Lina Wanga,
Yanling Wanga,
Guangyun Tonga,
Yu Lia,
Mengnan Leia,
Huan Wua,
Bin Wang*ab and
Rongfeng Hu*ac
aKey Laboratory of Xin'an Medicine, Ministry of Education, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, 230038, P. R. China. E-mail: wangbin5654@163.com
bInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Anhui Academy of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, 230038, P. R. China
cAnhui “115” Xin'an Medicine Research & Development Innovation Team, Anhui Academy of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, 230038, P. R. China
First published on 20th February 2025
Correction for ‘Development of a novel UHPLC-UV combined with UHPLC-QTOF/MS fingerprint method for the comprehensive evaluation of Nao-Luo-Xin-Tong: multi-wavelength setting based on traditional Chinese medicinal prescription composition’ by Lina Wang et al., Anal. Methods, 2019, 11, 6092–6102, https://doi.org/10.1039/C9AY01975H.
The authors regret the omission of additional detail on the comparison of the reflux extraction and liquid ammonia treatment methods. The following text should be included after the sentence starting ‘Pre-treatment approaches such as reflux extraction and liquid ammonia pretreatment10 were compared…’ in Section 2.1.5.
“For reflux extraction, the Nao-Luo-Xin-Tong samples were extracted with 75% ethanol for 60 minutes. For liquid ammonia treatment, Nao-Luo-Xin-Tong was treated at 110 °C for 30 minutes, with a loading of 1.0 g g−1 deionized water and 2.0 g g−1 ammonia. Through HPLC analysis, reflux extraction was found to be more suitable for extracting the main components of the Nao-Luo-Xin-Tong.”
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |