Selective oxo ligand functionalisation and substitution reactivity in an oxo/catecholate-bridged UIV/UIV Pacman complex

Abstract

The oxo- and catecholate-bridged U^IV/U^IV Pacman complex [{(py)U^IVOU^IV(μ-O₂C₆H₄)(py)}(L^A)] A (L^A = a macrocyclic “Pacman” ligand; anthracenylene hinge between N₄-donor pockets, ethyl substituents on meso-carbon atom of each N₄-donor pocket) featuring a bent U^IV–O–U^IV oxo bridge readily reacts with small molecule substrates to undergo either oxo-atom functionalisation or substitution. Complex A reacts with H₂O or MeOH to afford [{(py)U^IV(μ-OH)₂U^IV(μ-O₂C₆H₄)(py)}(L^A)] (1) and [{(py)U^IV(μ-OH)(μ-OMe)U^IV(μ-O₂C₆H₄)(py)}(L^A)] (2), respectively, in which the bridging oxo ligand in A is substituted for two bridging hydroxo ligands or one bridging hydroxo and one bridging methoxy ligand, respectively. Alternatively, A reacts with either 0.5 equiv. of S₈ or 4 equiv. of Se to provide [{(py)U^IV(μ-η²:η²-E₂)U^IV(μ-O₂C₆H₄)(py)}(L^A)] (E = S (3), Se (4)) respectively, in which the [E₂]²⁻ ion bridges the two U^IV centres. To the best of our knowledge, complex A is the first example of either a d- or f-block bimetallic μ-oxo complex that activates elemental chalcogens. Complex A also reacts with XeF₂ or 2 equiv. of Me₃SiCl to provide [{(py)U^IV(μ-X)₂U^IV(μ-O₂C₆H₄)(py)}(L^A)] (X = F (5), Cl (6)), in which the oxo ligand has been substituted for two bridging halido ligands. Reacting A with either XeF₂ or Me₃SiCl in the presence of O(Bcat)₂ at room temperature forms [{(py)U^IV(μ-X)(μ-OBcat)U^IV(μ-O₂C₆H₄)(py)}(L^A)] (X = F (5A), Cl (6A)), which upon heating to 80 °C is converted to 5 and 6, respectively. In order to probe the importance of the bent U^IV–O–U^IV motif in A on the observed reactivity, the bis(boroxido)-U^IV/U^IV complex, [{(py)(pinBO)U^IVOU^IV(OBpin)(py)}(L^A)] (B), featuring a linear U^IV–O–U^IV bond angle was treated with H₂O and Me₃SiCl. Complex B reacts with two equiv. of either H₂O or Me₃SiCl to provide [{(py)HOU^IVOU^IVOH(py)}(L^A)] (7) and [{(py)ClU^IVOU^IVCl(py)}(L^A)] (8), respectively, in which reactions occur preferentially at the boroxido ligands, with the μ-oxo ligand unchanged. The formal U^IV oxidation state is retained in all of the products 1–8, and selective reactions at the bridging oxo ligand in A is facilitated by: (1) its highly nucleophilic character which is a result of a non-linear U^IV–O–U^IV bond angle causing an increase in U–O bond covalency and localisation of the lone pairs of electrons on the μ-oxo group, and (2) the presence of the bridging catecholate ligand, which destabilises a linear oxo-bridging geometry and stabilises the resulting products.