Mahmoud Zorainyab,
Daria C. Boffitob,
Mohamed Gobaraa,
Ahmad Barakaa,
Ibrahim Naeema and
Hesham Tantawy*a
aChemical Engineering Department, Military Technical College, Cairo, Egypt. E-mail: h.tantawy@mtc.edu.eg; ramzy.hrt@gmail.com
bChemical Engineering Department, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Canada
First published on 3rd February 2021
We present the synthesis of a new cerium(III)–melamine coordination polymer (CMCP) by a mixed-solvothermal method and its characterization. Characterization techniques included Raman, Fourier Transformation Infra-Red (FTIR), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), in which the change in the electronic environment and the crystallinity were tracked. The characterization results confirm the coordination of cerium(III) with melamine through –NH2 groups, instead of the N atoms of the triazine ring, for which we propose a mechanism of interaction. In addition, Biovia Materials Studio package was applied to determine and investigate the molecular structure of the CMCP. All simulations were done using COMPASS force-field theory and atom-based method for summation of electrostatic and van de Waals forces. The application of the CMCP for the corrosion inhibition of AA2024 in 3.5% NaCl solution was tested using the potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) techniques. The results point out that the presence of cerium as cerium(III) in the CMCP structure plays the fundamental role of inhibition, whereby the inhibition mechanism occurs by cathodic oxidation of Ce(III) to Ce(IV) and cyclic reduction of Ce(IV) to Ce(III) by melamine part of CMCP.
Generally, metal corrosion is inhibited, reduced or controlled by adsorption-blocking and/or electrochemical action.4 Inhibitors working via the adsorption-blocking mechanism form a protective layer by physisorption at the metal/electrolyte interphase or as an insoluble complex barrier constructed by chemisorption, which prevents direct contact between the metal surface and the corrosive medium. Most of these inhibitors are organic materials designed to comprise aromaticity, heteroatoms such as nitrogen, oxygen and/or sulfur and/or conjugation. Indeed, the interaction is most favored with the metal when the inhibitor has a planar conjugated structure with a high π electron density.5
Chromate inhibitor/treatments had been effectively used to control the corrosion of AA2024 for many decades. Although, the prices of chromate treatment are cheap with respect to other inhibitors, there is a pressing demand to phase it out due to its carcinogenic effect. This adverse impact governs its concentration limits and finally it would be banned in many countries. Recently, researchers have investigated to replace chromate inhibitors with many eco-friendly inhibitors. Rare earth elements6–9 and coordination polymers (CPs) are considered as a suitable replacement candidate. The bonding of rare earth element to an organic matrix would confer the material the advantages of both organic and inorganic inhibitor. Although, the high prices of rear earth elements due to the high demands of other technology, cerium would have suitable stable price due to the fact that its applications in other technologies are well established.10
Recently, coordination polymers have been considered for corrosion inhibition, whereby the adsorption mechanism plays the leading role. For example, Etaiw et al. proposed Ag(CN)4 (quinoxaline)2 to inhibit the corrosion of carbon steel in 1 M HCl and found that nitrogen heteroatoms are responsible for the strong adsorption of the material to the metal surface.11 The same authors repeated the same type of experiments with Ag(quinoxaline)(4-aminobenzoic acid) as an inhibitor and found that inhibition is ascribed to adsorption as well.12
On the other hand, Massoud et al. suggested that the inhibition by CPs acts through both anodic and cathodic processes, with a dominant anodic inhibitory effect, when they investigated the use of two silver pyrazine MOFs, [Ag2(ampyz)(NO3)2]n and [Ag(2,3-pyzdic)(NO3)]n as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in acidic medium.13
However, the literature data concerning the use of coordinated polymers (CPs) and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) for corrosion inhibition are relatively scarce, and they all lead to the same conclusion that inhibition occurs by an adsorption-blocking mechanism.14–16 Indeed, CPs and MOFs include a countless number of different compounds where the organic linker confers them different functional groups, electron donor heteroatoms and p-orbital characters.4 On the other hand, and to the best of our knowledge, the corrosion inhibition by CPs or MOFs through electrochemical action has not been reported yet.
The use of a CP or a MOF for inhibition through electrochemical action requires a moiety in the structure that is suitable for a redox reaction, i.e., a moiety that undergoes oxidation/reduction must be present with suitable potential with respect to the metal it protects. Cerium is well known for being used as a corrosion inhibitor.17–19 In a corrosive media, Ce(III) plays the crucial role in the protection mechanism, whereby it precipitates on the cathodic sites as insoluble oxides and/or hydroxide hindering the reduction reactions.18,20 Therefore, we speculated that bonding Ce(III) to melamine as a ligand could form an effective material for metal corrosion inhibition.
Melamine (2,4,6-triamino-s-triazine) is considered as a poor ligand as it has a strong network structure due to extensive hydrogen bonding throughout the material, which causes very low solubility in common solvents, except for hot water. Hence literature data on the coordination of neat melamine is poor and mostly concerns its coordination with Ag metal to either purify water or perform ion exchange in aqueous media.21–23 Differently, there are many examples concerning the coordination chemistry of either functionalized melamine (hexamethylolmelamine,24 Schiff base networks25), or its coordination with other organic monomers such as succinic and adipic acid,26 uric acid.27 However, pure melamine/metal coordination should occur under proper synthetic conditions involving, for instance, an acidic environment.
In this study, we aimed at coordinating Ce(III) in the form of CP, whereby melamine was used as the coordinating ligand. This work is original for several reasons: it presents the synthesis of this novel CP, cerium/melamine coordination polymer (CMCP) and its characterization using FTIR, Raman, CHNO/S elemental analysis, XRD, and SEM-EDX. Also, it discusses the potential use of CMCP in the corrosion protection of AA2024 in aerated 3.5% NaCl solution. The electrochemical inhibition was studied through two techniques: potentiodynamic polarization (PDP), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The results of corrosion inhibition by CMCP are compared with those of blank, melamine, and cerium(III) inhibitors. In addition, SEM/EDX mapping was applied to give a better understanding of the inhibition behavior. This work presents the capability of corrosion inhibition by CPs as a promising valuable application in addition to other vital applications such as catalysis, gas storage, ion exchange, optics, and drug delivery.28
The surface morphology of the CMCP powder sample was investigated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Carl Zeiss EVO-10) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyzer. The semi-quantitative elemental analysis29,30 for the prepared CMCP crystals was conducted using EDX.
For each experiment, a freshly prepared AA2024 coupon constituted the working electrode, saturated calomel was the reference electrode, and platinum the auxiliary electrode. The measurements were conducted according to ASTM standard G59 where the potentiodynamic polarization experiments were performed after immersion of the working electrode for at least 30 minutes in the corrosive solution. The potentiodynamic polarization curves were obtained in the potential range of −250 to +250 mV with respect to open-circuit potential (OCP) at a scan rate of 0.5 mV s−1. The inhibition efficiency (IE) was calculated using the following relation:31
(1) |
The polarization resistance (Rp) was also determined to evaluate the corrosion resistance of AA2024 in presence and absence of inhibitor. Rp was calculated from both anodic and cathodic slopes (βa and βc) of Tafel extrapolation curve according to the following equation:32–34
(2) |
Moreover, the corresponding protection efficiency (PE%) was calculated according to the following equation:
(3) |
The EIS tests were performed at room temperature by a three-electrode assembly. A saturated calomel electrode was used as a reference electrode, platinum as a counter electrode, and freshly prepared AA2024 was the working electrode. The EIS tests were performed using a Gamry reference 600 instruments in a frequency range of 105 to 10−2 Hz with an amplitude of 10 mV peak-to-peak, using AC signal at OCP. The inhibition efficiency (η) was calculated using the following relation:35
(4) |
Fitting the EIS experimental data to equivalent electrical circuits was conducted by applying a nonlinear least square fitting technique using Gamry™ Echem Analyst software version 5.68. The quality of fitting was accepted when the goodness of fitting was not more than 1 × 10−3.
The Raman spectrum (Fig. 1) can be divided into three regions. The first region is the low wavenumber region (below 300 cm−1), which corresponds to lattice vibrations and is considered key in the case of crystalline materials.36 Hence, the presence of peaks in this region for melamine and CMCP indicates that these materials are crystalline. The disappearance and/or change of lattice vibration peaks upon the formation of CMCP from melamine indicates that crystal is changed by any means.37 From the figure, the main lattice vibration bands for melamine are present at 57, 93, 123, and 153 cm−1.38–40 Once CMCP is formed, on the other hand, only one very strong sharp peak appears at 87 cm−1. Since lattice vibrations are unique for a given crystalline substance, this peak can be sought as identification of the formation of CMCP.37 In general, the observed dramatic change in the lattice vibrations region of the product, CMCP, with respect to that of melamine, indicates that we obtained a crystalline CMCP. In addition, the lack of lattice vibration peaks of melamine in the CMCP spectrum would indicate complete conversion and a pure product.
The second region is the fingerprint region, which lies in the 400–1800 cm−1 range.41,42 Typical Raman peaks of melamine appears at 380, 582, 676, 780 and 984 cm−1.38,40,42,43 The most intense one at 676 cm−1 is assigned to the ring breathing II mode and involves in-plane deformation of the triazine ring.44,45 The second intense peak at 984 cm−1 arises from the ring breathing mode I of the triazine ring.44 Peaks appearing at 380, 582, and 780 cm−1 correspond to the triazine ring as follows: quadrant out-of-plane, ring bending, and out of plane C–N bend, respectively.46,47 The weak peak at 1438 cm−1 and the broad weak peak around 1560 cm−1 belong to ring vibrations and side-chain C–N stretching, respectively.38,46,48
Regarding the Raman spectrum of CMCP, it is evident that the melamine fingerprint peaks are collectively still present with some shifts. Furthermore, in this region, these peaks became more intense relative to those of melamine. This indicates that the triazine ring kept its aromatic structure and became even more ordered in the CMCP crystal.49 Moreover, the emergence of a new weak peak in the CMCP spectrum at 1678 cm−1 may be attributed to a new mode of NH2 bending upon complexing.42,46,50 The previous discussion leads to the conclusion of coordination of cerium with the amino groups, not with N-triazine and the observed shifts in peaks' positions of CMCP to those of melamine may occur merely because of the coordination of NH2-melamine molecules with cerium, which changes the electronic environment of the triazine ring. Besides, the observed strong blue-shift of the peak at 675 cm−1 (ring bending deformations of melamine) to 690 cm−1 (CMCP) confirms the presence of successive Ce(III)–melamine molecule bonding as the coordination weakens the original triazine ring bond strength.51
The last region comprises mainly the N–H vibrations. The melamine spectrum shows four typical peaks: sharp twin peaks at 3468 and 3417 cm−1, with two other peaks at 3328 and 3210 cm−1. These peaks are attributed to the asymmetric and symmetric N–H stretching.46,47 The splitting of the N–H vibrations may be caused by the strong hydrogen bonding between the melamine molecules.38 On the other hand, CMCP has only two broad peaks at 3337 and 3165 cm−1, and this could be attributed to the distortion of N–H groups of melamine molecules in the CMCP crystal. There are probably no conditions for the strong coupling giving NH bands caused by intermolecular hydrogen bonds N–H⋯N type, like in the crystal of melamine alone.46 The significant change in this part of the spectrum of the product confirms the difference of orientation of melamine molecules in the product rather than of the pure melamine.
The Raman spectrum also confirms that CMCP does not contain Ce-oxides, as no corresponding peaks are observed. In addition, there are no peaks from sulfate species bands between 990–1035 cm−1 and 1100–1180 cm−1,52,53 which points to the purity of CMCP. Moreover, when a ligand coordinates to a metal atom, new modes of vibration that are not present in the free ligand may become infrared or Raman active.54 Additionally, the N–H stretching frequency should shift, indicating a change of the n-electron density on nitrogen,55 which will be investigated thereafter.
The FTIR analysis of melamine and CMCP is reported in Fig. 2. Melamine spectrum presents the known characteristic peaks: NH2 stretching (3438 and 3386 cm−1), asymmetric NH2 stretching (3243 cm−1), symmetric NH2 stretching (3111 cm−1), NH2 deformation (1614 cm−1), quadrant stretching of the 1,3,5-s-triazine ring (1515 cm−1), semicircle stretching of the 1,3,5-s-triazine ring (1425 cm−1), C–N stretching of primary amines (1020 cm−1) and out-of-plane ring bending (811 cm−1).56
On the other hand, the CMCP spectrum shows noticeable differences from that of melamine, which strongly suggests the coordination of cerium ion with melamine pendent-amines, and these are: the absence of NH2 stretching, the shift of both symmetric NH2 stretching and asymmetric NH2 stretching to lower wavenumbers 3333 and 3113 cm−1 respectively, and the shift of NH2 deformation to a higher wavenumber 1662 cm−1. At the same time, the quadrant stretching of the 1,3,5in the triazine ring are the sites that should preferably coordinate with Ce(III),57 in our case, the coordination in CMCP occurred through pendent amine groups under the applied acidic condition (through optimization of acetic acid to water ratio). The proposed mechanism for this coordination presupposes that the hydrogen bonds between melamine molecules break down, and melamine molecules dissolve as melamium ions, whereby the protonation of the N-triazine atoms occur. As a consequence, the amino groups, conserving free lone pairs, can coordinate with Ce(III).57
Fig. 3 shows the PXRD patterns of melamine and CMCP. For melamine, all recorded diffraction peaks are as references: 2θ = 22.37, 22.51, 26.89, 27.55, 29.25, 30.31, and 38.75.58–60 The pattern of CMCP clearly displays strong and narrow peaks, indicating the good crystallinity of the CMCP. The peaks are at 2θ = 7.27, 15.98, 17.53, 25.28, 26.23, and 27.23. This set is different from that of melamine and indicates the successful preparation of the crystalline CMCP. In addition, there are no peaks of CeO2.61
Fig. 4 displays the SEM image of CMCP particles. It is evident that the particles are rhombus-like thick flakes. The results of the EDX and the CHNO/S elemental analysis (Table 1) are very similar and lead to the conclusion that the Ce(III) coordination number is eight.
Element | Atom% (EDX) | Atom% (EA) |
---|---|---|
H | — | 22.85 |
C | 16.29 | 11.42 |
N | 32.53 | 22.85 |
O | 37.85 | 34.28 |
S | 9.23 | 8.57 |
Ce | 4.12 | — |
According to the results of EDX, CHNO/S elemental analysis and FTIR, we proposed that the crystal superstructure of CMCP is of general formula [CeIII2(M)2(SO4)3(H2O)2·2H2O]n, where Ce(III) ions are linearly coordinated to two lateral tetradentate sulfate ions forming a 1D-linear chain, while the third tetradentate sulfate ion bridges between two Ce(III) ions from two adjacent chains forming a double-strand (or stair-like) 1D-linear chain. Each Ce(III) ion is also coordinated to one water molecule plus one melamine molecule through the nitrogen of the amino group forming a coordination sphere of eight. Last, there are two free water molecules per each two Ce(III) ions located in the crystal cavities. As a result, water molecules can easily diffuse between the layers and between the chains of the layers leading to dissolution of the material.13,62
To visualize the molecular structure of the developed material and to investigate the mechanism of assembling these 1D linear chains into the observed 3D structure, we used conformers and Forcite modules available in Biovia Materials Studio 2017 package. All simulations were done using COMPASS forcefield theory and atom-based method for summation of electrostatic and van de Waals forces. The charges were assigned using QEq method (QEq_charged 1.1) using formal charges as initial guess values and convergence limit of 1.0 × 10−6 e. Geometry optimization were performed using Smart algorithm with convergence limits of 0.001 kcal mol−1 Å−1 and 1.0 × 10−5 Å for force and displacement respectively. The free water molecules in the structure were ignored in simulations. To construct a preliminary molecular structure for the developed material, we started by drawing the coordination sphere of Ce(III) and running conformers module to search for the best conformer with minimum energy. Then, we continued to construct a double strand chain by connecting eight geometry optimized coordination spheres and ran geometry optimization using Forcite module to minimize the energy of the structure. The results of this simulation are displayed in Fig. 5.
Fig. 5 Optimized molecular structure of Ce(III) coordination sphere (top left) and double-strand chain (centre) (hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarity). |
Further simulation was performed to investigate the way of assembling the chains into 3D structure. Two double-strand chains were inserted at close proximity (5 Å separation) and geometry optimization were carried out again to find out the best way of packing and ordering of these chains and to search for the formed hydrogen bonds as well. The image in Fig. 6 shows that the two stair-like chains are connected to each other through numerous hydrogen bonds between N(H)–O, O(H)–N, O(H)–O and N(H)–NH in the range of 2.01–3.3 Å. These hydrogen bonds in addition to the hydrogen bonds formed by the free water molecules present in the residual cavities of the structure are responsible for assembling and packing the 1D stair-like chains into 2D layers which are further assembled by the same mechanism into the observed 3D flakes. The rupture of some layers, each of which has a thickness of about 1.2 μm in Fig. 7a, after exposing the particle to an SEM electron beam for about 2 minutes, supports this 3D-topology formation mechanism. After a prolonged exposure of about 7 minutes to the SEM electron beam, two facial layers (seems to be sheets-stacked) detached from each other (Fig. 7b and c). Therefore, the electron beam energy is sufficient to heat up the sample inducing thermal stresses and/or water molecules removal resulting in rupture of some H-bonds and separation of the stacked layers.
Fig. 6 Optimized geometry and hydrogen bonding scheme of two adjacent double-strand chains (without inclusion of free water molecules). |
Fig. 7 Detailed SEM images of CMCP. (a) Expressing the thickness of a single rhombus-shaped particle. (b) and (c) The exfoliation of the CMCP sheets via the SEM electron beam. |
The AA2024 samples were separately immersed in NaCl solutions containing 10 ppm of the different inhibitors: blank, melamine, Ce, and CMCP. The immersion time and bath temperature were 1 h and 25 °C, respectively. The polarization curves of the different samples were obtained, and the associated corrosion kinetics parameters of Tafel extrapolations (Ecorr, βc, βa, Icorr, and IE%) were determined. Fig. 8 displays the polarization diagrams of the different samples and demonstrates the anodic and cathodic polarization behavior of AA2024.
Fig. 8 Tafel plots of AA2024 in 3.5% NaCl with different inhibitors at room temperature. Ce = Ce(III) sulfate, CMCP = cerium(III)–melamine coordination polymer. |
It can be noticed that the corrosion potentials of M, Ce, and CMCP seem to be in the same range as the blank sample, however, nobler. The anodic branch is very similar for all the samples, which corresponds to the oxidation of aluminum. Also, the anodic current density immediately increases sharply in the anodic polarization direction beyond the corrosion potential in all samples, and no passive region is observed. This behavior with low anodic overpotentials indicates that these samples would show localized corrosion during an immersion course in 3.5% NaCl solution, i.e., pitting.
On the other hand, all curves are consistent with a cathodic process whereby oxygen controls the reduction reaction. Also, all the four samples exhibited a similar cathodic polarization response in the given condition, which indicates that all the samples have typically the same cathodic reaction but with different rates. Moreover, adding melamine insignificantly decrease the cathodic polarization of AA2024, whereas Ce and CMCP significantly suppressed the cathodic reaction. The parallel cathodic branch of CMCP and Ce samples with the blank sample indicates that CMCP inhibited the cathodic reaction but did not alter it. These data point out that the CMCP acts as a cathodic inhibitor for AA2024 in a 3.5% NaCl solution.63–65
Although the used CMCP contains the same amount of cerium as Ce and the same amount of melamine as M, it exhibits higher corrosion protection. The actual role of cerium in the corrosion inhibition process mainly depends on the oxidation state of cerium ion (i.e., Ce3+ or Ce4+). Literature data report that the only presence of Ce(III) ion can provide corrosion protection.66 On the other hand, melamine molecule contains six nitrogen atoms, which could enact an adsorptive-blocking mechanism of the aluminum substrate.67 However, the excessive hydrogen bonding in melamine structure makes its dissolution difficult.
Table 2 lists the electrochemical kinetic parameters of the Tafel extrapolations (Ecorr, βc, βa, Icorr, IE%). The anodic and cathodic slopes (βa and βc) are in the same range (Table 2). Likewise, Ecorr (the corrosion potentials) are close to each other. The clear difference lies in the corrosion current density (Icorr), whereby the CMCP and Ce samples are an order of magnitude lower than other samples, and the CMCP is the lowest. Although CMCP contains a lower concentration of Ce(III) than the Ce sample, it offers better corrosion protection.
Sample | βa [mV per decade] | βc [mV per decade] | Ecorr [mV] | Icorr × 105 [A cm−2] | IE% | Rp |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blank | 19 ± 3.1 | 242 ± 3.5 | −601 ± 5.9 | 5.6 ± 1.2 | — | 90.047 |
Melamine | 26 ± 2.3 | 265 ± 4.4 | −603 ± 5.1 | 2.9 ± 2.1 | 48.2 | 290.49 |
Ce | 27 ± 1.1 | 232 ± 3.6 | −619 ± 3.8 | 0.73 ± 1.8 | 86.9 | 933.79 |
CMCP | 35 ± 2.2 | 195 ± 2.6 | −605 ± 4.5 | 0.24 ± 1.0 | 95.7 | 2748.16 |
Moreover, Table 2 shows the values of polarization resistance (Rp) and the corresponding protection efficiency (PE%) for all tested samples where CMCP sample shows the highest corrosion resistance.
On comparing the inhibition efficiency of CMCP to other previous work that used cerium inhibitor, it turns out that the corrosion inhibition percent of CMCP seems to be better than cerium(III) and (IV) treatment for protection of AA2024. Rodič et al. used different cerium salts (chloride, nitrate, acetate and sulphate) as inhibitor for AA2024 in less aggressive corrosive solution (0.1 M NaCl).68 Also, the corrosion current density of CMCP is in the same order of that of cerium tartrate, cerium cinnamate treatment and cerium chloride for the same alloy (1.75 × 10−6 A cm−2) in 0.05 M NaCl solution.69–71 In our work, it can be noted that the corrosion current density of AA2024 inhibited with CMCP is slightly better than that of the synergistic effect of using cerium and melamine due to the intimate presence of cerium and melamine within same molecular structure.72
To better understand the corrosion performance of CMCP and to emphasize the importance of the coexistence of cerium and melamine in the same molecular structure, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed. Again, as a matter of comparison, EIS was measured for blank, melamine, Ce, and CMCP samples.
Generally, AA2024 is susceptible to pitting corrosion in chloride-containing electrolytes due to inhomogeneity of the alloy surface. This heterogeneity comes from intermetallic particles (IMP), which are different in the corrosion potential with respect to the aluminium matrix. The pitting shape and size vary according to the size and nature of the IMP.73
IMP covers ≈3% of the AA2024 surface area, and it can be classified into three categories according to size: hardening precipitates, dispersoid particles, and inclusions. The later type not only (size >1 μm) contribute to the mechanical properties of the alloy, but also have an adverse impact on the corrosion protection.74,75 Particularly, IMP containing Cu (such as Al2CuMg, AlCuMnFe, and AlCu2) decreases the corrosion resistance of AA2024.76,77
The reduction reaction in this aerated neutral electrolyte is the oxygen reduction:
½O2 + H2O + 2e− → 2OH− | (5) |
While Al undergoes a series of oxidation reactions in this chloride-containing solution, forming an aluminium hydroxyl chloride complex that easily dissolves in the solution.
Al + 3H2O → Al(OH)3 + 3H+ + 3e− | (6) |
Al + 2H2O → AlO(OH) + 3H+ + 3e− | (7) |
Al + H2O → Al2O3 + 3H+ + 3e− | (8) |
Al(OH)2+ + Cl− → Al(OH)Cl+ + 3H+ + 3e− | (9) |
The presence of IMP increases the area of oxygen reduction and the corrosion process takes place in the IMP neighbouring area, forming pitting.
Nyquist plots of AA2024 in a 3.5% NaCl solution after 24 h at open circuit potential, either in the absence or presence of various additives, are reported in Fig. 9. All the plots are imperfect semicircles with different diameters. This deviation from perfectness may be due to the frequency dispersion and/or the inhomogeneity of the surface.78,79 In a Nyquist plot, the greater the real diameter of the Nyquist' loop, the higher the corrosion resistance, where this radius represents the total resistance, including the charge transfer resistance (Rct) of the corrosion process.
Fig. 9 Nyquist plots AA2024 in 3.5% NaCl solution with different additives. Ce = Ce(III) sulfate, CMCP = cerium(III)–melamine coordination polymer. |
In Fig. 9, the blank sample exhibits the smallest diameter in the Nyquist plot, and the melamine's diameter is slightly greater, i.e., it acts slightly better as a corrosion inhibitor. In contrast, the CMCP and Ce samples have superior corrosion protection.
Also, the impedance plots of the blank and melamine have two semicircles; a capacitive loop that covers the high range of frequency and another loop at the low-frequency range. For aluminium alloys, this loop at the high-frequency range is attributed to formation of an oxide layer.80,81 Aluminium surface is immediately oxidized by O2 in air or aqueous solutions.82 However, the other one (time constant) at low frequency usually associates with the dissolution of aluminium i.e. evolution of corrosion products.63,83 These results are in good agreement with the potentiodynamic polarization results and the visual inspection where dark spots appeared on the surfaces of both samples after 72 h of immersion as indication of dissolution of AA2024.84
While the Nyquist plot CMCP and Ce samples show two impeded capacitive loops at high and mid frequency range, in addition to an inductive loop at low frequency range. The presence of an inductive loop at a low frequency may be attributed to redox activity85,86 and/or adsorption/desorption process of intermediates taking place on the surface of the substrate.87,88 The capacitive loop at high frequency range represents the inhibitive and/or the oxide film, however, the other loop represents the double-layer capacitance and the charge transfer resistance.
EIS is a semi-quantitative technique that offers measuring and predicting the protection efficiency of a metal in a corrosive electrolyte.89–91 The quantitative analysis of the EIS technique was applied by fitting the experimental data into an equivalent circuit. The equivalent circuit illustrated in Fig. 10a is used to fit the experimental data of both blank and melamine samples in the NaCl solution. While, equivalent circuit depicted in Fig. 10b is used for CMCP and Ce samples. The circuit, Fig. 10a, composes of ohmic electrolyte resistance (Rs), in series with a first constant phase element for the oxide film (CPEox), in parallel with a second resistance (R1) representing resistance of the oxide film, and in series with a second circuit correlated to the interaction at the metal/electrolyte interface. This interaction is represented by the double-layer capacitance (CPEdl) and the charge transfer resistance (Rct). A constant phase element (CPE) are used instead of pure capacitance due to defects such as surface roughness, heterogeneous appearance.92 In addition to the above components, circuit in Fig. 10b contains resistance (R3) and an inductor (L) representing the redox reaction and/or adsorbed intermediates on a fresh substrate.
Fig. 10 Equivalent circuits used for modelling of impedance data for (a) blank and melamine (b) CMCP and Ce samples in 3.5% NaCl solution at room temperature. |
The fitting results of the experimental EIS data are listed in Table 3. It is clear from the table that the charge transfer resistance values of Ce and CMCP samples are much greater than that of blank and melamine samples.
