Shohei Ishikawaa,
Hiroyuki Kamata*a,
Ung-il Chungabc and
Takamasa Sakai*ac
aDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. E-mail: sakai@tetrapod.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp; kamata@tetrapod.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
bCenter for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
cDepartment of Materials Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
First published on 5th July 2021
Scaffold systems that can easily encapsulate cells and safely retrieve them at the desired time are important for the advancement of cell-based medicine. In this study, we designed and fabricated thioester-based poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels with injectability and on-demand degradability as new scaffold materials for cells. Hydrogels can be formed in situ within minutes via thioester cross-linking between PEG molecules and can be degraded under mild conditions in response to L-cysteine molecules through thiol exchange occurring at the thioester linkage. Various cell experiments, especially with sucrose, which enables the adjustment of the osmotic pressure around the cells, showed that the damage to the cells during encapsulation and degradation was minimal, indicating the capability of on-demand retrieval of intact cells. This hydrogel system is a versatile tool in the field of cell-based research and applications such as tissue regeneration and regenerative medicine.
The hydrogels designed and fabricated here are based on completely synthetic poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), which is often used as a base material for biomaterials because of its good biocompatibility.13,14 In particular, hydrogels assembled with 4-arm PEGs are widely used by researchers worldwide because of their highly predictable physical properties.15–18 However, PEG itself is not easily degraded under normal physiological conditions; therefore, on-demand degradation cannot be realized without a special mechanism. To overcome this problem, we introduced thioester linkages into cross-linking points between the PEG molecules. Thioester cross-linking can be readily achieved by mixing two types of aqueous solutions of PEG molecules bearing either sulfhydryl or succinimidyl groups at the ends,19,20 hereafter called Tetra-PEG–SH and Tetra-PEG–NHS, respectively (Fig. 1A). The resulting thioester bonds can be cleaved by simply applying a neutral solution of L-cysteine (L-cys), leading to macroscopic dissolution of the hydrogels (Fig. 1B). The degradation of PEG hydrogels cross-linked with thioester using L-cys is unique in that it does not involve stimuli that may damage cells, such as heat, pH changes, or UV irradiation. Similar approaches have been explored in some medical fields;21,22 however, currently, little information is available on their potential as an ECM. Although safe on-demand degradation and cell retrieval have been demonstrated in some self-healing hydrogels based on dynamic covalent bonding,21 such bonding is, in principle, susceptible to dilution, and the spatial and temporal stability of the scaffold in water-rich environments remains a concern.
Fig. 1 Conceptual drawings of thioester-based hydrogels. (A) Cross-linking chemistry involved in the formation of hydrogels. (B) Degradation of hydrogels by the addition of L-cys. |
Prior to experiments with cells, the physical properties of the designed materials were evaluated. To demonstrate the injectability, the storage modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G′′) were evaluated by real-time rheological measurements immediately after mixing the two aqueous PEG solutions. In this study, we performed experiments with aqueous PEG solutions at different concentrations (20, 50, and 100 g L−1). Regardless of the concentration of PEG, G′ was smaller than G′′ in the time range of 0 to 100 s, indicating that the mixture is injectable during this time period, and can be administered via a syringe to any location while forming any shape (Fig. 2A and S1†). As time elapsed, a time point emerged at which G′ and G′′ overlapped that is technically defined as the gelation time (tgel). The tgel varied depending on the PEG concentration, with values of 930, 220, and 130 s, for 20, 50, and 100 g L−1, respectively (Fig. 2B). This gelation reaction is based on the formation of thioester bonds between Tetra-PEG–SH and Tetra-PEG–NHS molecules, as previously reported.19,20 To verify this, we performed FT-IR measurements. The characteristic but very weak peak of the S–H stretching at 2600–2550 cm−1 (not observed in Tetra-PEG–NHS) disappeared after the gelation reaction (Fig. S2†), which indirectly suggests the formation of thioester bonds between Tetra-PEG–SH and Tetra-PEG–NHS molecules. The obtained viscoelastic profile was comparable to that of existing injectable hydrogels, which are already used in medical sealants,23 drug carriers,24 and cell scaffolds,25–27 suggesting that this hydrogel could also be suitable as an injectable material. We have shown that in addition to PEG concentration, tgel is dependent on the pH, because, theoretically, a higher degree of protonation of the sulfhydryl group minimizes nucleophilic attack on the succinimidyl group.28 For instance, compared to the gelation behavior at pH 8.2, a longer time is required to form hydrogels at lower pH (Fig. S3†). Frequency sweep tests showed that G′ > G′′ in the angular frequency range of 0.1 to 10 Hz for all tested hydrogels (Fig. 2C), which is a characteristic feature of typical chemical hydrogels, indicating that the cross-linked structure is practically permanent. As the index of elasticity, G′ was approximately 20 kPa for the 100 g L−1 hydrogel, but this value decreased to 8 and 0.4 kPa for the 50 g L−1 and 20 g L−1 hydrogels, respectively (Fig. 2D). It is noteworthy that these values correspond to the range of those for biological soft tissues.29 The effect of the pH of the buffer solution was also examined. The G′ values of the hydrogels prepared at pH 6.7 and 7.8 were 14 and 19 kPa, respectively (Fig. S3C and D†), slightly lower than those obtained at pH 8.2; however, since hydrogels were formed at all tested pH values, they can be used for cell experiments that often involve neutral buffers. This slight decrease is explained by the inactivation of the succinimidyl group, which is prone to hydrolysis, due to a long tgel in aqueous buffers.8
The on-demand degradability of the designed hydrogels was investigated. To evaluate the degradation profile, L-cys was added as a cleavage agent at various concentrations to cylindrical hydrogels in phosphate buffer, and their swelling behavior was carefully observed. In the presence of L-cys, the thioester-linked hydrogels dissolved completely after 90 min (Fig. 3A). In contrast, the amide-linked hydrogel prepared as the control group swelled slightly, but did not dissolve over the same time range. This result strongly suggests that L-cys selectively cleaved the thioesters in the hydrogels. The thioester bond is known to be cleaved via the thiol–thioester exchange reaction (Fig. S4†), not only by L-cys as demonstrated here but also by other thiol compounds with a sulfhydryl group.20 According to the proposed mechanism, when the gel degrades, sulfhydryl groups are generated. However, no characteristic peaks of –SH were observed in the measurement of the degradation products (Fig. S5†). One of the reasons why we failed to observe such peaks may be that the oxidation proceeded in the air and disulfide formation occurred. It is also possible that the reaction was not completed, and –SH groups were not generated in sufficient quantities for detection during FT-IR analysis. Since the degree of swelling (Q) of hydrogels in water is affected by the number of effective cross-linking points,8 the cleavage can be evaluated from a different perspective by observing Q over time. Here, we recorded the change in Q of a hydrogel consisting of amide bonds and the counterparts consisting of thioester bonds at different PEG concentrations. In a phosphate buffer with 5 mM L-cys at pH 7.4 and 25 °C (Fig. 3B), the hydrogel consisting of amide bonds (100 g L−1) swelled gradually, reached an equilibrium state, and remained stable thereafter in the range of Q < 1.5. As these results correspond well with previously reported findings,8 and therefore the experimental system is considered to be reasonable. In stark contrast, the thioester-based hydrogels (20, 50, and 100 g L−1) swelled at faster rates, eventually leading to complete dissolution within 40, 60, and 80 min, respectively (Fig. S6†). The longer degradation time (tdeg) with higher PEG concentrations can be attributed to the fact that, in the current system, the increase in PEG concentration decreases the critical cross-link density to maintain the gel state, resulting in broadening of the gel region in the sol–gel phase diagram.30,31 Similar experiments were performed by fixing the PEG concentration at 100 g L−1 while varying the concentration of L-cys. The tdeg decreased with increasing L-cys content (Fig. 3C and D). A similar trend was observed for the changes in pH and temperature (Fig. S7†).
For biological applications, cells can be suspended prior to gelation in this system, where the resulting hydrogel serves as a 3D scaffold for the cells. When needed, the hydrogel could be dissolved by L-cys to retrieve the cells (Fig. 4A). Here, we used human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (hMSCs), which have recently undergone remarkable development in the field of regenerative medicine because of their multipotency and paracrine effects.29,32,33 First, hMSCs were three-dimensionally encapsulated in hydrogels, and a live/dead assay was then performed to demonstrate cytocompatibility (Fig. 4B). In the absence of special efforts, cell viability was low after encapsulation in hydrogels with a PEG concentration of 100 g L−1. We hypothesized that this low cell viability was due to the difference in osmotic pressure inside and outside the cells suspended in the hydrogels. To protect encapsulated cells from such severe conditions, we added 10% sucrose, which is known to regulate the osmotic pressure between cells and their external environment34 and is often used to prevent the formation of ice crystals that can cause apoptosis during freezing and thawing of cells.35 Even in the presence of sucrose, the physical properties (e.g., tgel and G′) did not significantly change (Fig. S8†), and importantly, the cell viability improved significantly as expected (Fig. 4B and C). To quantitatively evaluate biocompatibility, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of hydrogels with three-dimensionally encapsulated hMSCs were recorded. Counting the number of live cells revealed that the cell viability was as low as 16% in the group without sucrose (Fig. 4C). In marked contrast, the group treated with sucrose showed a very high cell viability of 90%. This protective effect of sucrose was also effective in a variety of solutions, such as Tetra-PEG–NHS, where its activated ester can be cytotoxic in water (Fig. S9A†). The hMSCs encapsulated in the hydrogels were found to survive at a high viability of approximately 90% for at least 120 min (Fig. S9B†). Before the cell retrieval experiments, the effect of L-cys on cell viability was evaluated. Some cells exposed to an aqueous solution containing L-cys were observed as dead cells with a viability of approximately 80%, as determined by trypan blue staining (Fig. S10†), indicating that L-cys can be cytotoxic under certain experimental conditions, which is consistent with previous reports.36 This may be one of the reasons why the current mechanism (i.e., degrading hydrogels with thioester linkages) has not been widely used for cell retrieval. In contrast, in an aqueous solution of L-cys with sucrose, no such tendency of cell death was observed; rather, high viability was maintained. As such, the addition of sucrose can ensure high cell viability during the process of degradation induced by L-cys. Furthermore, in the presence of both L-cys and sucrose, the hydrogel containing the cells was incubated at 37 °C for 60 min, and the encapsulated cells were collected. The retrieved cells were re-seeded onto 48-well plates, and their proliferation was evaluated. Fluorescence images revealed that the hMSCs had qualitatively similar proliferation profiles throughout the cell culture period, regardless of their origin, that is, from hydrogels or not (Fig. 4D). To evaluate the results more quantitatively, we counted the number of cells and compared the mitochondrial activity between the two groups. In both conditions, the data were comparable (Fig. 4E and F), suggesting that the retrieved cells were intact throughout the processes of encapsulation and degradation. The encapsulated (or subsequently retrieved) cells in the system may potentially be utilized for further biological applications where safe on-demand degradation is required, such as the bioanalysis of differentiated cells,37 coculture with other types of cells (e.g., xenogeneic cells),38 and transplantation as a cell–matrix composite to repair tissue defects.39 These are the areas where conventional scaffolding systems fail due to cellular damage caused by a non-neutral pH,7 high temperature,40 and UV irradiation.11
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d1ra01934a |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021 |