Theoretical insight into the C–H and C–C scission mechanism of ethane on a tetrahedral Pt4 subnanocluster†
Abstract
The activation mechanism of C2H6 on a Pt4 cluster has been theoretically investigated in the ground state and the first excited state potential energy surfaces at the BPW91/Lanl2tz, aug-cc-pvtz//BPW91/Lanl2tz, 6-311++G(d, p) level. On the Pt4 cluster, the optimal channel order was kinetically as follows: demethanation > dehydrogenation > deethylenation from C2H6. The two-fold dehydrogenation of ethane to acetylene was almost equivalent to its single dehydrogenation to ethylene, both thermodynamically and kinetically. In addition, the C–H cleavage intermediate was kinetically more preferable than the C–C cleavage intermediate, while both the C–H cleavage intermediate and the C–C cleavage intermediate were thermodynamically favoured. Nevertheless, the extremely stable C–H cleavage intermediate was trapped in a deep well, which hindered the release of H2. Together with the excellent reactivity of the Pt4 cluster, for the design of an efficient and selective catalyst towards the dehydrogenation of C2H6, one can expect that it is necessary to improve the release of H2 from the C–H cleavage intermediate by introducing some additive or support into the Pt4 cluster, which decreases the binding of the catalyst towards H2. Concerning selectivity, the Pt atom was the most favourable for the dehydrogenation, the Pt2 cluster was the most preferable for deethylenation, and the Pt4 cluster was the most beneficial for the demethanation. Both Pt4 and Pt2 clusters exhibited more promising catalytic performance compared with the mononuclear Pt atom towards C2H6 activation.