Sample | Rs [Ω cm2] | CPEox | R1 [Ω cm2] | CPEdl | Rct [kΩ cm2] | R3 [Ω cm2] | L [kH cm−2] | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y [μΩ−1 cm−2 sn] | n | Y [μΩ−1 cm−2 sn] | n | ||||||
Blank | 5.2 | 1362.1 | 0.87 | 185.1 | 86.3 | 0.90 | 0.26 | — | — |
Melamine | 7.4 | 113.4 | 0.89 | 192.3 | 9.9 | 0.93 | 0.42 | — | — |
Ce | 8.1 | 194.5 | 0.91 | 128.6 | 6.4 | 0.94 | 2.11 | 241.3 | 17.6 |
CMCP | 8.9 | 121.5 | 0.93 | 201.5 | 5.2 | 0.95 | 2.58 | 521.1 | 22.7 |
Fig. 12 displays the SEM images of AA2024 in the 3.5% NaCl solution with 10 ppm melamine. The surface exhibits many pits of different sizes covering the whole surface. This result proves that melamine alone cannot protect the alloy from corrosion at the tested conditions, in agreement with the electrochemical measurements.
Ce(III) sulfate showed better corrosion protection of AA2024 in 3.5% NaCl solution than melamine (Fig. 13), where neither pitting nor corrosion products appeared after 72 h of immersion in the corrosive solution. These findings seem to be consistent with other data, which found that Ce(III) can protect AA2024 in 3.5% NaCl.66,94,95
Fig. 14 reports the SEM image of AA2024 after 72 h of immersion in the 3.5% NaCl solution in the presence of 10 ppm CMCP. It is clear from images, at both low and high magnification, that there is no sign of corrosion on the surface of the sample. Besides, the high-resolution image demonstrates an intermetallic particle, around which there is no sign of corrosion. The EDX mapping also shows that the IMP contains copper, silica, and iron, where it is, generally, nobler than the aluminum matrix. The EDX clearly shows that cerium, oxygen, and carbon cover the IMP, where the source of carbon, in this case, is melamine. Therefore, the EDX analysis manifests the electrochemical measurements.
In conclusion, CMCP offers corrosion inhibition for AA2024 by forming a film that covers the cathodic sites, which decreases the oxygen reduction reaction and consequently decreases the susceptibility to pitting corrosion.
CMCP can offer corrosion prevention to the AA2024 via the following assumed mechanism; the aluminium matrix (anode) is oxidized following eqn (6) and (7).98 The Ce(III) within the CMCP (stair-like chains) reacts with the hydroxide ions to form a thin hydroxide layer of Ce(III) (eqn (10)). The presence of H2O2 as an intermediate of oxygen reduction (eqn (11)) would interact with Ce(III) to precipitate Ce(IV) at the cathodic sites (the intermetallic particles) according to eqn (12).66,98 Generally, Ce(III) can be oxidized to Ce(IV) at high pH as a result of the OH− ions (eqn (5) and (11)). In this case, the CMCP would hinder the cathodic reaction (oxygen reduction) taking place at the cathodic sets, consequently, decreasing the corrosion rate of the aluminium alloy.72 This proposed mechanism is in good agreement with the PDP results, where the results indicated that the type of corrosion inhibitor is predominantly a cathodic inhibitor.
Ce3+ + 3OH− → Ce(OH)3 | (10) |
O2 + H2O + 2e− → H2O2 + OH− | (11) |
2Ce3+ + H2O2 → 2Ce4+ + 2OH− | (12) |
Melamine in the molecular structure of the CMCP offers different types of protecting actions, as follows: (i) it is adsorbed on the metal substrate via nitrogen atoms due to the lone-pairs to coordinate to the metal surface.99,100 (ii) It improves the interaction of such a large molecule (coordination polymer), as it acts as a structure-director.101 (iii) It reduces Ce(IV) to Ce(III), where melamine should be oxidized subsequently.102,103 In the last case, melamine often regenerates Ce(III) during the immersion, thus extending the period of corrosion protection (Fig. 15).
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021 |