Shengmei Guoa,
Jianting Panab,
Jianyan Huanga,
Lin Konga and
Jiaxiang Yang
*a
aCollege of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Anhui University, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Chemistry for Inorganic/Organic Hybrid Functional Materials, Hefei 230601, P. R. China. E-mail: jxyang@ahu.edu.cn
bAnhui Province Institute of Product Quality Supervision & Inspection, Hefei 230051, P. R. China
First published on 20th August 2019
Two novel α-cyanostilbene derivatives bearing triphenylamine and BF2 groups are synthesized (named TPE-B and TPE-BN). The fluorescent emissions of compounds TPE-B and TPE-BN are hypochromatically shifted and bathochromically shifted, respectively, with increasing polarity of the solvents, suggesting that the two compounds have characteristic polarity-dependent solvatochromic effects. Furthermore, they show obvious aggregation-induced emission enhancement (AIEE) phenomenon in THF/water mixture solutions. Meanwhile, compounds TPE-B and TPE-BN emit orange and yellow fluorescence in their solid states, respectively. Most significantly, in aqueous medium, compounds TPE-B and TPE-BN can selectively and sensitively detect picric acid (PA) among a number of nitroaromatic compounds, and their limits of detection (LOD) are calculated as 1.26 × 10−6 M and 1.51 × 10−6 M, respectively. The recognition mechanism for PA can be attributed to the photo-induced electron transfer (PET) process and this is supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculation. This research provides two novel compounds for the rational design of AIEE-active materials for sensing systems.
For the purpose of obtaining eminent organic molecules with strong fluorescence in aggregated states, the molecular design according to organic fluorophores is critical for adjusting their photophysical properties. Triphenylamine (TPA) is strong electron-donating structural units with good luminescence properties, high thermal, photostability, good absorptivity, and high absolutely quantum yields.25–27 Furthermore, an organoboron compound allowing trigonal-planar geometry, endows high extinction coefficients and high absolutely fluorescence quantum yields.28–31,55 The combination of α-cyanostilbene modified with triphenylamine and BF2 groups were used to design AIEE-active compounds TPE-B and TPE-BN (Scheme 1).32–34 In the present investigation, it was found that picric acid (PA) is a powerful explosive as TNT, only a few available PA sensing reports in aqueous medium. Meanwhile, PA is a seriously environmental pollutant, which consequently causes damage of human health and aquatic systems.35–39 We expect two compounds to exhibit brilliant PA detection in aqueous medium.
Based on the above considerations, two α-cyanostilbene derivatives (named TPE-B and TPE-BN) were synthesized via facile reaction. The UV-vis absorption spectra and fluorescence spectra of compounds TPE-B and TPE-BN were systematically investigated in different polar solvents. Meanwhile, the aggregates emission behaviors of compounds were studied in THF/water mixture solution. In addition, the recognition properties of TPA-B and TPA-BN to PA were studied and the corresponding sensor mechanism was analyzed by density functional theory (DFT) calculations.
Red powder 3 (530 mg, 1.08 mmol, yield: 72%). FT-IR (cm−1, KBr) v: 3423, 2211, 1618, 1581, 1535, 1332, 1285, 1196, 1178, 902, 829, 753, 696, 621, 535, 511. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 6.94–6.98 (m, 2H), 7.04 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 7.19–7.23 (m, 7H), 7.38–7.47 (m, 5H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.79–7.87 (m, 4H), 7.92 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 8.99 (s, 1H), 13.06 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 106.78, 117.31, 118.63, 119.19, 120.74, 121.80, 124.45, 125.44, 125.74, 126.25, 126.67, 129.57, 130.71, 132.44, 133.43, 133.62, 141.38, 146.52, 148.41, 150.03, 161.22, 162.78. MALDI-TOF calcd for C34H25N3O, 491.200, found, 491.671.
Red powder 4 (590 mg, 1.04 mmol, yield: 69%). FT-IR (cm−1, KBr) v: 3430, 2965, 2924, 2210, 1633, 1558, 1520, 1375, 1193, 1177.69, 1133, 1076, 874, 972, 845, 751, 727. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 1.18–1.22 (m, 6H), 3.45–3.50 (m, 4H), 6.15 (s, 1H), 6.37 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.03 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.16–7.20 (m, 6H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.37–7.43 (m, 5H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 3H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 8.70 (s, 1H), 13.40 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 12.73, 44.65, 97.78, 104.05, 107.36, 109.16, 118.74, 120.98, 121.35, 124.34, 125.68, 126.15, 126.62, 129.56, 130.59, 132.69, 133.78, 133.99, 140.62, 146.67, 149.85, 152.12, 160.49, 164.21. MALDI-TOF calcd for C38H34N3O, 562.273, found, 562.995.
Orange red powder TPA-B (400 mg, 0.75 mmol, yield: 75%). FT-IR (cm−1, KBr) v: 3056, 2923, 2853, 2217, 1627, 1583, 1556, 1534, 1459, 1389, 1331, 1329, 1270, 1216, 1179, 1153, 1047, 758, 698, 530, 512. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 5.53 (s, 3H), 6.83 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.03–7.18 (m, 8H), 7.29–7.35 (m, 3H), 7.48 (s, 1H), 7.53 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (s, 1H), 7.63 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.76–7.81 (m, 3H), 8.48 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 105.76, 118.35, 120.53, 120.61, 124.12, 124.42, 124.66, 125.54, 125.76, 125.90, 126.83, 129.47, 129.54, 129.63, 130.22, 131.02, 132.26, 136.09, 139.58, 143.02, 146.42, 150.50. MALDI-TOF calcd for C34H24BF2N3O, 538.202, found, 538.595.
Yellow powder TPA-BN (410 mg, 0.66 mmol, yield: 66%). FT-IR (cm−1, KBr) v: 3035, 2975, 2929, 2204, 1626, 1589, 1509, 1459, 1352, 1313, 1297, 1278, 1241, 1217, 1192, 1145, 1075, 1030, 971, 961, 898, 842, 750, 729, 529. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 1.23–1.27 (m, 6H), 3.49–3.44 (m, 4H), 6.25 (s, 1H), 6.38 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.04–7.17 (m, 9H), 7.28–7.34 (m, 4H), 7.43 (s, 1H), 7.51 (s, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (s, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 8.06 (s, 1H).
13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 12.69, 45.24, 98.03, 106.40, 106.97, 107.17, 118.58, 120.75, 123.49, 124,51, 125.79, 126.22, 126.57, 129.62, 130.86, 134.17, 134.20, 142.03, 143.11, 146.55, 150.16, 156.48, 157.52, 161.96. MALDI-TOF calcd for C38H33BF2N4O, 609.271, found, 609.830.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 UV-vis absorption spectra (A) and PL spectra (B) of the compound TPA-BN in different solvent. |
Compounds | Solvents | λabsa | εmaxb | λflc | Δνd | Φe (%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Absorption peak position in nm (1 × 10−5 mol L−1).b Maximum molar absorbance in 104 mol−1 L cm−1.c Peak position of fluorescent (1.0 × 10−5 mol L−1), excited at the absorption maximum.d Stokes shift in cm−1.e Quantum yields determined (RhB as the standard). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TPA-B | Benzene | 419 | 4.59 | 541 | 5382 | 8.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DCM | 427 | 7.10 | 538 | 4832 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ethyl acetate | 420 | 6.64 | 570 | 6262 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THF | 420 | 6.76 | 531 | 4977 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ethanol | 408 | 6.06 | 530 | 5642 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acetonitrile | 420 | 7.19 | 535 | 5118 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DMF | 423 | 7.07 | 540 | 5122 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TPA-BN | Benzene | 423 | 7.78 | 516 | 4260 | 9.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DCM | 418 | 7.93 | 533 | 5161 | 6.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ethyl acetate | 415 | 7.81 | 519 | 4828 | 8.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THF | 416 | 7.75 | 520 | 4807 | 4.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ethanol | 414 | 7.59 | 526 | 5143 | 6.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acetonitrile | 422 | 8.76 | 542 | 5246 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DMF | 425 | 7.66 | 540 | 5010 | 3.1 |
Furthermore, PL spectra of compounds TPA-B and TPA-BN were investigated to explore the difference of solid emission. As was shown in Fig. 3, TPA-B exhibited orange emission, whereas TPA-BN containing an additional electron-donating group has a obvious influence on hypsochromic shift of fluorescent peaks, emitting yellow fluorescence. The solid state fluorescent quantum yields of TPA-B and TPA-BN were measured as 13.5% and 19.4%, respectively in the solid state. The possible fluorescence emission discrepancy was caused by the role of intermolecular arrangement and stacking in solid state. Thus, the introduction of additional electron-donating group could effectively affect their fluorescence emission behavior and result in different spectral shifts and absolute quantum yields.
