Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
DOI: 10.1039/C9RA90054C
(Correction)
RSC Adv., 2019, 9, 21946-21946
Correction: Handling and managing bleeding wounds using tissue adhesive hydrogel: a comparative assessment on two different hydrogels
Thiruselvi T,
Thirupathi Kumara Raja S,
Aravindhan R,
Shanuja S. K and
Gnanamani A*
CSIR-CLRI (Central Leather Research Institute), Adyar, Chennai-20, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail: gnanamani3@gmail.com; Fax: +91-44-24912150
Received
27th June 2019
, Accepted 27th June 2019
First published on 15th July 2019
Abstract
Correction for ‘Handling and managing bleeding wounds using tissue adhesive hydrogel: a comparative assessment on two different hydrogels’ by Thiruselvi T et al., RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 19973–19981.
The authors regret that Fig. 3(a) in the original article included an incorrect image. The top right image (48 hours control) was duplicated as the middle right image (48 hours PEG-gel) in error. The correct version of Fig. 3 is presented here.
 | ||
| Fig. 3 (a) Cytocompatibility assessments of the samples (PEG-gel and GEG-gel) through live cell tracker assay using calcein as a fluorescent probe demonstrates the cell adherence and proliferation observed at different time intervals in comparison with control (uncoated wells). The scale bar measures 10 μm. (b) Cytotoxicity assessment of the samples (PEG-gel and GEG-gel) using MTT assay by measuring the absorbance at 570 nm in comparison with control. | ||
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 |