Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Diastereo-, enantio-, and chemoselective sequential allylations of N,N′-alloc 3,3′-dimeric 2-oxindoles: formal total synthesis of (–)-idiospermuline

Kundan Shaw§ a, Avishek Roy§a, Debabrata Mondalb, Pranay Shyamalb, Arindam Khatuaa and Alakesh Bisai*ab
aDepartment of Chemistry, IISER Bhopal, Bhopal Bypass Road, Bhopal – 462 066, Madhya Pradesh, India. E-mail: alakesh@iiserkol.ac.in; alakeshb@gmail.com
bDepartment of Chemistry, IISER Kolkata, Mohanpur Campus, Kalyani, Nadia – 741 246, West Bengal, India

Received 11th May 2025 , Accepted 19th July 2025

First published on 22nd July 2025


Abstract

Calycanthaceae alkaloids feature two neighboring carbon atoms that are central to their structure (quaternary stereocenters) and a long, flexible bond between them [elongated labile C3a–C3a′s bond] with impressive biological activities. Herein, we envisioned an expeditious approach to dimeric hexahydropyrrolo[2,3b]-indoline via an unprecedented catalytic asymmetric sequential allylation of N,N′-alloc 3,3′-dimeric 2-oxindoles with eventual total syntheses of naturally occurring (−)-calycanthidine and a formal total synthesis of (−)-idiospermuline.


In nature, numerous organisms produce extensive arrays of natural product metabolites with similar molecular structures.1,2 This strategy enhances functional diversity and provides an evolutionary edge against competing systems within their environment. Alkaloids comprising of multiple cyclotryptamine units adjoined at different junctures constitute a large family of structurally fascinating natural products, which display a wide range of biological activities3 and possess retrosynthetically challenging and sterically crowded quaternary linkages. Moreover, in certain cases, the synthetic challenge is exacerbated by the heterodimeric C3a–C3a′ connectivity (Fig. 1). Significant advances have been made in the assembly of Csp2–Csp3 and Csp3–Csp3 linkages in cyclotryptamine-based alkaloids. The dimeric, heterodimeric, and oligomeric cyclotryptamine alkaloids exhibit a wide array of remarkable biological activities ranging from analgesic, antiviral, antifungal, and antibacterial properties to cytotoxic effects against human cancer cell lines.3 (−)-Calycanthidine (1f), a heterodimeric cyclotryptamine alkaloid bearing an unsymmetrical dimeric hexahydropyrrolo[2,3b]-indole scaffold was originally isolated in 1938 from Calycanthus floridus,4 but its structure was elucidated in 1962,2a,b followed by the assignment of its absolute stereochemistry by Overman and co-workers.5 The higher-order members of this group, such as (−)-hodgkinsine B (1g) and (−)-idiospermuline (1h), contain an additional hexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indoline unit attached at its benzylic quaternary stereocenter to peri positions of the aromatic ring of other hexahydropyrrolo[2,3b]-indoline fragments.5
image file: d5cc02666k-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Representative cyclotryptamine-based natural products.

Stimulated by these intriguing structures along with their biological activities, several strategies have been developed.6a–e Recently, a few heterodimerization strategies addressing unsymmetrical dimeric hexahydropyrrolo[2,3b]-indole scaffolds have been developed via a key diastereoselective pathway.6f–i In this regard, dynamic kinetic asymmetric transformations (DYKAT) using carbon nucleophiles on racemic substrates stand out as versatile methods for synthesizing complex natural products.6j

Over the past few decades, significant research efforts have been directed towards developing methods for constructing all-carbon quaternary stereocenters asymmetrically. In 2013, Trost et al. have shown an elegant approach towards symmetrical hexahydropyrrolo[2,3b]-indole scaffolds via stepwise consecutive Pd-catalyzed two-fold decarboxylative allylations of N-Boc protected bis-carbonates 2b with 92% ee (dr 3.2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1).7 Our group has also demonstrated enantioselective construction of vicinal all-carbon quaternary centers with excellent diastereocontrol via catalytic double asymmetric decarboxylative allylation towards the total synthesis of symmetrical N-alkylated dimeric hexahydropyrrolo[2,3b]-indole alkaloids in an efficient manner (Scheme 1) in the presence of (S,S)-L7-Pd(0).8,9 Although the catalytic asymmetric allylation of homo- and hetero-dimeric 2-oxindoles (3a–b) has been well documented (Scheme 1), no asymmetric method has been reported so far that avoids nitrogen protection (5). It was envisioned that a DYKAT following a Pd(0)-catalyzed highly chemo-, enantio- and diastereoselective sequential stereoablative alkylation of dimeric 2-oxindoles having two allylcarbamoyl functionalities, such as 4 (essentially bis-Alloc 4), could be an attractive platform to synthesize N-unprotected C2-symmetric dimeric 2-oxindoles, (R,R)-5 and its antipode (S,S)-5 (Scheme 1).


image file: d5cc02666k-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Prior work on the 3,3′-bis-allyl-2-oxindole skeleton.

The installation of a vicinal all-carbon quaternary stereogenic center in a highly enantioselective manner with excellent diastereocontrol remains a significant synthetic challenge. We hypothesized that a mixture containing all four stereoisomers of 4 could be efficiently converted to the corresponding enantioenriched diallyl 5 in the presence of a chiral Pd(0) complex, following a stereomutation process required for enantioconvergent catalysis (Scheme 2). However, the major challenge with such a transformation is the potential mismatch between the catalyst and the substrate, ultimately leading to low yields (Scheme 2).6 Initially, Pd(0)-catalyzed decarboxylative deallylation would proceed through intermediates 6a and b, which would immediately furnish the Pd(II)-π-allyl dimeric 2-oxindole intermediates 6c–e. Possible reactive intermediates in this reaction from intermediates 6a and b are shown in Scheme 2. Besides this, compound 4 would react with Pd to form different π-allyl complexes (Scheme 2).


image file: d5cc02666k-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Plausible nucleophilic center of bis-N-alloc-2-oxindoles (4).

Here, we thought three types of nucleophilic centers would be generated, namely, N-center (6c), C-center (6d) and O-center (6e). According to soft–hard principles, the C-center (6d) nucleophilic π-allyl complex might be more stable because of soft–soft interactions (Scheme 2). Therefore, catalytic asymmetric transformation of such a complex mixture of 5 would be challenging and needs special attention.

Based on the well-documented studies by Trost,7 Kozlowski10a and Wills10b research groups, we hypothesized that bis-N-alloc compounds could directly provide access to bis-allyl intermediates (Scheme 3) that can be extended to the total synthesis of alkaloids sharing a dimeric hexahydropyrrolo-[2,3-b]indole framework. So, based on our hypothesis, we assumed that bis-N-alloc oxindole (4) could provide compound 7a via a series of [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangements through various N-allyl and O-allyl intermediates. 7a converted to 7b via a [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement to form bis-N-allyl oxindole. 7a converted to 7b followed by [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement to provide compound 7c. Similarly, 7b, 7c, and 7d would be possible intermediates that are capable of undergoing [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangements, ultimately converted to a common product. Therefore, we thought that O-allyl as well as N-allyl substrates would be converted to a more stable C-allyl oxindole (because of a soft–soft combination) under our reaction conditions via [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement.10a


image file: d5cc02666k-s3.tif
Scheme 3 A dynamic equilibrium through the establishment of [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement.

Primarily, we planned to explore the Pd(0)-catalyzed Tsuji–Trost reaction. Towards this direction, for Pd-catalyzed enantioselective processes, we select 2-phosphino-oxazoline (PHOX) ligands (S)-L1–L4,11 2-phosphino-carboxamide ligands (S,S)-L5–L712a,b and binap base ligands (S)-L8–L1012c,d for our double allylation reaction. First, we carried out an optimization of Pd-catalyzed sequential double decarboxylative allylations of bis-N-alloc-2-oxindoles (4) in the presence of 2.5 mol% Pd2(dba)3 in combination with 7.5 mol% ligands L1–L102d in diethyl ether toluene and THF at room temperature and the results are presented in Table 1. After screening of various ligands, it was observed that ligand L7 afforded the product (S,S)-5 in 90% yield with 79% ee and dr up to 5[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 at room temperature (entry 7) (Table 1). We further focused on optimization by testing different solvents and reducing the temperature. Finally, we observed highly enantioselective (S,S)-5 (up to 96% ee) with high diastereoselectivity (up to 14[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1) and yield (up to 92%) (entry 19) (Table 1).

