Subramanian
Thiyagarajan
a,
Yael
Diskin-Posner
b,
Michael
Montag
a and
David
Milstein
*a
aDepartment of Molecular Chemistry and Materials Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel. E-mail: david.milstein@weizmann.ac.il
bDepartment of Chemical Research Support, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
First published on 16th January 2024
The coupling of mononitriles into dinitriles is a desirable strategy, given the prevalence of nitrile compounds and the synthetic and industrial utility of dinitriles. Herein, we present an atom-economical approach for the heteroaddition of saturated nitriles to α,β- and β,γ-unsaturated mononitriles to generate glutaronitrile derivatives using a catalyst based on earth-abundant manganese. A broad range of such saturated and unsaturated nitriles were found to undergo facile heteroaddition with excellent functional group tolerance, in a reaction that proceeds under mild and base-free conditions using low catalyst loading. Mechanistic studies showed that this unique transformation takes place through a template-type pathway involving an enamido complex intermediate, which is generated by addition of a saturated nitrile to the catalyst, and acts as a nucleophile for Michael addition to unsaturated nitriles. This work represents a new application of template catalysis for C–C bond formation.
Michael addition, which is a well-known type of conjugate addition reaction,7 is an established synthetic tool for generating C–C bonds.8 Nevertheless, this kind of reaction typically requires the in situ generation of carbon nucleophiles (Michael donors) through the use of strong bases, which may be incompatible with sensitive functional groups and can lead to undesired side products.9 Transition-metal-catalyzed variants of Michael-type reactions have been receiving growing attention due to their excellent selectivity and efficiency.10 Catalytic base-free Michael additions involving nitriles were pioneered in the late 1980's by Murahashi and coworkers, who reported a series of ruthenium-catalyzed reactions of activated nitrile nucleophiles featuring acidic α-methylene and α-methine groups (i.e., active methylene nitriles).11 Since then, other examples of transition-metal-mediated Michael-type reactions of activated nitriles have been reported.12 However, these processes required the use of bases or other additives, and were conducted at high temperatures. In 2013, we made our first contribution to this field, when we reported the catalytic Michael addition of benzyl cyanides to α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds, promoted by a pincer-type rhenium complex capable of metal–ligand cooperation (MLC), and carried out under base-free and mild conditions.13
The phenomenon of MLC, wherein both the metal center and ligand of a given complex are directly involved in bond activation, has opened new opportunities for selective activation of chemical bonds and has led to the discovery of new catalytic reactions that are atom-economical and environmentally-benign.14 Significant advances in this field have been achieved by our group, primarily using transition metal complexes of pyridine-based PNP- and PNN-type pincer ligands that exhibit aromatization/dearomatization of the pincer backbone, thereby enabling the cleavage of strong chemical bonds.14,15 Such was the reactivity of the aforementioned rhenium complex, which bears a PNP-type ligand and can activate the nitrile CN bond via reversible C–C coupling with the pincer backbone and simultaneous M–N coordination to the metal center.13 The activated nitrile was found to be susceptible to electrophilic attack, either at its nitrogen or α-carbon atom, while the metal-pincer framework serves as an anchor, or template, for the nitrile substrate. This mode of activation, which we have termed “template catalysis”, has enabled the catalytic substitution of nitriles at their α-positions.16 Otten, de Vries and coworkers have also developed similar nitrile-activating systems employing pyridine-based PNP- and PNN-ruthenium pincer complexes.17
The application of earth-abundant transition metal catalysts in organic synthesis has been gradually expanding, in light of the high natural prevalence and low cost of these elements, as compared to noble metals – the long-established workhorses of catalysis – like the abovementioned ruthenium.18,19 Manganese, a widely-used, inexpensive base metal, caught our attention nearly a decade ago, and we have since developed a series of PNP- and PNN-type complexes of this metal, which have shown unique catalytic activity based on MLC.19 This includes template catalysis, which allowed us to accomplish a variety of new transformations involving nitriles, namely, Michael addition of unactivated nitriles to α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds,16 oxa- and aza-Michael additions to unsaturated nitriles,20 and hydration and α-deuteration of nitriles21 (Scheme 1A and B).
