Faezeh
Makhlooghiazad
*a,
Colin S. M.
Kang
a,
Mojtaba
Eftekharnia
a,
Patrick C.
Howlett
a,
Oliver
Hutt
b,
Maria
Forsyth
a,
Luke A.
O’Dell
a and
Jennifer M.
Pringle
*a
aDeakin University, Melbourne, Institute for Frontier Materials, Victoria 3125, Australia. E-mail: f.makhlooghiazad@deakin.edu.au; jenny.pringle@deakin.edu.au
bBoron Molecular, 500 Princes Hwy, Noble Park, VIC 3174, Australia
First published on 14th September 2023
There is an increasing interest in ionic liquid electrolytes for battery applications because they are potentially safer alternatives to conventional liquid electrolytes. As the properties of ionic liquid electrolytes strongly depend on the chemistry of the constituent cations and anions, with phosphonium cations often being more favourable, here-in, we compare electrolytes based on methyl-substituted phosphonium and ammonium cations, namely a new tris(amino)-based phosphonium cation with the bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide anion (P1(DMA)3][FSI]) and the previously reported hexamethylguanidinium [HMG][FSI]. Highly concentrated electrolytes containing 50 mol% LiFSI are investigated for their thermal properties and dynamic behaviour as well as in lithium cells. Glass transition temperature, viscosity, ionic conductivity, and the ion diffusion coefficients show dependency on the nature of the cation. The electrochemical performance of the two electrolytes in Li metal symmetrical cells was compared under different cycling conditions, and the interfacial resistance monitored by EIS. Under milder cycling rates (0.5 mA cm−2), the [HMG][FSI] based electrolyte shows lower overpotentials compared to the phosphonium analogue, but this is reversed when Li metal is cycled at high current (1.5 mA cm−2). A higher interfacial resistance during the first 5 cycles was observed in the cell with 50 mol% LiFSI in [HMG][FSI] when cycled at 1.5 mA cm−2 which was consistent with the SEI analysis performed using ex situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy that showed the presence of higher amount of carbonate species at the Li metal surface. Finally, both electrolytes supported full cell cycling with LiFePO4 cathodes (2 mA h cm−2) with good rate performance and stability, although P1(DMA)3][FSI]/50 mol% LiFSI gave higher areal capacity values than the HMG analogue when cycled at C/5 (1.6 vs. 1.53 mA h cm−2).
In the past few years, there has been an increasing interest in the use of ionic liquids (ILs) (water-free organic salts that exhibit melting points below their decomposition temperatures),14 and their solid-state analogues, organic ionic plastic crystals (OIPCs), in electrochemical devices due to their unique properties such as high ionic conductivity, high thermal and electrochemical stability, nonflammability, negligible volatility and ability to form stable and conductive SEIs.15–24 The physicochemical behaviour and SEI formation properties of these salts can be tailored by altering the nature of the anions and cations as well as the electrolyte composition. It has been shown that high concentrations of alkali salts (50 mol% salt or more) added to ILs or OIPCs can form electrolytes with high target ion transport numbers that can support high charge/discharge rates in Li and Na devices.23,25–31 It is important to note that for OIPCs, depending on the binary phase diagram of the OIPC/salt combination, the resultant electrolytes can be solid, quasi-solid state or liquid at the chosen composition and temperature.
Previous reports have indicated the importance of the IL cation chemistry in improving Li and Na metal cycling.32,33 For example, Li metal cells were cycled with high efficiency of >99.2% by using a high concentration trimethylisobutylphosphonium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (P111i4FSI) ionic liquid of 3.8 m LiFSI in a Li|LiNi0.33Mn0.33Co0.33O2 (NMC111, ∼0.3 mA h cm−2) cell with capacities of 130 mA h g−1 for 200 cycles at room temperature.34–36 Stable Li stripping/plating behaviour was also achieved using 50 mol% LiFSI in triethylmethylphosphonium FSI ([P1222][FSI]) or N,N-diethylpyrrolidinium FSI, both of which form liquid electrolytes at room temperature despite the neat materials being solid.37,38
While alkyl substituted quaternary amines and phosphines have been the dominant cation chemistry in Li and Na based electrolytes, recently we have been exploring the influence of changing the shape and charge delocalisation of the IL cation. For example, the hexamethylguanidinium FSI, [HMG][FSI], OIPC was recently used as an electrolyte and presented interesting properties when mixed with Na and Li salts.39–42 Biernacka et al. investigated the effect of different anions and salt concentrations on the physicochemical properties of [HMG][FSI] by creating mixtures of [HMG][FSI]/LiFSI and [HMG][FSI]/LiTFSI. The results showed that 50 mol% LiFSI or LiTFSI in [HMG][FSI] is liquid with glass transition temperatures at −58 °C and −50 °C, respectively, whereas, [HMG][FSI] with 10 mol% and 90 mol% of LiFSI or LiTFSI acts as quasi-solid electrolytes with melting points at 89 °C for 90 mol% LiFSI and 120 °C for 90 mol% LiTFSI. Overall, the [HMG][FSI]/LiFSI mixtures showed higher ionic conductivity and greater Li ion diffusivity compared to the LiTFSI mixtures.40 The mixture of [HMG][FSI] with NaFSI showed a eutectic composition at 25 mol% NaFSI and a eutectic temperature of 44 °C. It exhibited a high ionic conductivity of 5.9 × 10−5 S cm−1 at 40 °C and a high sodium transference number of 0.36 at 50 °C. Stable stripping/plating of Na in a symmetrical coin cell was demonstrated with this electrolyte at 0.5 mA cm−2 current density with 1 h polarisation time with stable and low polarisation potential of 45 mV.
In a very recent work, we reported a new family of OIPCs with the tris(amino)-based phosphonium cation in combination with FSI or TFSI anions, where the FSI based OIPCs showed higher ionic conductivity.43 The structure of this new cation is of particular interest as it is similar to that of the HMG, which has shown very promising properties, but incorporates a phosphorus heteroatom instead of the central carbon. Phosphorus-based ILs and OIPCs have previously been shown to be very effective electrolytes for Li batteries, as discussed above. The electrochemical performance of the new phosphorus cation with ethyl-substituents, [P1(DEA)3][FSI], in combination with 50 mol% NaFSI, for Na metal battery application was demonstrated.43 However, the properties and performance of the new phosphorus-based salts with Li is yet to be studied. Further, there has been no direct comparison of the properties and electrochemical performance of the new phosphorus-based cation with that of the analogous HMG-based cation.
In this work, we selected the phosphonium cation with the smaller methyl chain [P1(DMA)3][FSI], chosen to exhibit closer structural resemblance to the HMG cation. After an initial study of both low and high concentrations of LiFSI on the phase behaviour, we then focused on the high salt content IL electrolyte (50 mol% LiFSI in [P1(DMA)3][FSI]). Our study aims to explore the thermal and transport properties of this bulk electrolyte in comparison to the 50 mol% LiFSI in [HMG][FSI]. This exhibits a wide liquid range and high ionic conductivities similar to those exhibited by DESs made from lithium salts and hydrogen bond donors such as an amide.12 Prior studies have revealed the importance of anion and cation chemistries on interphase properties and electrochemical performance in IL and OIPC electrolytes.32,44–46 Thus, here, we used X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of the SEI layer to study the interphase properties of the two electrolytes. Finally, successful cycling of a Li/50 mol% LiFSI in [P1(DMA)3][FSI]/LiFePO4 cell at C/5 and C/2 at 50 °C is demonstrated, paving the way for application of these new electrolytes in future high energy density Li-metal batteries.
The neat OIPCs were dried under vacuum on a Schlenk-line at 60 °C for 48 hours before use. Lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) (99.5% purity) salt was purchased from Nippon Shokubai (Osaka, Japan). The 50 mol% LiFSI electrolytes were prepared by mixing the calculated amount of LiFSI with the OIPCs under magnetic stirring at 50 °C to form a homogeneous solution. The IL was then dried under vacuum on a Schlenk-line at 50 °C for 48 hours until the moisture content was less than 50 ppm as measured by Karl–Fischer analysis. For making 10 mol% LiFSI in [P1(DMA)3][FSI], after adding LiFSI to the OIPC, a few droplets of anhydrous acetonitrile (Sigma) were added to achieve a clear solution. Then the acetonitrile was evaporated, and the electrolyte was dried under vacuum on a Schlenk-line at 50 °C for 48 hours. The chemical structure of [P1(DMA)3], [HMG], and FSI are presented in Fig. 1.
Rate capability tests were conducted at 50 °C and at C-rates of C/20, C/10, C/5, C/2 1C, 2C and 5C using the 50 mol% LiFSI in [P1(DMA)3][FSI] electrolyte and LFP electrodes (Aleees) with areal capacity of 0.4 mA h cm−2 (mass loading of 2.25 mg cm−2). Long term cycling test was performed at 50 °C and at C/5 using 50 mol% LiFSI in [P1(DMA)3][FSI] and 50 mol% LiFSI in [HMG][FSI] electrolytes and LFP electrodes with areal capacity of 2 mA h cm−2.
To prepare low capacity (0.4 mA h cm−2) LFP electrodes, LFP powder and carbon black were first dry mixed in FlackTek SpeedMixer (USA), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) dissolved in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) was added to the dry mixture. The weight ratio of active material, carbon black and PVDF was 80:10:10. The slurry was then cast on an Al foil using a doctor blade. The electrodes were first dried at 80 °C overnight before they were cut and dried again at 110 °C. The higher capacity (2 mA h cm−2) LFP electrodes were obtained from Customcells, Germany.
Fig. 2 (a) DSC heating traces (b) ionic conductivity, of the pure OIPC ([P1(DMA)3][FSI]), 10 mol% and 50 mol% LiFSI in the OIPC. |
Adding 10 mol% LiFSI did not alter the enthalpies or onset temperatures of the phase VI–V, V–IV, IV–III and III–II transitions, however, the enthalpy of the phase II–I transition reduced from 8 J K−1 mol−1 for the pure OIPC to 3.5 J K−1 molOIPC−1 for the 10 mol% LiFSI mixture. This indicates that upon addition of 10 mol% LiFSI, the OIPC becomes more disordered in phase I (above 144 °C). In addition, the melting transition was significantly broadened and shifted to a lower temperature in the 10 mol% LiFSI electrolytes, (the melting temperature at 175 °C was confirmed visually, compared to the neat OIPC at 246 °C).
Upon increasing the LiFSI content to 50 mol%, a transparent and colourless liquid with Tg at −81 °C was formed. Suppression of the crystalline phase is common in lithium/sodium-salt mixtures with OIPCs and was reported previously in several electrolytes.40,49,50
The effect of Li-salt concentration on the ionic conductivity was studied by comparing the salt with 10 mol% LiFSI and 50 mol% LiFSI to that of the neat [P1(DMA)3][FSI] (Fig. 2b). It can be seen that the addition of LiFSI increased the ionic conductivity in all three samples across the temperature range, as was previously demonstrated in other plastic crystal systems.51–54 However, a more significant conductivity enhancement occurred when LiFSI was increased from 10 mol% to 50 mol% LiFSI (4.6 × 10−7 to 9.5 × 10−4 S cm−1 at 30 °C and 4.3 × 10−6 to 4.3 × 10−3 S cm−1 at 80 °C). As discussed above, adding 50 mol% LiFSI to the OIPC totally interrupted the long-range order of the neat OIPC, resulting in an ionic liquid phase. The high salt content ionic liquid system ([P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI) was selected for further analysis and its properties were compared with 50 mol% LiFSI in [HMG][FSI]. As previously reported, the [HMG][FSI] based OIPC has been identified as having promising transport properties in combination with Na and Li salts.40,41
The physicochemical properties including thermal behaviour, ionic conductivity, density, dynamic viscosity of the [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI and the [HMG][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI, have been studied and are presented in Fig. 3 and Fig. S1 (ESI†). With the addition of 50 mol% LiFSI to the [HMG][FSI] OIPC, the crystallisation of the OIPC is also suppressed and the solution behaves as an ionic liquid with a low glass transition, −58 °C, which is higher than [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI electrolyte (−83 °C) (Fig. 3a). This reflects significantly different interactions and slower dynamics in the [HMG]-based electrolyte, particularly at low temperature, with a more rapidly increasing viscosity leading to a glassy state at higher temperatures (−58 °C) compared to that of the P1(DMA)3-based electrolyte. Previous work in [HMG][FSI]–NaFSI suggested that the HMG cation may order in the IL electrolyte, which could explain the higher Tg, although more evidence is needed to support this assertion.41 The temperature dependences of dynamic viscosity and ionic conductivity are presented in Fig. 3b and c. The viscosity of the [HMG][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI sample is higher at room temperature and is slightly lower at temperatures above 40 °C (97 mPa s at 60 °C) than for the [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI (113 mPa s at 60 °C). The ionic conductivity of the [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI is slightly higher from 35 °C, with a larger difference at higher temperatures. Comparing the ionic conductivity of these electrolytes with the well-studied 50 mol% LiFSI in [P111i4][FSI] IL, the latter has a higher ionic conductivity (1.4 × 10−3 30 °C) compared to 1.0 × 10−3 S cm−1 for the 50 mol% LiFSI in [P1(DMA)3][FSI] at 30 °C. However, their viscosity values are comparable to the 50 mol% LiFSI in [P111i4][FSI] electrolyte (362 mPa s at 30 °C in the [HMG][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI, 264 mPa s at 30 °C in [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI and 323 mPa s at 25 °C in [P111i4][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI).34
Fig. S2 (ESI†) shows Arrhenius plot of temperature-dependent conductivities and viscosity for the [HMG][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI, and [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI. Neither plot shows Arrhenius like behaviour, instead they show a curvature. Thus, the data was fit using the Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann (VFT) equation based on eqn (1).55 The VFT plots for conductivity and viscosity are presented in Fig. S2 (ESI†) and fit VFT parameters are summarized in Tables S1 and S2 (ESI†).
(1) |
(2) |
σ 0 and η0 are pre-exponential factors, related to the ionic conductivity and viscosity at infinite temperature. T is the temperature, T0 is the temperature at which ions start to show mobility. B is pseudo-activation energy for mobility. D is the fragility factor, (small D values are typical for fragile glasses (D < 30) while strong glasses show large D values (D > 30).
The pseudo-activation energy B for both conductivity and viscosity appears higher for [HMG][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI (575), in contrast to [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI (560), indicating that the latter requires less energy for ion mobility. Additionally, the value of T0 is lower in the [P1(DMA)3][FSI]-system, suggesting that [P1(DMA)3][FSI] IL electrolyte is more prone to forming fragile glasses. The parameter Tg − T0 is relatively low in both electrolytes, and smaller (0.4) in the [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI system. This observation points towards a greater ion dissociation in this electrolyte compared to the [HMG][FSI] electrolyte. It is worth noting that both electrolytes exhibit relatively small fragility factor, D, consistent with the behaviour of liquids that form fragile glass structures. A comparison of the VFT parameters with other IL-salt electrolytes,55,56 indicates that the pseudo activation energies (B) in both electrolytes are either in the same range or lower than the other electrolytes. A comparison of the T0 values also shows that they are lower in comparison to some ILs reported in the literatures. To illustrate, the T0 values are lower than the value observed in 0.5 M LiTFSI in [N2(2O2O1)3][TFSI] (210 K),55 2.7 M LiFSI in [N2(2O2O1)3][TFSI] (207 K),55 or in 10 mol% LiFSI in [C1O1mmor][FSI] (202 K).56
High ionic conductivity is an indicator of a promising electrolyte in terms of the applicability of the electrolytes in a device. However, all ions in the high salt content IL contribute to the measured ionic conductivity; high Li ion conductivity is also important to achieve good device performance. To investigate the impact of the cation on this parameter, the lithium transference numbers of the two electrolytes was measured at 50 °C using the Bruce–Vincent method, based on CV polarisation and EIS measurements,47 and is presented in Fig. S3 (ESI†). This showed that the transference numbers are very close in the two electrolytes, at 0.44 ± 0.02 in the [HMG][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI and 0.41 ± 0.03 in the [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI. It is worth noting that the transference number is also comparable to the [P111i4][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI electrolyte, which was previously reported as 0.4 ± 0.02 at 25 °C.21
Fig. 4 Diffusivity of the ions in 50 mol% LiFSI in [P1(DMA)3][FSI] and 50 mol% LiFSI in [HMG][FSI] at 60 °C. |
The extent of ionic interactions in an ionic liquid can be qualitatively characterized using a Walden plot, which is calculated based on the relationship between viscosity (fluidity (1/η)) and molar conductivity.58 The Walden plot of the two IL systems is presented in Fig. 5. Data for a dilute salt solution (0.01 M aqueous KCl solution,58 is also shown in a straight line in Fig. 6 as a reference to an ideal system in which the ions are fully dissociated and have equal mobility. Ideal systems have also been reported with 1 M KCl,59 or 0.1 M KCl.60 Deviation from the ideal line indicates the degree of ion association in the IL system. The dashed line in Fig. 5 indicates where the 10% of the molar conductivity for a given viscosity exists. The Walden plot of both electrolyte systems, 50 mol% LiFSI in [P1(DMA)3][FSI] and 50 mol% LiFSI in [HMG][FSI], show that they lie between the region of being ionic and sub-ionic according to Angell et al.,59 which likely indicate ionic interactions that prevent independent ion dissociation. However, this is common to Li-salt electrolyte systems as similarly observed in other Li-based electrolyte systems.61,62 However, the [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI solution shows a larger degree of dissociation at temperatures above 50 °C compared to the [HMG][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI IL. This is in agreement with the trends in the ion diffusivity diffusion coefficient data where self-diffusion of ions in the [HMG][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI IL is higher than in the [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI IL, but the ratio of Li diffusivity (DLi+) to IL cation diffusivity (DH+) is higher in the P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI electrolyte. In comparison, Walden plot data for [P111i4][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI IL lies fairly close to the ILs reported here, thus, in all three ionic liquids with 50 mol% LiFSI, the ion dissociation is good and of a similar order.34 According to the viscosity, conductivity, ionicity and Li transference data both electrolytes are relatively high conductivity with close viscosity and Li transference values, indicating potential applicability of both electrolytes in Li battery applications.
Fig. 5 Walden plot showing relationship between inverse viscosity and molar conductivity for 50 mol% LiFSI in [P1(DMA)3][FSI] and 50 mol% LiFSI in [HMG][FSI]. |
Longer-term symmetrical cell cycling was conducted at 50 °C for both electrolytes, after resting at 50 °C for 24 h. Since the [HMG]-based electrolyte showed lower polarization potential at lower current densities, in the long-term cycling study, the amount of charge cycled was set to a constant 0.5 mA h cm−2, but two different current densities, 0.5 and 1.5 mA cm−2, were applied. Fig. 6b shows the cycling potential profile of the Li|Li cells with the different electrolytes over 100 cycles (each electrode was plated/stripped for 1 h at 0.5 mA cm−2). In general, the voltage profiles of the Li|Li cells cycled in both highly concentrated IL electrolytes show impressive Li stripping and plating stability, with a low overpotential for 100 cycles without any breakdown. However, the polarisation potential for the cell with the [HMG][FSI] electrolyte is lower over the whole 100 cycles, which is consistent with the rate capability data where at lower current density the polarisation potential for the HMG-based electrolyte was lower. When a higher current density of 1.5 mA cm−2 was applied (Fig. 6c), initially the overpotential for the HMG system was higher, which then decreased upon continued cycling, stabilising at values only slightly higher than those of the [P1(DMA)3] system.
The cycling results indicate that the cell overpotential and cycling stability depends on the cation chemistry and the applied current densities and is influenced by multiple factors including conductivity and Li ion transport, as well as interfacial processes and the SEI. This is consistent with the recent report on Na metal cells at moderate current densities (1 mA cm−2) with 50 mol% NaFSI in [C3mpyr][FSI] IL which showed lower overpotentials compared to the [P111i4][FSI] IL system.44 However, upon applying higher rate cycling of (1 mA cm−2 and 4.0 mA h cm−2) the system with the [C3mpyr][FSI] IL exhibited a shorting failure while the phosphonium IL sustained 800 h (100 cycles) at this current density. The Na surface characterization showed different compositions formed at the surface of the Na metals when different cation chemistry and different current densities were used.
In order to understand the reason for the higher initial polarisation potential in the cell with the 50 mol% LiFSI in [HMG][FSI] electrolyte at higher current densities (1.5 mA cm−2), the interphases formed on the Li metal surface from the different ionic liquid electrolytes were studied by XPS analysis after 5 and 100 Li stripping/plating cycles. Fig. 8a provides a graphical representation of XPS survey spectra, illustrating the relative proportion of various chemical elements of various chemical elements (F, O, N, C, S, P, and Li) on plated Li surfaces. This figure immediately shows some significant differences between the two electrolyte systems. Firstly, whereas the top surface of the metal cycled in the [HMG][FSI] electrolyte system changes significantly upon increasing the cycling from 5 to 100 cycles, in contrast, the [P1(DMA)3][FSI] IL electrolyte sustains a more stable SEI composition as observed from all the XPS spectra. This behaviour has been noted before for Li metal cycled in [C3mpyr][FSI] under different cycling rates; when high rates were used to deposit Li metal the subsequent SEI remained stable throughout the cycling duration and, moreover, this correlated with better cycling efficiencies.63,64 Similarly for Na metal electrodes cycled in ammonium and phosphonium IL electrolytes, improved electrochemical performance for the phosphonium electrolyte appeared to coincide with a less changeable SEI composition.44 Notably, the data from both electrolyte systems demonstrate a consistent pattern of increasing the relative amount of F from 5 cycles to 100 cycles. In [HMG][FSI], the proportion of F rises from 1.51% after 5 cycles to 3.18% after 100 cycles, while in [P1(DMA)3][FSI], it increases from 2.01% after 5 cycles to 7.31% after 100 cycles. This observation indicates the formation of an interphase layer on the Li surface during cycling. Furthermore, the percentage of S, which likely represents FSI-reduction components, demonstrates an upward trend with successive cycling. This finding further supports the growth of the SEI layer over the cycling period. Notably, the percentage of these two components are higher on the Li surface with [P1(DMA)3][FSI] IL.
Taking a closer look at Li 1s, F 1s, C 1s, O 1s, and N 1s spectra shown in Fig. 8b–f, the nature of the chemical species and their relative amounts can be ascertained as follows. The Li 1s spectra of all the samples have a peak at ∼54 eV that shows the presence of lithium fluoride (LiF) and a peak at ∼55 eV related to lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) species.65,66 68% and 86% of Li is LiF in the 50 mol% LiFSI in [P1(DMA)3][FSI] IL after 5 and 100 cycles respectively, and 43% and 68% of Li is LiF, after 5 and 100 cycles respectively, when 50 mol% LiFSI in [HMG][FSI] electrolyte was used. Table S3 (ESI†) summarizes the composition of the SEI on the Li surface after 5 and 100 cycles. This shows that the LiF content on the Li surface from the [HMG][FSI] IL increased significantly upon cycling, and is consistently lower than in the 50 mol% LiFSI in [P1(DMA)3][FSI] IL.
It has been reported that bulk LiF has high chemical and mechanical stability and allows high Li diffusion, which stabilizes the SEI layer and allows homogeneous Li ion diffusion, hence better cycling performance.6,67 In all cases, the F 1s spectra also show a peak at 685 eV consistent with the presence of a layer of LiF on the surface,68 as indicated by the Li 1s spectra.
Quantification of the amount of LiF in the F 1s spectra indicates that it has rapidly formed on the Li surface when [P1(DMA)3][FSI] IL was used (75% after 5 cycles) and remained stable up to 100 cycles (75%). In contrast, it appears to take more time to build up on the surface of Li metal when the [HMG][FSI] electrolyte was used (21% after 5 cycles and 79% after 100 cycles). On all the surfaces another peak was observed at 687 eV, which is related to a covalent –F species like an –SO2F group, presumably resulting from decomposition of the FSI anion.69,70 The C 1s spectra all show a broad peak at 285 eV corresponding to the presence of aliphatic C species (C–C and/or C–H) and a C–N peak at 286 eV. There is also a small peak in the [HMG][FSI] electrolyte spectra at 288 eV attributed to CN, and a peak at 289 eV assigned to C–P in the [P1(DMA)3][FSI] IL based electrolyte, both of which are presumably related to the decomposition of the IL cation or residual salt on the surface.70,71
In the N 1s spectra from all the electrolytes, there are two peaks corresponding to the N-species which are attributed to degradation of FSI anions, appearing at 400 and 398 eV, in agreement with previous reports.72 A small quantity of nitride species is also observed at 396 eV, most likely related to species existing at the surface of pristine Li discs.65 All of the O 1s spectra have peaks indicating the formation of Li2CO3 at around 530 eV, consistent with the appearance of this species in the Li 1s spectra, and N(SOxFy) species (532 eV) presumably from decomposition of the FSI anions at the Li surface of all the electrolytes.73 A peak at 528 eV was also observed in the [HMG][FSI] and [P1(DMA)3][FSI] IL after 5 cycles that is associated with Li2O. Interestingly, the Li2O peak is no longer evident in the spectra of the surfaces after 100 cycles in either electrolyte. Thus, the Li2O species possibly exists on the surface of the Li metal in the native SEI or it was formed initially. The intensity of the Li2CO3 peak in the O 1s spectra decreased after 5 cycles from 65% to 8% after 100 cycles in the [HMG][FSI] electrolyte and the intensity of the peak associated with the FSI decomposition at 532 eV (–SO2–, –SO3–2) becomes more evident (28% after 5 cycles to 89% after 100 cycles). However, the intensity of these compositions did not significantly change in the [P1(DMA)3][FSI] electrolyte. Fig. S5 (ESI†) summarizes the SEI composition on the Li surface in the presence of 50 mol% LiFSI within [P1(DMA)3][FSI] and [HMG][FSI] electrolytes, examined after 5 and 100 cycles. Notably, the formation of LiF is observed after 5 cycles, exhibiting a gradual augmentation up to 100 cycles. This trend underscores the favourable stability of the SEI layer over extended cycling periods.
As a tentative conclusion, the differences in the XPS spectra between the two Li-metal electrodes cycled in two different electrolytes is most distinct after 5 cycles. Specifically, the [P1(DMA)3][FSI] IL facilitates a more rapid formation and conversion of the SEI into a LiF-rich film. This transformation results in a lower resistance and a reduced polarisation potential, as previously discussed. These effects highlight the potential advantages of the [P1(DMA)3][FSI] IL as compared to the alternative electrolyte system. While further investigations are warranted to fully understand the underlying mechanisms, the initial findings suggest that the [P1(DMA)3][FSI] IL promotes the development of a more favourable SEI composition, leading to enhanced electrochemical performance.
As the cells exhibited good rate capability with a low-loading mass cathode electrode at 50 °C, long-term cycling of the cells fabricated with higher mass loading LFP electrodes (2 mA h cm−2) was performed with both [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI and [HMG][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI electrolytes. The cells exhibited stable, long-term cycling at C/5 at 50 °C, as presented in Fig. 9b. The areal capacity of 1.6 mA h cm−2 with a capacity retention of 97% with ∼99.9% coulombic efficiency was achieved over 100 cycles in a cell with [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI and 1.53 mA h cm−2 with ∼99.9% coulombic efficiency was attained when [HMG][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI was used. The excellent cycling stability is also confirmed by the corresponding charge–discharge plots in Fig. S6 (ESI†).
As the [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI showed higher areal capacity, this electrolyte was subjected to higher current rates, C/2, at 50 °C. The cell showed stable, long-term cycling at C/2 with a first-discharge reversible capacity of 1.5 mA h cm−2 and a reversible discharge capacity value of 1.2 mA h cm−2 after 150 cycles (80% capacity retention and 99.9% Coulombic efficiency, (Fig. 9c). Table S4 (ESI†) provides a summary of the Li battery performance of the reported high salt content IL-based electrolytes.
The cycling of Li symmetrical cells indicated that Li can be cycled consistently and reversibly in both electrolytes at 50 °C up to current densities of 2.5 mA cm−2, with a lower polarization potential at lower current densities (up to 0.4 mA cm−2) in the [HMG][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI. Both electrolytes showed very good long-term cycling stability with current densities of 0.5 and 1.5 mA cm−2 and excellent reversibility in long-term Li plating/stripping tests. Slightly higher polarization potential was observed for the [HMG][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI at higher current density of 1.5 mA cm−2, and correspondingly higher interfacial resistance was observed in the EIS data with cycling. Finally, full Li-metal batteries with LiFePO4 cathodes demonstrated stable cycling with very good charge/discharge reversibility (CE = 99.9%) at C/5 after more than 100 cycles at 50 °C with both electrolytes. The best capacity retention was achieved using the cells with [P1(DMA)3][FSI]–50 mol% LiFSI. Thus, this work introduces two new Li metal battery electrolytes to the field, both of which show excellent device performance, and insights into the effect of the unique cation structures on the bulk and interfacial properties. Future investigations will involve conducting XPS depth profiling to compare the thickness of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) in both electrolyte systems. Additionally, molecular dynamic (MD) simulations will be employed to gain further insights into the structure of the different cations present at the metal surface.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ya00336a |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |