Issue 1, 2025

Engineering considerations in the design of tissue specific bioink for 3D bioprinting applications

Abstract

Over eight million surgical procedures are conducted annually in the United Stats to address organ failure or tissue losses. In response to this pressing need, recent medical advancements have significantly improved patient outcomes, primarily through innovative reconstructive surgeries utilizing tissue grafting techniques. Despite tremendous efforts, repairing damaged tissues remains a major clinical challenge for bioengineers and clinicians. 3D bioprinting is an additive manufacturing technique that holds significant promise for creating intricately detailed constructs of tissues, thereby bridging the gap between engineered and actual tissue constructs. In contrast to non-biological printing, 3D bioprinting introduces added intricacies, including considerations for material selection, cell types, growth, and differentiation factors. However, technical challenges arise, particularly concerning the delicate nature of living cells in bioink for tissue construction and limited knowledge about the cell fate processes in such a complex biomechanical environment. A bioink must have appropriate viscoelastic and rheological properties to mimic the native tissue microenvironment and attain desired biomechanical properties. Hence, the properties of bioink play a vital role in the success of 3D bioprinted substitutes. This review comprehensively delves into the scientific aspects of tissue-centric or tissue-specific bioinks and sheds light on the current challenges of the translation of bioinks and bioprinting.

Graphical abstract: Engineering considerations in the design of tissue specific bioink for 3D bioprinting applications

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Review Article
Submitted
11 Sept. 2024
Accepted
19 Okt. 2024
First published
23 Okt. 2024

Biomater. Sci., 2025,13, 93-129

Engineering considerations in the design of tissue specific bioink for 3D bioprinting applications

S. Tripathi, M. Dash, R. Chakraborty, H. J. Lukman, P. Kumar, S. Hassan, H. Mehboob, H. Singh and H. S. Nanda, Biomater. Sci., 2025, 13, 93 DOI: 10.1039/D4BM01192A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements