Issue 5, 2022

Comparing the microstructure and photovoltaic performance of 3 perylene imide acceptors with similar energy levels but different packing tendencies

Abstract

While it is widely recognized that microstructure plays an important role in the performance of organic photovoltaics (OPV), systematic studies are often challenging, as varying the molecular packing through typical chemical means (such as sidechain tuning) often affects the molecular energy levels, thus preventing a clear correlation. In this work we present the synthesis of three perylene imide (PI) based electron acceptors with almost identical energy levels, but distinct packing tendencies. We confirm our initial hypothesis by measuring solution and solid-state absorption, and cyclic voltammetry as well as characterizing the films by grazing incidence wide angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS). In a second step, we repeat the characterization of the three materials in blends with two polymer donors, namely PCDTBT or PBDBT, whose energy levels are well aligned with those of the PI acceptors, and which, additionally, exhibit different degrees of structural order. We show how the initial strong difference between acceptors is partially blurred in blends, but still critical. Finally, we correlate our structural data with OPV devices made with the corresponding six blends. Our data suggest that a good donor acceptor marriage should ensure good energy alignment but also exhibit complementary crystallization tendencies of the two components.

Graphical abstract: Comparing the microstructure and photovoltaic performance of 3 perylene imide acceptors with similar energy levels but different packing tendencies

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
19 Okt. 2021
Accepted
03 Janv. 2022
First published
07 Janv. 2022
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

J. Mater. Chem. C, 2022,10, 1698-1710

Comparing the microstructure and photovoltaic performance of 3 perylene imide acceptors with similar energy levels but different packing tendencies

R. Adel, E. Gala, M. J. Alonso-Navarro, E. Gutierrez-Fernandez, J. Martín, M. Stella, E. Martinez-Ferrero, A. de la Peña, A. Harbuzaru, M. M. Ramos, R. P. Ortiz, J. L. Segura and M. Campoy-Quiles, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2022, 10, 1698 DOI: 10.1039/D1TC05037K

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements