Fabrication and characterization of TiO2–ZrO2–ZrTiO4 nanotubes on TiZr alloy manufactured via anodization
Abstract
Titanium and its alloys are able to grow a stable oxide layer on their surfaces and have been used frequently as substrates for anodization in an electrochemical surface treatment. A nanotubular oxide layer is formed in the presence of fluorine anion (F−) via anodization due to the competition between oxide formation and solvatization. In this study, a highly ordered titania–zirconia–zirconium titanate (TiO2–ZrO2–ZrTiO4) nanotubular layer was formed on the surface of Ti50Zr alloy via anodic oxidation in an F− containing electrolyte. The sizes of the nanotubes (i.e., the inner and outer diameters, and wall thicknesses), morphology, crystal structure, hydrophilic properties and components of the TiO2–ZrO2–ZrTiO4 nanotubular layer before and after annealing were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thin film X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis and water contact angle measurements. The results indicated that the inner diameter, outer diameter and wall thickness of the as-formed TiO2–ZrO2–ZrTiO4 nanotubes were distributed in the ranges of 3–120 nm, 12–165 nm and 3–32 nm, respectively, and depended on the F− concentration of the electrolyte and the applied potential during anodization. The number of smaller nanotubes increased with increasing F− concentration and the mean nanotube inner and outer diameters increased with increasing applied potential. The as-formed TiO2 and ZrTiO4 nanotubes exhibited an amorphous structure and the as-formed ZrO2 nanotubes displayed an orthorhombic structure. These phases transformed into anatase TiO2 and orthorhombic ZrO2 and ZrTiO4 after annealing. The hydrophilic properties of the TiO2–ZrO2–ZrTiO4 nanotubular layer were affected by the size distribution of the nanotubes. The surface roughnesses and the nanotubular character transformed the nanotubes to exhibit superhydrophilic properties after annealing. The TiO2–ZrO2–ZrTiO4 nanotubular surface on Ti50Zr alloy exhibited higher surface energy than that of the TiO2 nanotubular surface on commercially pure (CP) titanium.