Issue 5, 2023

DOM removal from surface water by activated carbon vs. a nanocomposite: an experimental and modeling approach to optimize treatment

Abstract

Dissolved organic matter (DOM) is commonly removed from surface water by adsorption columns packed with sand (enhanced with coagulants), high-cost activated carbons, or specifically developed adsorbents. A main challenge in removing DOM is its chemical heterogeneity, both within and among water bodies, which makes adsorbent selection, DOM removal efficiency and removal prediction complex. Our approach to address these challenges consisted of three steps: 1. developing a facile UV-based methodology to represent DOM composition using three operationally defined fractions: humic acid, fulvic acid, and a non-UV-254 nm absorbing fraction, 2) parameterizing a hydraulic-adsorption model using commercially available humic and fulvic acids, and 3) applying the parameterized model to predict DOM removal from surface waters, which we mathematically partitioned using our UV methodology. We tested DOM removal from binary solutions of HA and FA and from three surface waters varying in UV absorption properties by three adsorbents differing in surface properties – new and regenerated granular activated carbon (GAC and rGAC, respectively) and a clay–polymer nanocomposite (PD-MMT). Despite the complexity of surface water DOM, we found that DOM removal can be predicted by its specific absorption of UV at 254 nm (SUVA254), and that SUVA254 was positively correlated with DOM removal by PD-MMT and negatively correlated with DOM removal by rGAC and GAC. One implication is that a column can potentially be tailored with an optimal adsorbent composition, i.e., PD-MMT and GAC based on water source SUVA254. Facile DOM characterization using UV absorption enabled us to predict DOM removal by three adsorbents from three surface waters. Finally, we estimated column capacity for UV254 adsorbing compounds under large treatment scales and found that the capacity of PD-MMT was three times larger than that of a commercial GAC.

Graphical abstract: DOM removal from surface water by activated carbon vs. a nanocomposite: an experimental and modeling approach to optimize treatment

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
10 Jan 2023
Accepted
24 Mar 2023
First published
27 Mar 2023

Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2023,9, 1531-1544

DOM removal from surface water by activated carbon vs. a nanocomposite: an experimental and modeling approach to optimize treatment

M. L. Kummel, I. A. Shabtai, S. Nir and Y. G. Mishael, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2023, 9, 1531 DOI: 10.1039/D3EW00010A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements