Issue 47, 2013

Effect of the spacer of gemini surfactants on reverse micellar extraction of bovine serum albumin

Abstract

Reverse micellar extraction has the potential to overcome the hurdles associated with the conventional separation and purification procedures for proteins and hence has been considered as an alternative to conventional techniques. The surfactants used in protein extraction so far have been almost exclusively di-2-ethylhexyl sodium sulfosuccinate and cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide. In the present paper, we extracted bovine serum albumin (BSA) by using a kind of novel surfactant – gemini surfactant Cm-s-Cm·2Br (m = 12 and 16, and s = 2, 5, 8, and 12). Compared with conventional surfactant reverse micelles, all the gemini surfactant reverse micelles show superior performance. The length and flexibility of spacer s of Cm-s-Cm·2Br contribute to the advantages of gemini surfactant reverse micelles, and increasing hydrophobic alkyl chain length weakens the effect of the spacer. As a result, the minimum content ([surfactant]min) of the surfactant needed for transferring protein into an organic phase is increased in the order of s being 5, 8, 12 (2) sequentially and [surfactant]min for C16-s-C16·2Br is higher than that for C12-s-C12·2Br. The loading capacity of C16-s-C16·2Br reverse micelle is lower than that of C12-s-C12·2Br reverse micelle and C12-12-C12·2Br reverse micelle can load the maximum amount of protein. In the backward extraction process, gemini surfactants with s being 8 and 12 are much more efficient than the other gemini surfactants at pH 4.3. With C12-8-C12·2Br and C12-12-C12·2Br reverse micelles, BSA can be recovered under neutral or basic conditions given a sufficient amount of salt present (while a pH of ca. 4.3 is prerequisite for the recovery of BSA from conventional surfactant reverse micelles) and the efficiency with C12-12-C12·2Br reverse micelle is higher. Since so far the reports about the effect of surfactant structure on protein extraction have been limited, this study should help us know more about how to optimize the surfactant structure.

Graphical abstract: Effect of the spacer of gemini surfactants on reverse micellar extraction of bovine serum albumin

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
13 Aug 2013
Accepted
08 Oct 2013
First published
10 Oct 2013

Soft Matter, 2013,9, 11383-11391

Effect of the spacer of gemini surfactants on reverse micellar extraction of bovine serum albumin

J. Dong, J. Cai, X. Guo and J. Xiao, Soft Matter, 2013, 9, 11383 DOI: 10.1039/C3SM52183D

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements