Ligand effects in photoluminescence of copper nanoclusters

Peiling Du a, Sachurilatu a, Wenya Jiang b, Jianyu Wei *b, Simin Li *a and Hui Shen *a
aCollege of Energy Materials and Chemistry, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China. E-mail: siminli@imu.edu.cn; shen@imu.edu.cn
bSchool of Materials and New Energy, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China. E-mail: jianyu.wei@nxu.edu.cn

Received 17th July 2024 , Accepted 27th August 2024

First published on 28th August 2024


Abstract

Copper nanoclusters have attracted significant interest in the field of materials science due to their high abundance, complex structure, and unique properties. However, there is a limited amount of research on the relationship between structure and properties. In this study, we synthesized and comprehensively characterized two new Cu9 nanoclusters, [Cu9(PhSe)6(PPh2O2)3] (Cu9-1) and [Cu9(CH3OPhS)6(PPh2O2)3] (Cu9-2), in order to investigate the effect of ligands on photoluminescence. Both clusters have the same metal skeleton and similar distribution of ligands, with the only difference being the surface ligands (PhSe vs. CH3OPhS). Interestingly, the photoluminescence lifetime of Cu9-2 was found to be 3.2 times longer than that of Cu9-1. Furthermore, a notable Stokes shift (ST) was observed in the emission spectra of the two clusters. Single-crystal X-ray analysis revealed the formation of hydrogen bonds between neighboring clusters of Cu9-2, which influenced intramolecular interactions. Additionally, the methoxy groups in Cu9-2, acting as conjugated electron donors, promoted intramolecular charge transfer and π–π interaction. This study is expected to inspire further research on surface ligand engineering for controlling the properties of copper nanoclusters beyond photoluminescence.


Introduction

Metal nanoclusters constitute a fascinating class of nanomaterials that exhibit unique physicochemical properties.1–3 Their size range (below 3 nm) positions them between small molecules and traditional nanoparticles. These nanoclusters have exhibited significant potential across a range of applications, including catalysis, sensing, imaging, and biomedical fields, among others.4–8 They constitute a rapidly evolving and promising domain of research.4–9 Ligand-stabilized metal nanoclusters are composed of a core of metal atoms encased in ligand molecules, resulting in a core–shell structure that significantly influences the properties of the clusters.10–13 The metallic core plays a significant role in determining the optical and various physical characteristics of the clusters, whereas the organic ligands are instrumental in influencing solubility and functionality.14–20 By meticulously selecting and engineering organic ligands, one can effectively manipulate the structural characteristics of the clusters. This enables a precise modulation of their properties, thereby enhancing their performance across a variety of applications.21–23

Copper (Cu) clusters exhibit numerous notable benefits as a novel category of cluster materials, applicable across a range of fields.24–28 The presence of multiple oxidation states of copper is fundamental to the formation of diverse copper nuclei, which in turn leads to a variety of structural configurations and properties.29–32 Moreover, the cuprophilic interactions present within copper nanoclusters, as well as the interactions between copper atoms and ligands, play a crucial role in establishing the molecular packing arrangement. This arrangement subsequently affects the luminescent and charge transport characteristics of the materials.33–36 Furthermore, the capacity to adjust surface ligands offers extensive opportunities for the design and engineering of copper nanoclusters with customized characteristics suitable for diverse applications.37,38 In this context, there exists a significant interest in acquiring model copper clusters to facilitate the establishment of correlations between their structural characteristics and associated properties.

Herein, two analogous clusters, [Cu9(PhSe)6(PPh2O2)3] (Cu9-1) and [Cu9(CH3OPhS)6(PPh2O2)3] (Cu9-2), were developed and employed as a model system to examine the influence of ligands on the photoluminescence properties of copper clusters. Both clusters exhibit an identical metallic core; however, they are distinguished by the ligands utilized, with Cu9-1 incorporating PhSe and Cu9-2 incorporating MeOPhS. Notably, the photoluminescence lifetime of Cu9-2 was measured at 247.7 μs, 3.2 times longer than that of Cu9-1. This observation underscores the substantial impact that ligands have on the phosphorescent properties of copper clusters. Additional characterization indicated that Cu9-2 demonstrates intermolecular hydrogen bonding and enhanced π–π interactions, which culminate in a compact and stable structural configuration. These characteristics are instrumental in producing the unique photoluminescence properties observed in Cu9-2 in contrast to Cu9-1. This research highlights the significant influence of peripheral ligands on the regulation of intramolecular interactions and intercluster aggregation, which in turn impacts the phosphorescent characteristics.

Results and discussion

Synthesis of [Cu9(PhSe)6(PPh2O2)3] (Cu9-1) and [Cu9(CH3OPhS)6(PPh2O2)3] (Cu9-2)

Both Cu9-1 and Cu9-2 were synthesized utilizing a one-pot synthesis approach. In the experimental protocol, Cu(Ph2POO)2, PPh4BPh4, NaBH4 and PhSeH for Cu9-1 or MeOPhSH for Cu9-2 were dissolved in a solvent mixture comprising methanol and dichloromethane. The resultant mixture was agitated for a duration of three hours at ambient temperature, leading to the development of an orange-coloured solution. Subsequently, this solution underwent centrifugation and diffusion with ether, culminating in the production of orange bulk crystals as the final products (Fig. S1 and S2).

Structure analysis and characterization

Initially, the structural characteristics of the two crystals were validated through single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) analysis (Fig. S3 and S4). The findings indicated that crystal Cu9-1 is crystallized in the R3c space group of the trigonal system, whereas crystal Cu9-2 is classified within the monoclinic system, specifically exhibiting the I2/a space group (Fig. S5 and S6, see Tables S1 and S2 for detailed crystallographic and refinement data). In the crystal structure of Cu9-1, the asymmetric unit comprises two PhSe ligands, one PPh2O2 ligand, and three copper (Cu) atoms. As illustrated in Fig. 1, the nanocluster unit is composed of six PhSe ligands, three PPh2O2 ligands, and a metal core consisting of nine copper atoms, leading to the molecular formula of [Cu9(PhSe)6(PPh2O2)3] (Cu9-1). The absence of counterions within the structure suggests that the cluster is electrically neutral. Cu9-2 is synthesized in a manner analogous to Cu9-1, but with the substitution of MeOPhS for PhSe.
image file: d4dt02060j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Total structures of Cu9-1 (a) and Cu9-2 (b). Colour legend: blue, Cu (centre); yellow, Cu (side); brick red, Se; orange, S; purple, O; light-blue, P; grey, C. All hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

The Cu9 metal core within Cu9-1 is situated at the center of a Cu3 equilateral triangle (designated as Cu3-centre, indicated in blue in Fig. 2a). The Cu–Cu bond length measures 2.869(2) Å, which is significantly greater than the bond length typically found in metallic copper, which is 2.56 Å. This indicates that the interactions within the Cu3 triangular core are comparatively weak. The three edges of the Cu3-centre core rise to create three supplementary triangles, each associated with one of the three Cu atoms positioned above. In this configuration, each edge of the Cu3-centre core functions as the base for the extended triangles, with the three additional Cu atoms situated at the vertices. The described structure exhibits a crown-like configuration, wherein the Cu3-centre serves as the base, while the three Cu atoms positioned above it function as the decorative jewels atop the crown (refer to Fig. 2b). The connection of the three peripheral Cu atoms results in the formation of a larger equilateral triangle (Cu3-side, marked in yellow), which is nearly parallel to the Cu3-centre but oriented in the opposite direction. The elongated Cu–Cu bond length of 4.208 Å on the Cu3-side necessitates the interconnection of the Cu3-side that are connected by three Se atoms from PhSe, thereby establishing a “6-crown-3” configuration (Fig. 2d).


image file: d4dt02060j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Core structure of Cu9-1. (a) Cu3-centre. (b) Cu3-centre@Cu3-side. (c) Cu3-centre@Cu3-side@Se3. (d) Se3@Cu3-side@Cu3-centre@Se3 viewed from the front. (e) Se3@Cu3-side@Cu3-centre@Se3 viewed from the top. Colour legend: blue, Cu (centre); yellow, Cu (side); brick red, Se.

The triangular configuration created by the interconnection of the three Se atoms (Se3, with a Se–Se bond length of 3.697 Å, represented in purple in Fig. 2c) is oriented in the same direction as the Cu3-centre. Furthermore, the plane of this triangle is positioned marginally above that of the Cu3-side. In addition, by extending the Cu3-centre in a downward direction, it is possible to achieve an additional perfectly symmetrical “6-crown-3” configuration. Notably, the upper and lower “6-crown-3” configurations exhibit a near-exact overlap almost exactly along the c-axis. Consequently, the Cu9 core of Cu9-1 is comprised of a Cu3-centre triangle formed by three copper (Cu) atoms, flanked by two additional Cu3-side triangles at the upper and lower positions. Additionally, two selenium (Se) triangles are positioned to cap the Cu9 core on both the upper and lower sides. The arrangement of these components from various perspectives is illustrated in Fig. 2d and e, respectively. The three PPh2O2 molecules provide additional stabilization to the Cu9 core by linking the respective vertices of the two Cu3-side triangles. The bond lengths between the Cucentre and Cuside range from 2.667 to 2.717 Å (average: 2.684 Å), which are shorter than those observed in the Cu3 triangle core, but comparable to the Cu–Cu distances found in the complex [Cu13{S2CNnBu2}6{C[triple bond, length as m-dash]CC(O)OMe}4]+ (2.522(4) to 2.786(3) Å). This suggests that the interactions among copper atoms are strengthened as one moves from the central region to the peripheral areas. The mean bond length among all Cu atoms is 2.722 Å. The Cu–Se bond distances range from 2.326 Å to 2.428 Å, with an average value of 2.370 Å, which are common in other reported Cu clusters, such as [Cu23(PhSe)16(Ph3P)8(H)6]·BF4 (dCu–Se range: 2.335 to 2.593 Å).39 The average Cu–O bond distance is 1.932 Å.

Cu9-2 demonstrates a structural resemblance to Cu9-1, differing primarily in the substitution of PhSe with MeOPhS (Fig. S7). The Cu3-centre in Cu9-2 is configured in an isosceles triangular formation, characterized by a waist length of 2.864 Å and a base length of 2.939 Å. The average bond length between the Cu3-centre and the Cuside atoms is 2.656 Å. The bond lengths between the Cu atoms range from 2.584 Å to 2.939 Å, with an average of 2.702 Å. In contrast, the Cu–S bond lengths range from 2.201 Å to 2.297 Å, with an average of 2.251 Å. Additionally, the average Cu–O bond distance is 1.947 Å. It is thus apparent that the average Cu–Cu bond lengths in Cu9-2 are shorter than those in Cu9-1, and similarly, the average Cu–S bond lengths in Cu9-2 are also reduced compared to those in Cu9-1. As a result, Cu9-2 exhibits a more compact structural configuration.

Furthermore, Cu9-1 and Cu9-2 exhibit restricted solubility in a range of organic solvents, such as methanol, ethanol, dichloromethane, trichloromethane, acetonitrile, acetone, and tetrahydrofuran. This presents difficulties in precisely assessing their mass spectrometric characteristics. To mitigate this issue, we performed powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analysis to confirm the purity of the compounds. Fig. S8 presents the experimental powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns for Cu9-1 and Cu9-2, which exhibit a strong correlation with the simulated patterns. Additionally, the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis at the Cu 2p core level identifies two prominent signals at 934.6 and 954.2 eV, corresponding to the Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2, respectively. These signals suggest the existence of Cu atoms with a +1 oxidation state within the Cu9 clusters (see Fig. S9).

Photoluminescence (PL) properties

The photoluminescence (PL) characteristics of the clusters Cu9-1 and Cu9-2 were subsequently investigated. At a temperature of 298 K, the excitation spectra for both Cu9-1 and Cu9-2 exhibited similarities when subjected to excitation by light at approximately 466 nm. Cu9-1 demonstrated photoluminescence (PL) at approximately 648 nm, accompanied by a shoulder feature near 684 nm, and exhibited an absolute photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) of approximately 0.36% in air. Cu9-2 also exhibited PL at approximately 648 nm, accompanied by a shoulder feature near 680 nm (Fig. S10). The absolute PLQY of Cu9-2 in air was approximately 0.63%. Both Cu9-1 and Cu9-2 demonstrated dual emission characteristics, accompanied by a notable Stokes shift (ST).40,41 The PL lifetimes (τ) of Cu9-1 and Cu9-2 at a temperature of 298 K were recorded at 16.4 μs and 18.6 μs, respectively, suggesting the presence of phosphorescent emission (Fig. S11).42

Subsequently, the photoluminescence characteristics of the Cu9-1 and Cu9-2 clusters were evaluated at a temperature of 77 K. At this temperature, Cu9-1 exhibited emission at a wavelength of 660 nm, accompanied by a shoulder at 675 nm, whereas Cu9-2 demonstrated emission at a wavelength of 718 nm. The findings indicate that Cu9-2 exhibits a larger Stokes shift, attributed to the π–π interactions and intramolecular charge transfer (refer to Fig. 3a and b). The temperature-dependent luminescence characteristics of the solid-state samples were assessed over a range from 303 K to 83 K, revealing distinct luminescent behaviors for both clusters at lower temperatures. Notably, as the temperature was reduced from 303 K to 83 K, there was a significant increase in both the intensity and lifetime of the phosphorescence. Specifically, Cu9-1 demonstrated a redshift of 11 nm, with an enhancement factor of 5.4 (Fig. S12). In contrast, Cu9-2 exhibited a more substantial redshift of 27 nm, accompanied by an enhancement factor of 10.6 (illustrated in Fig. 3c). The larger red shifts transitioning from 303 K to 83 K suggest a greater energy gap between the singlet (S1) and triplet (T1) states in Cu9-2. Previous research has established that the singlet and triplet energy gap (ΔEST) significantly influence the light lifetime, efficiency, and color characteristics of luminescent materials.43,44 Materials with a larger ΔEST are likely to display enhanced luminous color contrast and a larger Stokes shift, which is beneficial for achieving emissions at longer wavelengths. This study substantiates that the emission wavelength of Cu9-2 surpasses that of Cu9-1.


image file: d4dt02060j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a) Excitation (blue, λem = 466 nm), emission (yellow) and solid-state UV-Vis absorption (purple) spectra of Cu9-1 at 77 K. (b) Excitation (green, λem = 467 nm), emission (red) and solid-state UV-Vis absorption (purple) spectra of Cu9-2 at 77 K. (c) Temperature dependence of the emission spectra in the range of 83–303 K of Cu9-2. Insert: maximum photoluminescence intensity at each temperature. (d) Plots of emission decay lifetime of Cu9-1 and of Cu9-2 at 77 K.

Upon a reduction in temperature to 77 K, the PL lifetime (τ) of Cu9-1 and Cu9-2 was prolonged by 78.1 μs and 247.7 μs, respectively. Furthermore, Cu9-2 exhibited an exceptionally extended lifetime (see Fig. 3d). This phenomenon can be explained by the progressive enhancement of hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions in Cu9-2 as the temperature decreases. As a result, the decay rate of phosphorescent radiation, denoted as kp, exhibited a reduction, which in turn enhanced luminous efficiency and extended the duration of luminous life. Additionally, there was a decrease in the mobility of the cluster, which served to impede the non-radiative transitions of the triplet excitons.

To gain insight into the different photoluminescent characteristics of the two clusters, we conducted a thorough structural analysis. As shown in Fig. S13, both Cu9-1 and Cu9-2 display three pairs of nearly parallel benzene rings, which can be attributed to π–π interactions. The densely packed configuration of molecules, characterized by a significant presence of π-conjugated chromophores and short-range π–π interactions, serves to effectively suppress non-radiative transitions, consequently extending the lifetime of the phosphor. The inter-ring distances between the benzene rings in Cu9-2 are 3.579 Å, 3.741 Å, and 3.744 Å, respectively, which are notably smaller than the uniform distance of 3.896 Å (see Fig. S13). This reduction in distance suggests a stronger π–π interaction within Cu9-2. The enhanced π–π interactions present in Cu9-2 contribute to a further decrease in the energies of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). In such a system, π-electrons are not merely localized between two carbon atoms; rather, they can be distributed across multiple atoms. This electron delocalization results in an expansion of the electron cloud, which in turn lowers the overall energy of the system. More specifically, orbital overlap between conjugated (pi) components facilitates the formation of new molecular orbitals (MOs). These newly formed MOs are capable of more effectively dispersing the electron density and are energetically closer together, thereby diminishing the HOMO–LUMO energy gap. This reduction in the energy gap has implications not only for the electron transfer characteristics of the molecule but also for its optical properties, leading to red shifts in optical emission spectra.

Furthermore, Cu9-2 is characterized by the presence of a methoxy group (MeOPh) attached to each of its six benzene rings. The lone pair of electrons in methoxy engages in conjugation with the π-electron system of the aromatic ring. These methoxy groups function as conjugated electron donors, facilitating the charge transfer (CT) process from the outside to the inside and enhancing the electron delocalization within the system. This leads to a decrease in the energy gap between the ground state and the excited state, causing the emitted light to have lower energy and a longer wavelength, which may cause the large Stokes shift.45,46

More surprisingly, the stacking configuration of the cluster Cu9-2, as depicted in Fig. 4b, demonstrates a distinctive arrangement characterized by a reverse and alternating stacking pattern. This exceptional structural organization arises from the interaction of two copper atoms on two Cu3-sides of each cluster, which are linked to adjacent clusters via hydrogen bonding interactions. It facilitates the formation of a network in which multiple clusters are interconnected in an alternating manner, resulting in a dense and stable configuration. The hydrogen bonding interactions present among the clusters in Cu9-2 not only bolster the stability of the stacking arrangement, but also augment the overall cohesion and intercluster interactions, thereby enhancing the electronic and optical properties of the cluster Cu9-2 assembly. In contrast, Cu9-1 does not exhibit a comparable hydrogen bonding structure (see Fig. 4a).


image file: d4dt02060j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 The packing structures of Cu9-1 (a) and Cu9-2 (b). Colour legend: blue, Cu (centre); yellow, Cu (side); brick red, Se; orange, S; purple, O; light-blue, P; grey, C; pink, H. Hydrogen bonding between Cu and H: green.

In Cu9-2, the methoxy groups function as conjugated electron donors, facilitating intramolecular charge transfer and enhancing electron delocalization, establishing hydrogen bonding between neighboring clusters. This interaction results in a notable increase in the phosphorescence lifetime at low temperatures, an enhancement in luminous efficiency, and the attainment of longer wavelength emission relative to Cu9-1. In other words, the presence of MeOPhS is essential for the emission of phosphorescence, significantly prolonging the phosphorescence lifetime at low temperatures, enhancing luminous efficiency, and facilitating emission at longer wavelengths. This insight into the conformational relationships of the clusters enhances our understanding and application of ligand-functionalized clusters, thereby aiding in the future rational design of such clusters.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we synthesized two Cu9 nanoclusters with an identical metal core and tailorable ligands. Cu9-1 was stabilized by PhSe ligands, while Cu9-2 by MeOPhS. By introducing different ligands, the formation of hydrogen bonds between neighboring clusters of Cu9-2 has been shown to influence intramolecular interactions and intermetallic aggregation within the cluster assembly. Moreover, the methoxy groups in Cu9-2, as conjugated electron donors, promote intramolecular charge transfer and π–π interaction. This contributes to greatly extending the low-temperature phosphorescence life, improving the luminous efficiency, and achieving longer wavelength emission of the cluster compared to Cu9-1. This structural modification opens up new possibilities for designing and engineering copper clusters with improved optical properties for various applications in luminescent materials.

Experimental

Materials

Diphenylphosphinic acid (Ph2POOH, 98%), sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 98%) and 4-methoxythiophenol (MeOC6H5SH, 97%) were purchased from Bidepharm (Shanghai, China). Tetraphenylphosphonium tetraphenylborate (PPh4BPh4, 98%) was purchased from TCI (Tianjin). Benzeneselenol (C6H5SeH, 90%) was purchased from HEWNS (Tianjin). Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (AR) was purchased from Tianjin Fengchuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Tianjin, China). Acetonitrile (CH3CN, A.R.), hexane (C6H14, A.R.), dichloromethane (CH2Cl2, A.R.), methanol (CH3OH, A.R.) and ether (C4H10O, A.R.) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China). Water used in all experiments was ultrapure. All other reagents were used as received without further purification.

Synthesis

General synthetic process of Cu(Ph2POO)2. To a methanolic solution of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (1.0 mmol in 10 ml methanol), a solution of Ph2POOH (1.0 mmol in 10 ml acetonitrile) was added under stirring. The stirring was continued for 2 days. Single crystals of Cu(Ph2POO)2 were obtained by slow evaporation of the solvents. Single crystals were filtered, washed with hexane and dried.
General synthetic process of Cu9-1 and Cu9-2. 50 mg (0.1 mmol) Cu(Ph2POO)2, 20 mg (0.03 mmol) PPh4BPh4, 3.8 mg (0.025 mmol, for Cu9-1) C6H5SeH or 6.8 mg MeOPhSH (0.05 mmol, for Cu9-2) and 40 mg NaBH4 were dissolved in a mixed solvent of 1 mL methanol and 3 mL dichloromethane. The mixture was stirred at room temperature over a period of 3 h, resulting in an orange solution. Orange block crystals were obtained by vapor diffusion of ether into the solution. 6.9% yield for Cu9-1 and 14.2% yield for Cu9-2 (based on Cu).

Characterizations

PXRD. The powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) spectra were recorded by a Bruker AFS D8 ADVANCE. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) data were collected on ESCALABXI + System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, U.K). The C 1s peak of adventitious carbon was used for position correction (284.5 eV) in all cases. Luminescence, lifetime and quantum yields were measured by Edinburgh FLS-1000 spectrometer.
Crystallography. The diffraction data of the single crystals of Cu9-1 and Cu9-2 was collected on an Agilent Technologies SuperNova system X-ray single-crystal diffractometer using Cu Kα (λ = 1.54184 Å) at 100 K. The data were processed using CrysAlisPro. The structure was solved and refined using full-matrix least-squares based on F2 using ShelXT,47 ShelXL48 in Olex2.49 The thermal ellipsoids of the ORTEP diagram were done at 50% probability. Detailed crystal data and structure refinements for the compound are given in Tables S1 and S2. The CCDC number 2358288 (Cu9-1) and 2358101 (Cu9-2) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this study.

Author contributions

PD, Saqorrltu, WJ and SL performed the experiments under the guidance of JW and HS. The data were analysed by PD, SL, and HS. The manuscript was written by PD, SL and verified by HS.

Data availability

CCDC number 2358288 (Cu9-1) and 2358101 (Cu9-2) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this study.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

H. Shen acknowledges the financial support from the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFB3507100), National Natural Science Foundation of China (22301149), Program for Young Talents of Science and Technology in Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (NJYT23035) and start-up funding of Inner Mongolia University (10000-23112101/043). H. Shen expresses his greatest appreciation to Professor Nanfeng Zheng (Xiamen University) for his generous support.

References

  1. I. Chakraborty and T. Pradeep, Atomically Precise Clusters of Noble Metals: Emerging Link between Atoms and Nanoparticles, Chem. Rev., 2017, 117, 8208–8271 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. R. Jin, C. Zeng, M. Zhou and Y. Chen, Atomically Precise Colloidal Metal Nanoclusters and Nanoparticles: Fundamentals and Opportunities, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 10346–10413 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. M. Matus and H. Häkkinen, Understanding ligand-protected noble metal nanoclusters at work, Nat. Rev. Mater., 2023, 8, 372–389 CrossRef CAS.
  4. X. X. Xu, Y. Liu, F. Sun, Y. Y. Jia, Q. H. Xu, J. Q. Tang, Z. L. Xie, J. Sun, S. M. Li, Q. Tang, S. Guo, H. Shen and N. F. Zheng, Array-Based Clusters of Copper with Largely Exposed Metal Sites for Promoting Catalysis, Chem. Mater., 2023, 35, 7588–7596 CrossRef CAS.
  5. T. Imaoka, Y. Akanuma, N. Haruta, S. Tsuchiya, K. Ishihara, T. Okayasu, W. J. Chun, M. Takahashi and K. Yamamoto, Platinum clusters with precise numbers of atoms for preparative-scale catalysis, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 688 CrossRef PubMed.
  6. R. W. Huang, Y. S. Wei, X. Y. Dong, X. Wu, C. X. Du, S. Q. Zang and T. C. W. Mak, Hypersensitive dual-function luminescence switching of a silver-chalcogenolate cluster-based metal–organic framework, Nat. Chem., 2017, 9, 689–697 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. D. C. Lim, B. Y. Seo, S. G. Nho, D. H. Kim, E. M. Hong, J. Y. Lee, S. Y. Park, C. L. Lee, Y. D. Kim and S. Cho, Emissive Nanoclusters Based on Subnanometer–Sized Au38 Cores for Boosting the Performance of Inverted Organic Photovoltaic Cells, Adv. Energy Mater., 2015, 5, 1500393 CrossRef.
  8. H. Shen, Q. Y. Wu, S. Malola, Y. Z. Han, Z. Xu, R. Qin, X. K. Tang, Y. Chen, B. K. Teo, H. Häkkinen and N. F. Zheng, N-Heterocyclic Carbene-Stabilized Gold Nanoclusters with Organometallic Motifs for Promoting Catalysis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 10844–10853 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. W. Qiao, Y. Wang, S. Li, R. Wang, J. Wu and S. Q. Zang, Integrating Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalysis in a Copper Nanocluster with Lewis Acid–Base Sites for Chemical Conversion of CO2 and Propargylamine, CCS Chem., 2024, 1–11 CAS.
  10. K. Konishi, M. Iwasaki and Y. Shichibu, Phosphine-Ligated Gold Clusters with Core + exo Geometries: Unique Properties and Interactions at the Ligand-Cluster Interface, Acc. Chem. Res., 2018, 51, 3125–3133 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. P. N. Gunawardene, J. L. Martin, J. M. Wong, Z. F. Ding, J. F. Corrigan and M. S. Workentin, Controlling the Structure, Properties and Surface Reactivity of Clickable Azide–Functionalized Au25(SR)18 Nanocluster Platforms Through Regioisomeric Ligand Modifications, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202205194 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. Z. Qin, S. Sharma, C. Wan, S. Malola, W. Xu, H. Häkkinen and G. Li, A Homoleptic Alkynyl-Ligated [Au13Ag16L24]3− Cluster as a Catalytically Active Eight-Electron Superatom, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 970–975 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. C. Dong, R. W. Huang, C. Chen, J. Chen, S. Nematulloev, X. Guo, A. Ghosh, B. Alamer, M. N. Hedhili, T. T. Isimjan, Y. Han, O. F. Mohammed and O. M. Bakr, [Cu36H10(PET)24(PPh3)6Cl2] Reveals Surface Vacancy Defects in Ligand-Stabilized Metal Nanoclusters, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 11026–11035 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. S. Sharma, K. K. Chakrahari, J. Saillard and C. W. Liu, Structurally Precise Dichalcogenolate-Protected Copper and Silver Superatomic Nanoclusters and Their Alloys, Acc. Chem. Res., 2018, 51, 2475–2483 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. Q. Yao, T. Chen, X. Yuan and J. Xie, Toward Total Synthesis of Thiolate-Protected Metal Nanoclusters, Acc. Chem. Res., 2018, 51, 1338–1348 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. K. Isozaki, R. Ueno, K. Ishibashi, G. Nakano, H. Z. Yin, K. Iseri, M. Sakamoto, H. Takaya, T. Teranishi and M. Nakamura, Gold Nanocluster Functionalized with Peptide Dendron Thiolates: Acceleration of the Photocatalytic Oxidation of an Amino Alcohol in a Supramolecular Reaction Field, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 13180–13187 CrossRef CAS.