Table 1 Enantioselective double decarboxylative allylation of bis-N-alloc-oxindoles

image file: d5cc02666k-u1.tif

S. no.a Solvent Ligand Temp. (°C) drb Time/product (h) Yield (%) eec (%)
a Reactions were carried out on 0.037 mmol of the substrate in 3 mL of the solvent in a sealed tube.b dr values were calculated from 1H-NMR spectra of the crude reaction mixture.c ee values were determined using a Chiralpak OJ-3 column.
1 Et2O L1 25 3[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 10 58 18
2 Et2O L2 25 4[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 10 62 15
3 Et2O L3 25 5[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 10 73 17
4 Et2O L4 25 2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 10 74 23
5 Et2O L5 25 3[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 10 79 52
6 Et2O L6 25 7[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 10 79 56
7 Et2O L7 25 5[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 10 90 79
8 Et2O L8 25 3[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 10 82 35
9 Et2O L9 25 5[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 8 78 66
10 Et2O L10 25 6[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 9 80 64
11 PhMe L7 25 4[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 9 78 69
12 THF L7 0 8[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 12 88 73
13 PhMe L7 0 7[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 10 91 71
14 Et2O L7 0 8[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 10 86 83
15 Et2O L7 0 6[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 10 91 90
16 MTBE L7 0 6[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 10 86 69
17 THF L7 −10 9[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 12 90 74
18 Et2O L7 −10 9[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 12 86 85
19 Et2O L7 −25 14[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 16 92 96
20 Et2O L7 −40 10[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 24 89 88


After successful stereoconvergent development of vicinal stereogenic all-carbon quaternary centers of enantioenriched (S,S)-5, we thereafter focused our efforts on the elaboration of this compound for the total synthesis of the homo- and heterodimeric cyclotryptamine alkaloids. To achieve this, (S,S)-5 was reacted with methyl iodide in the presence of NaH to the corresponding N-methyl oxindole (S,S)-8a (Scheme 4).


image file: d5cc02666k-s4.tif
Scheme 4 Total synthesis of (−)-chimonanthine (1a), (−)-folicanthine (1b), and (+)-calycanthine (1c).

Next, (S,S)-8a was treated with OsO4 to achieve dihydroxylation of allyl groups such as (+)-9a, which, without further purification, underwent periodate cleavage to furnish bis-aldehyde (−)-10a in 86% yield over 2 steps. Next, bis-aldehyde (−)-10a was dissolved in a MeOH solution of MeNH2, followed by NaBH4 reduction in one pot to form a dimeric bis-amine intermediate (11a); subsequent reduction with Red-Al in toluene at 110 °C completed the total synthesis of (+)-folicanthine (1b) with approximately 40% overall yield in the LLS (Scheme 4). We also completed the total synthesis of (−)-chimonanthine (1a) following a similar synthetic strategy as shown in Scheme 4. Here, (S,S)-5 was reacted with benzyl bromide in the presence of NaH to the corresponding N-benzyl oxindole (S,S)-8b (Scheme 4). Then (S,S)-8b was treated with OsO4 and underwent periodate cleavage to afford bis-aldehyde (−)-10b in 82% yield over 2 steps.

Next, bis-aldehyde (−)-10b was dissolved in a MeOH solution of MeNH2, followed by NaBH4 reduction in one pot to form a dimeric bis-amine intermediate (11b), which underwent subsequent reduction with Red-Al to form the bis-tricyclic core (−)-12a. Finally, debenzylation of (−)-12a using Pd/C with 5 bar H2 pressure completed the total synthesis of (−)-chimonanthine (1a) (Scheme 4). We next turned our attention to the utilization of (−)-chimonanthine (1a) for the total synthesis of (+)-calycanthine (1c) as planned. Thus, a biomimetic route to (+)-calycanthine (1c) from (−)-chimonanthine (1a) was realized using a refluxing AcOH/H2O mixture (59% yield).

Furthermore, we have synthesized unsymmetrical dimeric 2-oxindole from (S,S)-5 (Scheme 5). Accordingly, desymmetrization of (S,S)-5 was carried out through a reaction with one equivalent of MeI [mono-alkylation of one of the N–H groups of C2-symmetric (−)-5] in the presence of NaH to obtain the corresponding unsymmetrical N-methyl 2-oxindole (S,S)-8a (see the ESI for details). Compound (S,S)-8a upon N-benzylation furnished heterodimeric oxindole (S,S)-10c (Scheme 5). In an alternative approach, mono-benzylation of one of the N–H groups of C2-symmetric (−)-5 afforded N-benzyl oxindole (S,S)-8b (see the ESI for details). Next, N-methylation of (S,S)-8b furnished heterodimeric oxindole (S,S)-8c in a synthetically useful yield (Scheme 5). With (S,S)-8c in hand, we have disclosed the total synthesis of (−)-calycanthidine (1f) (Scheme 5). In this regard, following a similar sequence of reactions as shown in Scheme 4, we have synthesized the unsymmetrical dimeric hexahydropyrrolo-[2,3-b]indole core (−)-12b (Scheme 5). Thus, a total synthesis of (−)-calycanthidine (1f) has been accomplished by debenzylation of (−)-12b under 5 atm pressure. Since the total synthesis of (−)-idiospermuline (1h) from (−)-calycanthidine (1f) is known, our effort culminated in the formal total syntheses of this alkaloid.


image file: d5cc02666k-s5.tif
Scheme 5 Total synthesis of (−)-calycanthidine (1f) and formal synthesis of (−)-idiospermuline (1h).

In conclusion, we have successfully developed a two-fold Pd-catalyzed decarboxylative asymmetric allylation of dimeric oxindoles to construct vicinal quaternary carbon stereocenters in an efficient manner. This strategy not only offers a general approach to the synthesis of cyclotryptamine alkaloids, but also clearly demonstrates the potential of double enantioselective transformation in the construction of molecules with a high level of stereochemical complexity. Thus, the total syntheses of naturally occurring (−)-folicanthine (1b), (−)-chimonanthine (1a), (+)-calycanthine (1c), and (−)-calycanthidine (1f) and the formal total synthesis of (−)-idiospermuline (1h) have been accomplished using this unprecedented sequential allylation.

Financial support from the SERB (SCP/2022/000486 and CRG/2023/000782) and the STARS, MoE (STARS/2023/0753) is gratefully acknowledged. D. M. and P. S. thank the UGC for the senior research fellowships (SRFs).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included in the ESI.

Notes and references

  1. For racemic approaches, see: (a) T. Hino and S.-I. Yamada, Tetrahedron Lett., 1963, 4, 1757 CrossRef; (b) J. B. Hendrickson, R. Goschke and R. Ress, Tetrahedron, 1964, 20, 565 CrossRef CAS; (c) A. L. Scott, L. Guo, F. McCapra and E. S. Hall, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1964, 86, 302 CrossRef CAS; (d) C.-L. Fang, S. Horne, N. Taylor and R. Rodrigo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 9480 CrossRef CAS; (e) H. Ishikawa, H. Takayama and N. Aimi, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 5637 CrossRef CAS; (f) Y.-X. Li, H.-X. Wang, S. Ali, X.-F. Xia and Y.-M. Liang, Chem. Commun., 2012, 2343 RSC . For total synthesis of meso-chimonanthine and meso-calycanthine, see: ; (g) J. T. Link and L. E. Overman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 8166 CrossRef CAS; (h) C. Menozzi, P. I. Dalko and J. Cossy, Chem. Commun., 2006, 4638 RSC . For total synthesis of hodgkinsine B via desymmetrization of meso-chimonanthine, see: ; (i) R. H. Snell, R. L. Woodward and M. C. Willis, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 9116 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (j) R. H. Snell, M. J. Durbin, R. L. Woodward and M. C. Willis, Chem. – Eur. J., 2012, 18, 16754 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. For structural elucidation of calycanthidine, see: (a) J. E. Saxton, W. G. Bardsley and G. F. Smith, Proc. Chem. Soc., 1962, 148 CAS; (b) I. J. Grant, T. A. Hamor, J. M. Robertson and G. A. Sim, Proc. Chem. Soc., 1962, 148 CAS . For a general method for the construction of quaternary carbon stereocentres, see: ; (c) A. Y. Hong and B. M. Stoltz, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2013, 2745 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) C. J. Douglas and L. E. Overman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2004, 101, 5363 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) J. Christoffers and A. Baro, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 1688 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) E. J. Corey and A. Guzman-Perez, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 388 CrossRef.
  3. (a) D. M. Gardiner, P. Waring and B. Howlett, J. Microbiol., 2005, 151, 1021 CAS; (b) D. Greiner, T. Bonaldi, R. Eskeland, E. Roemer and A. Imhof, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2005, 1, 143 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) J. W. Blunt, B. R. Copp, M. H. Munro, P. T. Northcote and M. R. Prinsep, Nat. Prod. Rep., 2006, 23, 26 RSC; (d) C. R. Isham, J. D. Tibodeau, W. Jin, R. Xu, M. M. Timm and K. C. Bible, Blood, 2007, 109, 2579 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. (a) G. Barger, A. Jacob and J. Madinaveitia, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 1938, 57, 548 CrossRef CAS ; (–)-calycanthidine was also isolated from the seeds of Chimonanthus praecox., see: ; (b) H. Takayama, Y. Matsuda, K. Masubuchi, A. Ishida, M. Kitajima and N. Aimi, Tetrahedron, 2004, 60, 893 CrossRef CAS.
  5. (a) L. E. Overman and E. A. Peterson, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 2525 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) L. E. Overman and E. A. Peterson, Tetrahedron, 2003, 59, 6905 CrossRef CAS.
  6. (a) J. T. Link and L. E. Overman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 8166 CrossRef CAS; (b) L. E. Overman, D. V. Paone and B. A. Sterns, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 7702 CrossRef CAS; (c) L. E. Overman, J. F. Larrow, B. A. Stearns and J. M. Vance, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 213 CrossRef CAS; (d) M. Movassaghi and M. A. Schmidt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 3725 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) M. Movassaghi, M. A. Schmidt and J. A. Ashehurst, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 1485 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) J. Kim, J. A. Ashehurst and M. Movassaghi, Science, 2009, 324, 238 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) J. Kim and M. Movassaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 14376 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (h) C. Pérez-Balado and R. deLera, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 3701 CrossRef PubMed; (i) E. Iwasa, Y. Hamashima, S. Fujishiro, E. Higuchi, A. Ito, M. Yoshida and M. Sodeoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 4078 CrossRef CAS PubMed . For DYKAT see: ; (j) V. Bhat, E. R. Welin, X. Guo and B. M. Stoltz, Chem. Rev., 2017, 117(5), 4528 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. B. M. Trost and M. Osipov, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 9176 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. S. Ghosh, S. Bhunia, B. N. Kakde, S. De and A. Bisai, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 2434 RSC.
  9. A. Roy, P. Shyamal, K. Shaw, D. Mondal, A. Khatua and A. Bisai, Org. Lett., 2024, 26, 10803 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. (a) E. C. Linton and M. C. Kozlowski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 16162 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) C. W. Edwards, M. R. Shipton, N. W. Alcock, H. Clase and M. Wills, Tetrahedron, 2003, 59, 6473 CrossRef CAS.
  11. PHOX ligands L1–L4: (a) G. Helmchen and A. Pfaltz, Acc. Chem. Res., 2000, 33, 336 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) M. R. Krout, J. T. Mohr and B. M. Stoltz, Org. Synth., 2009, 86, 181 CrossRef CAS PubMed and references cited.
  12. Ligands L5–L7, see; (a) B. M. Trost and D. L. Van Vranken, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1992, 31, 228 CrossRef; (b) B. M. Trost, D. A. Thaisrivongs and J. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 12439 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) A. Ortega-Martínez, R. de Lorenzo, J. M. Sansano and C. Nájera, Tetrahedron, 2018, 74, 253–259 CrossRef; (d) F. Richard, P. Clark, A. Hannam, T. Keenan, A. Jean and S. Arseniyadis, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2024, 53, 1936 RSC.

Footnotes

This work is dedicated respectfully to Professor R. Vijaya Anand, IISER Mohali, on the occasion of his 50th Birthday.
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures, characterization data, and NMR spectra. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5cc02666k
§ These authors contributed equally to this work.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.