Issue 10, 2024

Determining the sources of (sub)permil-level inaccuracy during laser ablation-MC-ICPMS boron isotope measurements of carbonates

Abstract

Recent developments in spatially-resolved boron isotopic analysis using laser ablation as a means of sample introduction to MC-ICPMS instruments (LA-MC-ICPMS) increasingly allow researchers to explore the spatial heterogeneity of the boron isotopic composition of a range of geochemical applications, for example in palaeoclimatology and mantle petrology. However, previous work has shown that a diffuse interference centred near 10B, when measuring samples with a calcium-rich matrix, can significantly bias especially the measurement on 10B, affecting the accuracy of boron isotope measurements. Although several correction approaches have yielded sufficiently accurate analyses of δ11B in calcium carbonate, the root cause of this interference is still not fully resolved. Here, we explore the various potential sources of inaccuracy in boron isotope measurements made using (LA-)MC-ICPMS by experimenting with dry and wet plasma conditions, in both solution and laser ablation mode (in the former case, our solution (Ca–Mg)/B ratios broadly mimic those found in natural samples). In solution mode, we find that irrespective of wet or dry plasma conditions, the introduction of a Ca-containing matrix yields a baseline up to ∼4 and ∼14 times higher around m/z ≈ 10 for wet and dry plasma conditions, respectively, compared to both a Mg-only matrix and lack of matrix. In order to explore this further, we performed mass scans around m/z ≈ 10 during laser ablation of different carbonates with varying matrix [Ca]. These show that the m/z ≈ 10 interference scales linearly with a mixture of the calcium content of the analyte matrix and 40Ar4+ ion beam intensity, as previously hypothesised. Moreover, by experimenting with different plasma loading scenarios during the ablation of CaCO3, i.e. varying laser spot sizes, we find that permil-level inaccuracies in δ11B may occur when the analyte ablated mass is significantly different than that of the standard used to calibrate instrumental mass bias. This is important given that we also show that different commonly-used reference materials ablate at very different rates, which illustrates the need for a careful standardisation approach irrespective of broader matrix effects when sub-permil level accuracy and precision are desirable when utilising LA-MC-ICPMS.

Graphical abstract: Determining the sources of (sub)permil-level inaccuracy during laser ablation-MC-ICPMS boron isotope measurements of carbonates

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
23 Apr 2024
Accepted
23 Jul 2024
First published
30 Jul 2024
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2024,39, 2409-2420

Determining the sources of (sub)permil-level inaccuracy during laser ablation-MC-ICPMS boron isotope measurements of carbonates

D. Coenen, D. Evans, H. Jurikova, M. Dumont, J. Rae and W. Müller, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2024, 39, 2409 DOI: 10.1039/D4JA00154K

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements