a stomatal conductance assay using ht1 leaves.43 The results of that study suggest that blue light-dependent stomatal opening is masked by impairment of the CO2-dependent stomatal responses. Therefore, it may be difficult to evaluate blue light-dependent stomatal opening using stomatal conductance assays with intact leaves of the cbc1cbc2 mutant.
Under red light irradiation, the stomatal responses of cbc1cbc2 mutants were different from those of WT (Fig. 3C).11 These results suggest that CBC1 and CBC2 function not only in blue light signaling, but also in other signaling for regulation of stomatal aperture. We can not exclude the possibility that stomatal blue light phenotypes in cbc1cbc2 mutants are derived from alteration of a more general regulatory mechanism, such as stomatal CO2 signaling.
CBC1 and CBC2 are involved in blue light-dependent inhibition of S-type anion channel activity in guard cells, and the inhibition is thought to contribute to stomatal opening under light conditions.11 However, in our stomatal aperture measurement, stomata in cbc1cbc2 and cbc1cbc2-2 epidermises showed clear opening in response to blue light (Fig. 3A, B and Fig. S3†). Actually, anion channel activity was hardly detected without high CO2 or bicarbonate application.7,11 These results suggest that blue light-inhibited S-type anion channel activity may not strongly contribute to blue light-dependent stomatal opening in the aperture measurement using epidermis under ambient CO2 conditions.
CBC1 was expressed in guard cells, whereas CBC2 was expressed in both guard cells and vascular tissues (Fig. 5A). Guard cells are the only cells in which CBC1 and CBC2 co-occur. Consistent with the expression results, phot-mediated blue light responses were induced normally, except for stomatal opening in the cbc1cbc2-2 mutant (Fig. 2 and 3). Both CBCs are likely to function in the guard cell cytoplasm to regulate stomatal opening. CBC2 may regulate other physiological responses in vascular tissues in addition to stomatal responses. Further investigation is needed to clarify the physiological roles of CBC2 in other tissues.
In plants, the Raf-like kinase subfamily belongs to the MAPKKK family, and comprises clade B and C members, which are thought to function differently from typical MAPKKKs involved in the MAPK cascade.44 Plants have a large MAPKKK family compared to mammals, including a particularly large Raf-like kinase subfamily.45 However, the functions of plant Raf-like kinases are largely unknown, except for the involvement of some B and C clade members in biotic and abiotic stress signaling in plants.44 Constitutive Triple Response1 functions as a negative regulator of ethylene response and Enhanced Disease Resistance1 is involved in disease resistance.46,47 In Physcomitrella patens, ABA and Abiotic Stress-responsive RAF-like Kinase is involved in the activation of the SnRK2s, which are core protein kinases in ABA signaling, and also mediates ABA and hyperosmotic signals.48 Raf-like kinases in the C subgroup have been shown to regulate stomatal responses to CO2 and blue light.3 HT1 is a member of the C5 subgroup and a key component of stomatal responses to both low and high CO2 concentrations.43 Recently, we identified BHP in the C1 subgroup as a positive regulator of blue light-dependent stomatal opening between phots and PM H+-ATPase in guard cells.9 In addition to BHP, we showed that another C1 member, At1g4000/VH1-INTERACTING KINASE (VIK) also positively regulates blue light-dependent stomatal opening, in a manner different from that of BHP.9 VIK may regulate signaling for stomatal opening after the action of PM H+-ATPase in guard cells. The C7 members CBC1 and CBC2 are involved in blue light-dependent stomatal opening and CO2-dependent stomatal movement, as demonstrated by our results and those of a previous study.11 Clade C Raf-like kinases are thought to have spread uniquely during the process of plant evolution, since they are likely to mediate plant-specific responses including stomatal movement. HT1 has been shown to phosphorylate CBC1 and CBC2 in vitro,11 suggesting that these two signals for stomatal opening in response to CO2 and blue light availability converge at the CBCs. There may be other crosstalk points among the Raf-like kinases in guard cells; such signal convergence is important for characterizing the regulation of stomatal aperture in changing environments.
Footnotes |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9pp00329k |
‡ Present address: Department for Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and Owner Societies 2020 |