Scheme 1 Addition reactions involving nitriles promoted by manganese pincer complexes through template catalysis. |
Michael additions are typically carried out using stoichiometric amounts of strong bases, which are necessary for generating Michael donors in situ, but these bases are incompatible with many functional groups, as noted above.10,12,22 Moreover, the electrophilic addition partners (Michael acceptors) used in such reactions have thus far been largely limited to α,β-unsaturated ketones, esters, amides and nitro compounds.10 By contrast, α,β- and β,γ-unsaturated nitriles have rarely been reported as Michael acceptors, because such nitriles are prone to side reactions like polymerization and self-addition.9,17b Hence, directly using unsaturated nitriles for selective C–C bond formation via Michael addition reactions is a highly challenging task. Herein, we report the synthesis of glutaronitriles through direct addition of unactivated saturated nitriles to α,β- and β,γ-unsaturated nitriles, catalyzed by a PNP-manganese pincer complex under very mild, neutral conditions (Scheme 1C). This catalytic system, which operates in the absence of base, was shown to preserve base-sensitive functional groups, and afforded a variety of dinitriles in generally good to excellent selectivity and yield. To the best of our knowledge, such base-free catalytic heteroaddition of saturated nitriles to unsaturated ones to generate dinitriles has not been previously documented.
Entry | Catalyst | Solvent | Conversionb | Yieldc |
---|---|---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions: benzyl cyanide (0.3 mmol), cinnamonitrile (0.3 mmol), solvent (1 mL), catalyst (loading as indicated), stirred at room temperature for 24 h. b Conversion of benzyl cyanide was determined by GC analysis, using mesitylene as internal standard. c Yield of 2a was determined for the isolated compound after column chromatography. d 0.6 mmol (2 equiv.) of cinnamonitrile was used. | ||||
1 | Mn-1 (0.5 mol%) | THF | >99 | 99 |
2 | Mn-1 (0.3 mol%) | THF | 80 | 76 |
3 | Mn-1 (0.5 mol%) | Benzene | 78 | 76 |
4 | Mn-2 (0.5 mol%) | THF | 80 | 80 |
5 | Mn-3 (0.5 mol%) | THF | 72 | 70 |
6d | Mn-1 (1 mol%) | THF | >99 | 99 |
7 | — | THF | — | — |
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we set to explore the substrate scope of our catalytic nitrile heteroaddition system (Scheme 2; 2a is duplicated from Table 1 for comparative purposes). Reaction of benzyl cyanide with alkyl-substituted acrylonitrile derivatives, namely, trans-3-cyclopentyl-acrylonitrile and crotononitrile, afforded the corresponding products, 2b and 2c, in moderate to good yields (Scheme 2). Benzyl cyanide was also coupled with 2-pentenenitrile, but in the absence of solvent, giving dinitrile 2d in excellent yield, thereby demonstrating the efficiency of the catalytic system under solvent-free conditions. Furthermore, benzyl cyanides bearing various electron donating and withdrawing substituents on their arene rings were coupled with different unsaturated nitriles, affording the corresponding products, 2e–l, in good to excellent yields. This indicates that the present catalytic system tolerates these substituents, and this is particularly notable for the halogen and cyano functionalities. Moreover, these experiments show that catalyst Mn-1 can promote both the isomerization of allyl cyanide and its subsequent conjugate addition to saturated nitriles (2f, 2j and 2l). Importantly, base-sensitive functional groups, namely, ketone, ester, and amide, were also tolerated, and the corresponding dinitrile products 2m–o were isolated in good yields. An N-heterocyclic saturated nitrile underwent smooth heteroaddition, using allyl cyanide as its partner, to furnish dinitrile 2p in 70% yield. Similarly, an O-heterocyclic α,β-unsaturated nitrile, 2-furanacrylonitrile, was coupled with 1-naphthylacetonitrile to give the desired product 2q in 90% yield. The reaction of α-substituted benzyl cyanides with acrylonitrile proceeded efficiently to afford the desired products 2r and 2s in 99% and 68% yield, respectively. Lastly, we examined the highly challenging application of unactivated aliphatic nitriles as substrates in our catalytic system. Under the optimized catalytic conditions, acetonitrile reacted with cinnamonitrile to give the corresponding product 2t in low yield (<20%). However, employing acetonitrile as solvent, instead of THF, and increasing the catalyst loading to 5 mol%, enabled us to achieve high to quantitative product yields (2t and 2u). It should be noted that when the reaction of acetonitrile with cinnamonitrile was repeated under the same conditions, but with the manganese catalyst replaced by an equimolar amount of the strong base KOtBu, poor results were obtained (8% conversion, 5% yield of product 2t), thereby highlighting the nitrile coupling efficiency of Mn-1 relative to general base catalysis. Other unactivated nitriles, i.e., propionitrile and pentanenitrile, were coupled with vinyl nitriles, using Mn-1 under similar conditions, to afford products 2v and 2w in 47% and 49% yield, respectively (Scheme 2).
The underlying mechanism of nitrile addition catalyzed by complex Mn-1 was probed through stoichiometric experiments (Scheme 3). A competition experiment was performed, wherein this catalyst was treated with an equimolar mixture of benzyl cyanide and cinnamonitrile, each at 5 equiv. per catalyst, in THF at room temperature (Scheme 3a). Interestingly, only benzyl cyanide reacted productively with the dearomatized complex, affording the respective rearomatized enamido complex Mn-4, whereas no cinnamonitrile complex, nor derivative thereof, was observed (see ESI†). This enamido complex has already been fully characterized, including X-ray crystallographic and density functional theory analyses, as part of our previous work on conjugate additions involving nitriles.16 In the present work, when independently-prepared Mn-4 was employed as catalyst, benzyl cyanide and cinnamonitrile were coupled to quantitatively give dinitrile 2a (Scheme 3b), thereby implying that the enamido complex is an intermediate in this addition reaction.
The aforementioned competition experiment showed that Mn-1 reacts preferentially with benzyl cyanide, rather than cinnamonitrile. This is due to the higher thermodynamic stability of the generated enamine complex, which cannot be formed in the case of cinnamonitrile.23 However, in the absence of benzyl cyanide, this complex reacted with 5 equiv. of cinnamonitrile in THF to afford a new complex, the ketimido adduct Mn-5 (Scheme 3c), which was structurally identified by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography (see ESI† for full details). In THF solution, Mn-5 exists in equilibrium with Mn-1 and free cinnamonitrile, and addition of benzyl cyanide (5 equiv.) leads to quantitative formation of complex Mn-4 within minutes at room temperature (Scheme 3c).
A plausible catalytic cycle for nitrile heteroaddition by Mn-1 is proposed (Scheme 4), based on the above experimental observations and previous mechanistic studies involving this complex.16,20,21 Initially, the saturated nitrile adds across the dearomatized metal-ligand framework of Mn-1 to generate the rearomatized ketimido intermediate I, which undergoes facile tautomerization to the thermodynamically more stable enamido intermediate II. The ketimido species I′, which forms reversibly upon reaction of Mn-1 with the unsaturated nitrile, is likely an off-cycle species that is not directly involved in the catalytic mechanism. Intermediate II reacts with the unsaturated nitrile through a Michael-type addition, leading to C–C bond formation between the two species and generating the formally zwitterionic intermediate III. This, in turn, undergoes proton transfer from the N–H bond of the coordinated ketimine group to the dangling ketenimide fragment, affording intermediate IV. Finally, the dinitrile product is released from this intermediate, thereby regenerating the dearomatized complex Mn-1 and closing the catalytic cycle.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. CCDC 2224607 and 2224950. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3sc04935c |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |