View PDF VersionPrevious ArticleNext Article

Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
DOI: 10.1039/D2SC90026B (Correction) Chem. Sci., 2022, 13, 2495-2495

Correction: EDOT-based conjugated polymers accessed via C–H direct arylation for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production

Zhi-Rong Tan a, Yu-Qin Xing a, Jing-Zhao Cheng a, Guang Zhang b, Zhao-Qi Shen a, Yu-Jie Zhang a, Guangfu Liao c, Long Chen b and Shi-Yong Liu *a
aJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Functional Molecular Materials Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China. E-mail: chelsy@zju.edu.cn; chelsy@jxust.edu.cn
bDepartment of Chemistry, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Optoelectronic Sciences, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
cEngineering Research Center of Nano-Geomaterials of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

Received 31st January 2022 , Accepted 31st January 2022

First published on 11th February 2022

Abstract

Correction for ‘EDOT-based conjugated polymers accessed via C–H direct arylation for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production’ by Zhi-Rong Tan et al., Chem. Sci., 2022, DOI: 10.1039/d1sc05784g.

The authors regret that incorrect details were cited in the following sections of text from the original article.

In the section heading titled ‘Photocatalytic H2 production and mechanism analysis’, for the sentence ‘Fig. 4b shows that the CPs dispersed in AA/H2O/NMP exhibit 1.5–44 times higher HER than the dispersions in AA/H2O/MeOH, which are mainly ascribed to the exfoliation effect in NMP (Fig. S2, S4 and S5†),37 yielding colloidal CPs that possess more exposed active sites and a shorter migration distance of charge carriers compared to their bulk counterparts in MeOH’, the correct version should cite ref. 36 instead of ref. 37. The correct details for this citation are given below as ref. 1.

Incorrect details were also given in the section heading titled ‘C–H direct arylation vs. classical Stille coupling’, for the sentence ‘More impressively, the PHP activities of both DArP-derived BSO2–EDOT and DBT–EDOT are superior to those of their Stille-derived counterparts, i.e., 0.95 vs. 0.91 mmol h−1 for BSO2–EDOT and St–BSO2–EDOT, and 0.39 vs. 0.26 mmol h−1 for DBT–EDOT and St–DBT–EDOT (Fig. S13†), which were contrary to our previous results.30,’ the correct version should cite ref. 29 instead of ref. 30. The correct details for this citation are given below as ref. 2.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.

References

  1. J.-Z. Cheng, Z.-R. Tan, Y.-Q. Xing, Z.-Q. Shen, Y.-J. Zhang, L.-L. Liu, K. Yang, L. Chen and S.-Y. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9, 5787–5795 RSC.
  2. J.-Z. Cheng, L.-L. Liu, G. Liao, Z.-Q. Shen, Z.-R. Tan, Y.-Q. Xing, X.-X. Li, K. Yang, L. Chen and S.-Y. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 8, 5890–5899 RSC.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022