  17. S. Chandra, Nonappa, G. Beaune, A. Som, S. Zhou, J. Lahtinen, H. Jiang, J. V. I. Timonen, O. Ikkala and R. H. A. Ras, Highly Luminescent Gold Nanocluster Frameworks, Adv. Opt. Mater., 2019, 7, 1900620 CrossRef CAS.
  18. L. B. Qin, F. Sun, X. S. Ma, G. Y. Ma, Y. Tang, L. K. Wang, Q. Tang, R. C. Jin and Z. H. Tang, Homoleptic Alkynyl-Protected Ag15 Nanocluster with Atomic Precision: Structural Analysis and Electrocatalytic Performance toward CO2 Reduction, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 26136–26141 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. Q. You, X. L. Jiang, W. T. Fan, Y. S. Cui, Y. Zhao, S. L. Zhuang, W. M. Gu, L. W. Liao, C. Q. Xu, J. Li and Z. Wu, Pd8 Nanocluster with Nonmetal-to-Metal- Ring Coordination and Promising Photothermal Conversion Efficiency, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202313491 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. C. Zhang, Z. Wang, W. Si, L. Wang, J. Dou, Z. Gao, C. Tung and D. Sun, Solvent-Induced Isomeric Cu13 Nanoclusters: Chlorine to Copper Charge Transfer Boosting Molecular Oxygen Activation in Sulfide Selective Oxidation, ACS Nano, 2022, 16, 9598–9607 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. L. Jin, D. S. Weinberger, M. Melaimi, C. E. Moore, A. L. Rheingold and G. Bertrand, Trinuclear gold clusters supported by cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene ligands: mimics for gold heterogeneous catalysts, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 9059–9063 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. T. D. Nguyen, Z. R. Jones, D. F. Leto, G. A. Wu, S. L. Scott and T. W. Hayton, Ligand-Exchange-Induced Growth of an Atomically Precise Cu29 Nanocluster from a Smaller Cluster, Chem. Mater., 2016, 28, 8385–8390 CrossRef CAS.
  23. X. J. Wang, B. Yin, L. R. Jiang, C. Yang, Y. Liu, G. Zou, S. Chen and M. Zhu, Ligand-protected metal nanoclusters as low-loss, highly polarized emitters for optical waveguides, Science, 2024, 381, 784–790 CrossRef PubMed.
  24. A. Baghdasaryan and T. Bürgi, Copper nanoclusters: designed synthesis, structural diversity, and multiplatform applications, Nanoscale, 2021, 13, 6283–6340 RSC.
  25. B. Han, Z. Liu, L. Feng, Z. Wang, R. K. Gupta, C. M. Aikens, C. Tung and D. Sun, Polymorphism in Atomically Precise Cu23 Nanocluster Incorporating Tetrahedral [Cu4]0 Kernel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142, 5834–5841 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. T. D. Nguyen, Z. R. Jones, B. R. Goldsmith, W. R. Buratto, G. Wu, S. L. Scott and T. W. Hayton, A Cu25 Nanocluster with Partial Cu(0) Character, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 13319–13324 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. G. Yang, Y. Xie, Y. Wang, Y. Tang, L. L. Chng, F. Jiang, F. Du, X. Zhou, J. Y. Ying and X. Yuan, Water-soluble Cu30 nanoclusters as a click chemistry catalyst for living cell labeling via azide-alkyne cycloaddition, Nano Res., 2023, 16, 1748–1754 CrossRef CAS.
  28. Y. Yun, L. Li, M. Zhou, M. Li, N. Sun, H. Li, S. Jin, C. Zuo, H. Sheng and M. Zhu, Atomically precise coreless AuCu bimetallic nanoclusters for Ullmann C-O coupling, Nano Res., 2023, 16, 10756–10762 CrossRef CAS.
  29. Y. M. Wang, X. C. Lin, K. M. Mo, M. Xie, Y. L. Huang, G. H. Ning and D. Li, An Atomically Precise Pyrazolate–Protected Copper Nanocluster Exhibiting Exceptional Stability and Catalytic Activity, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202218369 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. C. Xu, Y. H. Jin, H. Fang, H. J. Zheng, J. C. Carozza, Y. X. Pan, P. J. Wei, Z. Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, Z. Zhou and H. X. Han, A High-Nuclearity Copper Sulfide Nanocluster [S-Cu50] Featuring a Double-Shell Structure Configuration with Cu(II)/Cu(I) Valences, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2023, 145, 25673–25685 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. J. Sun, X. D. Yan, L. Z. Wang, Z. L. Xie, G. L. Tian, L. Wang, A. He, S. M. Li, Q. X. Guo, Chaolumen, J. L. He and H. Shen, Decorating an Anticuboctahedral Copper Kernel with Labile Surface Coatings for Controlling Optical and Catalytic Properties, Inorg. Chem., 2023, 62, 9005–9013 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. H. Wu, G. N. Andrew, R. Anumula and Z. Luo, How ligand coordination and superatomic-states accommodate the structure and property of a metal cluster: Cu4(dppy)4Cl2 vs. Cu21(dppy)10 with altered photoluminescence, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2024, 35, 108340 CrossRef CAS.
  33. Y. Zhang, Z. D. Lu, A. R. Feng, J. W. Y. Lam, Z. G. Wang, Y. E. Shi and B. Z. Tang, Green–Emissive Copper Nanocluster with Aggregation–Enhanced Emission for Selective Detection of Al3+, Chem. – Eur. J., 2023, 29, e202203554 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  34. R. S. Dhayal, J. Liao, Y. Lin, P. Liao, S. Kahlal, J. Saillard and C. W. Liu, A Nanospheric Polyhydrido Copper Cluster of Elongated Triangular Orthobicupola Array: Liberation of H2 from Solar Energy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 4704–4707 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  35. X. Fan, F. Yuan, J. Wang, Z. Cheng, S. Xiang, H. Yang and Z. Zhang, Structural Isomerization in Cu(I) Clusters: Tracing the Cu Thermal Migration Paths and Unveiling the Structure-Dependent Photoluminescence, CCS Chem., 2022, 5, 350–360 CrossRef.
  36. C. Deng, B. Han, Z. Liu, Z. Pan, J. He, Y. Li, Z. Yang, G. Luo, C. Tung, D. Sun and L. Zheng, Hierarchical Homochiral Assembly of Polyhedral Cage-Type Nanoclusters, CCS Chem., 2024, 1–12 CAS.
  37. K. Basu, S. Paul, R. Jana, A. Datta and A. Banerjee, Red-Emitting Copper Nanoclusters: From Bulk-Scale Synthesis to Catalytic Reduction, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2019, 7, 1998–2007 CrossRef CAS.
  38. L. Liu, Z. Wang, Z. Wang, R. Wang, S. Q. Zang and T. C. W. Mak, Mediating CO2 Electroreduction Activity and Selectivity over Atomically Precise Copper Clusters, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202205626 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  39. R. W. Huang, J. Yin, C. Dong, P. Maity, M. N. Hedhili, S. Nematulloev, B. Alamer, A. Ghosh, O. F. Mohammed and O. M. Bakr, [Cu23(PhSe)16(Ph3P)8(H)6]·BF4: Atomic-Level Insights into Cuboidal Polyhydrido Copper Nanoclusters and Their Quasi-simple Cubic Self-Assembly, ACS Mater. Lett., 2021, 3, 90–99 CrossRef CAS.
  40. S. Havenridge and C. M. Aikens, Deciphering the dual emission in the photoluminescence of Au14Cd(SR)12: A theoretical study using TDDFT and TDDFT + TB, J. Chem. Phys., 2021, 155, 074302 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. L. Luo, Z. Liu, X. Du and R. Jin, Near-Infrared Dual Emission from the Au42(SR)32 Nanocluster and Tailoring of Intersystem Crossing, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 19243–19247 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  42. W. Q. Shi, L. L. Zeng, R. L. He, X. S. Han, Z. J. Guan, M. Zhou and Q. M. Wang, Near-unity NIR phosphorescent quantum yield from a room-temperature solvated metal nanocluster, Science, 2024, 383, 326–330 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  43. P. Chandrashekar, G. Sardar, T. Sengupta, A. C. Reber, P. K. Mondal, D. Kabra, S. N. Khanna, P. Deria and S. Mandal, Modulation of Singlet-Triplet Gap in Atomically Precise Silver Cluster-Assembled Material, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202317345 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  44. W. Si, C. Zhang, M. Zhou, W. Tian, Z. Wang, Q. Hu, K. Song, L. Feng, X. Huang, Z. Gao, C. Tung and D. Sun, Two triplet emitting states in one emitter: Near-infrared dual-phosphorescent Au20 nanocluster, Sci. Adv., 2023, 9, eadg3587 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  45. L. Wang, Z. Xiong, J. Zhi Sun, F. Huang, H. Zhang and B. Z. Tang, How the Length of Through-Space Conjugation Influences the Clusteroluminescence of Oligo(Phenylene Methylene)s, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202318245 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  46. J. Zhang, Y. Tu, H. Shen, J. W. Y. Lam, J. Sun, H. Zhang and B. Z. Tang, Regulating the proximity effect of heterocycle-containing AIEgens, Nat. Commun., 2023, 14, 3772 CrossRef PubMed.
  47. G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXT-integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Adv., 2015, 71, 3–8 CrossRef PubMed.
  48. C. B. Hubschle, G. M. Sheldrick and B. Dittrich, ShelXle: a Qt graphical user interface for SHELXL, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2011, 44, 1281–1284 CrossRef PubMed.
  49. O. V. Dolomanov, L. J. Bourhis, R. J. Gildea, J. A. K. Howard and H. Puschmann, OLEX2: a complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2009, 42, 339–341 CrossRef CAS.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. CCDC 2358101 and 2358288. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4dt02060j
These authors contribute equally to this work.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.