Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

The role of flexible amide spacers in the self-assembly of star-shaped triphenylbenzenes with photoactive triphenylamine units: stimuli-responsive liquid crystals and gels

Alejandro Martínez-Buenoab, Patricia Marín San Románab, Raquel Giménez*ab and Teresa Sierra*ab
aInstituto de Nanociencia y Materiales de Aragón (INMA), CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain. E-mail: rgimenez@unizar.es; tsierra@unizar.es; t.sierra@csic.es
bDepartamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain

Received 14th May 2025 , Accepted 10th July 2025

First published on 14th July 2025


Abstract

This work reports on the decisive influence of the length of flexible amide spacers for obtaining soft materials out of star-shaped molecules. Either liquid crystal behaviour or gel behaviour was found for 1,3,5-triphenylbenzene connected to three triphenylamine units through flexible amide spacers with different numbers of carbon atoms. The spacer of two carbon atoms induces liquid crystal behaviour but not gel formation. Conversely, an analogous compound with a three carbon atom spacer is not liquid crystalline and forms gels in different solvents. The obtained liquid crystal phase shows a hexagonal columnar organization responsive to electric fields, allowing the material to be aligned homeotropically in ITO cells, that is, with the columns perpendicular to the electrodes and parallel to the applied electric field. Taking advantage of the photoactivity of triarylamine units bearing amide groups, the response under light irradiation in the gel state was explored.


Introduction

Liquid crystals (LCs) are archetypical examples of soft nanostructures in which conveniently tailored small molecules can yield functional assemblies able to respond to light, or electric or magnetic fields.1 Among the LC phases, the columnar mesophases hold great promise as new π-functional materials for organic electronic applications, as columns can act as a 1D nanostructure for anisotropic charge or ion transport,2–4 or build a neat dipole moment to achieve new forms of soft polar nanostructures.5

Among molecular designs, not only discotic π-conjugated molecules but also less conventional ones such as three-arm star-shaped mesogens6 can give rise to columnar mesophases. Star-shaped molecules have attractive prospects, in part due to their synthetic versatility to introduce π-conjugated functional units at their arms,7 either conjugated8–15 or joined through a non-conjugated spacer.16–21 Thus, columnar organizations with prominent semiconducting properties10,22–26 or stimuli-responsive luminescence8,27 have been reported.

To enhance the stability of these columnar architectures, hydrogen bond groups can be introduced in the arms to reinforce intermolecular/intracolumnar interactions. In this respect, aromatic tricarboxamides, such as benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxamide (BTA) (Fig. 1), are the most used star-shaped structural motif to achieve hydrogen bonding stabilized columnar liquid crystals and/or nanoaggregates in solvents.28


image file: d5tc01929j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Chemical structure of BTA and TPB star-shaped cores.

The 1,3,5-benzene core has also been expanded to 1,3,5-triphenylbenzene (TPB) (Fig. 1), introducing additional levels of rotational mobility. In this respect, TPB trisamides have been studied for gels29,30 and aggregates.31 Concerning liquid crystal behaviour, several star-shaped mesogens with a TPB core have been described, albeit without amide groups,32–37 with an important interplay between molecular structures and modes of self-assembly.

In this work, a novel design for star-shaped hydrogen bonded TPBs is reported, but unlike previously described BTA derivatives, the amide group is inserted within a short but flexible spacer of two or three carbon atoms (Scheme 1). This spacer is useful to bring higher flexibility, which in combination with hydrogen bonding abilities favours the formation of stable columnar phases at room temperature and gels.17,22 Functional units derived from triphenylamine (TPA) have been introduced at the periphery to bring photoactive properties, leveraging the photooxidation behaviour of amide TPA derivatives.38 In particular, we describe here the synthesis and properties of two TPB star-shaped molecules, namely TPB-2CTPA and TPB-3CTPA, their thermal properties, the contrast between hydrogen bonding patterns by IR spectroscopy, and their gel formation abilities. Different behaviour was found depending on the number of carbon atoms of the flexible amide spacers connecting the core with the arms. In addition, the presence of amide groups allowed us to explore the response of the mesophase to electric fields and the photoactivity of TPA units in the gel state.


image file: d5tc01929j-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Synthetic procedure of TPA–triphenylbenzene derivatives.

Results and discussion

Synthesis

Star-shaped derivatives were synthesized as described in Scheme 1 and Scheme S1 (ESI). Precursory compounds, TPA-NH222 and TPB-3OH,39 were prepared as reported previously. TPB with flexible spacers containing carboxylic acid moieties (TPB-2CCOOH and TPB-3CCOOH) was obtained from TPB-3OH via two different synthetic strategies. Compound TPB-2CCOOH was prepared via a Williamson etherification reaction with methyl α-bromoacetate and subsequent hydrolysis of the esters to carboxylic acids. In the case of the three-carbon length spacer precursor TPB-3CCOOH, the introduction of methyl β-bromopropionate through Williamson etherification was not efficient due to an α,β-elimination side reaction occurring under these conditions. To avoid this, the etherification was carried out with 3-bromopropyl benzoate and after the deprotection of the terminal CH2OH groups they were oxidized with (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxidanyl (TEMPO) and bleach to yield the carboxylic acids. The two final compounds were synthesized through a triple amidation reaction of the TPB-containing carboxylic acids (TPB-2CCOOH and TPB-3CCOOH) with TPA-NH2 in the presence of 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) as an activating agent of the carboxylic acid.

Liquid crystal and thermal properties

The thermal properties and the liquid crystal behaviour of TPB-2CTPA and TPB-3CTPA (Table 1) were studied using polarized optical microscopy (POM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and X-ray diffraction (XRD).
Table 1 Thermal properties and hexagonal lattice parameter
Compound Thermal propertiesa (T °C, [ΔH kJ mol−1]) T5%b Lattice parameters
a Thermal data obtained from the first cooling process and the second heating process at a rate of 10 °C min−1. Temperatures are taken at the onset.b Temperature corresponding to a 5% weight loss using thermogravimetry. Colh(g): glassy hexagonal columnar phase, Colh: hexagonal columnar mesophase, I: isotropic liquid, and Cr: crystalline phase.
TPB-2CTPA I 94 [2.2] Colh 47 Colh(g), Colh(g) 64 Colh 100 [3.0] I 363 a = 45.5 Å
TPB-3CTPA I 115 [31.3] Cr, Cr 127 [27.4] I 355


Upon cooling from the isotropic phase, POM observations of compound TPB-2CTPA revealed a birefringent fan-shaped texture (Fig. 2a), characteristic of hexagonal columnar mesophases. This texture was fluid below the clearing temperature, and could be sheared, but became rigid at room temperature. This thermal behaviour was in agreement with the DSC thermogram of the first cooling cycle, which showed an exothermic peak at 94 °C and a glass transition at 47 °C. The heating cycle was consistent with the cooling ones, showing a glass transition at 64 °C and an endothermic peak with an onset at 100 °C, corresponding to the transition to the isotropic liquid (Fig. 2b).


image file: d5tc01929j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) Photomicrograph observed for compound TPB-2CTPA by POM at room temperature, (b) DSC thermogram of compound TPB-2CTPA corresponding to the first cooling process and the second heating process, (c) photomicrographs observed for compound TPB-2CTPA by POM of the ITO/glass liquid crystal cell at different times after applying the E-field with a schematic representation of the process, (d) X-ray diffractogram of compound TPB-2CTPA at room temperature, and (e) schematic representation of an idealized model for the self-assembly of TPB-2CTPA in the columnar liquid crystal phase.

The texture behaviour of TPB-2CTPA was also investigated under the application of an electric field given the possibility of attaining a net dipole moment along the column due to intermolecular hydrogen-bonded amide motifs.16,40–43 For this purpose, the material was introduced in a commercial 5 μm ITO/glass cell. Upon cooling from the isotropic liquid, the columnar mesophase exhibited a birefringent fan-shaped texture (Fig. 2c), with larger domains than in the texture observed during previous POM studies. The application of a square-wave electric field (1.0 Hz, 20 Vpp) at 90 °C led to the darkening of the ITO area in 80 min, which is consistent with the evolution of the texture to a homeotropic alignment. This homeotropic texture is stable after removing the electric field and cooling at room temperature, while the ITO-free area retained the initial texture. The same effect was observed by applying a square-wave electric field (1.0 Hz, 50 Vpp) in the isotropic liquid phase, followed by cooling under the applied field at a rate of 0.5 °C min−1.

On the other hand, the analogue TPB-3CTPA with a longer spacer behaves under the POM as a crystalline solid with an undefined texture. The corresponding thermogram shows only one thermal transition upon both heating and cooling, with an enthalpy value of around 30 kJ mol−1 (Fig. S4a, ESI). These results evidenced that this compound crystallizes directly from the isotropic liquid, without forming a mesophase, as confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiments (Fig. S4b, ESI).

The columnar mesomorphism of compound TPB-2CTPA was confirmed by XRD experiments performed at room temperature in samples cooled from the isotropic liquid (Fig. 2d). The diffractogram shows three reflections in the small angle region related to distances with ratios of d, d/√3 and d/√4, which correspond to the reflections (100), (110) and (200) of a hexagonal lattice with a lattice parameter a = 45.5 Å. Furthermore, a diffuse broad reflection is observed at 4.5 Å due to the molten nature of the alkyl chains, confirming the liquid crystalline behaviour. The absence of a maximum at high angles corresponding to an intermolecular distance along the column hinders the calculation of a stacking parameter (c) and, therefore, impedes the correct estimation of the number of molecules per unit cell (Z). For similar star-shaped compounds with tris(triazolyl)triazine at the core, and a hexagonal columnar phase with parameters a = 49.5 Å and c = 3.4 Å and density = 1 g cm−3, a Z = 2 value was considered.22 Taking into account the similar molecular size and the lattice parameter obtained for TPB-2CTPA, it is reasonable to propose a disordered columnar packing in which two molecules arrange on each column stratum on average (Fig. 2e). The non-regular arrangement is in accordance with the fact that intracolumnar stacking is not observed and not all amide groups are involved in intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions (see below).

Hydrogen bond studies using FTIR spectroscopy

The formation and strength of the intermolecular hydrogen bonds formed between amide groups in systems with C3 symmetry and flexible amide spacers, which decouple the amide group from the star-shaped core, are strongly correlated with the spacer length.17,22 To further investigate the differences in hydrogen bonding interactions between the amide groups in compounds TPB-2CTPA and TPB-3CTPA and to correlate these differences with their respective spacer lengths and their final properties, variable-temperature FTIR studies were conducted.

At room temperature, the compound with the shortest spacer, TPB-2CTPA, exhibits two N–H stretching bands around 3300 and 3400 cm−1 (Fig. 3a), consistent with the presence of both hydrogen bonded and free N–H groups within the columnar assemblies, respectively. Additionally, the C[double bond, length as m-dash]O stretching region appears as a broad band spanning 1650 to 1720 cm−1, indicating an overlap of hydrogen-bonded and free C[double bond, length as m-dash]O stretching vibrations. In contrast, TPB-3CTPA shows a single N–H stretching band centred at 3295 cm−1 and a sharp C[double bond, length as m-dash]O stretching band at 1660 cm−1 (Fig. 3b), suggesting that both the N–H and C[double bond, length as m-dash]O groups are fully engaged in hydrogen bonds.


image file: d5tc01929j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Infrared spectra of (a) TPB-2CTPA and (b) TPB-3CTPA at various temperatures.

Upon heating TPB-2CTPA, the intensity of the associated amide N–H stretching band gradually decreased and shifted to higher wavenumbers, while the intensity of the free N–H stretching band increased. A similar trend was observed for the C[double bond, length as m-dash]O stretching band, which shifted to higher wavenumbers as expected due to the progressive weakening of hydrogen bonds with increasing temperature.

For TPB-3CTPA, no significant changes were observed in the associated N–H and C[double bond, length as m-dash]O stretching bands until the transition to the isotropic liquid takes place. At this temperature, both bands exhibited a marked intensity decrease along with an abrupt shift to higher wavenumbers. Additionally, the emergence of new bands at 3390 cm−1 and 1690 cm−1, corresponding to free N–H and C[double bond, length as m-dash]O stretching vibrations, respectively, indicated the partial disruption of intermolecular hydrogen bonds. This abrupt change at the melting temperature is consistent with a crystalline phase.

These results revealed a clear distinction in the nature and strength of the intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions of TPB-2CTPA and TPB-3CTPA, which correlates well with their different phase behaviour. For TPB-2CTPA, the presence of both hydrogen-bonded and free N–H and C[double bond, length as m-dash]O stretching bands suggests the formation of more dynamic, ordered but fluid, hydrogen bonded columnar aggregates. Also, this is consistent with a non-regular arrangement, as deduced from the absence of a reflection maximum at high angles in the DRX pattern related to a long-range stacking distance. In contrast, the longer and more flexible spacer in compound TPB-3CTPA facilitates hydrogen bonding interactions between amide groups, leading to enhanced stabilization of intermolecular interactions, thus favouring the formation of a crystalline phase.

Gel properties

As part of our ongoing efforts to identify versatile molecular platforms for the development of functional materials across different environments, including bulk and solution,44 we further explored the ability of these two molecules to act as building blocks for soft self-assembled materials formed in different solvents at a concentration of 1 wt% (Table S1, ESI). Notably, compound TPB-3CTPA formed opaque gels in 1-octanol (Fig. 4a), semi-transparent gels in dodecane (Fig. 4b) and transparent gels in toluene (Fig. 4c). However, compound TPB-2CTPA is soluble in all of these solvents at this concentration. These results support the critical role of the spacer length in the self-assembly ability of these compounds, as already observed in their liquid crystalline behaviour.
image file: d5tc01929j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 SEM images of xerogels of compound TPB-3CTPA from (a) 1-octanol, (b) dodecane and (c) toluene.

The morphology of the aggregates formed by TPB-3CTPA in each solvent was analysed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the xerogels. All three xerogels show a fibrillar morphology, regardless of the solvent employed. The 1-octanol xerogel displayed entangled fibril bundles with an average width of 150 nm (Fig. 4a). In the case of the dodecane xerogel, larger aggrupation of fibres made of smaller fibres of average width 75 nm can be distinguished (Fig. 4b). The xerogel in toluene displays fibril bundles with a width of 100 nm on average (Fig. 4c).

Some TPA derivatives containing at least one amide group36,45–50 or a carboxylic group51 have the ability to generate radical cation species under light irradiation in the presence of chlorinated solvents (Fig. 5a). In this respect, the photoresponse of TPB-3CTPA was investigated both in dilute dichloromethane solution and in the 1-octanol gel by introducing a small amount of dichloromethane (DCM). These studies were carried out using UV-vis (Fig. 5b and d) and 1H NMR spectroscopy (Fig. 5c).


image file: d5tc01929j-f5.tif
Fig. 5 (a) Schematic representation of TPA oxidation in the presence of chlorinated solvents. (b) UV-vis spectra recorded for TPB-3CTPA in dichloromethane solution (10−5 M) at different times of irradiation and the respective pictures of the sample. (c) 1H NMR spectra recorded for TPB-3CTPA in deuterated dichloromethane solution (2.5 × 10−3 M) before (down) and after irradiating the solution for 1 min (up). (d) UV-vis spectra recorded for the TPB-3CTPA gel at 1 wt% in 1-octanol/dichloromethane (95/5) (10−5 M) at different times of irradiation and the respective pictures of the sample.

The solution was initially colourless, and the UV-vis spectrum exhibited two intense absorption bands at 275 nm and 310 nm, along with two weaker bands at 405 nm and 800 nm (Fig. 5b, black line). After 2 minutes of irradiation with a Hg lamp, the solution turned light green, and the bands at 275 nm, 405 nm and 800 nm showed a marked intensity increase, except for the 310 nm band, which displayed a pronounced decrease. In addition, three new absorption bands appeared at 725 nm, 650 nm, and 465 nm (Fig. 5b, green line). These spectral changes are attributed to the formation of the triarylammonium radical cation, which was also observed to form by cyclic voltamperometry (Fig. S5, ESI), and it is known to exhibit a strong absorption in the near-infrared region.38,52 After 16 minutes of irradiation, the solution turned orange, and the absorption bands at 800 nm, 725 nm, and 650 nm almost disappeared, while the band at 465 nm increased in intensity (Fig. 5b, orange line). The orange color is consistent with the formation of the dicationic species, which has been reported to absorb in the visible range and represents a further oxidation state of the TPA moieties.52

In the case of the 1H NMR spectra, the initial spectrum displayed well-resolved signals corresponding to the aromatic protons of the TPA moieties, the TPB core, the spacer, and the aliphatic chains (Fig. 5c). After irradiation, all signals attributable to the TPA protons vanished, while the signals corresponding to the TPB aromatic core and the aliphatic chains remained observable. This behaviour is consistent with previously reported photoinduced aggregation and radical formation processes involving TPA derivatives in chlorinated solvents, in which the disappearance of proton signals has been attributed to the formation of the triarylammonium radicals and subsequent supramolecular self-assembly into highly anisotropic aggregates.38,52,53

The modification of the gelation properties through the photooxidation process was studied for the 1-octanol gel by introducing 5 wt% of dichloromethane. As in the case of the solution, short irradiation times induced the generation of light green colour in the gel due to the presence of the triarylammonium radical cations as confirmed in the UV-vis spectrum (Fig. 5d). As observed for the solution, longer irradiation times resulted in the formation of dicationic species and the disruption of the gel. This phenomenon is attributed to the increased charge density and stronger electrostatic repulsion between the dicationic units, which interferes with the non-covalent interactions, such as π-stacking or van der Waals forces, responsible for maintaining the integrity of the supramolecular network.

Finally, the photooxidation process did not occur in a solution of the compound in acetone or in the gel in 1-octanol, that is, in the absence of chlorinated solvents.

Conclusions

The contrasting behaviour of two derivatives of TPB differing only in the length of the flexible amide spacer is demonstrated. Whereas the compound with a two-carbon atom spacer yields liquid crystalline behaviour, whose order can be maintained in a glassy state at room temperature and can be oriented under electric fields, the compound with a three-atom carbon spacer is crystalline. FTIR experiments confirm differences in the establishment of intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions between amide groups that align with the differences observed in phase behaviour. Indeed, the compound with a three-carbon spacer shows a full engagement of amide groups in hydrogen bonding interactions in contrast to the two-carbon spacer compound, which shows partial formation of hydrogen bonds.

Furthermore, the formation of aggregates in solvents is also different depending on the spacer length, and only the three-carbon spacer derivative can yield organogels in different solvents at 1 wt%. It is demonstrated that the TPA redox unit photooxidizes in the gel state under light irradiation by adding a small amount of a chlorinated solvent, which is interesting for stimuli-responsive gels and optoelectronic applications.

Author contributions

A. M.-B.: investigation, methodology, data curation, and writing – original draft. P. M. S. R.: investigation, methodology, and data curation. R. G.: conceptualization, formal analysis, validation, supervision, funding acquisition, and writing – review and editing. T. S.: conceptualization, formal analysis, validation, supervision, funding acquisition, and writing – review and editing.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the ESI.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Spanish projects PID2021-122882NB-I00 and PID2021-126132NB-I00 financed by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ and by “ERDF A way of making Europe”, the INMA Severo Ochoa Excellence Center CEX2023-001286-S grant financed by MCIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/, the CSIC project PIE 202260E054, and the Gobierno de Aragon-FSE (E47_23R research group). The authors would like to acknowledge the Laboratorio de Microscopias Avanzadas-LMA (Universidad de Zaragoza), Servicio General de Apoyo a la Investigación-SAI (Universidad de Zaragoza) and Servicios Científico-Técnicos of CEQMA (CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza) for their support. We acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).

Notes and references

  1. H. K. Bisoyi and Q. Li, Chem. Rev., 2022, 122, 4887 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. T. Wöhrle, I. Wurzbach, J. Kirres, A. Kostidou, N. Kapernaum, J. Litterscheidt, J. C. Haenle, P. Staffeld, A. Baro, F. Giesselmann and S. Laschat, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 1139 CrossRef PubMed.
  3. T. Kato, M. Yoshio, T. Ichikawa, B. Soberats, H. Ohno and M. Funahashi, Nat. Rev. Mater., 2017, 2, 17001 CrossRef.
  4. R. De and S. K. Pal, Chem. Commun., 2023, 59, 3050 RSC.
  5. T. M. Swager, Acc. Chem. Res., 2022, 55, 3010 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. M. Lehmann, in Handbook of Liquid Crystals, ed. J. W. Goodby, P. J. Collings, T. Kato, C. Tschierske, H. Gleeson and P. Raynes, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2014, vol. 5 Search PubMed.
  7. H. M. Diab, A. M. Abdelmoniem, M. R. Shaaban, I. A. Abdelhamid and A. H. M. Elwahy, RSC Adv., 2019, 9, 16606 RSC.
  8. C.-Y. Zeng, W.-J. Deng, K.-Q. Zhao, C. Redshaw and B. Donnio, Chem. – Eur. J., 2024, 30, e202400296 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. I. Bala, H. Kaur, M. Maity, R. A. K. Yadav, J. De, S. P. Gupta, J.-H. Jou, U. K. Pandey and S. K. Pal, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater., 2022, 4, 1163 CrossRef CAS.
  10. S. Dhingra, I. Bala, J. De, S. P. Gupta, U. K. Pandey and S. K. Pal, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2021, 9, 5628 RSC.
  11. N. Tober, T. Rieth, M. Lehmann and H. Detert, Chem. – Eur. J., 2019, 25, 15295 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. F. A. Olate, M. L. Parra, J. M. Vergara, J. Barberá and M. Dahrouch, Liq. Cryst., 2017, 44, 1173 CrossRef CAS.
  13. S. K. Pathak, S. Nath, J. De, S. K. Pal and A. S. Achalkumar, New J. Chem., 2017, 41, 9908 RSC.
  14. H. Detert, M. Lehmann and H. Meier, Materials, 2010, 3, 3218 CrossRef CAS.
  15. R. Cristiano, J. Eccher, I. H. Bechtold, C. N. Tironi, A. A. Vieira, F. Molin and H. Gallardo, Langmuir, 2012, 28, 11590 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. J. Bi, J. Uchida and T. Kato, New J. Chem., 2025, 49, 3708 RSC.
  17. A. Martínez-Bueno, R. Vidal, J. Ortega, J. Etxebarria, C. L. Folcia, R. Giménez and T. Sierra, Mater. Today Chem., 2023, 29, 101394 CrossRef.
  18. E. Beltran, M. Garzoni, B. Feringan, A. Vancheri, J. Barbera, J. L. Serrano, G. M. Pavan, R. Gimenez and T. Sierra, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 1811 RSC.
  19. K.-Q. Zhao, X.-Y. Bai, B. Xiao, Y. Gao, P. Hu, B.-Q. Wang, Q.-D. Zeng, C. Wang, B. Heinrich and B. Donnio, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2015, 3, 11735 RSC.
  20. I. Paraschiv, M. Giesbers, B. van Lagen, F. C. Grozema, R. D. Abellon, L. D. A. Siebbeles, A. T. M. Marcelis, H. Zuilhof and E. J. R. Sudhölter, Chem. Mater., 2006, 18, 968 CrossRef CAS.
  21. C. P. Umesh, A. T. M. Marcelis and H. Zuilhof, Liq. Cryst., 2015, 42, 1269 CrossRef CAS.
  22. A. Martínez-Bueno, S. Martín, J. Ortega, C. L. Folcia, R. Termine, A. Golemme, R. Giménez and T. Sierra, Chem. Mater., 2024, 36, 4343 CrossRef PubMed.
  23. S. Gómez-Esteban, A. Benito-Hernandez, R. Termine, G. Hennrich, J. T. L. Navarrete, M. C. Ruiz-Delgado, A. Golemme and B. Gómez-Lor, Chem. – Eur. J., 2018, 24, 3576 CrossRef.
  24. A. Benito-Hernández, U. K. Pandey, E. Cavero, R. Termine, E. M. García-Frutos, J. L. Serrano, A. Golemme and B. Gómez-Lor, Chem. Mater., 2013, 25, 117 CrossRef.
  25. T. Yasuda, T. Shimizu, F. Liu, G. Ungar and T. Kato, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 13437 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. I. Paraschiv, K. de Lange, M. Giesbers, B. van Lagen, F. C. Grozema, R. D. Abellon, L. D. A. Siebbeles, E. J. R. Sudholter, H. Zuilhof and A. T. M. Marcelis, J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, 5475 RSC.
  27. R. K. Gupta, S. K. Pathak, J. De, S. K. Pal and A. S. Achalkumar, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2018, 6, 1844 RSC.
  28. S. Cantekin, T. F. A. de Greef and A. R. A. Palmans, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 6125 RSC.
  29. Y. He, Z. Bian, C. Kang, Y. Cheng and L. Gao, Tetrahedron, 2010, 66, 3553 CrossRef CAS.
  30. H.-K. Yang, H. Zhao, P.-R. Yang and C.-H. Huang, Colloids Surf., A, 2017, 535, 242 CrossRef CAS.
  31. S. Díaz-Cabrera, Y. Dorca, J. Calbo, J. Aragó, R. Gómez, E. Ortí and L. Sánchez, Chem. – Eur. J., 2018, 24, 2826 CrossRef PubMed.
  32. Y.-F. Bai, C. Li-Qin, H. Ping, L. Kai-Jun, Y. Wen-Hao, N. Hai-Liang, Z. Ke-Qing and B.-Q. Wang, Liq. Cryst., 2015, 42, 1591 CAS.
  33. T. Wöhrle, H. Taing, C. Schilling, S. H. Eichhorn and S. Laschat, Liq. Cryst., 2019, 46, 1973 CrossRef.
  34. A. Obsiye, T. Wöhrle, J. C. Haenle, A. Bühlmeyer and S. Laschat, Liq. Cryst., 2018, 45, 164 CrossRef CAS.
  35. T. Wohrle, S. J. Beardsworth, C. Schilling, A. Baro, F. Giesselmann and S. Laschat, Soft Matter, 2016, 12, 3730–3736 RSC.
  36. K. Bader, T. Wöhrle, E. Öztürk, A. Baro and S. Laschat, Soft Matter, 2018, 14, 6409 RSC.
  37. M. A. Grunwald, T. Wöhrle, R. Forschner, A. Baro and S. Laschat, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2020, 2190 CrossRef CAS.
  38. E. Moulin, F. Niess, M. Maaloum, E. Buhler, I. Nyrkova and N. Giuseppone, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 6974–6978 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  39. B. P. Dash, R. Satapathy, J. A. Maguire and N. S. Hosmane, Organometallics, 2010, 29, 5230 CrossRef CAS.
  40. C. F. C. Fitie, W. S. C. Roelofs, M. Kemerink and R. P. Sijbesma, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 6892 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. K. Sato, Y. Itoh and T. Aida, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 13767 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  42. D. Miyajima, F. Araoka, H. Takezoe, J. Kim, K. Kato, M. Takata and T. Aida, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 7865 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  43. J. Guilleme, E. Cavero, T. Sierra, J. Ortega, C. L. Folcia, J. Etxebarria, T. Torres and D. González-Rodríguez, Adv. Mater., 2015, 27, 4280 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  44. M. Castillo-Vallés, A. Martínez-Bueno, R. Giménez, T. Sierra and M. B. Ros, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2019, 7, 14454 RSC.
  45. E. Moulin, E. Busseron, Y. Domoto, T. Ellis, A. Osypenko, M. Maaloum and N. Giuseppone, C. R. Chim., 2016, 19, 117 CrossRef CAS.
  46. Y. Domoto, E. Busseron, M. Maaloum, E. Moulin and N. Giuseppone, Chem. – Eur. J., 2015, 21, 1938 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  47. E. Busseron, J. J. Cid, A. Wolf, G. Du, E. Moulin, G. Fuks, M. Maaloum, P. Polavarapu, A. Ruff, A. K. Saur, S. Ludwigs and N. Giuseppone, ACS Nano, 2015, 9, 2760 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  48. J. Kim, J. Lee, W. Y. Kim, H. Kim, S. Lee, H. C. Lee, Y. S. Lee, M. Seo and S. Y. Kim, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 6959 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  49. R. J. Kumar, Q. I. Churches, J. Subbiah, A. Gupta, A. Ali, R. A. Evans and R. A. Holmes, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 6552 RSC.
  50. E. Moulin, F. Niess, G. Fuks, N. Jouault, E. Buhler and N. Giuseppone, Nanoscale, 2012, 4, 6748 RSC.
  51. B. Feringán, A. Martínez-Bueno, T. Sierra and R. Giménez, Molecules, 2023, 28, 2887 CrossRef PubMed.
  52. T. K. Ellis, M. Galerne, J. J. Armao, A. Osypenko, D. Martel, M. Maaloum, G. Fuks, O. Gavat, E. Moulin and N. Giuseppone, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 15749 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  53. I. Nyrkova, E. Moulin, J. J. Armao, M. Maaloum, B. Heinrich, M. Rawiso, F. Niess, J. J. Cid, N. Jouault, E. Buhler, A. N. Semenov and N. Giuseppone, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 10111 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Synthetic route and full experimental procedures and characterization data. NMR spectra. DSC thermograms. Additional information about XRD studies and electrochemical properties. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5tc01929j

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.