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 Normalized PL spectra of two solids. Inset: the corresponding fluorescence images of TPA-B and TPA-BN under illumination. |
The key to performing better practical application, the experiment was carried out to better explore the sensitivity of compounds TPA-B and TPA-BN towards PA in aqueous medium. As shown in Fig. 4c and Fig. S6c,† the fluorescent quenching efficiencies of TPA-B and TPA-BN were 82.7% and 81.6% in the presence of 10 equivalents PA, respectively. In order to evaluate the quenching efficiency of TPA-B and TPA-BN in response to the PA in solution, a quenching process can be analyzed by Stern–Volmer equation,52 the equation was as follow:
I0/I = Ksv[A] + 1 |
Density functional theory (DFT) calculation was used to investigate possible PA sensing mechanism. As shown in Fig. 5, the LUMO level (−2.79 eV) of TPA-B is higher than that of PA (−3.90 eV), which suggested when excited TPA-B was exposed to PA, the excited electron was transferred from the LUMO of fluorophores to that of the electron-deficient PA. The radiative electronic transition was blocked due to the electron transfer from the chromophore to PA, resulting in fluorescence quenching. Moreover, the other driving force is the energy difference between the LUMO of the fluorophore and the LUMO of analytes.61–65 The LUMO orbital energy typically indicates how easily an electron can be transferred from excited fluorophore to the electron-deficient analytes. As the LUMO orbital energies of PA and TNT calculated by DFT is −3.90 eV and −3.33 eV, respectively. As expected, because of its small LUMO value, the PET driving force of PA is larger than that of TNT. This may partly explain the sensitivity and selectivity of TPA-B for PA detection. Similarly, for TPA-BN, the LUMO energy level of PA is between the LUMO energy level and the HOMO energy level of TPA-BN, indicating that the fluorescence quenching of TPA-BN with PA may suggest that the possibility of electron transfer from the LUMO of the chemosensor to the lower LUMO of PA. Based on the above results, the main driving force was attributed to the photo-induced electron transfer (PET) process, resulting in fluorescence quenching. Meanwhile, as was showed in the Fig. S8,† the UV-vis absorption spectra of PA and the PL spectra of TPA-B and TPA-BN were recorded and presented to examine whether fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) occurs in detection process. The absorption spectrum of PA has no overlap with the PL spectra of the two chemosensors, indicating that FRET was neglectable in the quenching process. Therefore, the PET process may be main reason for recognition mechanism between the chemosensors and PA.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Photophysical properties; the Sterne–Volmer plots; UV-vis spectra in THF/H2O mixtures. PL emission spectra changes of TPA-B in THF/H2O mixtures; photophysical properties of PA detection for compound TPA-BN; normalized absorption spectrum of PA and the fluorescence spectra of TPE-B and TPE-BN. See DOI: 10.1039/c9ra05116c |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 |