Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
Correction: Engineering poly(dehydroalanine)-based gels via droplet-based microfluidics: from bulk to microspheres
Hannah F. Mathewsab,
Tolga Çepercde,
Tobias Speenab,
Céline Bastardab,
Selin Bulutab,
Maria I. Pieperab,
Felix H. Schachercdef,
Laura De Laporteabg and
Andrij Pich*abh
aDWI – Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials, Forckenbeckstr. 50, 52074 Aachen, Germany. E-mail: pich@dwi.rwth-aachen.de
bInstitute of Technical and Macromolecular Chemistry, RWTH Aachen University, Worringer Weg 2, 52074 Aachen, Germany
cInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Humboldtstr. 10, 07743 Jena, Germany
dJena Center for Soft Matter (JCSM), Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Philosophenweg 7, 07743 Jena, Germany
eCenter for Energy and Environmental Chemistry Jena (CEEC), Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Philosophenweg 7a, 07743 Jena, Germany
fCluster of Excellence Balance of the Microverse, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Grüne Aue, 07754 Jena, Germany
gInstitute of Applied Medical Engineering (AME), Department of Advanced Materials for Biomedicine (AMB), University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Center for Biohybrid Medical Systems (CMBS), Forckenbeckstr. 55, 52074 Aachen, Germany
hAachen Maastricht Institute for Biobased Materials (AMIBM), Brightland Chemelot Campus, Maastricht University, 6167 RD Geleen, The Netherlands
First published on 21st February 2025
Abstract
Correction for ‘Engineering poly(dehydroalanine)-based gels via droplet-based microfluidics: from bulk to microspheres’ by Hannah F. Mathews et al., Soft Matter, 2024, 20, 6231–6246, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SM00676C.
The authors regret the specification of incorrect units regarding the flow rates of the individual solutions in the microfluidic experiments. In the publication, the flow rate data is given in “μL min−1” (p. 6234). Instead, the correct unit should be “μL h−1”. This correction applies to all microfluidic flow rates stated in the article and is important for the reproducibility of the data, but has no influence on the remaining results and conclusions of the publication. The corrected version of the text from the article is shown below.
In the case of two separate aqueous solutions, the volumetric flow rate of each was set to Qwater = 75 μL h−1 and the oil phase was adjusted to Qoil = 300 μL h−1. In the case of a singular aqueous phase, the volumetric flow rate was set to Qwater = 200 μL h−1 for the dispersed phase and Qoil = 400 μL h−1 for the continuous phase.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |